Trump Adds 3 More Names to the List of Enemies He Wants the Justice Department To Prosecute
"There was tremendous criminal activity," the president averred, urging unspecified charges against former Special Counsel Jack Smith, former FBI lawyer Andrew Weissmann, and former Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco.

"Deranged Jack Smith, in my opinion, is a criminal," President Donald Trump said during a press conference in the Oval Office on Wednesday. The sentiment was not new: Everyone knows that Trump has a grudge against Smith, the former special counsel who obtained two federal indictments against him, which Trump described as "the worst weaponization" of the justice system "in the history of the world." But the fact that the president offered his assessment of Smith alongside three top federal law enforcement officials—Attorney General Pam Bondi, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, and FBI Director Kash Patel—made it seem more like marching orders than his usual airing of grievances.
Bondi, Blanche, and Patel are all Trump loyalists who previously worked for him personally. Bondi served on Trump's defense team during his first impeachment. Blanche represented him during his 2024 criminal trial in New York. Patel—the author of children's books detailing the travails of the wise and just "King Donald," who is able to triumph over his evil enemies with the help of "a wizard called Kash the Distinguished Discoverer"—served as a campaign surrogate and a go-between during the dispute over the presidential records that Trump took when he left the White House in January 2021. But in their current positions, Bondi, Blanche, and Patel are supposed to be working for the American people, and before their Senate confirmations all three promised to pursue justice rather than revenge.
How is that going? The dubious perjury indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, who earned a prominent spot on Trump's enemies list by overseeing the investigation of alleged ties between his 2016 campaign and the Russian government, came just five days before the statutory deadline and five days after the president publicly told Bondi that "we can't delay any longer." That Truth Social missive also mentioned the need to prosecute another Trump nemesis, New York Attorney General Letitia James, who last week was charged with mortgage fraud in an indictment obtained by the same neophyte prosecutor: Lindsey Halligan, a former Trump lawyer whom he appointed as the interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia after her predecessor proved insufficiently enthusiastic about pursuing cases against Comey and James.
Bondi and Blanche reportedly were also privately skeptical about the viability of those cases. The president nevertheless got what he wanted, which suggests the same thing could happen with Smith, regardless of Trump's inability to explain exactly what crime the former special counsel supposedly committed.
Trump alluded to an October 8 interview at University College London in which Smith defended his work on criminal cases that charged Trump with mishandling classified material after he left office and with illegally trying to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Smith's interviewer at that event was former FBI General Counsel Andrew Weissmann, which reminded Trump that Weissmann also is "a bad guy" who probably should be prosecuted for something. "I hope they're gonna look into Weissmann too," he said.
Weissmann earned Trump's ire by participating in the Russia probe as part of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team. And while Trump was on the subject of people who had wronged him in one way or another, he added that Lisa Monaco, deputy attorney general during the Biden administration, likewise "should be looked at very strongly." Monaco, Trump explained, was Weissmann's "puppet," so she also should be punished.
"There was tremendous criminal activity," Trump averred. "You're talking about political crime….I hope they're looking at political crime because there's never been so much political crime against a political opponent as what I had to go through."
New York Times reporter Glenn Thrush notes that Bondi, Blanche, and Patel "smiled, nodded and shuffled in place" as their boss suggested that the Justice Department should find charges to pin on Smith, Weissmann, and Monaco. But not to worry: Patel, during his confirmation hearing, promised there would be "no politicization at the FBI" and "no retributive actions" against the president's enemies.
Patel felt a need to offer those assurances because in 2023 he had published a book, Government Gangsters, that included an appendix listing 60 "Members of the Executive Branch Deep State," whom he described as "corrupt actors of the first order." Weissmann and Monaco were both on that list. Smith did not make the cut, possibly because he did not obtain the first indictment of Trump until June 2023, after Patel had finished his manuscript.
In any case, Patel assured the senators who confirmed him that, notwithstanding his promise to "come after" the anti-Trump "conspirators," he would not use his powers in service of the president's personal vendettas. Patel nevertheless portrayed the Comey indictment as a response to the "Russiagate Hoax," even though the charges against him were legally unrelated to that investigation.
Like Patel, Bondi was confirmed after promising to be guided by the facts and the law rather than the president's grudges. "The partisanship, the weaponization, will be gone," she declared. "America will have one tier of justice for all….There will never be an enemies list within the Department of Justice."
Blanche sang the same tune during his confirmation hearing. "Politics should never play a role in the Department of Justice," he said. "We will work to restore the American people's faith in our justice system."
Whether or not Bondi and Blanche meant those words when they said them, the president plainly does not share the vision they described. "They're all guilty as hell," Trump said in the Truth Social rant addressed to Bondi, which mentioned Adam Schiff, the not-yet-indicted Democratic senator from California (whom Trump also mentioned on Wednesday), along with Comey and James—a list to which he has now added three more names. Guilty of what? The Justice Department's job, as Trump sees it, is to figure that out.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
JS;Dr
GFY
JS;dr
Lmfaaaoooo you pathetic defeated right wing rejects AHAHHAHAHAAAAAHAHAHHAAHA
Sad and lazy.
Defeated? We won the election in a massive landslide. Trump has largely been winning. Including this week’s historic peace agreement in the Middle East.
Your party is weak, shrill and leaderless. You’re on the losing side of very relevant 80/20 issue. So much so that your traitor party has lost over 4.5 million registered democrats over the last few years. With half now registered with the GOP.
But I have a way out for you. The only way.
https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-services-benefits/medical-assistance-dying.html
You couldn't even get a simple majority, so shut the fuck up about a landslide, you lying shit. Plenty of those who did vote for the vengeful liar are already regretting it.
Well, these are the New Rules.
Embrace The Suck
So in Sullum's world signing off on paying a lawyer is 34 crimes but actual crimes are fine so long as it serves the (D)eep State bureaucracy. GFY with this leftist propaganda.
Sullum, do you think this is a good area for you to write about after supporting...
J6
Trump Russia
Bannon prosecution
Navarro prosecution
Leticia James
Alvin bragg
Mueller
Jack Smith
Garland
Going after trumps lawyers
Ale. Jones defamation
Gulliani defamation
Fox News defamation
JizzeAzz, Trump is partly to blame for foolishly appointing Bush Republicans. Trump knows it was Bush Republicans that led to his first failed term…he’s not making the same mistakes this term…he’s making different mistakes!! 😉
Those are all excellent reasons to go after the lying sack of shit Donnie and his lying sack of shit supporters. Despite all of his whining and lying, the legal system coddled him every step of the way. If we can't hold the criminal in chief accountable, nailing a few of his disgusting little Mini Mes is better than nothing.
Fatass Donnie the Fascist did say retribution was his main goal this term. Using his star chamber to imprison critics fits his MO.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Is your local cineplex hiring? 'cause those are some impressive projection skills.
https://psychcentral.com/disorders/treating-pedophilia#aversion-therapy
Just because the prior administration turned it's employees loose to commit crimes and refused to prosecute it's favorites doesn't mean the next has to have a blind eye towards it. These clowns Trumps DOJ are going after are dirty in every sense of the word and it's hard to understand anyone who would support them unless they are suffering severe TDS.
Of course there was "tremendous criminal activity". Under the ancien regime, it was a crime to criticize the king.
If you’re going to go after someone who could possibly control any aspect of the government, maybe don’t have actual illegal activity in your closet?
Let them all tear each other apart.
100%
Cmon man.
Real libertarianism is raging against all qualified immunity... except democrats. Raging against all politicians... except democrats. Being against abuse of powers... except when democrats do it. Demanding equality on the law... Just democrats have more of that sweet equality.
The most real libertarian thing is being for novel criminal construction and against being against standard construction.
"One of the funniest types of people I meet in political circles are those who take all sorts of cheap partisan positions, then suddenly invoke some Deep Principle on a matter—as if any of us believe them to be motivated by a consistent political philosophy. As confirmation of their cynicism, you'll find the "principle" always aligns with their partisan interest." - Steve Greenhut
m.c invoking "principle"? They do say the devil can quote scripture.
"Let them all tear each other apart."
Yeah, don't bother with any attempt at analysis.
Thinking is HARD, and it's much easier to stick your fingers in your ears and read comic books, right?
If they've done nothing wrong, they have nothing to hide.
I'm sure they are all furiously "wiping their servers with a cloth" right now.
If they've done nothing wrong, they have nothing to hide.
I'm still struggling with the notion that the Executive and DOJ can't investigate itself for any overreach or misdeed on... [Ron Burgundy rising intonation] some kind of principle?
James Jones, a black garbage man, seeks justice after being
(1) convicted of a nonsensical federal election interference case concocted out of a state misfiling misdemeanor that occurred AFTER the election, on only FOUR guilty votes
(2) probed for being a Russian plant based on a fraud dossier prepped by a political operative
(3) indicted for fraud by a partisan AG who swore to go after him, and was busted for committing the same crime and sheltered a fugitive at a house that she obtained through that crime.
(4) investigated by another partisan prosecutor who was appointed unconstitutionally and spied on private phone conversation without warrant
(5) Twice a target of assassination and nearly failed by a bumbling DEI secret service and FBI
JS - "Well Jones is really going after the enemies he named"
Replace Donald Trump here with anyone you care about - illegal aliens, drug dealers, people who can't charge 50 bucks for a notebook thanks to tariffs, parents arrested for letting kids play outside.
I can't help you if you don't get it. I really can't.
(3) indicted for fraud by a partisan AG who swore to go after him, and was busted for committing the same crime and sheltered a fugitive at a house that she obtained through that crime.
I hate to keep being "one of the funniest types of people" that Greenhut comes across but, again, she ran on prosecuting him at all costs **SWORE AN OATH TO HER CONSTITUENCY TO UPHOLD THE LAW** and *then* pursued malicious prosecution.
Time was in Western History and still fairly recently in the history of other parts of the world where, the details of the case didn't much matter, it was the specific violation of the public trust and rule of law that would reserve you a noose or a spot in a ditch for your body.
'Trump Adds 3 More Names to the List law-breakers'
Fixed it for you, Sullum, you slimy pile of lying TDS-addled shit.
Fuck off and die, but don't mark your grave; I don't want to stand in line to piss on it, asswipe.
"Trump Adds 3 More Names to the List of Enemies of the People."
Fixed it again. And we should expect a much, much longer list, if at long last, justice is to be served.
^+1.
Trumps Feinde sind Staatsfeinde und damit Volksfeinde. Wohin der Anführer auch geht, wir folgen ihm, denn wir haben keine funktionierenden Gehirnzellen. Nur unser lieber faschistischer Anführer kann uns retten.
That’s super original. I’ve never seen someone on the internet allude to that Austrian guy with the funny mustache when talking about Trump.
More sullum fun.
Biden's retention of classified material is significant, and the timing of the Justice Department's acknowledgment that it is looking into the incident is fishy.
https://reason.com/2023/01/10/like-trump-biden-had-a-private-stash-of-secret-documents-but-it-was-much-less-impressive/?nab=1
After defending the mar a lago raid multiple times.
That is not to say there are no meaningful differences between what Trump did and what Biden did.
https://reason.com/2023/01/13/biden-looks-careless-shady-and-hypocritical-after-the-revelations-about-his-handling-of-classified-material/?nab=1
That damn Biden ruined a dozen threads defending jack Smith didnt he sullum.
Follow the thought pattern big brains. Trump's DOJ announces they have indicted John Bolton for...can you guess?... possessing classified documents. John Bolton made the obvious mistake of trusting Trump and working for him but leaving on bad terms.
I don't really care for Bolton - neocon's can all rot in hell for all I care after all... but if you are arguing Trump shouldn't have been charged then a consistent position would be that Bolton shouldn't either. Bolton says he got some kind of pre-clearance to write a book or somecrap. But at least he didn't ignore a DOJ subpoena seeking the documents return for as long as possible and then use a lawyer to suborn perjury when certifying that a small handful of documents that were returned were all the documents responsive to the subpoena???
I guess there are some differences between Biden, Trump and Bolton cases after all. Notably, Bolton isn't charged with obstruction of justice.
Hey not a lawyer retard. The investigation started under Biden because Bolton released a memoir after he was told it had classified information in it by Bidens DoJ.
God you're a fucking moron.
I notice in your not a lawyer analysis you ignore what the law actually says. Because again youre not a fucking lawyer. Youre a bog standard leftist retard lol.
Trump was President, Bolton was not. Trump's argument that he had the unquestioned right to declassify anything and possess it was not settled. Bolton can make no such claim.
Trumps claim was actually settled on Navy vs Egan which established classification powers to the president. And even said they can declassify on a whim.
Is this for real? Does sullum really think there should be no consequences for the russiarussiaruassia hoax now, simply because Trump was re-elected?
Trump's biggest fault in his first term was failing to go after corrupt Democrats because he didn't want to be the first President to target former political rivals. The opportunity to be that was taken away, so now he has a free reign.
Sullim agreed with the hoax.
He agreed with garlands and jack smiths lawfare. Until it touched democrats.
Lawn jockey's blog is now blaring: Libertarian Soft on Commie Dems! Harry Anslinger Back from Geneva Parley...
JS; dr
Nobody is above the law.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣿⣿⠿⣟⢷⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⢸⣏⡏⠀⠀⠀⢣⢻⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⢸⣟⠧⠤⠤⠔⠋⠀⢿⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⣿⡀⢀⣶⠤⠒⠀⢻⣇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢿⣆⣠⣤⣤⣤⣤⣴⣦⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⢿⢿⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⣀⠘⣿⠋⠁⠀⠙⢇⠀⠀⠙⢿⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⢇⡞⠘⣧⠀⢖⡭⠞⢛⡄⠘⣆⠀⠀⠀⠈⢧⠀⠀⠀⠙⢿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⣠⣿⣛⣥⠤⠤⢿⡄⠀⠀⠈⠉⠀⠀⠹⡄⠀⠀⠀⠈⢧⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣦⠀⠀⠀
⠀⣼⡟⡱⠛⠙⠀⠀⠘⢷⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⡀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣧⡀⠀
⢸⡏⢠⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢳⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢳⡀⠀⠀⠀⠘⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⣷⡀
⠸⣧⠘⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢳⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢣⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⠇
⠀⣿⡄⢳⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⡟⠀
⠀⢹⡇⠘⣇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠰⣿⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⣼⡟⠀⠀
⠀⢸⡇⠀⢹⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⢳⣼⠟⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠸⣧⣀⠀⢳⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢃⠀⢀⣴⡿⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠈⠙⢷⣄⢳⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢳⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⡿⠟⠛⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⢿⣷⣦⣄⣀⣀⣠⣤⠾⠷⣦⣤⣤⡶⠟⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠉⠛⠛⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Sullum is a regime bootlicker and useful idiot for the deep state.
"Show me the man, and I'll show you the crime."
- Lavrentiy Beria, head of the Soviet secret police under Joseph Stalin
"Show me the man, and I'll show you the crime."
-Trump administration and it's defenders
Yet they're the ones going around calling people leftist Marxist leftists. And they simply cannot see the irony. They can't see it.
Again.
You defended it every step against trump and his allies even for novel legal creation. Even when bragg and Leticia campaigned on it. When Biden demanded it.
Here's an entire thread of you doing just that.
https://reason.com/2024/06/18/protections-for-the-undocumented/?nab=1&comments=true#comment-10607339
I can post plenty more.
You have no morals here retard.
And you are in fact a leftist now. You defend them and support them.
Yep
His sock that hasn’t muted you will claim that is out of context. The drunk has no shame.
You tell ‘em, JizzeAzz!!!
Ah... so mystical brainwashing still makes knowledge of facts go away. Conservatives like nothing better than ancient traditions...
Yep, the true libertarians here argue for fewer crimes and less powerful government. The cultists argue for prosecuting Trump's enemies while ignoring all the criminals he's pardoned and invited into his administration.
The cultists argue for prosecuting Trump's enemies while ignoring all the criminals he's pardoned and invited into his administration.
All the while justifying it with "They did it first! That makes it ok! They did it first! That makes it ok!"
Both you and shrike demanded 20 years for even non violent J6ers. You screamed 34 felonies against trump. Is being a lying hypocritical piece of shit part of being a leftist?
Difficulty shrike. You only argue less for illegals and democrats. You demand more against your enemies. Just like Jacob.
The thing libertarians actually support is equality under the law. Something neither you, sarc, nor Jacob support. You see the law as a tool for politics.
You continue to demand no repercussions for those who wielded state power illegally. While you previously cheered those abuses.
We are past the aggression of the NAP. Your team is the aggressors.
Amazing.
Did Bolton send classified information out of bounds and possess it when not in government or did he? It doesn't appear to be a question as he clearly did and was warned about his book but ignored the warnings. That someone is now holding assholes like Bolton to account when previous administrations turned a blind eye to law breaking is not a basis to ignore illegality.
"....by overseeing the investigation of alleged ties between his 2016 campaign and the Russian government,..."
---
There was no "collusion" between Trump and Russia. It was all a lie cooked up by Hillary Clinton, approved by Obama, and then coordinated between the HRC campaign, the FBI, the DOJ, and the media. This was to distract from Hillary's crimes.
Also Trump didn't have any classified documents at Mar a Lago. That accusation was cooked up by the Democrats to deflect from Joe Biden's document possession crimes. Trump didn't have nuclear secrets or super secret Iran documents. That was all a lie given to the media in hopes everyone would believe it.
I can't believe JS is still beating those dead horses. They are so dead the vultures are no longer picking over the bones.
Waitaminit! According to the commie Dems, its the nazi GOP that lies about stuff. Surely you don't imagine BOTH halves of the Nixon-subsidized looter Kleptocracy would stoop to saying untrue things, right?
Girl bullier.
You mean Bush Republicans!! Trump was clueless his first term. Lol.
Enemies list indeed.
“The Stormy Daniels case: On May 30, 2023, Trump was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records “to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity” while he was a candidate in the 2016 presidential election. The records pertained to money allegedly paid to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels to not reveal details of an extramarital affair she said she had had with Trump in 2006. On May 30, 2024, a New York jury found Trump guilty of all 34 counts. Read the indictment.”
This was, bar none, the stupidest piece of lawfare of that list. And more than a few of our resident morons use it as the basis to call him a felon.
So Trump was famous and rich, banged a porn star and paid her to keep quiet. The majority of America couldn't have cared less. Stephanie wasn't bad looking when she was younger.
I guess the secret to being safe from prosecutions, according to Sullum, is to make enemies of government officials. Because once you do that, no matter what crimes you commit, you are not untouchable lest the government officials be thought to be using your criminal behavior against you for personal gain.
Reading Sullum's summary of events sets off a history-rhyming sense of deja vu...
"The Night of the Long Knives was a purge that took place in Nazi Germany from June 30 to July 2, 1934, where Adolf Hitler ordered the assassination of leaders of the SA (Sturmabteilung) and other political opponents to consolidate his power." Christian National Socialism, like its Islamic variants, seems to be having trouble evolving or or assimilating into the real world of 91 years after.
[D]'s ordered the assassination of Trump.
Is that the 'history-rhyming' sense of deja vu ur referring too?
[D]'s openly support [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism].
Is that the 'history-rhyming' sense of deja vu ur referring too?
Or is this just a butt-load of Leftard Self-Projection ... Attempting to blame-shift everything the left does/stands-for onto 'Christians'?
Crooks was a bitter clinger MAGA Republican—a true DEPLORABLE!! Good riddance!!
Given the openly Nazi chats that leaked, it's clear Trumpists embrace more of National Socialism than just prosecuting their political enemies.
You already got smacked down in the roundup from ML posting the actual chats. Mocking you for calling them nazis. That's what the chat was fucking about.
Meanwhile your side is actually murdering people.
https://psychcentral.com/disorders/treating-pedophilia#aversion-therapy
I didn't read the diatribe... So here's the three who I want the Trump to prosecute. That guy who actually shot JFK. That guy who actually shot RFK, and the guy who actually killed Epstein. Gimme those three sons of bitches and I'll start to trust the government and the police again.
“"There was tremendous criminal activity," the president averred, urging unspecified charges against former Special Counsel Jack Smith, former FBI lawyer Andrew Weissmann, and former Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco.”
-Jack Smith: Normally, prosecutors are fairly immune from prosecutions they undertake. Except that according to Judge Cannon, Smth wasn’t legally appointed to be Special Prosecutor, so whatever he did in that role was ultra vires. Much of what he did in that role was borderline. The indictments in both cases were questionable, ignoring fairly settled law and adverse facts. The MAL raid was abusive, and his people grossly exceeded the limits on the search warrant. The various other search warrants he authorized were arguably illegal. And, it turns out that his people electronically surveiled at least 8 GOP Senators and 1 GOP Rep.
- Andrew Weissmann: This one is going to be interesting. He was the lead DOJ Atty in the Mueller investigation, where he utilized aggressive LawFare theories to go after Trump and his people. His usage of 18 U.S. Code § 1001 perjury traps was especially egregious, since they invariably ignored the Materiality requirement clearly added to the statute to combat this sort of abuse. But all that was more than six years ago, putting whatever he did illegally outside the statute of limitations.
- Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco. She was DAG under Biden/Garland, and one of Obama’s people. She was how he controlled the DOJ under Biden. And being DAG means that she as in operational, DAY to DAY, control of the DOJ. The DOJ which undertook the two Smith cases, as well as the numerous J6 prosecutions, very many of which appear to have abusively violated various Constitutional rights of many of the defendants. She probably has prosecutorial immunity for much of what she did as DAG. But that probably doesn’t extend to Civil Rights violation, nor RICO. We shall see. And esp see how she likes being the object of selective prosecution, after all the selective prosecutions she authorized and oversaw.
Nice breakdown cutting through the crap on these people. There were a ton of very shaky people in the Biden Administration using their positions in government to do things that shouldn't have been done. The type of people that shouldn't be anywhere near the levers of power.
They're guilty. Go cope.
-jcr
Do Democrats really think there was not going to be a FAFO phase of all the bullshit criminal and civil cases against Trump?
(Obviously not an original post based on all the above but adding my two cents that I feel the same way).
Dear Leader wills it, so the cultists know it's right. What load of pathetic authoritarian clowns you lot are.