More Age Verification Fallout: Artist Blogs Blocked, Porn Data Leaked, Traffic Boosts for Noncompliant Sites
Unintended—but entirely predictable—consequences abound!

As more places around the world—including U.S. states—pass laws requiring age checks around the internet, we're continuing to see a slew of unintended (but entirely predictable) consequences. The latest round includes some U.S. residents being blocked from a blogging platform, French folks in dangers of their porn viewing habits being leaked, and porn websites that violate the law in the U.K. being rewarded with big boosts in web traffic.
Let's start closest to home.
Another website is blocking access to Mississippi residents in response to the state's age verification and online harm prevention law taking effect.
We've already seen some fallout from this law, including the social media platform Bluesky beginning to block Mississippi residents.
Now, Dreamwidth Studios—a blogging platform meant for artists (and one of the parties represented by tech trade group NetChoice in a challenge to the Mississippi law)—is also blocking access for people in Mississippi, as well as preventing minors in Tennessee from opening new accounts.
"People whose IP addresses geolocate to Mississippi will only be able to access a page that explains the issue and lets them know that we'll be back to offer them service as soon as the legal risk to us is less existential," Dreamwidth says on its website.
The company announced its new Mississippi policy on August 26, saying, "Mississippi residents, we are so, so sorry. We really don't want to do this." But "the Mississippi law is a breathtaking state overreach: it forces us to verify the identity and age of every person who accesses Dreamwidth from the state of Mississippi and determine who's under the age of 18 by collecting identity documents, to save that highly personal and sensitive information, and then to obtain a permission slip from those users' parents to allow them to finish creating an account.""
Dreamwidth goes on:
[The Mississippi law] also forces us to change our moderation policies and stop anyone under 18 from accessing a wide variety of legal and beneficial speech because the state of Mississippi doesn't like it -- which, given the way Dreamwidth works, would mean blocking people from talking about those things at all. (And if you think you know exactly what kind of content the state of Mississippi doesn't like, you're absolutely right.)
Needless to say, we don't want to do that, either. Even if we wanted to, though, we can't: the resources it would take for us to build the systems that would let us do it are well beyond our capacity."
Mississippi users of Dreamwidth aren't the only ones with restricted access. The platform will also "prevent any new account signups from anyone under 18 in Tennessee to protect ourselves against risk," it said. "The judge in our challenge to Tennessee's social media age verification, parental consent, and parental surveillance law (which we are also part of the fight against!) ruled last month that we had not met the threshold for a temporary injunction preventing the state from enforcing the law while the court case proceeds," Dreamwidth posted. "The Tennessee law is less onerous than the Mississippi law and the fines for violating it are slightly less ruinous (slightly), but it's still a risk to us."
Dreamwidth's moves further highlight how age verification laws like the ones enacted by Mississippi and Tennessee will come down harder on small and niche platforms than on big tech companies.
Age verification laws will also come down harder on companies that follow the rules, of course. That's what we're seeing in the U.K.
"When the United Kingdom began requiring thousands of websites to verify their users' ages last month, one group saw an enormous burst of traffic: pornography sites ignoring the law," reports Drew Harwell of The Washington Post.
The requirement was part of the U.K.'s Online Safety Act. So far, the act has resulted in a ridiculous array of roadblocks for those who want to access anything from news about the war in Gaza to anti-masturbation forums to eating disorder support groups.
Some porn websites have complied with the Online Safety Act by requiring U.K. visitors to upload an ID or submit to a facial scan. "But some of the biggest porn sites that disregarded the 'scan your face' rule entirely have been rewarded with a flood of traffic," the Post found. "Some have doubled or even tripled their audiences in August compared with the same time last year."
When sites do comply with rules like these, they risk putting people's privacy and cybersecurity at risk. The more times you have to submit a copy of your driver's license or a picture of your face for identification, the more likely you are to find yourself in a data breach.
Depending on the particular rules they're following, both tech platforms that verify ages directly and third-party age verification services may have some duties to minimize the collection or storing of personally identifying data. But these systems aren't always followed or don't always work.
In France, "an age verification provider is potentially leaking information about people visiting pornographic websites," reports Politico.
A report from the nonprofit AI Forensics says that AgeGO—a popular age verification service "used by three of the six porn websites currently complying with France's online pornography regulations," per Politico—isn't using what's known as "double anonymity." A policy of double anonymity means that the age verification provider doesn't get details about which websites users of its services visit; rather, it merely knows that people are trying to verify that they are over age 18.
AI Forensics' report "found age verification service AgeGO receives requests with code disclosing the website being visited, as well as a link to the exact video the person is trying to access," Politico says.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Getting in here before the Trumptards to say:
Libertarians for blocking porn, nude art, and other immoral things because won't you please think of the children.
Libertarians for equal and unfettered "access" and "sexcess" to Queen Spermy Daniels!!! Twat's good for The Imperial Emperor (Pussy-Grabber In Chief), is good for the peons!!!
Sad to say, The Emperor gets all of the gold, while the peons are DAMNED lucky to get peed-on in a Golden Shower!
Unread
Age verification laws have a long history in our country.
They really don't. Age restrictions for buying cigarettes ramped up in the late 1800s. Age verification for alcohol didn't start until after prohibition was repealed. Age verification for strip clubs, adult toy stores, and porn didn't really start until the '70s.
Prior to the first photographic IDs prototyped for the 1876 Centennial Exhibition and the first drivers' licenses issued in 1903 there really was no age verification.
There may be a long history of age restrictions/requirements (e.g. age of consent in English Common law predates the United States), but there certainly is not a long history of age verification.
Prohibitions against beating pedants with sticks doesn't have a very long history in English Common law either. Especially pedants defending pedophiles and other predatory sexual deviants.
THANKS for an INTELLIGENT comment. Wish there was a Like button.
You do realize that the "late 1800's" is half of our nations history, right?
And I wouldn't call "half of our nations history" a "long history."
Unless you're grandfathered in, Reason requires a credit card to post here!
Shrike found out when you post a link to underage porn, that privilege to post using the free account gets revoked.
Bluesky beginning to block Mississippi residents.
I'm pretty sure Mississippi residents block Bluesky... AMIRITE FELLAS?!!
So wait, Bluesky recognizes borders? What in the sam hell is the world coming to?
Some porn websites have complied with the Online Safety Act by requiring U.K. visitors to upload an ID or submit to a facial
Are we doing phrasing any more guys?
LOL
I was going to do age verification for my porn site by requiring a dick pic, but it ended up blocking all Filipinos.
lol, that's some tough requirement to view a website.
Privacy on the Internet died when advertising on it became profitable.
Complaining that this hampers privacy is barn-door already open levels of retard.
Similar with porn.
People don't want to see dongs next to their car seat ads any more than they want free viagra emails next to their emails from nana.
The idea that it's some sort of uber-puritanical march or purge, especially given the proliferation of such industry and content otherwise, is bootleggers inventing their own Baptist religion to make themselves seem unfairly persecuted.
French folks in dangers of their porn viewing habits being leaked
Surprise reveal: women with armpit hair was all just a ruse to make fat, lazy American feminists seem more cosmopolitan and intellectual; even French guys don't like it.
Anyone heard of VPNs? Spread the word.
(And if you think you know exactly what kind of content the state of Mississippi doesn't like, you're absolutely right.)
Wow, uh, going with "We're not showing adult content to minors and, even if we were, it's a good thing." Bold strategy.
Indeed. The entire global world should boycott puritan power-mad psychopaths in state politics. Stop using your 'Guns' to force your religion on everyone! That's not the American way.
And stop acting like every-bodies children is children of the State.
Now, Dreamwidth Studios—a blogging platform meant for artists
I love how literally the three random page I went to started with, "You're about to view content that the journal owner has advised should be viewed with discretion." And then followed up with, "The writings of a pagan, queer, nonhuman collective" and "turning his dick into a wolf head" and the third was literally just a list of their kinks.
BUT IT'S ART, RIGHT ENB?
See, if we take the concept of Art - a term which has meaning - and rape it against the pinball machine until it's devalued and meaningless, then EVERYTHING is art!
When sites do comply with rules like these, they risk putting people's privacy and cybersecurity at risk. The more times you have to submit a copy of your driver's license or a picture of your face for identification, the more likely you are to find yourself in a data breach.
You don't have to do it at all. If such concerns are literally lower in priority than your ability to instantly access pornography - well you're assuming the risks at that point, aren't you. Ever seen Shut Up and Dance, on Black Mirror?
It's your stupid risk to take, isn't it.
You could always just turn off the computer, find a nice partner, court them, marry them, and share a happy and fulfilling monogamous life together. Certainly more happy and fulfilling than whatever you think porn (or as ENB always likes to defend, kiddie porn) is going to get you.
Without this, a 7th grader doing a science/ecology report on beavers could be traumatized for life after the Google results start displaying images.
Ugh, you're right. Very disturbing.
WTF was that?
After a children's entertainment company tried to push blowjob lessons on kindergartners as public policy, who could've possibly foreseen backlash?
Given that ENB is pro-sex trade to the point she'll pretty openly defend self-administered coat hanger abortions down to the last 10 yr. old immigrant girl, it should be understood that an innate or basal understanding of human behavior is not her forte.
>Bluesky beginning to block Mississippi residents
Is this supposed to be a bad thing? Or, a thing literally anyone in the world worth listening to cares about?
There's plenty of debate to be had, lots of arguments for privacy and speech and all of that, but... Blueski? Nobody gives a shit about blueski. Maybe call us when Mastadon starts blocking people because of the law, because I hear that's going to be the next big thing.
Those darn kids will never figure out what a VPN is. Smart policy.
Personally, I'm more worried about the low IQ adults who don't realize that signing up for a reasonably secure and reliable VPN is/was harder (but way more secure) than renewing my FOID.