Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Privacy

Crossing the U.S. Border? Keep Your Electronic Devices Safe from Searches.

Officials at the border have the power to paw through sensitive data on your phone.

J.D. Tuccille | 6.25.2025 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Close-up of a woman's hands as she turns off an iPhone, sitting in an airplane seat. | Ifeelstock | Dreamstime.com
(Ifeelstock | Dreamstime.com)

It's not difficult to attract the attention of government officials, especially if you have a relatively high profile in business, political activism, or journalism. That can lead to difficulty crossing borders, even in countries with relatively firm civil liberties protections, such as the United States. Officials at border crossings often have powers beyond those of police within the country, meaning that even returning citizens might have to submit to searches of their possessions and their electronic devices. But travelers can take steps to keep information safe and beyond the reach of nosy enforcers.

You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Growing Scrutiny at the Border

"A growing number of news reports indicate that travelers heading to the US are facing scrutiny at the border, with some subjected to electronic-device searches," Sarah Grevy Gotfredsen of the Columbia Journalism Review reported in April. Gotfredsen cited the case of Jeremy Dupin, a documentary filmmaker who, upon returning to the U.S. from a trip to Haiti, was interrogated and pressured to provide his phone password.

"With my phone unlocked, agents were able to access some of my most sensitive reporting work, including communications with editors about particular projects and photographs taken while on assignment," he wrote about the incident. "After extensively questioning me about my work for several hours, agents finally let me go."

Journalists have been specifically targeted based on their work, according to a 2019 story by San Diego's NBC affiliate. "In addition to flagging the individuals for secondary screenings, the Homeland Security source told NBC 7 that the agents also created dossiers on each person listed," the story noted.

All Merchandise and Persons Are Subject to Inspection

For its part, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) claims that "all merchandise and persons crossing the border, both inbound and outbound, are subject to inspection by CBP pursuant to its authority to enforce immigration, customs, and other federal laws at the border. CBP's search authority extends to all persons and merchandise, including electronic devices, crossing our nation's borders." A separate document details the legal authority for the search policy.

CBP divides its searches of electronic devices into "basic searches" which can be conducted "with or without suspicion" and "advanced searches." Of basic searches, CBP adds, "this search may reveal information that is resident upon the device and would ordinarily be visible by scrolling through the phone manually (including contact lists, call logs, calendar entries, text messages, pictures, videos, and audio files)." Advanced searches are triggered by suspicion of illegal activity and require a supervisor's permission. An advanced search is "any search in which an Officer connects external equipment, through a wired or wireless connection, to an electronic device not merely to gain access to the device, but to review, copy, and/or analyze its contents."

Supposedly, less than 0.01 percent of travelers legally entering the U.S. suffer device searches. But if it's your unlucky day, there you are. Even suspicion-less basic search subject travelers to intrusions into their personal lives and the exposure of potentially sensitive information—if they don't prepare beforehand.

Use Printed Boarding Passes, Purge Messages, and Sign Out of Accounts

Working together, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) created a list of tips for international travelers. (TSA doesn't claim authority to search the devices of domestic travelers.) The first concern is what to do if tagged by CBP for extra attention: "At an international airport or other port of entry, you have to decide whether you will comply with a request to access your device, but this might not feel like much of a choice if you are a non-U.S. citizen entering the country! Plan accordingly."

Among their suggestions is to use old-school printed documents, such as boarding passes, so you won't have your devices on and unlocked. They also suggest minimizing the number of devices you bring and considering dedicated travel devices that contain a minimum of sensitive information or else backing up your devices before factory-resetting them and adding only necessary data.

Devices should be encrypted and passcodes should be long and unpredictable. Separately, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) urges: "turn off biometric access to your phones and laptops. To secure your devices, use the longest PIN possible."

If traveling with your usual devices, "remove any apps, files, chat histories, browsing histories, and sensitive contacts you would not want exposed during a search." Also, "log out of accounts you do not want accessible to border officials," delete messages, and purge all deleted data from the trash.

With the federal government now scrutinizing travelers' social media accounts, CPJ advises that "journalists may wish to make their social media accounts private before travelling."

Keep Sensitive Information in the Cloud

One tactic for maintaining access to sensitive data is based on limitations to CBP's authority. As CBP puts it, "border searches extend to the information that is physically resident on the device and do not extend to information that is located solely on remote servers." So, sensitive information can be stored in the cloud, with devices signed out of the appropriate accounts, to be accessed once past the port of entry. Keep in mind that not all cloud services work everywhere. Dropbox, for example, isn't available in Crimea, North Korea, or Syria because of international sanctions. That shouldn't be an issue when entering the U.S. and it might be bypassed by a VPN, but plan accordingly.

If all of this sounds like a lot of effort to go through when crossing the border into a country that continues to have regularly scheduled elections, a lively opposition press, and courts that slap down government officials, it is. But the Trump administration rightly draws a lot of heat for screening students and travelers for their political opinions. Alistair Kitchen, a Substacker from Australia, was recently refused entry to the country, apparently for his pro-Palestinian views (CBP claims it was because he lied about his drug use, but they discovered that only after questioning him and searching his phone).

Before Trump, the Obama administration was caught spying on journalists who reported stories inconvenient to the White House. Margaret Sullivan, then-public editor for The New York Times, accused the Obama White House of "unprecedented secrecy and of unprecedented attacks on a free press."

Which is to say, no matter who is in charge, governments don't consistently respect rights to liberty and privacy. That's especially true for places, like border crossings, where protections are few and limited.

So, consider your own circumstances. Protect your data. And enjoy the trip.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Brickbat: What Could Go Wrong?

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

PrivacyInvasion of PrivacyBorder CrossingsBordersAirportsCellphonesInformationSurveillanceLaw enforcementFederal government
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (20)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Minadin   4 months ago

    I've crossed the US border approximately 168 times in the last 30 years, 74 of those times being the border with Mexico, coming and going. I haven't had to worry about my cell phone, tablet, or laptop being part of a search even once.

    I did have a border patrol dog sniff through (and pee in) my luggage once. And I've been yelled at in pretty bad Spanish sometimes. But I hold a US Passport and a Missouri drivers license, no matter how Mexican I might look, or how much more fluent I might be than the border patrol agents.

  2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   4 months ago

    Love how the solution is to keep shit on the cloud because it isnt like government can't request from a 3rd party access to your data lol.

    1. Longtobefree   4 months ago

      Absolutely!
      The absolutely best safest place for your data is on someone else's computer.

  3. Longtobefree   4 months ago

    No REAL American would even think of leaving the US.

  4. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   4 months ago

    Thanks to trumps border policy I have seen some crazy things. I went to McDonald's and my order was taken by a teen who spoke English! Also the road crew I usually pass with 4 people working with 6 standing around, now it just 4 people working! Oh the horrer

  5. Gaear Grimsrud   4 months ago

    Well border crossings have always been a no man's land and you could always be subject to a search. I'm not sure why that would change with the advent of electronic devices. My wife and I were interrogated and searched 35 years ago crossing into Canada with our infant son because we didn't have his birth certificate with us. Accused of kidnapping our own kid. Leave your sensitive shit at home and have your paperwork in order. Don't be a dumbass and then complain about it.

    1. SRG2   4 months ago

      I'm not sure why that would change with the advent of electronic devices.

      The search principle hasn't changed - what has changed is the amount of personal and private information that a search can reveal.

    2. Zeb   4 months ago

      While that is true about borders, it always seems silly to me. You can't stop information movement like that. The internet and encryption are things that exist. And to me "persons and merchandise" could reasonably be interpreted as limited to inspection of physical objects being brought across the border to prevent tax evasion or the importation of contraband.

  6. Social Justice is neither   4 months ago

    Gotta wonder what's on TooSilly's computer that such elaborate protections are necessary in the context chosen. General good advise or paranoia from a prog with things to hide no sane society would countenance?

    1. Zeb   4 months ago

      You really going with "why would you object to a search if you have nothing to hide?"?

    2. Minadin   4 months ago

      Well, maybe he was just giving advice to Pluggo.

    3. Stupid Government Tricks   4 months ago

      Fucking toady, statist suckup.

  7. Use the Schwartz   4 months ago

    I've said it a million times, for INTL travel get a burner.

    It's not just for privacy; if you lose it or it is stolen, so what?

    1. SRG2   4 months ago

      And a clean tablet

  8. Dillinger   4 months ago

    fail to see why the concept is so difficult.

  9. Eeyore   4 months ago

    My lock screen app, when the wrong pin is entered, takes a selfie of the user and uses AI to generate a little gay porn that it replaces the background image with. It also turns the volume to max and locks the user out from being able to turn the volume down.

  10. InsaneTrollLogic (Muting Sarc like he mutes us)   4 months ago

    Crossed the US-Canadian border many times with a cell phone and a laptop and have never been asked about them by either set of customs agents. Had the Canadian one stamp my passport at Emerson once, but that’s pretty much it.

    1. Eeyore   4 months ago

      For me leaving the country has always been trivial. Coming back home - while technically not a problem - has always been a hassle with way too many steps and delays.

      They should have never allowed fast pass or global entry. I feel like they are incentivized to suck.

  11. Think It Through   4 months ago

    Supposedly, less than 0.01 percent of travelers legally entering the U.S. suffer device searches.

    How do you leave out pertinent information? The link says "during FY 2024." The current panic among the left is that this has entirely changed during the Trump Administration.

  12. AT   4 months ago

    especially if you have a relatively high profile in business, political activism, or journalism.

    It really gnaws at you to not be in that club, doesn't it JD.

    If traveling with your usual devices, "remove any apps, files, chat histories, browsing histories, and sensitive contacts you would not want exposed during a search."

    What sane person would have ANY of that on their cell phone in the first place?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Minnesota Cop Who Fabricated a Sex-Trafficking Ring Won't Be Held Accountable

Billy Binion | From the November 2025 issue

The Government Shutdown Isn't Stopping Trump From Amassing 'Emergency' Powers

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the December 2025 issue

Maybe AI Therapists Will Suck. That Doesn't Mean We Should Ban Them.

Emma Camp | From the November 2025 issue

Vaccine Skeptics Said That COVID Shots Would Cause Mass Death. We're Still Here.

Ronald Bailey | 10.24.2025 5:05 PM

Michigan Mom Fights School District Rule That Says 7-Year-Old Can't Walk 3 Minutes Home From the Bus Stop

Lenore Skenazy | 10.24.2025 4:25 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300