Tariffs Are Keeping Interest Rates High
The Federal Reserve is unwilling to lower interest rates because "there will be some inflation from tariffs coming," Jerome Powell told a Senate committee.

Interest rates may have fallen this year, if not for the uncertainty and higher costs created by President Donald Trump's tariff schemes.
Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell told a House committee on Tuesday that the central bank likely would have "continued cutting" interest rates during the first half of 2025, but decided to hold rates higher as a hedge against the higher prices caused by tariffs. The Federal Reserve cut interest rates three times last year, but the central bank has not changed its benchmark interest rate since January and voted last week to hold those rates at the current level of 4.25 percent to 4.5 percent.
"If you just look at the basic data and don't look at the forecast, you would say that we would've continued cutting," Powell told the House Financial Services Committee on Tuesday. "The difference, of course, is at this time all forecasters are expecting pretty soon that some significant inflation will show up from tariffs. And we can't just ignore that."
Powell said that the Federal Reserve is still unsure how much of the higher costs from Trump's tariffs will be passed along to consumers. Until there is more certainty about the federal government's trade policy and the consequences of it, he said the central bank is taking a cautious approach.
On Wednesday, Powell repeated that warning to a Senate committee. "There will be some inflation from tariffs coming," Powell told the Senate Banking Committee. He said that tariffs would raise prices for consumers and reiterated that the Federal Reserve is "just kind of waiting to see more data on that."
Trump has been applying public pressure to Powell and the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates, but Powell's comments this week suggest the president could nudge that process along by reducing or eliminating the tariffs the president has imposed in recent months. Trump has scaled back some of those tariffs and postponed others—but a 10 percent universal tariff remains in effect, as do higher tariffs on imported steel, aluminum, and various other products. America's effective tariff rate is now over 14 percent, up from about 2.3 percent last year.
Businesses are raising prices as a result of the tariffs, and many are expecting more price increases to hit in the months to come, the Federal Reserve reported earlier this month. In the most recent update to its "Beige Book," the Fed reported that "higher tariff rates were putting upward pressure on costs and prices" at businesses across the country.
In some cases, businesses said they were raising prices in anticipation of higher costs coming later this year. One heavy construction equipment supplier told the Federal Reserve that it was raising prices "to enjoy the extra margin before tariffs increased their costs." (Businesses in the Federal Reserve's report are anonymous.)
Some tariff advocates, like American Compass executive director Oren Cass, argue that Powell and the Federal Reserve are overstepping their authority by considering tariffs when determining interest rates. In a post on X, Cass accused Powell of making "a nakedly political decision intended to frustrate the policy choices of elected leaders" by holding interest rates higher due to tariff costs.
Cass' point is that tariffs are not inflationary in the technical sense, because inflation only results from an expansion of the money supply. Tariffs artificially increase prices, but those increases are a function of fiscal policy—that is, higher taxes on imported goods—rather than monetary policy.
Cass is correct about that, though most Americans probably won't find much comfort in knowing that the higher prices created by tariffs are categorized differently by economists than the higher prices created by inflation during the Biden years.
Does that mean Powell is acting in a politically motivated way? Hardly. The Federal Reserve has a mandate to keep inflation down, and higher interest rates are one way to do that—because higher interest rates make it marginally more attractive to save money rather than spend it. Inflation is also holding steady right now: the annual inflation rate was 2.4 percent in May, up from 2.3 percent in April. And Powell is right to point out that many analysts expect rising inflation later this year. The University of Michigan's monthly survey of consumer sentiment shows inflation expectations above 5 percent for the year ahead.
Lowering interest rates now would risk sparking higher inflation. That risk might be more tolerable if Trump weren't already hiking prices in other ways. By holding rates where they are, the Fed is hedging against the possible combination of higher prices from tariffs and higher prices from inflation hitting simultaneously.
Indeed, it's not the Federal Reserve's job to help offset the consequences of Trump's foolish trade policies.
If Trump (and his allies, like Cass) seek greater economic growth and more affordable prices, then the president should simply undo his tariffs. That would prevent a huge tax increase, provide more certainty to American businesses, and protect consumers from higher prices. It might also encourage the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, which would provide additional relief in the form of lower mortgage rates and more affordable loans of all kinds.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Bullshit, Eric. It’s Jerome Powell keeping rates higher, not tariffs. If you were an honest writer, you’d know that and write about it.
Powell in his discussions admitted they werent seeing inflation form tariffs. But always the future ripples.
Wrong Eric. The tariff narratives that have been wrong for months are keeping them high. The models proven wrong, the ideas proven wrong, the claims you've made proven wrong, are why the fed chair didn't act.
You and your ignorant class of economists were the reason lol.
It doesn’t stop the left with climate change either. So let’s just get rid of the left.
Problem solved.
Trump has completely upended the conventional wisdom on trade, immigration, the federal bureaucracy and the entire world geopolitical order. I keep telling myself he can't be right about everything but so far I'm enjoying the ride.
The inflation that they were certain was going to be here two months ago is still going to happen sometime. They just know it. Give it up. Really, just admit that things didn't work the way you thought they would.
I say let them continue. They are doing more to discredit think tank economists and economic journalists than I could ever hope for.
No no, trust the experts. No matter how many times they prove to be partisan hacks.
But only experts with credentials.
So tariffs are magic that collect money from nothing AND don't contribute inflation?
Or maybe if prices aren't going up, economic growth is being stifled. Or maybe it just takes a few months for prices to equilibrate. Or maybe both of those.
Businesses are raising prices as a result of the tariffs, and many are expecting more price increases to hit in the months to come,
Just got a batch of invoices from one of my larger vendors, with a tariff fee added.
Hopefully those easy to make deals come through soon.
You do know that a single rise in price is not the same as inflation, right?
They dont.
I can answer for myself. But since your here tell me how nationalizing US Steel isn't socialism? Always good for a laugh watching you justify MAGA marxism.
Yes, but not the only increase I've had either. I'll let you know when it effects inflation, I'm not quiet. I trust my own eyes and the prices I get back from multiple vendors competing for my business before the feds figure out shit, though.
But glad you think me or my vendors paying more to the federal government is good policy, though. Heaven forbid people can afford homes without more government policy putting that out of reach.
IF you don't like taxes, fine. That is a sensible objection. Saying "tariffs are bad because they cause inflation" is not.
Thank you. Usually I get the Jessie AOC bullshit "your greedy" to my objection to paying more in taxes so if my response was unduly harsh, I apologize.
When Democrats raise taxes on businesses it is understood that that's just another cost that gets factored into the price of what they sell. So the result of Democrats raising taxes on businesses is higher prices. Few people will argue against this.
However when Trump raises taxes on businesses in the form of tariffs it's totally different. Trump's taxes don't raise prices because they're magic. The problem with idiot economists is that they don't believe in magic.
Duplicate comment detected; it looks as though you’ve already said that!
« Back
Didn't this guy patiently explain that massive inflation under Biden was transitory? But now low inflation under Trump is transitory? Maybe that was his main squeeze Yellin. But I'm really confused here. I'll just have to resist believing my own lying eyes. Yeah trust the experts Eric. They're never wrong or Lying to your face like they did yesterday.
The inflation under Biden was a result of him and Trump increasing the money supply with their massive stimulus packages. That increased the rate of inflation, which has now come back down. If you plot prices over time, the slope of the curve is the inflation rate. Tariffs do raise prices, but they don't effect the rate of inflation. They take that price curve and shift it upwards without changing the slope. They are inflationary in that they raise prices, but they do not effect the rate of inflation.
Unfortunately Trump defenders don't know enough math for that explanation to be anything but gibberish to their willfully ignorant minds.
Econ 101 sarcsplained to us.
And yet he continues to be wrong ad can be seen in analysis from the tariffs of 2017-2019 or really any time period.
Remember when you told us you dont work OT because you got smaller paychecks if you did?
sarcasmic 3 months ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
The idea behind a consumption tax like the Fair Tax is that it doesn't tax work and investment. Not directly anyway. I remember when I worked at a job that paid overtime, and if I worked too much my paycheck would be smaller because it put me into a higher bracket. So I limited the hours I worked. Capital gains taxes discourage saving and investment. If we want more work and more investment, then perhaps taxing those things isn't the way to go.
Yet you gaslight as an economics expert.
He really said that? What a retarded fuck.
Yeap. And defended his statement multiple times.
He is really fucking retarded on all things economics.
Does he know capital gains are taxed at a lower rate to encourage investment?
Lol. You think sarc invests his money outside of glass bottles?
I’ll take the L on that one.
I had to unmute the bad faith liar to see what I was being accused of this time.
Do you understand how tax withholding works? They take your compensation for the pay period, do the math to determine what your total yearly income would be based upon that number, and then withhold taxes accordingly. So if I got a lot of overtime that would, at least to the payroll company, put me into a higher tax bracket. They would then withhold accordingly. I don't remember exactly but it was somewhere between 50 and 55 hours a week where the overtime would cause the withholding would jump up. So the 55 hour paycheck would be less than the 50 hour paycheck, due to how much taxes they would withhold.
The only retarded fucks here are you and Jesse for being too dumb to understand that.
And while I've never claimed to be an expert in economics, my turds know more about the subject than Jesse who does claim to be an expert on the subject by virtue of the fact that he claims to know more about the subject than any economist who ever lived.
I'm putting the fuck back on mute.
Lol. He continues to be retarded on this!
Fucking hilarious.
“I had to unmute the bad faith liar to see what I was being accused of this time.”
Sure thing sarc.
My accussation was a bad faith citation of his own retarded assumption who doesn't understand tax brackets or withholding tables.
Sarcasmic doesn't seem to understand the concept of tax brackets. You get taxed on the money you make above the threshold not retroactively on all of it.
But he is an expert on economics.
Markets know that interest rates should be dropping.
My confidence comes from having a house on the market in Austin, TX, where the housing market has been frozen all year. If the market thought rates will rise, they would buy now. If they thought they would remain flat, they would not postpone. When there is no movement, it is because the market anticipates a drop and doesn't want to have just overpaid.
Fucking Jerome Powell is killing me. I am paying VA income taxes and TX property taxes. Worst case scenario.
Yeah the FED has virtual veto power over the real estate market. No question in my mind that it was due for a correction but Powell is setting up a crash.
The fed is always acting too late.
Tariffs Are Keeping Interest Rates High
You have now jumped the shark to an evil notion. Interest rates are not 'high'. They have not been high for decades. What you are advocating is that the purpose of interest rates is to keep bubbles inflated and to keep asset prices jacked up and to manipulate the price of capital in order to favor those with assets - to favor the donor class. To favor the notion that an economy and business cycles can and should be managed via a centrally planned cost of capital and a permanent growth in debt.
A continuation of the stupidity of permanent trade deficits - to favor the financialization of the economy. Not because that might be considered 'free markets'. But because that's what your donors want so that is the 'economics' you advocate.
Trump's tariffs strategy is stupid as fuck and can't possibly work. To oppose it by advocating a return to the manipulation of the economy via interest rates is - as I said - evil.
Trump's tariffs strategy is stupid as fuck and can't possibly work.
Seems to be working so far.
Rare earths from China to the US dropped by 93% in May. It's not going to take long for auto production, defense, etc to shut down. It almost certainly is the main reason the '12 day war' had to stop due to lack of interceptors.And rare earths are only the most yapped about.
China has restricted exports of certain rare earth minerals and metals, including gallium, germanium, antimony, and graphite, primarily to the United States, citing national security concerns and as a retaliatory measure against US restrictions on chip technology.
Tariffs not mentioned.
Gallium, germanium, graphite, and antimony are not rare earths. Rare earth elements are in orange - the lanthanides
including…
Hahahaha. What about chocolate pudding?
What percentage of rare earth metals do you think China holds including current known deposits?
Lack of interceptors, maybe.
But the production pipeline for building replacements is not measured in weeks - there's no way that an increase in price of rare earths that would have only happened in the last couple of months had any effect on rate of production.
Also, rare earths are not rare. The difficulty is chemically separating them *profitably* as they're all extremely similar chemically.
The US is 'self-sufficient' in proved reserves - its just more expensive to mine (safety and environmental standards) and refine them here.
And the US actually provides more in precursor chemicals than we receive in rare metals. Something like 3 to 1 in total value. The agreement on rare metals was signed by China due to threats to withhold those chemicals, not due to tariffs.
You are delusional, JewFree. The interest rate going from 3 to 6.5 when I was buying a home increased the mortgage payment by $1000. That was on top of 20% inflation over the prior 2.5 years wiping out the value of the rise in real estate prices.
Yes, the rates are high because the property values are high. But whether or not this was caused by rates being artificially low is moot when the increase in rates suddenly makes homes unaffordable to middle class people.
It is coincidence if it benefits the donor class. They don't really give a fuck as they already got theirs.
What if the price of dollars was determined by the buyer and seller instead of a bunch of private bankers? We wouldn't have to have this conversation.
Bankers are the ones who create dollars (by making loans) and destroy dollars (by paying off loans)
Tariffs can also lower prices and bring inflation down.
With the many inputs to many products there is always substitution and the opening of new markets. Inflation has been doing much better under Trump than non-tariffs under Biden !!! So let's use our little grey cells
Tariffs can also lower prices and bring inflation down.
Only by causing an economic downturn deflationary pressure.
Impact from tariffs are still far less than the regulatory impacts that occurred under Biden as well. That has always been the case. But instead of focusing on deregulation reason seems to ignore this fact, along with many globalist economists. They want to keep offshoring so they ignore regulatory delta that are a prime driver of trade imbalances.
Nothing like taxes to make things cheaper. What a dumbass.
Please point to the data.
It is amazing how little of economics you understand. You truly think every variable is independent. Just fucking amazing.
Also you continue to demand 2x in raised income taxes. Lol.
What we learned from 2003 and 2018 is that the banking system is so geared towards the wealthy that top tax rate cuts have no positive impact on GDP growth…and may negatively impact GDP growth by increasing asset value inflation and thus harming the upper middle class by pricing them out of neighborhoods and private schools.
OK. Cool. This will cause maybe a bit of deflation, which we need right now.
You know what I don't need? My savings being attritted away year after year.
We had deflation in 2020 that contributed to this current round of inflation. Inflation only harms wealthy people and so it’s not an issue for 99% of Americans.
Good Lord he's still going on about it.