Brickbat: Slow Down, Say Cheese

Authorities are deploying new "ultra" two-way speed cameras across the United Kingdom, capable of peering inside vehicles to detect offenses beyond speeding, such as using cellphones or not wearing seat belts. These advanced cameras use video and a virtual grid to monitor traffic in both directions and enforce multiple violations, like running red lights, without the need for road markings or visible flashes. Supporters say the cameras will improve traffic safety, but critics say they will grow the U.K.'s surveillance state.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Welcome to the People's Republic of Britstan.
You'd be ok with it if the cameras were there to detect skin colour, of course.
You are. That is what you want - the only thing you are arguing over is which skin color is bad.
Aren't you one of those who likes to snipe about other commenters "knowing" what other people's motives are?
These cameras theoretically could pick up multiple rapefugees committing multiple acts of rapefugeeing but the globohomos know rapefugees won’t ever be doing any serious time, regardless of how intense the rapefugeeing was. But there will be a record on camera of it. And any native Brit will do hard time if they merely post about it on social media.
Swill these newer cameras also catch pet-snatching, pet-eating Somalians? And-or some alien ass-probers ass swill?
Alex Jones told me about nubile young unmarried women getting PREGNANT from anal-probing space aliens!!! Has anyone alerted Trump and DeSatan about this yet?!?!?
Sometimes they express regret, so that's ok.
I'm told they have a very sensitive color filter.
Colour me not surprised.
More plunder for the revenuers
What the heck is a "two-way" camera? I know what a two-way radio is, and a two-way highway has no median barriers. But a two-way camera? All google and AI say is that it has two-way audio. On a highway? Photographing traveling cars?
I think it's pretty safe to say they don't perform introspection.
Per the article, it's one camera looking in two directions. That is, you only need one camera to spy on travelers going in both directions on the road.
I saw this:
but did not think that was a definition. I can see, now, how it can be treated that way, but that's about as weak a marketing definition as bragging that it can cover "up to three lanes". What else can it do, detect trucks too, not just cars? Glory be that's some fancy technology!
It's cutting-edge technology that allows one camera to look in both directions at once. Of course, it's twice as big, twice as heavy, and twice as expensive as the one-way cameras, but it's State-of-the-Art Technology!
Looks like the Blade Runners have a new target.
If the cameras could detect immigration status you can bet that MAGAs would be demanding them on every road in the US.
Look, I know nobody likes it - but you guys have got to get over the fact that this tech is here and it's GOING to be used.
Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if the government (like your car manufacturer and cell phone company) coordinates with the insurance and credit companies to measure your habits and adjust risk management tables appropriately.
The same goes for biometrics. I cannot TELL you how glad I am that I bought my life insurance policy before wearables went mainstream.
Do I love the idea of a surveillance state? Only at the border. But am I keenly aware of the fact that WE ASKED FOR ONE by demanding all the conveniences and luxuries of modern technology? You bet we did. When you cheered the adding of a high-res digital camera and omni-directional microphone in your pocket computer, you lost the ability to say, "Hey, that's not how I intended for it to be used!" There IS NO control over that. We ceded that control when we accepted the tech.
It's no different than AI. Is it deeply disturbing how it can deepfake porn, or allow Jim Acosta to have an "interview" with a dead kid (and somehow call it "journalism"), or put Ozzy on screen with rock stars long since dead? Sure. But the tech is out there, and it's GOING to be used.
And now you have three options: 1) embrace State controls over tech; 2) become a Luddite; 3) get on board, and evolve or die.