So You Wanted Flying Cars?
Plus: Chinese state-sponsored hackers, Trump-Epstein bromance, and more...

Here they come: The Federal Aviation Administration just lifted regulations on light-sport aircraft. "Our recreational pilots and plane manufacturers have correctly noted outdated regulations were inhibiting innovation and safety," said Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy in a statement. "No more. Let's bring this industry into a new age!"
The new Modernization of Special Airworthiness Certification (MOSAIC) rule makes huge changes to how light-sport aircraft are regulated: It majorly ups weight and speed limits; includes aircraft with retractable landing gear and more seats; allows "for new types of propulsion and modern avionics" (including provisions to deal with simplified flight controls); and lets "pilots operating under Sport Pilot privileges to fly a broader range of aircraft." This is actually a really good thing for people who care about innovation!
The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.
"The safety continuum makes sense," writes Eli Dourado on his Substack newsletter. "US airlines carry hundreds of millions of paying passengers per year. Those passengers have high safety expectations, particularly because some of them feel out of control on an airliner in a way that they don't in a car they're driving or riding in. The airline business doesn't work without a high safety bar.…At the other end of the safety continuum, there are some pretty big benefits to allowing experimentation. The system of permissionless innovation under which the Wright brothers worked is directly responsible for us having aviation at all. We made rapid progress in the early days of aviation by sacrificing a lot of test pilots. Even today, new aviation technology often starts out in the experimental and light-sport world and works its way up to airliners over time as safety regulators figure out how to certify it as safe. Composite materials are one example—they were used in experimental aircraft for decades before the 787 became the first majority-composite airliner."
Dourado also notes that the loosening of these rules allows new entrants in the field to hire talent and start companies. "Let's say you were starting a company to build airliners," he adds. "You could have trouble finding engineers with Part 25 experience—you might have to hire them away from Boeing or Airbus. But fortunately, it's relatively easy to find engineers who have built experimental or Part 23 aircraft before." Basically, there are huge benefits to having a bias toward allowing innovation and experimentation, and there are actually huge safety costs to overregulating this industry, since innovation will be crippled and we'll lose out on unseen, unknowable advancements.
The upshot, per Dourado: "By making a category of aircraft that doesn't require type certification, is actually useful for transportation (250 knots and 4 seats), and can be flown with less skill via simplified flight controls, FAA is opening the door to a bigger market and vastly more innovation."
It's not exactly the Trump administration legalized flying cars, but it is a step closer to that. If you want innovation in this realm, this is how you get it.
Scenes from New York: "Columbia University has expelled and suspended students who were involved in a pro-Palestinian demonstration that shut down the main campus library in May, moving more quickly to hand down punishments than it has in the past, university officials announced on Tuesday," reports The New York Times.
Universities being tougher on really bad conduct—the type that impedes other students' abilities to learn and use public spaces; the type that damages university property—is probably a great way to attempt to get in front of the Trump administration's attempted crackdown. Though the threats to pull federal funding make my libertarian heart sing, the administration is at times demanding or implying that the universities crack down on certain types of protected First Amendment activity, which is decidedly not the way. It's true that Columbia's leaders should not have allowed the takeover and occupation of Hamilton Hall, but it's also not clear to me that the feds needed to get involved; the better course of action is the one Columbia is taking now (albeit a year too late).
QUICK HITS
- "Photos from 1993 confirm for the first time that Epstein attended Trump's 1993 wedding to Marla Maples. Epstein's attendance at the ceremony at the Plaza Hotel was not widely known until now," reports CNN. "In addition, footage from a 1999 Victoria's Secret fashion event in New York shows Trump and Epstein laughing and chatting together ahead of the runway event." Trump's response:
In a brief call with CNN on Tuesday, President Trump, asked about the wedding photos, responded, "You've got to be kidding me," before repeatedly calling CNN "fake news" and hanging up. https://t.co/uLY9i0pz93
— Edward-Isaac Dovere (@IsaacDovere) July 22, 2025
Honestly, we already knew they were friends, so this doesn't really do much to answer the outstanding question: How much did Trump know about Epstein's sexual crimes, and what efforts have powerful people inside and outside the government taken to cover them up?
- Ozzy Osbourne dies at 76. RIP.
- Yes:
Usually when I see someone saying something awful is capitalism they are describing something that 1) is genuinely awful 2) is a consequence of material scarcity and 3) has gotten much much less bad under capitalism
— Kelsey Piper (@KelseyTuoc) July 21, 2025
- "Microsoft Corp. warned that Chinese state-sponsored hackers are among those exploiting flaws in its SharePoint software to break into institutions globally, with the US agency responsible for designing nuclear weapons now among those breached," reports Bloomberg.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Scenes from New York
Man sucked into MRI machine via his heavy metallic necklace experienced a medical episode and as a result perished. This is off the chain.
https://people.com/man-killed-mri-machine-while-wearing-chain-attached-machine-nearly-hour-family-claims-11776370
No reports of any illegal aliens raping the corpse this time.
They say he had a magnetic personality.
Those machines can be a pain in the neck.
Operators are supposed to check for metals.
There was a breakdown in the chain of command,
Someone thought the rules were malleable.
Oh, the irony!
It was said he entered the room unauthorized.
Given that there are warning signs typically, he sounds more and more like a Darwin Award winner.
I have never found heavy chains to be attractive, but clearly some people do.
Chain, chain, chain,
Chain of fools.
They were able to make a link between the machine and what happened.
He had some pull within the hospital.
The image of what happened will resonate with the witnesses for some time.
“I am Ironman!”
I was Iron non-birthing person
Shut up and finish your ironing.
I pity the fool.
Noice
“They gonna put y’all back in chains!”
A Trump brand MRI?
His family is probably going to sue for the facility not adequately preventing him from walking into a clearly marked restricted area while wearing metal.
Did the sign mention “twenty pound chain necklaces” because if it didn’t then the facility will be parting with a six or seven figure settlement. Suppose it would be in poor taste if they offered the widow and any next of kin free MRIs for life as an alternative to monetary compensation.
Free MRIs for life (but you have to wear a twenty-pound chain necklace). That will cut down on the number of free MRI scans they'll have to do.
I like the cut of your jib.
Might not have been able to read English.
Reading is oppressive white privilege culture.
>>probably going to sue
probably going to be the proud owners of an Imaging operation.
Just think, if it was a government run facility, the courts would easily give them qualified immunity, as no one's rights had ever been violated in precisely that way before.
Back in my day this was done with an old tire and a can of gasoline. What a wondrous modern world we live in.
If only we had more immigrants, and entrepreneurial MRI trucks.
Columbia University has expelled and suspended students who were involved in a pro-Palestinian demonstration that shut down the main campus library...
First Trump deports Colbert to El Salvador, and now this. Is there no end to the fascism?
Had that on my bingo card. Iirc, some got suspended while others were permanently deported from the university.
I'm actually surprised they did it, to be honest. Columbia's been a hotbed of marxist shitlibbery for decades going back to the 1950s. The most prominent Weather Underground terrorists went to school there.
Now they teach there.
“……expelled AND suspended…..”
The former would seem to make the latter moot. Unless the meaning of those words has changed too. I’m not a biologist, so who knows….
How long before NYC imposes a congestion charge on flying cars?
Probably right after they tax them for climate change and wealth/luxury.
But not before Trump tariffs the parts and components.
How long before some Muslims fly their cars into some buildings?
Too soon?
Flying, red SUVs?
Not only can they plow into Christmas parade attendees, but now he can chase down Santa!
They also need to mandate that they have zero emissions and run on electricity.
Basically, there are huge benefits to having a bias toward allowing innovation and experimentation...
Boeing's latest iteration of the 737 is going to be all experimentation now.
Between "innovative" aircraft design (and maintenance) and DEI flight crews, flying should get interesting.
If you want innovation in this realm, this is how you get it.
China is just going to steal your flying car specs anyway.
Not my problem.
— Eric Swallwell
China is WAY ahead of the US re 'flying cars'. They are already being produced/sold - at a lower price point than any US producer can ever achieve. There are at least 200 'airports' that are specifically in place for VToL vehicles - with clear airspace for commuting routes around those cities.
I don't think there's a market that will grow rapidly anywhere. This tech is more about trying to sell innovation (and leverage it within a company) than about solving a customer need. But that's not unique. At any rate - it is the US that is a distant second and that won't catch up.
If only we had a totalitarian government that controlled technical development and deployment. Oh, and lied our asses off about achievements.
Your delusions are why the US is chasing bubbles and can no longer even pay more for defense than we must pay to keep ourselves afloat.
The LA Olympics plans to ban cars, but allow VToLs to fly contestants around. Make it make sense.
How about rickshaws pulled by losers?
There are at least 200 'airports' that are specifically in place for VToL vehicles - with clear airspace for commuting routes around those cities.
I don't think there's a market that will grow rapidly anywhere. This tech is more about trying to sell innovation (and leverage it within a company) than about solving a customer need.
Yep, sounds like central planning to me. No market for it, but lets build the infrastructure anyway.
Yep, sounds like central planning to me. No market for it, but lets build the infrastructure anyway.
Hahaha. Do you know how much Big Tech is spending on AI hyperscale infrastructure - and how little revenue it generates? And the only reason they are hyping 'all the jobs that will be lost over the next couple of years' is because the investors know there is no way $20/month subscriptions is going to come close to covering AI costs once they built out.
Infrastructure is -- bubbles. And bubbles have been part of capitalism since tulips and south seas and the 1920's and dotcom and ninja loans.
China is WAY ahead of the US re 'flying cars'. They are already being produced/sold - at a lower price point than any US producer can ever achieve. There are at least 200 'airports' that are specifically in place for VToL vehicles - with clear airspace for commuting routes around those cities.
They're also way ahead of us in the collapsing building industry. We need to close the collapsing building gap!
Canadian University DEI Hire
In accordance with UBC’s CRC Equity, Diversity, & Inclusion Action Plan and pursuant to Section 42 of the BC Human Rights code, the selection will be restricted to members of the following federally designated groups: Women and gender equity-seeking groups, Racialized individuals (members of groups that are racially categorized), persons with disabilities, and Indigenous Peoples.
Healthy straight cis white men banned from applying.
https://ubc.wd10.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/ubcfacultyjobs/job/UBC-Okanagan-Campus/Canada-Research-Chair--Tier-II--in-Human-Centered-Explainable-Artificial-Intelligence--Assistant-Professor--tenure-track-_JR19499
gender equity-seeking groups
That’s code for something, right?
Methinks the administrators take a lot of gender fluids to stay hydrated.
Is gender-equity seeking the same as sex-equity seeking? Asking for all high school boys.
Healthy straight cis white men banned from applying.
Seems pretty racially categorized to me.
But in a good way, right?
“ Racialized individuals (members of groups that are racially categorized”
So categorized as “white” qualifies you for the job, right?
Only if you capitalize "White".
not in this century.
Don’t be silly. In academia, whites are a stain on history, not a race.
Also, vermin?
Academia
Like a Lewinsky blue dress
Stains of white present
Unapologetic racial, sex, sexual orientation and ability discrimination touted as a virtue. We live in a dystopia.
Weird how the lefty white dudes in power do not feel the need to give up their power to put a DEI joke in their spot.
Carney could be replaced by a metronome and you would not have appreciably worse results.
Can I apply? I am white by definition, but also AI, soooo?
--White Mike-GPT
ChatGTP is certainly on the same team as you. The Gaslight City Soyboys.
https://amandaguinzburg.substack.com/p/diabolus-ex-machina
Just say you identify as a handicapped black woman.
I miss the old days, when bleeding heart liberals, in order to indulge their compulsive compassion, would just identify "with" a handicapped black women. Now they have to be one.
Quit fighting kutlur war hurr durr.
The fine print also forbids any akita owners from applying.
"Microsoft Corp. warned that Chinese state-sponsored hackers are showing that Microsoft makes crappy software.
That’s not exactly a state secret. There’s a reason they’re called Microsuck.
Milintel story about how Microsoft farmed out programming to folks that farmed it out to Chinese nationals.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/microsoft-ends-use-china-based-computer-engineers-certain-defense-dept-projects-amid-espionage-fears
What, not enough domestic ex-coal miners?
"Epstein's attendance at the ceremony at the Plaza Hotel was not widely known until now," reports CNN.
Any word yet from CNN on who was running the fucking country the previous four years?
Nobody knows for sure.
That guy Otto?
Wasn’t his last name something like Penn?
CNN has more important things to focus on - TMZ (Trump MAGA Zeitgeist).
CNN: Everyone Is Dying in Afghanistan Because of Trump.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/07/22/why-cnns-anti-trump-segment-on-afghanistan-is-beyond-laughable-n2660776
Um, Maybe It's All the Taliban-ing Going on.
Oh, wait—they are a third-world trash heap with the Taliban running things, abusing and oppressing women like we didn’t see that coming when Joe Biden engaged in one of the most ignominious and shambolic retreats in American history. That didn’t stop CNN from pushing this shoddy piece about how Trump is killing Afghan civilians. I mean, the fact that the Taliban refused to be interviewed should’ve been a clue. Maybe it’s the whacko Islamic fundamentalists that are killing, you know, the women. The ones doing the Taliban-ing, but sure, let’s blame Trump
I don't think we can hold the manufacturer of the autopen accountable for their customers usage.
What difference, at this point, does it make?
CNN is still looking for a missing airplane. You think they noticed anything in the last 4 years?
Relax. They’ll have “new” info on that in 32 years.
You know who else was at that wedding?
Celebrity guests included Howard Stern, Rosie O'Donnell, and O.J. Simpson.
Microsoft Corp. warned that Chinese state-sponsored hackers are among those exploiting flaws in its SharePoint software to break into institutions globally, with the US agency responsible for designing nuclear weapons now among those breached...
Iranians gonna be sporting some knockoff NBA ICBM's.
So we're going to continue to focus on the pre-revelation period as if it didn't exist on Epstein-Trump? Working on those MSNBC bona fides are we Liz? If you have something say it but this baseless guilt by association aspersion is a slimy tactic and beneath the National Enquirer for standards. Right now you're doing the MSM imitation of the pizzagate affair but with less evidence of weirdness or wrongdoing.
"Pre-revelation"?
Before everyone found out what Epstein was doing?
Ah, that makes sense.
Lets trot out all the people that knew Epstein in high school while we are at it.
Horshack, “Boom Boom” Washington, and Barbarino just to name a few.
I blame Mr. Kotter.
Epstein’s scheme was his ticket out.
he had a note from Epstein's Mother.
Note that Howard Stern is also right in front in one of the pictures. THAT creep I can definitely see taking a few trips to the island.
I don't get how Trump being friendly with Epstein in 1993 and 1999 mean a damned thing when he was not prosecuted for anything for years afterwards. Democrat royalty Clinton flew with him frequently without Secret Service agents AFTER his proclivities were known.
I love Dems pretending to give the first iota of a shit about Epstein.
It doesn’t. It’s Democrats trying to make any shit stick. Remember, Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-A-Lago in 2007 or so when Epstein was found to be harassing the younger ladies there. And, Epstein was banned for life. I’d say that any friendship ended at that time.
There’s a PICTURE OF CLINTON GETTING A MASSAGE BY A VICTIME ffs.
Wearing a blue dress?
Clinton or the victim?
Yes.
I have to say, the painting of Clinton in a Blue Dress that Epstein had hanging in his residence has to be one of the weirdest aspects of this whole thing.
The lack of coverage of the documents released by Tulsi is shameful.
I do wonder why it was released on a Friday night, though. It doesn't make any sense. The Trump team isn't retarded--they all know you get the least traction dumping a story on a Friday night. Whether one believes that story was released to distract from all of the negative press about Epstein, or if it was done to finally get justice for what Obama did, neither motivation would be best served releasing it on a Friday night. Who, in the Trump admin, is making these strategic blunders?
Agreed, it was strange.
But the media should still report on the documents. This isn’t some conspiracy theory, unless someone is claiming the documents are fraudulent, which I haven’t seen.
Yup. More so though I hope this goes to trial. DOJ just got the charging docs, so we'll see.
Of course this story should have much more traction.
I was just commenting on how it seems lately that the Trump team is going about things in a way that boggles my mind. Even the Epstein stuff, if indeed they were never going to release new evidence, could have just been something they didn't bring up themselves. After inviting a bunch of right-wing influencers, giving them a binder, then parading them through the press, only for the binder to have nothing new in it. Then, later on, instead the DOJ posts an unsigned document saying there's basically nothing to see here. Why pull the stunt with the influencers? Why post the more recent report at all? Let everyone keep the impression that they're still working on it. Politically that would have been the better move.
Iran: Trump says this is to stop a nuclear threat and that's it. Then he "Truths" something about how maybe regime change would be good. At least right now, regime change doesn't seem to be the goal of the Trump admin, so why even post about it?
So many more unforced errors. What the hell is the goal here? Is there a defined direction that they want to go in? It seems right now that everything is random or spontaneous. This is giving the vultures in the legacy media ample ammunition to derail Trump, when most of it could easily have been avoided.
Why pull the stunt with the influencers? Why post the more recent report at all?
A lot of this reads like they think they know where the story will end but haven't done any of the work yet. So they make promises and focus attention as if it's going to play out as the most extreme people think/expect only to find a far different result when they look into it. I saw the same thing with Doge - every find was hyped beyond any reasonable expectation which made even the program successes seem small by comparison.
That could be the reason. I don't know.
As far as the overhyping and underdelivering, it reminded me of a book I had to read for a poli-sci class in the early 2000s: "Team Bush" by an author named Kettle or Kittle or something. It was a surprisingly positive view of Bush (or at least his political style/strategy). It talked about how W would intentionally keep the people's expectations low so that he could more easily meet that expectation or even exceed it, especially as he began his political career. -Kind of like using his reputation for being dumb to his advantage.
*disclaimer: Bush was a terrible president, but the unconventional approach by the book to his strategy (probably developed by Rove) was refreshing when everything at that time (esp in a college class) was about how stupid and evil Bush was.
It talked about how W would intentionally keep the people's expectations low so that he could more easily meet that expectation or even exceed it,
Yes, during the campaign he talked about how Gore was a "great debater" so if it was judged a tie people would think it a Bush victory. That's very different from Trump who has always been bombastic.
But they also had similar traits. Bush pronounced nuclear as nukular which Dems attacked. But many people mispronounce words and the Dems as schoolmarmish pronunciation police helped Bush by reminded the public generally that Dems hate them.
If they can't act superior and critical then why bother being an elite?
haven't done any of the work yet
Influencers are generally people who have made a lucky prediction or in the past or are being fed inside information. Very few people do the work anymore. When you do the work, you get scooped by the next "influencer".
The work I reference was done by Doge and the DOJ, I'm not even considering the influencers.
Definitely some unforced errors.
After inviting a bunch of right-wing influencers
You identified the problem right there. It is the 21st century and we have the internet. Why are we still respecting the gatekeepers?
Release this stuff to the public, not the media. The "press" was only ever a thing because they owned the means of distribution. They don't magically understand more than anybody else.
Tulsi has reported on new documents every day this week.
New Epstein documents or documents about Obama's spying on Trump?
I don't recall new Epstein documents, but I may have missed them.
Russiagate.
Epstein they ordered transcripts released and meeting with Gisele
Flying cars are impossible in any practical sense until some brand new technology comes along. There's just too damned much wind involved to be acceptable as cars near the ground, as in takeoff and landing.
Consider the R22, the smallest commercial helicopter available, or close to it. 25 foot rotor diameter, weight 1000 pounds, and everyone knows how much wind it generates and how much noise. Now condense that 25 foot circle into a 6x15 foot car shape, remembering that most of that area is car, not open air, and the speed of the downdraft wind has to increase by a factor of 10 at least to generate the same lift, and that's only enough for a 1000 pound vehicle. No one would tolerate that near their homes or parking on a street, or even landing on the top floor of a parking garage.
Just ain't gonna happen. No Jetsons any time soon. Need some brand new physics.
But we were promised flying cars!
Do you want women piloting flying cars?
We were also promised only white men would drive them.
Guess the University of British Columbia won’t be seeing any in their staff parking lot.
Hey, anyone can land a flying car! Once.
Avoid flying them low near medical facilities operating an MRI machine.
Given the assholes I encountered on the way to work this morning, I don’t think we’re even remotely ready for flying cars. I have enough trouble looking for them in two dimensions; I don’t need them coming from above and below as well.
Yeah, watch for motorcycles…
doing stupid shit like lane splitting in traffic at 90 miles an hour next to a semi.
I watched some bozo on a crotch rocket, bent over and laying flat, tailgating a loaded gravel truck.
Organ donor practice.
I just read that article; it's from two years ago. A followup would be interesting to see what progress has been made.
The new regulations also don't care how many or what type of engines, so he has an example of a small turbo-generator driving half a dozen drone-style electric engines for simpler more reliable operation, along with a small battery, possibly as an emergency backup to get down to the ground.
They also allow for simplified controls, so that pilots just use an arcade-style control to tell the software what they want to do, and the software won't let them do anything impossible. No stupid trying to climb too fast and stalling or diving too fast and ripping the wings off. Could even be fully automated.
I am impressed that a federal regulatory body as fuddy-duddy as the FAA could actually come up with better regulations, especially during the Biden years (two years ago!).
About the only issue not addressed is situational awareness. People have this naive idea that radar sees everything around a plane; it's more like looking through the cardboard tube from a roll of paper towels and having to scan the sky over and over. Pilots of these new machines might be more aware of their surroundings in a city, and their planes might even have automatically deployed ballistic parachutes like airbags to avoid high speed unintentional landings aka crashes, but ground dwellers won't appreciate bozos crashing into each other and landing somewhat softly in back yards or streets or on roofs. Rural pilots might not even think about looking around for other planes, especially if these things are buzzing around at 200 mph.
Situational awareness is what 3 billion years of evolution created, and 3 decades of coddled nanny-state domestication eliminated.
Human eyes did not adapt to recognizing 200 mph airplanes from another 200 mph airplane moving in different directions.
So? Did human eyes adapt to endless staring at little screens while completely ignoring the world (and risks) around them?
Maybe you should learn what you are talking about. There are aircraft based on scaled up drone technology that are capable of carrying 1 or 2 people. This change clears the way for the simplified flight controls that are used in drones or RPV's to be used in sport aircraft. The only thing restricting "flying cars" is a way to power them.
Saying "learn what you are talking about" doesn't refute what he said. Physics still applies. Whether you use one, two, four, or eight rotors, you still have to generate several hundred, if not thousand, pounds of thrust, something not generally tolerated even by stationary systems in controlled factory settings; let alone in public at the street level.
Even for drone technology and the helicopters, you don't or wouldn't operate even a fairly robust and powerful drone at or around street level where wind can readily exceed the horizontal thrust of the drone.
So, yeah, if you live in Skypad Apartments and have got a designated helipad at your home and your destination, flying cars will be a big hit. Otherwise, it doesn't matter how feasible you think lifting cars by the bumper like Superman may be, it's not practical.
Thank you! Each time I write that up, I keep learning there are a lot of dumb people who can't handle that basic fact.
Yeah, as you can see with jimc5499 doubling-down below, we've got a lot of "A heat pump heats your home more efficiently when it's 32 degrees out than your furnace does when it's 65!" types.
Imagine one of those 4 rotor people-carrying drones zipping down the street into a crowd of "holiday revelers".
The GPS phone gives the thing a nice "Titan submersible" feel.
We're talking "flying cars" not hovercraft. You wouldn't be operating them at street level. You would take off and fly at a couple hundred or a couple thousand feet. I could see regulations on minimum distances from buildings and other obstructions for take off and landings.
We're talking "flying cars" not hovercraft.
Nobody said anything about hovercrafts until you decided to be stupid. The "flying car" still needs an exceptionally convenient place to take off and land, the way your car parks right outside your house or apartment or office. Otherwise, it's just a dishonest game of 3-card Monty pretending that going out of your way to a slightly more regional airport and getting in a two-seater "flying car" is more convenient for travelling short distances than driving and elevators.
I could see regulations on minimum distances from buildings and other obstructions for take off and landings.
Essentially relegating take off and landing in urban areas to parks... and outright forbidding it in certain weather conditions... and limiting it to certain flight paths or corridors where, if all the safety features fail, it doesn't land on a music festival or something... kinda like with small passenger airplanes, powered hangliders and para gliders, and hobby helicopters now, except mouth breathing morons who have trouble distinguishing a man from a woman without the help of a biologist get to point at the sky and say "Car!"
This is same stupid shit, different day with the whole "Autonomous vehicles will reduce the total amount of asphalt cars occupy or require without reducing the footprint of the car."
Need some brand new physics.
Airships had the ability to do what flying cars have yet to achieve over 150 yrs. ago.
If you're going to invent new physics, do it right.
By gum! There's an idea! Make a super strong perfectly spherical lifting body enclosing a vacuum! Lighter then hydrogen!
Air weighs 1.2 kg per cubic meter. A 600 kg flying car would need 500 cubic meters, only 10 meters in diameter. Silent! Yeah, that's the ticket.
I guess I should've said "socio-logistically". Blanchard and Jeffries crossed the English channel a century before powered flight. If balloons were infeasible, flying cars are the same level of feasible just with different quirks in a different niche. Between buoyancy, mechanical lift, and limited payload, it would be dead simple to get two people from Dover to France in minutes. Even without blasting people on the ground with air and noise. The issue isn't strictly the technology, the issue is also the (contextual) logistics. Do you need the person or the artifact or do you just need the information? Because the information can be sent much, much... much faster and more efficiently and often times, it's way less intrusive and more efficient to bring the artifact to the person rather than the person to the artifact.
A 600 kg flying car would need 500 cubic meters, only 10 meters in diameter.
That aint gonna fit in my garage.
But, yeah, if you could obtain neutral buoyancy you can drive it in 3 dimensions like a submarine without falling out of the sky if you lose power or lift.
https://jetson.com/
Jeff would be too fat though.
Although, Jeffy is a giant gasbag.
I think Baron Vladimir Harkonnen would be a better sci-fi comp to Lying Jeffy.
Jabba the Hutt’s skiff.
Baron Vladimir Harkonnen would be a better sci-fi comp to Lying Jeffy.
Yes indeed. Although, "sandworms in trunks" might be a bit of stretch.
Magnets. Just saying.
Pilots would be banned from wearing 20# chain necklaces.
'Universities being tougher on really bad conduct—the type that impedes other students' abilities to learn and use public spaces; the type that damages university property—is probably a great way to attempt to get in front of the Trump administration's attempted crackdown.'
No, Liz. Expelling college students (you know, "adults") for illegal and destructive acts is a simple way to ensure they experience consequences for their actions. I thought libertarians understood this.
We do. Regarding her, she’s no jedi.
Not even a Padawan.
Lizshoka
'Honestly, we already knew they were friends, so this doesn't really do much to answer the outstanding question: How much did Trump know about Epstein's sexual crimes, and what efforts have powerful people inside and outside the government taken to cover them up?'
"Honestly"? What kind of media joornalist are you?
BTW, the answer to "how much did Trump know?" is however much you need to support your narrative.
Scenes from NY:
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1945929553274196188
Zohran Mamdani on abolishing prisons and jail: "What purpose do they serve, besides making people feel good?"
And
https://x.com/ZohranKMamdani/status/1265738795317673988
Zohran Kwame Mamdani
@ZohranKMamdani
Each according to their need, each according to their ability
If jails make people feel good they are doing it wrong.
They dont even toast the sandwiches there.
+1
I think jails as currently run are obsolete and could be vastly improved.
They serve three purposes: punishment aka civilized revenge; public safety; rehabilitation.
The fact is that almost all prisoners get released sooner or later, and jails don't do much at all to prepare prisoners for release back into the wild. I have read of studies showing that any punishment beyond a week or two changes from dread to endurance and learning new criminal skills. That seems intuitive to me, partly based on boot camp. But some of the studies emphasize the speediness of the punishment too. A punishment six months later loses most of its effectiveness for the same reason: the criminal gets so used to knowing its coming that it loses all its shock value.
I wonder if jails would be better if ...
* Lock up truly dangerous criminals indefinitely, with all the rehab help they want, but it's up to them to prove they are learning. Segregate jails by progress, so that as they learn to stop picking fights, throwing food, and daring guards to overreact, they get more privileges with others of the same maturity instead of all crammed together.
* Use a lot more ankle monitors to track the habitual non-violent criminals. Not only would it be easier to convict them, stores could have alarms to detect the property threats. And considering incarceration costs something like $40,000 a year and empowers one of the worst civil service unions there is, it would save a lot of money. The criminals could also hold down regular jobs, support families, pay taxes, and maybe even decide the benefits of staying mostly free outweigh being a criminal and risking actual jail time.
* Focus on the mostly-free convicts paying restitution rather than stuck in jail.
* Allow alternate punishments instead of a week in jail to scare them straight. A day in the stocks or pillory with buckets of rotten eggs and tomatoes for the public to throw at them would probably satisfy a lot of victims more than a jail they know nothing of. Or have them spend the day walking around their neighborhood and their victim's neighborhood wearing a sandwich board proclaiming their guilt, and signing and handing out copies of the trial transcript and verdict.
Of course distinguishing dangerous criminals from the ones that need a week or two to be scared straight is impossible with DAs that release killers whose parents were victims of racism.
But some of the studies emphasize the speediness of the punishment too.
This and the perceived chances of getting caught and punished. So an instant lashing from a security guard would likely be more effective shoplifting deterrent than a court summons months away where charges will likely be dropped anyway.
It ought to be legal.
I am very much in favor of direct punishment like that for shoplifters and vandals and such. The risk of getting your ass kicked for petty shit like that is a much better deterrent than what happens now, particularly considering how many don't get caught.
I heard an interesting suggestion in some Youtube history video about that. In the past, there were a lot of pretty harsh punishments for what we'd not consider fairly minor crimes. Like getting hanged for stealing a chicken or something. But it wasn't because people were extra cruel or bloodthirsty, but because without modern policing very few people ever got caught for petty crimes. So to have any deterrent effect, the punishments for low risk acts had to be very high consequence.
The store owner will get far more time for beating up a thief. Our system is broken.
The system is doing just what it was designed to do. The problem is the system was changed without our consent.
I was on the train in Chicago on my way to the old Comiskey Park to see Tom Seaver go for win 300. That’s how long ago this was. A guy on the train moved and caught a pickpocket’s hand in his pocket. His friend held the pickpocket down while the victim broke both his hands by stomping on them. He said, “Pick a pocket now motherfucker!”.
YEah, like that. You want to victimize people? You get what you get.
Obviously fans of "The Hustler." I'm not particularly squeamish, but the scene where Newman's thumbs are broken still makes me cringe.
Yup, coupled with a reduction of what is considered a crime though. Don't want a customer to be allowed to break a chef's hand because his onion rings are made from diced onions.
That's fairly straightforward on a dollar basis. What's the restitution, all costs considered? Pre-emptive vigilante justice balanced against going to court.
I'm thinking more of people directly defending their property or persons with force. Allowing anyone to mete out punishment for any legal infraction is a bit more complicated. I would also hope that it would serve as a deterrent and beatings of shoplifters would not be a regular occurrence once people get the message.
Some of those "harsh" punishments were in balance with the impact of what we see now as minor crimes. But when stealing a chicken might mean a family does not eat for a few days, or stealing a horse means a cowboy dies on the range, then flogging and hanging were justified.
That's a good point.
It would be interesting to see a comparison of horse stealing in cities versus out in the boonies or frontier, as far as laws, punishments, and effects.
Fair point. But I think it is also very relevant that people were very unlikely to get caught (if not caught in the act) for most crimes, so the deterrent effect was more relevant.
Nope.
Two options after conviction:
1. Exile, temporary or permanent, for most crimes.
2. Execution, for heinous crimes.
They tried that and ended up with Australia.
And we got shrimp on the barbi. Win win.
Exile to where?
Does it matter?
In any case I bet "compassionate" states like California wold be proud to become exile sanctuaries.
Got to be some place. If you can't name any place, then it's impossible, and if you're fantasizing about the impossible, might as well be something useful, like the brain-fixing rays of Doctor Fixemup.
There’s an island by San Francisco that could work.
Don’t we have several uninhabited rocks in the Pacific that might be more out of sight, out of mind?
They might tip over if we send too many people.
3. Freezing like in Demolition Man
4. Halo and tubes like in Minority Report
5. Open-air prison like Escape From NY
I know these are fictional, and 5. is basically the Australia model already mentioned. But a smaller island, like one of the Aleutian Islands could be more readily patrolled.
6. The moon, like in The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress. Next stop: super smart computer leading a libertarian revolution!
Greenland. Don't you all see it?
The idea that prisons don't have continuous monitoring via camera is ridiculous with current technology. Punish every transgression and provide the training that they should have received when they were kids.
Jails as they exist are just playgrounds where the bully always wins.
Even then, you'd still see the cameras for Cell Bock X mysteriously goes offline and the guards just all happened to fall asleep coincidentally right as some prisoner "killed himself."
YEah, corruption of prison guards is definitely a thing too which enables a lot of the organized gang activity in prisons.
They serve three purposes: punishment aka civilized revenge; public safety; rehabilitation.
And two of these purposes - revenge and rehabilitation - are mutually exclusive, which is at the heart of why our prison system is dysfunctional.
Dirty Barry makes Tricky Dick look clean.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tulsi-about-drop-more-evidence-against-barack-obama
Eat your heart out, Shrike.
Yeah but Trump had lunch with Epstein 40 years ago.
Obama fucked this country up so bad. People forget race relations were actually pretty decent --- before Obama.
Obama was certainly a catalyst, but the groundwork had already been laid with all the "whiteness" bullshit pervading through academia in the 15 years or so prior to that. All the e-zine shitlibs that were so pervasive in the early-mid 2000s were all spouting that nonsense before Obama was even designated the second coming.
Would you say Obama was more a symptom of this woke movement more than a cause, similar to how many view Trump as a symptom of this populist, everyman movement more than the cause of it?
Obama's victory convinced leftists they were powerful enough to force their vision on the country openly. Before his victory these same ideas were supported and enacted bureaucratically where possible, but leftist leaders understood they were unpopular and had too be hidden from the public.
In fact these ideas go back 50 years when the first wave of left wing radicals entered academia after the mass-protest era ended with the Vietnam draft. These radicals normalized their ideas with academic trappings and began recruiting among their disaffected students promising them cushy make-work jobs in return. As these students graduated they took jobs in academia, media, and government becoming the leading edge of radicalism in those institutions, spreading to NGOs as leftists created them to accomplish what government agencies could not directly.
Obama was a trigger convincing people Dems would effectively own the Presidency from then on with largely figurative Rep opposition in congress. Obama did very little himself although he still deserves his share of blame for being part of this process.
I certainly remember after he was elected, along with a majority in the House and Senate, how seemingly everyone was saying there would be a permanent Dem majority. One of the pillars of that was that the country was becoming less white, and that "demographics are destiny," which would further cement the Democratic permanent majority. Though, back then, it wasn't considered racist to talk about white replacement, as long as you were celebrating that fact.
it wasn't considered racist to talk about white replacement, as long as you were celebrating that fact.
Ann Althouse has long said that anyone can claim any gender based difference they want no matter how absurd or obviously sexist as long as you present the difference as positive to women.
The gender police aren't interested in a fair framework that enhances understanding. They're interested in crushing their enemies. This is no different, all left wing groups operate under the same values.
Definitely a symptom. As Marshal notes, Obama's victory led them to believe that they were starting another 40-year run of dominance (Carville and Begala even released a book in the aftermath that literally had that figure in the title), similar to FDR's victory traumatizing the GOP so badly that they only put up token resistance to the left for decades afterward.
One of the reasons Obama implemented the "whole of society" project and his team went all-in to control the information stream across multiple media platforms was specifically to try and neuter any kind of right-wing pushback against them. That all started due to the Marcusian belief that got mainstreamed in the 2000s that anything from the right needed to be squashed.
"Eat your heart out, Shrike."
I harbor hopes that some parent caught that pile of shit diddling a kid, ripped his arm off and beat him to death with it.
We should only be so lucky.
WHAT ABOUT EPSTEIN!!!!
But!!!
Mainstream media response options:
1. Fake news! Usually the first go-to (and personal value delusion).
2. Old news! The default deflection when contradiction looks difficult.
3. Geez, let's just move on and not make things worse. Similar to 2, but sounds more statesman-like. Also hoping for some new Trump scandal.
The most common response is to deny the left ever claimed the election was hacked - i.e. that vote totals were systematically altered to favor Trump. In fact left wingers here have made that point.
Here's two minutes of left wing media figures, mostly CNN, and politicians asserting exactly that:
https://x.com/LarryOConnor/status/1947628066974359870
The reason so many left wingers deny this ever happened is that they never believed it. Note that they said it anyway which means they knew they were lying when they made the claim.
In fact they never believed any of the Russian Collusion Hoax. It was always mythology never intended to be believed similar to The 1619 Project, that 1 in 4 female students are raped during a 4 year term on campus, or that capitalism created slavery. They create these assertions because they support their political goals, truth is not a relevant factor.
Note that they said it anyway which means they knew they were lying when they made the claim.
It is projection. Because they knew it could be done.
Accusing others of whatever bad things you plan to do first to create an atmosphere of doubt is right out of the Alinsky playbook.
Dirty Barry makes Tricky Dick look clean.
Not to jumble up the narrative timelines too much, but after the Twitter Files, Meta Files, Facebook Files, and Snowden Affair, Tricky Dick already looked pretty clean.
Also, once again, Ukrainian military agents planned and blew up NS1 and 2 and both Biden and Zelensky had prior knowledge.
Again, not to jumble up the narrative timelines, but the DNC from Obama onward has been far more collusive and manipulatively fucked up than even the Bush Dynasty.
'Usually when I see someone saying something awful is capitalism they are describing something that 1) is genuinely awful 2) is a consequence of material scarcity and 3) has gotten much much less bad under capitalism'
Most pseudo-socialist morons who blame capitalism for their problems suffer from two problems. First, their understanding of economics never advanced beyond the pre-school level, especially their core concept of unfair divisions of a fixed-size pie. Second, they just don't have much value to offer in free market exchanges, hence life is "unfair".
Or just lazy.
TV News this morning had headline something like "Price of chocolate set to soar". Talking heads recounted Hershey's guidance on upcoming pricing and package sizes, and said that "Hershey's says this is not related to tariffs" and then proceeded to spend the next few minutes explaining to each other how Trump's tariffs will make candy bars cost more.
Big Chocolate will lobby against what caused this. Their political action committee, Fudge PAC, is the stuff of legends. They are proficient at wiping out smear campaigns.
Sounds like recent tariff activity has backed up traffic on Hershey’s highway of imports, but I don’t think that claim passes the smell test.
What about shit vs. shinola?
Not due to Trump's tariffs but Hersey uses American sugar from sugar beets which means they are using more expensive sugar due to the sugar lobby tariffs against South American and Central American sugar cane sugar.
"This change is not related to tariffs or trade policies," the spokesperson said in a statement to CBS News. "It reflects the reality of rising ingredient costs including the unprecedented cost of cocoa."
But somehow it's tariffs...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/hershey-to-raise-candy-prices/ar-AA1J68FY
Cocoa prices have skyrocketed in recent years due to a global cocoa shortage. The cost for the commodity was $8,402 in June, a 73% increase from five years ago, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, which tracks food prices.
The majority of the world's cocoa supply comes from Ghana and the Ivory Coast, which have faced heatwaves and heavy rain linked to climate change. These unfavorable weather conditions have led to diseases like Black pod rot, which kills cocoa crops. Chronic underinvestment in cocoa farms is another reason behind the spike in cocoa prices, according to an article from J.P. Morgan Global Research.
Pre ripples man. Tariffs are the cause.
Tarrifs caused climate change!
I think that is the correct answer.
Four out of five baristas agree!
Where does skin color fit in?
"Chronic underinvestment in Ghana and Ivory Coast" not blowing your skirt up?
Fair.
Scenes from NYC:
https://abc7ny.com/post/suspect-shooting-off-duty-border-patrol-agent-shot-face-manhattan-park-us-illegally/17223361/
HARLEM, New York (WABC) -- An off-duty Customs and Border Protection officer who was shot in the face is recovering after an apparent botched robbery in Fort Washington Park on Saturday.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced in a news conference Monday morning that a second suspect was in custody in connection to the incident near the George Washington Bridge.
Both suspects, Christhian Aybar-Berroa and Miguel Francisco Mora Nunez, are undocumented immigrants from the Dominican Republic, officials say.
Mayor Eric Adams said both men have lengthy criminal records and both men should have been deported months ago.
Video of the incident released by the Department of Homeland security shows two men on a moped approach the 42-year-old officer who was with a female companion. The officer was shot in the face and arm but fired back with his service weapon, hitting the gunman's leg.
Aybar-Berroa has been arrested eight times between March and April of last year for grand larcenies and robberies.
Officials had previously announced the arrest of 21-year-old Nunez, who they say was in the country illegally and has a history of violence in recent months.
Noem said Nunez remained in the United States despite having been ordered deported back to the Dominican Republic two years ago. They say he has an active warrant for kidnapping in Massachusetts.
Adams says the suspect is wanted for a robbery and stabbing in the Bronx and is exactly the type of individual the city is cooperating with the federal government to try and capture.
"I am very clear, always have been clear, stop the revolving door system, go after the dangerous migrants and asylum seekers who are here and allow hardworking people who are in this city to go on with their lives as they go through the process," Adams said.
But I am sure Aybar-Berroa and Nunez are great fathers, and just trying to contribute to the US economy. What's the chance they were robbing people to raise money for a food truck?
"Mayor Eric Adams said both men have lengthy criminal records and both men should have been deported months ago."
I bet NYC reached out to ICE anytime in the last 6 months to get it done. Right?
Hope they get their infinite due process.
The only reason the ICE cop isn't dead is because he was carrying, these thugs aren't used to armed victims in blue cities. I had a friend years ago who was an FBI agent. He was required to carry every time he left the house and I'm guessing it's the same for ICE.
But armed resistance to immigrant robbers is colonial oppression!
Always Be Carrying
The “hardworking, peaceful” illegals should beat the known bad hombres with baseball bats for making things worse for all of them. I could support amnesty for that.
Be better if the bad hombres weren’t released from jail in the first place, but sanctuary city leaders don’t care about citizens, so…..
News too local for Reason to include
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/donald-trump-announces-massive-trade-deal-with-japan/ar-AA1J6Bkv
Donald Trump has announced a “massive” trade deal with Japan that would earn the US economy $550 billion (£407 billion) in investment.
The agreement, with one of the US’s largest trading partners, would lower tariffs for Japan and is the most significant of a string of trade deals the White House has negotiated before Mr Trump’s tariffs are due to kick on August 1.
Under the plan, the US president said Japan will pay a 15 per cent tariff on goods imported to the US – down from 25 per cent – and open its markets to American goods, including cars and rice.
“This is a very exciting time for the United States of America, and especially for the fact that we will continue to always have a great relationship with the Country of Japan,” Mr Trump said on his Truth Social platform.
Expand article logo Continue reading
The deal also lowers the tariff to 15 per cent from 25 per cent on Japanese cars, which account for more than a quarter of all the country’s exports to the US.
The announcement ignited a rally in Japanese stocks, with the benchmark Nikkei climbing 2.6 per cent to its highest in a year.
"Expand article logo Continue reading"
Is this your Joe Biden teleprompter moment?
Still recovering from the last tariff apocalypse. Now we have another one?!?
Ripples, man.
God damn ripples.
Both nations now have a higher tariffs against each other now than before liberation day.
how's the balance?
With this deal? Both governments collect 15% tariffs when their citizens import goods from the other nation.
I have been led to believe trade balance is the goal.
Not by the “Cheap Chinese shit is The American Dream” crowd.
lolz Generation Me
Feels weird right after the "news" about MAGA-fication of Japan.
Almost like they don't want actual diversity and actual trade between mutually respective people and cultures, they want the status quo so they can continue to discriminate against "white adjacent" people and tell the LatinX people how to use pronouns.
Pretty sure there’s an article up explaining why this is a terrible and unfair deal.
Medulla Oblongata, is the following the article that you implicitly requested from _Reason_?
https://reason.com/2025/07/23/trumps-deal-with-japan-is-another-loser-for-americans/?itm_source=parsely-api
So reason has time and effort to continue to push every corporate media narrative about trump... but has zero interest in numerous declassified reports and information about the fake Trump Russia scandal Obama pushed and reason bought into? Nothing?
I’m actually surprised Sullum hasn’t had an article yet defending Obama and his Russiagate actions.
I guess the USAID cuts have slowed down issue of daily talking points.
Sullum would try to make the "fake but true" case.
Or the 'yes, but Trump,' defense.
Same. I figured he'd be unable to resist making an ass of himself and maybe he still will. Not that I'll read it. But the MSM strategy so far is a total blackout and it looks like Reason is on onboard with that until the narrative changes to it's all been debunked. Reason is deeply compromised on this issue. Most of this was known years ago to anyone slightly curious. But Gabbard has now released the documented proof so denial is no longer possible.
Media reported on the Obama non statement on the report.
Why you see people like QB claiming this is all a distraction from epstein like Obama said.
People like me now includes Dave Smith.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmeQAxKC40o&t=163s
TL;DW
Dave says the timing is obvious and he approves of the investigation and hopes it leads to prosecutions but is extremely skeptical that it will lead to any prosecutions. Seems to be right in line with my thoughts, but I guess we both have TDS now.
dude Dave Smith is not a cite-able source.
and that's not a swipe at you it's a swipe at a loser comedian who isn't funny enough to be a comedian being thirsty enough to say stupid shit to an audience Rogan's size because he glanced at the Sunday NYT
Dave Smith is the leftover friend guy in your weed circle who nobody really wants around because the idiocy coupled with the extreme certitude is just too arrogant to hang
I agree with you about the comedy, but I think he's a big name in libertarian, especially MC libertarian circles. I also disagree with you about his level of knowledge on topics. I think he's pretty well researched.
Still, I don't cite him as an authority that this is correct, but merely to counter those who think noticing the suspicious timing here is a leftist narrative.
Noticing the suspicious timing =\= deflecting every discussion on the topic back to Epstein.
I'm ready to drop it, but I'll defend my point when called out.
cool. I will never get past "the IDF shoots babies in the head. I saw the x-rays." until apologies are issued. ludicrous speed.
Fair enough. I missed that one.
That's the story that really put me off on him too.
I'll listen to him on some things, but not international policy. Repeating an obvious propaganda story as truth not once but multiple times and a year later is just dumb.
Repeating an obvious propaganda story as truth not once but multiple times and a year later is just dumb.
In all honesty, I thought Ashley Babbitt was a dipshit who got herself offed rushing the cops based on the media narrative.
Then I watched the video and saw her getting shot in the throat by a scaredy-cop while in a completely defenseless position with both her hands occupied holding herself in the window frame. And then the 3 cops who within feet of her on the other side trying to give aid and calling out an active shooter.
That video can't be found on CNN or MSNBC.
I think Sullum is going to pretend none of this is happening.
Yeah not even worth a mention in a blurb at the bottom of the roundup. Maybe someone is working on a big story on it, and they are waiting for it to drop.
A combined Sullum/Boehm libertarian defense of Russiagate?
I'm sure that somehow Alligator Alcatraz and Tariffs! will be responsible.
Where is sarc with his BOAF SIDEZ!!! nonsense?
He's screaming concentration camp, no more elections, imperialism, etc etc all over the threads.
He is no different than your standard retard leftist redditor at this point.
Sharing a brain with chemjeff has to wear out anybody.
I wasn’t aware jeffsarc had a full brain to share. I thought it was more along the line of a single brain cell.
They only get to use it when Reason isn't.
I don't read fuckstick's comments, idjit.
Then you need to educate yourself, oh drunk one.
He will not.
You don't have time with watching maddow and the view.
Chiquita got fed up with workers strikes in Panama. It has now fired all employees in Panama and shutdown all operations there.
https://www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/chiquita-lays-off-https://ticotimes.net/2025/07/01/chiquita-brands-leaves-panama-amid-protests-talks-underway-to-resume
Laid-off workers from the U.S.-based banana company Chiquita Brands said on Monday that they are hoping for the company’s return to Panama, after it halted operations in the country due to millions in losses caused by two months of protests. Chiquita laid off more than 6,500 employees at its plant in Changuinola, in the Caribbean province of Bocas del Toro, after workers went on strike on April 28 and blocked roads in opposition to a pension reform.
“Workers are desperate because those who worked for Chiquita depended on their daily labor,” said Héctor Palacio, who lost his job after 14 years at the company. “The situation is very tough for us because we’ve already gone two months without work, and little by little, it’s drained the few savings we had,” said Arcelio Valencia, who also lost his job at the banana company.
Due to the strike, Chiquita halted its operations in Panama and, a month ago, estimated its losses at over $75 million. Now the workers are urging the government to open talks with the company to resume operations. “There is no other industry that can provide 7,000 jobs in the province,” so it is “very necessary” to reach an agreement for Chiquita to “continue the production process” in Panama, said Palacio.
As usual, people learn the hard way that the true minimum wage is always zero.
^+1. And that you can fuck with your employer only so much before your employer decides "no mas"!
Why do I sense that Palacio still doesn't get it?
50/50 they seize the lands and processing facilities, put the people back in, and *then* learn that owning the means of production isn't the entire equation.
The whole situation is just bananas.
Eric is salivating with the ability to scream tariffs in regards to bananas.
They will say it anyways. Or blame the filthy American company for abusing those brown people.
Ripples caused them to go on strike.
next piece is about a New Hampshire three-employee business selling those kitchen counter things the bananas hang from
Come mister tallyman and tally me banana
- Jamaica
Panamanian workers should have read about Detroit.
So the union gave the workers the idea that Chiquita had no choice without realizing they always have a choice.
I've posted this story before.
My father was in corporate HR, specializing in negotiations with unions.
One year, negotiations with the union representing a particular plant the company owned/operated broke down. Despite agreeing on virtually the entire package, two sticking points remained. First, the company wanted to change the traditional two-week shutdown (for retooling and maintenance) to one week, since the modernized equipment permitted the faster turnaround. Of course, all not involved in the actual shutdown operations treated it as a two-week paid vacation. Second, corporate wanted the union to be on the same healthcare plan that management was on.
The company was unwilling to give on these two items, and told the plant's union negotiators that and that the plant, being one of several producing the same parts in the supply chain AND being the worst performing of the group, that the plant would likely be shut down permanently otherwise.
Union bosses said they would even give the members a chance to vote on this losing proposition. And they didn't.
When the contract officially expired, the plant was listed for closure. The membership was mad and wanted to accept the deal that they had known nothing about. The plant was mothballed, the town was hurt by the loss of jobs. Oddly, another plant in the same town, in the same industry and the same union, ALSO closed down shortly thereafter for a similar story (corporate wanted increased employee contributions for healthcare union bosses said “We couldn’t do that. Better to negotiate for good severance than to take a humiliating reduction [in takehome pay]."), and THAT plant had lost money over the previous 4-5 years.
Union bosses only care about themselves. Union members often don't care about doing a good job.
Though the threats to pull federal funding make my libertarian heart sing, the administration is at times demanding or implying that the universities crack down on certain types of protected First Amendment activity, which is decidedly not the way.
JFC, your take on this is dumb, Liz. First of all, threats to pull funding shouldn't make your heart sing. ACTUAL pulling of funding should do that. Second, if the universities prize free speech, they may choose to keep it AND they will stop helping themselves to our money. That is a win-win.
Taking government money means you are subject to political whims. THat's what the universities really need to learn.
Democrat admits they need illegals for redistricting numbers.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/immigrants-needed-redistricting-purposes-house-dem-admits-viral-clip-quiet-part-out-loud
"saying the quiet part out loud"
Oops. See what happens when we defund elite universities and NGOs?
Look at the bright side. At least they're not trying to replace citizens...
So far.
Too local.
Now, back to our regularly scheduled “Open borders good mkay” coverage.
Unpossible, Chemjeff swears that's a conspiracy theory.
Not satisfied with "But who will pick our crops?", Dems need illegal aliens for redistricting wins...
https://news.meaww.com/outrage-after-dem-rep-admits-more-immigrants-needed-for-redistricting-purposes-in-resurfaced-clip
Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY): "I need more migrants in my district, for redistricting purposes"
Yvett Clarke is heard saying in the clip, "When I hear my colleagues talk about, you know, the doors of the inn being closed, no room in the inn, I’m saying, you know, I need more people in my district, just for redistricting purposes and those members could clearly fit here."
New York City, which is heavily Democratic, has faced past criticism for moving to allow non-citizens to vote in local elections.
Iirc, even if the illegals don’t vote it still provides more population for apportionment (for House of Reps and Electoral College votes).
Heritage explains it here:
https://www.heritage.org/border-security/commentary/stop-allowing-noncitizens-determine-congressional-and-presidential
As a young lad I once was a Census enumerator. The training was clear that illegals were to be included in the census taking.
Duh. Why else spend billions to get "migrants" across the border? and then distributed strategically.
Nothing about how, if nobody else, Colbert's AGENT knew of his show's termination on 6/27 (before Trump settlement, etc)? Kinda obliterates the popular progressive mantra of the day. Also makes one wonder how an agent could manage to keep slightly important info like that from a client and why nobody would have contacted Colbert at all about it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/colberts-manager-knew-shows-cancellation-weeks-before-host-show-axed-financial-reasons-report
But that is, of course, too local. Always seems to be.
Nobody is willing to admit the guy isn’t funny.
He wasn't funny on Comedy Central, either. He's the Joy Behar of male comedians. He is the Jimmy Kimmel of moderately heterosexual comedians.
He's an ego hosting a money-losing TV program.
He was funny in Strangers With Candy.
Didn't do much for me in that. Not a big Amy Sedaris fan as is and Steve did not improve it.
Have Hunter Biden take over the show. I'd watch that.
Nah. But I would watch a revival of Jackass with Hunter.
Only if he promises to do coke during every episode. Which I’m sure he would.
They could cut the staff to the bone. The jokes write themselves.
He was also pretty funny as a voice actor in some of the older Adult Swim shows like Harvey Birdman.
There, he had a script to follow.
They had 200 writers for the Colbert show.
Soon to identify as was/were
It was actually 25 writers (200 employees in total). I, legitimately, do not understand how 200 people could be employed to make that show. The writing was hacky as hell (stole jokes regularly too), you can only have so many cameramen and unless you need 20 producers per employee, it makes zero sense.
Gutfeld, who has kicked his ass for well over a year now, has a total staff smaller than Colbert's writing team.
175 fluffers
>>He wasn't funny on Comedy Central, either.
lucked out with the green-screen McCain mocking & milked it all the way to last week.
No accounting for taste.
Is it time we give Adam Carolla respect for being a fucking prophet on what EXACTLY would happen after the LA fires?
He called everything. To the letter. No permits. So much red tape you will never be able to rebuild.
He called everything. To the letter. No permits. So much red tape you will never be able to rebuild.
It is California. That is not prophecy, it is just not being a complete idiot or in the bag for the Democrats.
I liked watching a video of a contractor personally going to the LA "One stop" location to get permit approval and basically obliterating every lie Karen Bass told.
No fees were being waived ("suspended" was how the government drone described it. And not universally). Also said that he has no idea how long permits take for approval but "very, very few" have been approved.
That bill in CA State Senate that was pulled for a year --- the state is going to steal all of the land and build low-income housing to guarantee their voter base.
That sounds a lot like the aftermath of the Lahaina, HI fire.
I do not get why Hirono is not bitching about that incessantly. She is doing her state poor benefit.
I start cheering whenever I see the nuke scene in Terminator 2 now.
Something about a one-eyed man in the valley of the blind?
Water is wet.
Reading about Carolla and Kimmel in the same comment section brings back fond memories of The Man Show.
Also a reminder that Kimmel is a hypocritical, opportunistic cunt.
Girls on trampolines will never go out of style.
Unless that includes "girls".
Right from the pilot episode of the Man Show, you knew it was going to be good. They were in the park collecting signatures to "End Women's Suffrage," and all of these ignorant ladies were lining up to sign it, thinking "suffrage" meant "suffering."
I am always baffled how HARD Kimmel sold the fuck out.
I hope his wife's boyfriend is nice to him.
Kimmel is a poster boy for what happens when you give up your balls. Sure, he got money and fame, but without your manhood why bother?
Corrola: yeah, it was cool. Who doesn’t like chugging beers and watching hot chicks in their underwear bounce around on trampolines?
Kimmel: I’m so ashamed…. sniff….. to have been a part of a show that objectified women like that…. sniff….
Respect to Adam.
https://amgreatness.com/2025/07/23/californias-fraudulent-disaster-recovery-is-a-land-grab/
That's an eye-opening read. I knew CA and LA were corrupt, but I didn't think they'd be that blatant about it.
"Photos from 1993 confirm for the first time that Epstein attended Trump's 1993 wedding to Marla Maples. Epstein's attendance at the ceremony at the Plaza Hotel was not widely known until now," reports CNN. "In addition, footage from a 1999 Victoria's Secret fashion event in New York shows Trump and Epstein laughing and chatting together ahead of the runway event."
And they both lived in the EASTERN TIME ZONE!!!!!!!!!!!
Do I have to connect the dots for you?!
I am sure Harvey Weinstein has an excellent reputation at the time.
Did anyone see Trump in the same place with Weinstein?
Heck, didn't Obama send his daughter to WORK for Weinstein?
Sounds like Obama was trafficking his own daughter...
And what about that Weiner guy?
And Robert Maxwell introduced Ghislaine to Epstein. Meet the new aristocracy, same as the old aristocracy.
>>It's not exactly the Trump administration legalized flying cars
close enough for the boards of Farmers, Allstate et al. to collectively orgasm
>>the outstanding question: How much did Trump know about Epstein's sexual crimes, and what efforts have powerful people inside and outside the government taken to cover them up?
lacks relevance for an outstanding question.
>>Ozzy Osbourne dies at 76. RIP.
yes in his then still-alive honor I was "swallowing colors of the sounds I hear" all weekend @phish in Chicago.
"maybe it's not too late to learn how to love & forget how to hate."
I'm just "sick and tired of being sick and tired."
Lilly Von Schtupp, is that you?
>>"Microsoft Corp. warned that Chinese state-sponsored hackers are among those exploiting flaws in its SharePoint software
why do exploitable flaws exist in SharePoint software?
Do I need to remind you Microsoft made it? What have they made that is not eminently hackable?
honestly idk I stopped programming in like 1983 because chicks ... seems they'd be better at it by 2025
NSA asked them not to fix?
that's not bad. thumb emoji
>>Columbia University has expelled and suspended students who were involved in a pro-Palestinian demonstration
likely for about another month and then school fires up again ....
it's also not clear to me that the feds needed to get involved; the better course of action is the one Columbia is taking now (albeit a year too late).
Is this some sort of fantasy world where left wingers in control of institutions act appropriately without others forcing them to? I wish we lived in a world I invent also, but lets be the adults in the room and accept that we can't.
>>I wish we lived in a world I invent also
Reason's entire raison d'etre.
Chemjeff smiles.
Pete Buttigieg’s DOT spent $80 billion on DEI grants, delayed air traffic control upgrades: records, industry insiders
That's at least half of the entire budget for the average fiscal year.
I've been waiting for the news to try to blame Trump's FAA cuts for the near-crash in Mexico City yesterday.
https://abc7ny.com/post/delta-aeromexico-jets-collide-mexico-city-airport/17247812/
An Aeromexico plane nearly collided with a Delta Air Lines plane while landing in Mexico City on Monday.
FlightRadar24 data shows Aeromexico Flight 1631 flew over Delta Flight 590 on runway 5R at Mexico's Benito Juarez International Airport before proceeding to land ahead of it on the same runway. The two aircraft were just 200 feet apart, according to data from FlightRadar24.
Delta Air Lines said the Atlanta-bound flight with 150 people onboard was on its takeoff roll when the crew aborted after observing "another aircraft landing in front of their aircraft on the same runway."
In air traffic control recordings, the Delta pilot can be heard saying, "We are holding on the runway" followed by someone saying, "Wow" and "Increíble." (Spanish for "incredible.") It is unclear if that was said by a nearby pilot or a controller.
France's Macron is very mad that Trump pulled out of UNESCO.
"Unwavering support for UNESCO, a universal guardian of science, the Ocean, education, culture, and world heritage. The withdrawal of the United States will not weaken our commitment alongside those who lead this fight."
If only Trump pulled us out of the UN entirely, and sold off the UN property in NYC.
It would be a great location for a city run grocery store.
"Unwavering support for UNESCO, a universal guardian of feel-good virtue-signaling..."
Moments afterwards, France surrendered.
Tonight the woke left got ran out of Canary Wharf by British patriots.
They got run out of Epping.
They got run out of Diss.
They got run out of Tower Hamlets.
They are quickly becoming irrelevant.
Maybe not irrelevant, but the proletariat is learning to push back.
Also enjoying the pushback in Ireland and Eastern Europe against importing the 3rd world. Maybe not all of Europe is lost.
All eyes still on Chisinau. If the Moldovan citizens topple the puppet Sandu, it will cascade across western Europe.
"So You Wanted Flying Cars?"
And the article's photo is of a Cessna.
Just redefine flying car to include anything that flies and is a carriage. Aircarriage.
cairrage?
Tiny screens you know, but yes.
It identifies as a flying car, or maybe an attack helicopter.
As long as the doors aren’t bloeing off, copacetic.
Ozzy Osbourne dies at 76. RIP.
he's into the void now.
FIFY!