Police Target Dozens of Reporters During L.A. Anti-ICE Protests
Press freedom groups say they're alarmed by the dozens of clearly identified cases of reporters being targeted by police during the protests.

Dozens of journalists have been assaulted and injured by federal and local law enforcement in Los Angeles during protests earlier this week against Donald Trump's mass deportation program.
Press freedom groups are demanding that law enforcement stop targeting reporters covering the L.A. protests after on-air news broadcasts and cellphone video showed federal, state, and local police firing indiscriminately on crowds with pepper balls, rubber bullets, and other so-called less-than-lethal ammunition, while in other cases officers are seen firing on clearly identified members of the press.
A coalition of 28 groups including the Los Angeles Press Club, the Committee to Protect Journalists, and the American Civil Liberties Union, sent a letter to Department Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Monday "to express alarm" over the incidents and urge Noem to ensure that federal law enforcement officers uphold the First Amendment.
According to the groups, there were at least 24 documented instances of journalists being targeted by law enforcement while covering Los Angeles protests between June 6 and June 8.
"A number of reports suggest that federal officers have indiscriminately used force or deployed munitions such as tear gas or pepper balls that caused significant injuries to journalists," the letter said. "In some cases, federal officers appear to have deliberately targeted journalists who were doing nothing more than their job covering the news."
Besides the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of the press, reporters in California are also protected by a state statute that allows them access to areas closed or blocked off by police responding to protests and prohibits any efforts to obstruct them.
Nevertheless, police shot and injured multiple journalists with "less-than-lethal" munitions, physically impeded them from staying in areas they were legally allowed to cover, and threatened them for trying to assert their rights.
Australian TV reporter Lauren Tomasi was live on the air when police shot her with a rubber bullet.
U.S. Correspondent Lauren Tomasi has been caught in the crossfire as the LAPD fired rubber bullets at protesters in the heart of Los Angeles. #9News
LATEST: https://t.co/l5w7JxixxB pic.twitter.com/nvQ7m9TGLj
— 9News Australia (@9NewsAUS) June 9, 2025
That same day, a California Highway Patrol officer shot New York Post photographer Toby Canham in the head with a rubber bullet. The New York Post reported that Canham was "standing just off the 101 Freeway at an elevated level, was filming video of the chaos between cops and rioters when a California Highway Patrol (CHP) officer suddenly turned his weapon toward him and fired from about 100 yards away."
"When I got whacked, to my best recollection it was just me filming with my cameras on and then I got shot," Canham said. "Where I was hit, I was the only person overlooking the freeway. I wasn't surrounded so I was an easy target."
"It's a real shame," Canham continued. "I completely understand being in the position where you could get injured, but at the same time, there was no justification for even aiming the rifle at me and pulling the trigger, so I'm a bit pissed off about that, to be honest."
HuffPost reported that freelance news photographer Nick Stern was hospitalized after being shot in the leg with a 3-inch projectile that had to be surgically removed. Stern said he believed the device was supposed to be fired above a crowd, not at it.
"Why this device was shot at human, kind of, waist high level, I do not know," Stern told HuffPost. "The people around me at that time was [sic] doing nothing more than waving Mexican flags."
Other video shows police firing on a Univision television crew, shoving NBC LA reporters,
The Southern California News Group's Ryanne Mena also posted photos of bruising from where she was struck by police pepper balls.
Homeland Security agents shot me and other journalists with pepper ball bullets yesterday in Los Angeles pic.twitter.com/2JX28M69QO
— @ryannemena.bsky.social (@ryannemena) June 7, 2025
CNN's Jason Carroll was also detained by police while reporting in Los Angeles.
"Based on these incidents, it is apparent that LAPD and LASD officers are failing to meet their obligation to respect journalists' rights, protected by both the First Amendment and California statute, to gather and report news at protests—including after they're broken up by police," a coalition of press freedom groups wrote this week in a separate letter to the Los Angeles chief of police and Los Angeles County sheriff.
The repression of media during protests is one of the hallmarks of lawless authoritarianism. It cuts off the flow of nongovernment information during unrest and chills the right of everyone to hold the government accountable. It should be condemned by leaders and investigated by agencies, and the individual officers should be held accountable.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Oh yeah? Well what about Ashli Babbitt, huh? You never complained when she was murdered in cold blood you hypocrite. That means you have no right to criticize the police and makes everything they do ok.
Dumb and boring. Do you not have even the tiniest spark of creativity in you?
No, he drowned his creativity in Colt 45 a long time ago.
Sarcs real thoughts on babbit...
I back the blue when they’re right. In this case, as you very well know, the cop didn’t know she was unarmed and from his vantage point he couldn’t see the crowd. He just saw someone crawling through a smashed barricade while hearing chaos on the police radio. So based upon what he knew based upon what he could see and hear, he did what he thought was right.
Ashli Babbitt was a traitor and got what she deserved.
So, should you be shot for “trespassing” on public property?
Just like they are in LA?
MG is a slimy pile of lying lefty shit who has not yet gotten what s/he deserves.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
Those who simp for illegals are traitors and I hope they get what they deserve.
At least dr retard is honest about their fascist bias. Sarc is way worse with his pretend morality.
Gross. Calling an air force vet a traitor let's us all what special kind of turd you are.
Just remember not to cry when you're forced to play by your own rules.
"Your lack of empathy proves this is fascism."
Autism is fascist now? Fuck me, hispanic chicks are as mean as ever.
at least she did the outfit right. they found one chick who did the outfit right.
Yeah, give me 3 minutes with her and I’ll fix her.
Thanks. I was struggling with "Your of proves this is LACK EMPATHY FASCISM".
Perhaps the press could consider not putting themselves in the position of human shields for rioters?
thank you for standing in and reporting on the riots, but nobody weeps for the press it's your fucking job ... you could write the roundup instead
I get the distinct impression that if the press had tried just a little bit harder to keep up, physically and mentally, with our spry, 80 yr. old former President who had cancer, they wouldn't have as much trouble dodging pepperballs and bean bags now.
several times a week lately I've questioned wasting my time at this site arguing with a blonde chick and a handful of retard authors reminiscent of polysci undergrad decades ago ... but then I remember the comment section is totes the hook
When I want to know what people are saying on BlueSky, I go to twitter.
@ryannemena.bsky.social
@ryannemena
Homeland Security agents shot me and other journalists with pepper ball bullets yesterday in Los Angeles
I could spend minutes watching Christian National Socialists and communist dupes beating each other up like a Three Stooges rerun. But... this is news?
Not sorry; you ain't nothing special.
Just be thankful you are not in the south during the sixties. I remember dogs and water cannon were a lot more effective at crowd control than cops not being sent at all.
"A number of reports suggest that federal officers have indiscriminately used force or deployed munitions such as tear gas or pepper balls that caused significant injuries to journalists,"
Suggest...
I've seen a couple videos where reporters were shot with LTL rounds. Each were in the thick of the rioting.
So the National Guard is too heavy-handed, and the LAPD is too.
I see what is going on here.
see the new Spaceballs trailer yet?
Hopefully, between his "own" film and Oct. 7th, the flotsam and jetsam have been cast overboard since the HOTW pt. II mess on Hulu.
Pullman and Moranis are attached
Right, but Hulu isn't telling him what to make, right? My memory of Keke Palmer's apocryphal monologue/lecture from "Nope" makes me less than enthused.
The Search for More Money.
the mere scroll is fucking hilarious I about fell out of my chair
Hell yes, I'm so there!
I remember during the BLM riots how they passed out or slapped badges on agitators claiming to be reporters.
I also remember when libertarians understood there aren't excess rights for reporters.
The the agitators also atatck reporters not aligned to their causes.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/07/02/antifa-members-have-repeatedly-attacked-journalists-who-cover-them
So... are they reporters or agitators?
Or how reason had no care about Andy Ngo getting assaulted.
https://www.newsweek.com/conservative-journalist-gets-300000-after-antifa-assault-protest-1821760
Mixed messaging, buddy.
I haven't seen the videos you're referring to, but it's kinda hard to fire paint ball guns accurately at a crowd of people all milling about and dodging and weaving. Unless those "clearly identified members of the press" are by themselves away from the crowds, I don't see how you can claim they were being deliberately targeted; and if they are in the midst of those crowds, then (a) why? and (b) what do they expect?
The Australian lady seemed pretty apart from the mob. I don't doubt that some (perhaps many) of the cops are trigger happy dicks. But I'd question an assertion that many are specifically targeting reporters.
Thanks. I try to avoid mainstream media reports. I'd rather not know what they say than have to try to factor out their bias.
The Australian lady seemed pretty apart from the mob.
She also appeared to take it in the calf/ankle and said "I'm okay." Fairly standard hazard job hazard pay all the way around I'd say. If cop got hit in the leg with a projectile and they all started with "Cops are being specifically targeted!" I think most of us would say they were full of shit too.
I haven't seen anything from the Australian reporter apart from their own footage which only shows what is in front of them.
Off Camera: You okay?
Lauren Tomasi: Yeah, I'm good. [nervous giggle] I'm good.
Sounds "mostly peaceful" to me. If you're gonna pull the tiger's tail, you better be prepared to deal with the teeth.
How is one 'clearly identified as the press' when there is no such special category of citizen? We are all the press.
Something Reason fights for in other circumstances. Now they want the press to be a special category.
Also, what if the Press is helping in the riots? Light a fuse, throw a rock, duck inside, come back out with a camera and it's all 'I'm just reporting on events officer'?
Hamas has been doing this and Reason got caught buying their shit.
Can you imagine the outrage from Trump defenders if a Fox News reporter was shot at by the police? Yeah, they'd go nuts.
No, Strawcasmic, most wouldn’t.
Poor sarcbot.
What's your response to them being attacked by your peaceful protesters?
https://video.foxnews.com/v/1082739704001/
https://video.foxnews.com/v/4200671032001
Or Biden and Garland issuing arrest warrants against them to monitor them?
But as for your actual example... it happened... no false outrage.
https://www.adweek.com/tvspy/fox-philadelphia-reporter-hit-with-pellets-during-live-shot/
So next strawman?
Oh. And your favorite BLM protestors.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/fox-news-reporter-attacked-chased-from-demonstration/2020/05/30/d3e7c31c-a2df-11ea-be06-af5514ee0385_story.html
It's not a special category, you are right about that. "The press" doesn't and has never meant only professional jouralists/reporters. But we aren't all "the press", except when we are publishing something. And someone with a press pass isn't the press just because they are wearing their credential. I suppose in the cell phone age, that just about anyone could be the press at any time.
Reason got caught buying Hamas' shit wholesale October 8, 2023
October 8, 2023 - currently.
indeed. the ghost of Dave Smith rides
Journalists don't get extra rights. This doesn't support the contention that they were targeted. If history is any guide, these journalists were participating in the protests/riots and refused to get out of the way. I have no sympathy for them catching strays.
Journalists get shot with nonlethal rounds by cops (possibly wearing body cam) in a riot
"Obviously the cops targeted journalists because they hate free press"
Pro illegal immigration activist throw bricks and fireworks at cops
"Most illegal immigrants commit less crime than natives, chill"
The Biden admin had a mole at Reason magazine. They knew they would earn the ire of writers here if they suppressed the press directly, so they gently pressured social media platforms to remove honest reporting like the Hunter Biden laptop. And Reason would say "Hey, it's private Bizinezz" and lampoon republicans for being targeted.
Antifa assaults the press AND riots in cities. No they're not a threat to free press, because they're not government. Even if the government does nothing to stop them, they're not a threat to free press. Got it?
Indiscriminately sending non lethal weapons into crowds of rioters is antithesis of targeting. Why is every article a wishy washy flippy floppy contradiction within itself?
Just wait until you read the article about the "reasonable expectation of privacy" argument against the arrest of illegal immigrants.
Why should I give a shit about Marxist propagandists that hate me? Come back when they're firing .50 calibre rounds into the crowd or you find some semblance of honesty and objectivity for your reporting instead of hackery.
Trump's failure to follow the law results in predictable fashion.
https://reason.com/volokh/2025/06/13/federal-court-rightly-invalidates-trumps-illegal-federalization-of-california-national-guard-troops/?comments=true#comments
That will be overruled by a court that knows the constitution.
Guess what? They’ve already been overturned.
They're not reporters when they go to places like this.
They're war correspondents.
And that job comes with a significant assumption of risk. From the enemy, and sometimes from friendly fire - especially when the friendly's can't discern whether the war correspondent is friend or foe or when the correspondent has placed themselves in an unavoidable path of harm between their engaging the enemy.
They are there to tell the story, inform the world, get the message out. They do this at great personal risk to themselves. They do this with a noble acceptance of the potential sacrifice in their crusade for Truth.
Yea, but that's not what we're talking about, are we. CJ, that faggot, equates that nobility with these jOurNaLiSt's whiny entitlement and mild bruising. Hence why every one of them isn't making it about the war - they're making it about themselves.
Theater kids gon' theater kid.
Police in a riot and soldiers in a firefight must have perfect knowledge of who they are firing at and never make an error. If a journalist ever gets hit, then it is obvious they are being targeted because they are press.
Google: Michael Kelly, Terry Lloyd, and Marie Colvin.
It happens.
They are not "obviously" being targeted, you moron.
The reporters should stand in front of the police instead in front of the demonstrators. That way they will not risk being shot with rubber bullets, only being hit by rocks, Molotov cocktails, and fireworks.
“…when a California Highway Patrol (CHP) officer suddenly turned his weapon toward him and fired from about 100 yards away."
Pretty impressive accuracy for a rubber bullet.
Police.
That's what needs to be stressed here. Police.
Under the control of the mayor.
And state police--under the control of the governor.
That's who's shooting reporters.
Reason tries, desperately, to include the feds with vague 'tear gas' inconveniencing reporters stories --but it's Karen and Gavin's cops that are firing the rubber bullets AT journalists.
(Emphasis added.)
I call bullshit. Either the the journo is lying to demonize the police or he was struck by a stray round.
* Average cops aren't known for being particularly good marksmen.
* Unless they are using rifles and taking particular aim, their weapons aren't that accurate to 100 yards.
* Rubber and less-than-lethal bullets aren't ballistic profiles aren't particularly accurate either.
Regardless, stand around in an active shooting zone, expect to be in the line of fire. Sounds like FAFO.