Trump Reiterates His Promise To Protect Farm and Hospitality Workers From 'Pretty Vicious' Deportation
The president is torn between the economic concerns of his supporters and the demands of immigration hardliners.

During a rally in Des Moines, Iowa, last Thursday, President Donald Trump said his administration is working on legislation that would allow undocumented workers in the farm and hospitality industries to remain in the country despite his crackdown on unauthorized immigrants. "We're gonna work with them," Trump said, referring to employers in those two sectors. "We're gonna work very strong and smart. And we're gonna put you in charge; we're gonna make you responsible. And I think that's gonna make a lot of people happy."
This is not the first time that Trump has signaled that he is inclined to protect employees of certain businesses from deportation. "In the face of public protests and an apparent lobbying effort by businesses and members of his administration," Reason's Eric Boehm reported on June 16, Trump "ordered a pause on some workplace immigration raids." But that pause did not last long, as Boehm noted the very next day: "The Trump administration is reportedly restarting workplace immigration raids just days after pausing them amid public outrage and a behind-the-scenes lobbying effort by farms and the hospitality industry."
As Trump has acknowledged, he is torn between the economic concerns of business owners, including many of his own supporters, and the demands of hardliners like White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller. That tension is apparent in the contrast between the administration's immigration rhetoric, which emphasizes the removal of dangerous criminals, and workplace raids that target peaceful, productive people with strong, longstanding ties to the United States. And it reflects the general public's mixed attitude toward immigration enforcement, which includes an openness to legal pathways that would allow people in the latter category to remain in the country.
"In 2020–22," the U.S. Department of Agriculture reports, "32 percent of crop farmworkers were U.S. born, 7 percent were immigrants who had obtained U.S. citizenship, 19 percent were other authorized immigrants (primarily permanent residents or green-card holders), and the remaining 42 percent held no work authorization." But as Trump tells it, he was not aware of how his deportation campaign might affect U.S. farmers until Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins, who attended the Des Moines rally, brought the issue to his attention. "You were the one that brought this whole situation up," he said to her at the rally. "Brooke Rollins brought it up, and she said, 'So we have a little problem. The farmers are losing a lot of people.'"
Trump has repeatedly promised to execute "the largest deportation program in American history"—a goal that he reiterated in Des Moines. Yet he sounded surprisingly sympathetic toward at least some of the people affected by that crackdown. "These people…work so hard," he said. "They bend over all day. We don't have too many people [who] can do that." He added that "some of the farmers…cry when they see [immigration raids] happen." He alluded to "cases where…people have worked for a farmer on a farm for 14, 15 years" and "then they get thrown out, pretty viciously." His conclusion: "We can't do it. We've got to work with the farmers and people that have hotels and leisure properties."
If the agricultural sector's reliance on undocumented workers somehow was news to Trump even after he served as president for four years, he should have been intimately familiar from his own businesses with the potential impact of immigration enforcement on the hospitality industry. In 2023, the American Immigration Council estimated, U.S. hotels and restaurants employed 1.1 million unauthorized workers, 7.6 percent of the total work force.
Trump did not mention construction. But last September, the National Immigration Forum estimated that undocumented workers accounted for "almost a quarter" of employees in that industry.
It was completely predictable, in other words, that a broad crackdown on unauthorized U.S. residents that included workplace raids would have an outsized impact on several kinds of businesses, generating the complaints to which Trump has intermittently responded. "We're going to have a system of signing them up so they don't have to go," he said during a visit to the "Alligator Alcatraz" immigration detention center in Florida on July 1, referring to undocumented farm workers. "They're not going to have citizenship, but they'll be working. They'll be paying taxes. We need to get our farmers the people they need….Without those people, you're not going to be able to run your farm."
In Des Moines, Trump acknowledged that "serious radical-right people, who I also happen to like a lot," may not be "quite as happy" as the farmers with that solution. "But they'll understand," he suggested. "Won't they? Do you think so?"
Probably not. "If you want to break our coalition, go and push amnesty," warned conservative activist Charlie Kirk, executive director of Turning Point USA. "That right there would be a complete collapse of everything that we have worked for."
Conservative commentator Michael J. Knowles likewise rejected Trump's promises of forbearance and accommodation. "Eleven million to 16 million illegal aliens in this country," he said on his Daily Wire show. "If you want to actually start to rectify that situation, you can't just deport the ones with face tattoos. You do, kind of, have to deport abuela. You do eventually, at least. You can't have just random carve-outs."
Trump is avowedly ambivalent. "I'm on both sides of the thing," he said on Fox News last month. "I'm the strongest immigration guy that there's ever been, but I'm also the strongest farmer guy that there's ever been. And that includes also hotels and, you know, places where people work."
Polling suggests that most Americans share that ambivalence. In a Pew Research Center survey conducted in early June, 54 percent of respondents opposed "more raids where people in the U.S. illegally may be working," and 65 percent thought "there should be a way for undocumented immigrants to stay in the country legally, if requirements are met." Despite Trump's rhetorical emphasis on deporting criminals, 57 percent of respondents anticipated that his immigration policies would have "no impact" on crime or lead to "more crime." A plurality (46 percent) thought those policies would make the U.S. economy "weaker," while just 34 percent said they would make it "stronger."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
He knows his actions are nasty, even openly admits it, but does not care, and the MAGAs do not care. Hurting people is their goal.
If your goal is to be a cartoonish douchey idiot on message boards, well done
Trust in Trump... He will Find a Way! To split the baby, that is...
I predict that shit will be to continue to "do" wanton ICE raids... But only in BLUE areas like in LA! Punish ONLY the blue areas!
(Make the liberals cry, that is.)
Yup.
They claim to only be after criminals, but then they redefine criminal to include people who have not broken criminal laws.
They claim to only be after illegals who don't follow the rules, and then cheer when Trump creates illegals by revoking visas and parole for people who have followed all the rules.
They claim to support legal immigration, and then cheer when Trump makes it harder and more expensive to immigrate legally.
In short they're lying or confused. Maybe both. Either way you're right. Hurting people is the goal.
They said they were prioritizing criminals dumdum.
Weird how you cant even get basic facts right.
Also weird how you keep crying about costs and government spending while defending illegal immigration which raises both.
The trannie isn't going to fuck you. But hey, keep trying!
Keep posting comments like that and my stalkers will give you an orgy you'll never forget! It will be more fun than that time you sucked a bag of dicks!
Simmer down Olbermann.
MUTE HIS ASS SARC!
FAKE MUTE HIS ASS SARC!*
Hey, you're the guy that shipped Nardz and Sevo, and who dreamed about everyone else jacking off, drunky.
Don't worry though, we know you're basically het and only ever went gay for pay to get a couple of bottles of bum wine.
Your pals on the other hand: "I worked with this Mexican guy that for fun he and his friends would jerk off into chicken cages to watch them eat the goo.
https://reason.com/2025/04/18/how-to-raise-backyard-chickens/?comments=true#comment-11009784
Sarc, no matter how much you simp, Molly is still not going to fuck you.
You know you are a lying pile of steaming lefty shit and show it every time you post and do not care. Making a public ass of yourself is the goal.
Fuck off and die, shit-for-brains.
Another loss for sullum, sarc, and doc retard.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-allows-trump-move-forward-plans-mass/story?id=123586738&cid=social_twitter_abcn
Tony, you’re a retarded clown. And I hear you’re a full post op tranny now, so you’re probably suicidal. Follow that instinct.
Your life is completely without value or meaning.
JS;dr
JS; dr
We are all SOOOO PROUD of Ye PervFected Trumpturds, that Ye have finally summoned the stellar brainpower required to SNOT read stuff!
hey did you see TCM ran Holy Grail & Life of Brian back to back Sunday night?
Did SNOT see that...
Butt...
Always look on the Bright Side of Life!!! (Ass the Killer Rabbit kills ye, SING it, LOUDER!!!)
I still fall off the couch when the peasant gets repressed.
After calling out moistened bints handing out swords.
"Ignorance is strength"
That your motto? Seems to not be working for you.
Yes. That is a perfect response to a Sullum article. Glad to see you get one right for a change.
You actually believe that.
Oddly, you just described yourself all too well.
Indeed. Contrary to the leftard made-up BS ("pity-me" some *entitlement* to others nation); Immigration control is about immigrating the "we're gonna" *be* "responsible" mentality.
At a 6:4 Immigrant:Citizen welfare ratio and a 75%+ Immigrant Socialism-Party support the majority of what is invading this nation is [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s] trying to "conquer and consume" the USA. Immigration control was massively BROKEN and that is what needs fixed no matter how many Nazi's cry about it.
"You can't have just random carve-outs."
Can't you? Or couldn't they work on a compromise? Trump's book, after all, is The Art of the Deal, so if anyone can, I'd think he would. It won't result in the solution I prefer, but that's what compromise is about, and I expect it.
Do you honestly think Trump actually read The Art of the Deal?
Do you honestly think the rest of us are fooled into thinking you have two brain cells instead of the one you have?
Fuck off and die, asshole.
Some form of carve out for farm industries for Congress to do it's job might be sellable as the jobs are located in lower population centers and vital. Doing the same for dishwashers, street vendors or other urban jobe would be silly as there are loads of unutilized or parasitic alternatives to use.
Tell them what they want to hear. Then, when they feel like they're safe, arrest and deport them. Go get them in the dead of night. Hunt them down with dogs in the fields. Heck, lie to them and say, "You're cordially invited to an immigrant rights party," at which point ICE says "PSYCH!" and arrests them all. Whatever. Who cares.
100% on board with this.
The illegals could honestly save themselves a lot of trouble (and give themselves much more opportunity) by self-deporting. If they don't, well then America doesn't really care what happens next for them anymore.
America is showing a great amount of restraint here. The only people who can make it worse for the illegals are the illegals and their enablers.
His conclusion: "We can't do it. We've got to work with the farmers and people that have hotels and leisure properties."
So ... not the workers, per se. The
slavebusiness owners must have access to cheap, desperate labor.Back during the Industrial Revolution in England, poor subsistence farmers flocked to the cities for jobs. The people who considered that kind of work to be beneath them complained on their behalf, saying that their pay and living conditions were intolerable. They even compared it to slavery. Yet poor people did it anyway because for them it was an improvement.
Same thing is happening is Asia today. Poor people are moving to cities for jobs, and people who consider that work beneath them are complaining on their behalf, comparing their voluntary situation to slavery. Ironically those who think they are defending these people would, if they got their way, push these people back to subsistence farming and starvation.
Now Trump defenders are doing it here. They're claiming that immigrants who just want a job, who are doing this voluntarily because it improves their lives and the lives of their families, are really slaves to the rich business owners.
Some things never change.
poor subsistence farmers flocked to the cities for jobs. The people who considered that kind of work to be beneath them complained on their behalf, saying that their pay and living conditions were intolerable. They even compared it to slavery.
Because it was slavery and it was wrong. Especially the scrips and the company stores.
You're seriously evil if you're trying to white wash debt bondage and peonage.
Hes just really fucking dumb and ignorant.
Figured I'd unmute the lying Canadian cunt out of curiosity.
No, liar. It was not slavery. Slavery is owning another human being. The people in this context were doing everything voluntarily. No one owned them. And bringing up company stores is a great example of fellating two fallacies at once. Moving the goalposts and fallacy of composition.
I'd invite you to address what I actually said instead of lying and bringing up unrelated bullshit, but I don't call you the lying Canadian cunt because you're honest and stick to the subject.
Fuck off, and back on mute you go you stalking piece of human garbage.
Figured I'd unmute the l…
So fucking lame,
You dont mute anybody. You do remain ignorant.
You mute no one, motherfucker.
The TDS-addled slimy pile of shit Sullum reiterates his article Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!, Trump!
Get reamed with a barb-wire-wrapped broomstick and die a painful and deserved death, asswipe.
Like he does with all of the country's allies and enemies, our wildcard President Trump likes to keep ICE guessing. That's how you end up with the best deals.
Trump isn't worried. It's not him that'll be on trial when ICE agents inevitably overstep their legal authority based on his conflicting demands.
Gee, Ed, that's your best, last bit of bullshit?
Fuck off and die, TDS-addled asswipe.
The demand to enforce immigration laws as passed by congress?
>>the economic concerns of his supporters
Chamber of Commerce or Joe the Plumber?
JS;dr
The only illegals who should be allowed to stay are those who crossed the border as children with their parents and those who've been here 20 years with no criminal history (aside from the border crossing, obviously).
Nope. Just because they werent convic6ed doesn't mean they didnt commit other crimes. Many blue states even had a policy to drop crimes for illegals to shield them.
Stolen identification. Tax fraud. Worker fraud. Driving without a license, registration, insurance. Medicare fraud. And all sorts of other crimes were never pursued. They shouldn't get amnesty for their illegal acts.
unauthorized U.S. residents
Newspeak continues to evolve.
"Trump admin 'exposed as liars' after El Salvador makes major admission to United Nations"
https://local.newsbreak.com/trending-story/el-salvador-denies-legal-responsibility-for-venezuelan-detainees-deported-by-trump-administration-686d7db7d36e2877ec406544
Nooooooooooooooobooooooooddddddddyyyy cares about border jumping gangbanger criminals.
Why do you, incidentally?
The development led to strong reactions on social media.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.
The X account "@TheWarMonitor" wrote
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.
"Trump, his administration and their mouthpieces, exposed as liars, yet again!" wrote Democratic strategist
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.