DHS Collected DNA from 2,000 U.S. Citizens Without Due Process. It's Now in a Law Enforcement Database.
By expanding federal agents' authority to collect the DNA of immigrant detainees, the government has risked violating Americans’ rights.

For years, the federal government has been amassing DNA profiles of noncitizens. But recently released Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data reveal that officials knowingly collected the DNA of approximately 2,000 American citizens and added it to a national genetic surveillance database used by law enforcement.
This genetic collection was made possible by a March 2020 rule change to the 2005 DNA Fingerprint Act, which removed the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) discretion to exempt detained noncitizens from DNA collection. This drastically expanded the number of DNA samples the DHS collects and uploads to the federal database known as the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS).
Between 2020 and 2024, the CBP alone—which is only one of the many agencies under DHS—added between 1.3 and 2.8 million people to CODIS, compared to just 30,000 detainees added between 2005 and 2020, according to Georgetown Law's Center on Privacy and Technology. Of this total, CBP provided CODIS with the DNA of between 1,947 and 2,131 U.S. citizens.
The collection of DNA under DHS's civil authority raises due process concerns. Because immigration detention is considered a civil matter, immigration authorities do not receive the same level of oversight as criminal cases, such as requiring judicial review of an immigration agent's "probable cause" before detaining someone and collecting their DNA.
Unhindered by the protections afforded to criminal defendants, the DHS has quickly increased the number of DNA profiles in CODIS by taking samples from noncriminals. Between December 2024 and April 2025, 97 percent of the nearly 300,000 DNA profiles collected by the DHS were collected from individuals who were detained under civil, not criminal, authority. Georgetown Law reports that in many cases, civil detainees were coerced into giving a DNA sample or were unaware that a DNA sample had even been taken.
The lack of oversight also carries a serious concern "that DHS will erroneously take DNA from permanent residents and citizens…without the suspicion of wrongdoing," according to Georgetown Law, which could "be used by police to prosecute that person criminally, even in states that have laws explicitly requiring a criminal conviction or a warrant before a person can have their DNA taken."
Georgetown's fears have clearly come true. Recently released CBP data confirms that the DNA of U.S. citizens was submitted to CODIS. The legal justification provided for collecting DNA samples from 525 of these citizens—at least 40 of whom were minors—was the fact that the individual was simply a detainee, despite CBP having a directive that "CBP agents/officers may never document" U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents as "detainees" for DNA profile placement. Approximately 865 American citizens had their DNA collected without receiving formal federal charges, meaning that no one outside the executive branch reviewed CBP's authority to arrest, detain, or take the DNA of these individuals, according to Georgetown Law.
Once collected by the DHS, the DNA samples are sent to the FBI for analysis and uploaded to the CODIS, where law enforcement nationwide can search for the individual's permanent DNA record. The sample is then stored indefinitely at the FBI's Federal DNA Database Unit, creating privacy concerns about how the DNA samples may be used in the future.
The number of American citizens and legal permanent residents whose DNA has been collected and uploaded into CODIS by DHS has likely already grown since President Donald Trump took office. Under the Trump administration, the DHS has used its broad, vague, and unchecked power to accumulate a record number of immigration detentions, including individuals who have been wrongfully detained.
"Those spreadsheets tell a chilling story," Stevie Glaberson, director of research and advocacy at Georgetown Law's Center on Privacy and Technology, told WIRED. "They show DNA taken from people as young as 4 and as old as 93—and as our analysis found, they also show CBP flagrantly violating the law by taking DNA from citizens without justification."
The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable search and seizure, including the compelled taking of a DNA sample, unless probable cause—checked under judicial review—exists. Predictably, by expanding the authority of the DHS to collect the DNA of civilly detained immigrants, the Fourth Amendment rights of American citizens have been violated. These violations will likely continue as the Trump administration ramps up surveillance technology and immigration enforcement manpower to meet the president's mass deportation goals.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Purge the US citizen data. Suspend the staff that took those. If they already had issues, then fire them.
This is FUD. If you read, there's no actual proof or evidence, just a serious concern. One or more bases has been skipped.
Police collect unknown DNA from crime scenes all the time and put it into CODIS. It fundamentally boils down to collecting objective evidence, or proof, for the judiciary to evaluate. It's why we have grand juries and evidentiary hearings. It's how OJ was criminally innocent but civilly liable. It's how divorce courts can find Dads liable for alimony and get CA to enforce NY's paternity laws.
The obviation is the same stupid shit from "open borders" retards about LatinX persons being surprised that they have a majority-European ancestry. Unless Reason or other were willing to wade into or entertain discussions about how, without borders, people with certain genetic makeup were likely not criminal but also not eligible for federal aid, social security, etc., etc., etc. there's no reasonable way to avoid this... except with passports and voter IDs and social security cards.
I don’t read the articles here. Most of the writers/editors are experts on nothing and cannot provide proper insight on topics. They also aren’t libertarian nor are they smart. It would become a waste of my time and I’d be worse off for doing so.
Incidentally putting the 0.07% of citizens' DNA into CODIS as part of immigration enforcement is a horrible, unforgivable violation of due process. An outrage.
An NICS (created hand-in-glove with CODIS) background check of every single firearm sale across any border external or internal by citizens and non-citizens alike is how due process is supposed to work. It's just the government making sure the citizens are secure in their possession of the firearms and that nobody is illegally seizing them in violation of the 4th.
You can donate your DNA to big brother if you’d like. I prefer they never have mine.
The NICS check is gay and violates 2A.
You can donate your DNA to big brother if you’d like. I prefer they never have mine.
As indicated, this is "donating your DNA to the State" the way OJ and Nicole "donated" their DNA to the State.
Remember when the 10 yr. old girl showed up for an abortion in IN and it turned out that Mom's boyfriend was the father and Mom defended him? Reason is backhandedly/ass-backwardly making the case that testing the little girl and/or the fetus' DNA was/would/could be illegal search and seizure.
Unlike the background check which is done with every gun purchase, as long as you aren't housing large numbers of illegal immigrants, raping little immigrant children, and are similarly of dubious reputation/documentation, the odds of your DNA wrongly winding up in CODIS because of this is non-existent, and exceedingly slim otherwise. CBP, Police, the FBI, the semi-random dude who tapped your bumper in the grocery store parking lot and wants to exchange information; all would vastly prefer your driver's license or insurance card or similar rather than your DNA, but lacking documentation while still being obligated to identify you, are SOL for anything except objective physical identifiers they can collect from the scene.
Back when right to privacy was wrongly elicited from the emanations an penumbras of Roe v. Wade, people frequently interpreted it as a right to stupify and defraud your fellow citizens. This is the same thing.
Did CBP collect the DNA in the criminal case of a pregnant 10-year old?
Nicole was murdered (crime) and OJ was a suspect in said crime. CBP wasn’t involved with that either.
The linked article asserts that US citizens being detained are open to having this done. They did not provide any data as to how many detained but not arrested for a crime. Emma/Fiona provides it later as 525 (including 40 children). Having just gone through customs and immigration here and elsewhere, I saw a few flagged for shit that needed them to go into the special room but unlikely they will get any charges. But they were being detained. Don’t like that bar being set at that low height for US citizens. I live within their jurisdiction (within 100 niles of Quebec). Not interested in being detained for spurious purposes and having my DNA taken then put into a federal database. I get it if I house a bunch of illegal aliens; that isn’t being argued.
If you want to provide DNA to CBP (or have them provide some to you), that is your business. They should not be taking any DNA from US citizens under the weak threshold of being detained.
TL,DR: Favorably to their own numbers, 2131/1300000 = Not enough to significantly affect the outcome.
This kind of whining is the equivalent of complaining cops should not have had cars in 1910 because it gave them an unfair advantage over the hoi polloi who couldn't afford cars.
Sure, I'd rather the government not scan faces and license plates and DNA. But this kind of data collection is impossible to put back in the bottle. Even if cops were angels and never collected the data themselves or accessed any private collections without a proper search warrant, it is impossible to stop private parties collecting all the information people put on social media.
Should we stop collecting DNA, so that we no longer have a reliable method of determining whether an illegal alien is a re-offender? I want to know that Bob Smith is really Bob Smith, and not Bert Diggler, 4th time illegal entry rapist.
They don't realize they're just one step away from demanding convictions before opening an investigation. The real question is was this data misused or just collected or even (gasp) used to exonerate them?