Trump Promised To 'Save Vaping.' His FDA Head Does Not Seem Inclined To Do That.
Marty Makary grossly exaggerates the prevalence of adolescent nicotine addiction, the concern underlying his agency's restrictions on e-cigarette flavors.

During his 2024 campaign, President Donald Trump bragged that he "saved flavored vaping" during his first term and promised that he would "save vaping again." That promise was significant in light of the de facto ban that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had imposed on vaping products in flavors other than tobacco and menthol—a policy that rejects the varieties that former smokers overwhelmingly prefer. But recent comments by Marty Makary, the Trump-appointed FDA adminstrator, cast doubt on whether he is committed to following through on the president's commitment.
Testifying before a Senate appropriations committee last week, Makary hyped the threat posed by underage vaping, which is the rationale for the FDA's flavor restrictions. In comments he highlighted on his official X account, Makary averred that "there are high schools in America now where kids are saying half of the kids in high school are addicted to these vaping products." Whatever those students might be saying, that statement is hard to reconcile with the latest results from the National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS), which is conducted each year by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
In the 2024 NYTS, 7.8 percent of high school students reported that they had used e-cigarettes during the previous 30 days. Yet Makary implied that 50 percent of students at certain high schools are "addicted to these vaping products," which is more than six times the nationwide prevalence of past-month use in the 2024 NYTS and about 22 times the rate of daily use (assuming 30 percent of past-month users were daily users, as in the 2023 survey).
Contrary to the impression that Makary left, underage vaping has fallen sharply in recent years. The prevalence of past-month use among high school students last year was down from 10 percent in 2023 and about 72 percent lower than the peak of 27.5 percent recorded in 2019.
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D–N.H.), who pressed Makary to explain what the FDA is doing to curtail e-cigarette use by teenagers, dishonestly obscured that dramatic decrease in underage vaping. "One of the things that I've been concerned about for a very long time is the increased use of vaping by young people," she said. "The numbers have gone up dramatically in the last 10 years."
That is not true: According to the NYTS, the prevalence of past-month e-cigarette use among high school students last year was less than half the rate recorded in 2015. Yet that whopper paled beside the one that Shaheen told in January 2024. "We've all seen the statistic that teenage e-cigarette consumption has increased by 1,800% in just the last year," she said.
That figure actually refers to the increase in past-month use between 2011 and 2019. The 2023 number was already down 64 percent from that peak, and the rate fell again in 2024. Yet last year Shaheen insisted that "e-cigarettes continue to be an epidemic among our youth."
Far from correcting the record, Makary echoed Shaheen's alarm. "There are kids in America today who are addicted, they know they're addicted, they come from good families, they're good kids, and they can't stop," he said. "And that is something that we have to address."
Makary bragged about the FDA's seizures of illegal, Chinese-made vaping products that "are designed to get kids addicted." In the past, he said, the FDA had blocked imports of those products at one port but failed to confiscate them, with the result that they would enter the country at another port.
"It's been a joke, and they've been laughing at us," Makary told Shaheen. "And so we are going to stop that….We've got to get serious about them."
Whatever the merits of seizing those particular products, it is notable that adolescent vaping dropped sharply during the same period when Makary says the FDA was falling down on the job. But Makary did not have to address that puzzle because he did not even acknowledge the downward trend. To the contrary, Makary implied that underage addiction to vaping products is rampant, offering an estimate that is blatantly at odds with the government's own numbers.
Shaheen, a longtime critic of the vaping industry, was visibly pleased by Makary's attitude. "I agree," she said. "I think we should right-out ban vaping products—for anybody under a certain age, certainly." Since the federal government already prohibits e-cigarette sales to anyone younger than 21, Shaheen must have in mind a more ambitious form of prohibition. Yet Makary said nothing about the right of adults to purchase these products.
Nor did Makary object when Shaheen dismissed the enormous harm-reducing potential of vaping products. "One of the other selling points that they use is [that] it's a way to get cigarette users to stop smoking," Shaheen said. "They can vape, and the harmful impacts are not as serious." Although she implied that "selling point" was fraudulent, the FDA itself has repeatedly acknowledged the evidence that vaping is a much less dangerous form of nicotine consumption than smoking.
Despite that concession, the FDA during the Biden administration refused to approve vaping products in the flavors that are most popular among former smokers—a policy that the Supreme Court greenlighted last month, when it rejected a challenge to those denials. That decision put the ball back in the FDA's court.
If the FDA reconsiders its flavor ban, as Trump said it would, manufacturers of vaping products will be free to supply the e-liquids that adult consumers demonstrably want. But Makary's gross hyperbole about the prevalence of adolescent nicotine addiction suggests he is not inclined to do that.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I just taught a class on this issue to medical students earlier this month. The truth is that there isn't a lot of good evidence as to whether vaping is a good harm reduction measure or not. The students were assigned a project to come up with a research plan to investigate this. RFK Jr. wants to research stuff that is settled science (sorry, but vaccines DO NOT cause autism), but where is the research for this issue?
I just taught a class on this issue to medical students earlier this month.
LOL
He's a Harvard graduate and an expert on all things. He's also a lawyer but under a different username.
Also a political consultant. The act Blue script gave him .any hats to wear.
Welcome to the company of educated men.
The republicans are toast.
Ok dummy.
You mean act blue frauds as evidenced by your actual arguments.
It is always amusing how you all use false credentials to make an argument instead of logic and information.
Was he ‘Bo Cara Esquire’?
No you didn't.
I guess liberty just doesn't enter into the equation.
More testing needed!
I believe there is an age restriction on vape products and of course cigarettes just as there is for alcohol.
I don't see bans on different flavors of alcohol...
Who needs flavors? - sarc
JS;dr.
Why do they call it vaping when it's more accurately captured as douchebagging?
I mean, I could understand if the products were just literally something you suck in and exhale discreetly. Tell you what - how about you just ban the vegetable glycerin and low-resistance coils from them - you know, the douche bag-causing effects - and we'll measure the social reaction to the practice.
Bet you $20 most people wouldn't even notice. It's funny how much more willing people are to leave you alone and, no pun intended, to your devices when you're not being a total douche bag about what you're doing.
Well, then you probably have no frame of reference for that, do you Jake.
What's douchebagging? Are actual bags of douche problematic too?
No, they're understood and accepted for what they are. Necessity demands.
It's the intentional, brazen, in-your-face, behavioral douchebaggery that's objected to. It's like masturbating in public. Just... don't do that. I mean, come on. The f is wrong with you.
I don't see vapers as particularly like that. Where are you seeing them act douchey? Or baggy?
Are they vaping for their sake, or for the display that they're putting on? Buncha douchebag peacocks.
Like I said - let's give it a try and just take the vegetable glycerin and low-resistance coils out of the equation. See who's still interested in doing it and who stops giving a rip whether anyone does.
What display?
Don't be dense.
AT in his typical douchebag way of complaining about people who are doing things he doesn't like but doesn't really affect him (or don't get down and suck the dick of every cop that they come across, like he does), is referring to the very small segment of people who buy fancy vaping devices and mess with the liquid and the devices themselves to create huge visible clouds of vapor.
As usual, we can ignore one of our resident bootlickers.
Trump is a lying sack of shit. Anyone who believes him is a willing fool.
Poor Molly.
Molly is Tony.
Funny you are still regurgitating talking points of those proven to be liars and yet are fine with it.
Hey, hey! Molly is at least smart enough to not believe herself.
I wouldn’t call Trump a liar. I think that, in the moment, he believes what he says.
Lying is being intentionally dishonest. (Like my fan club. It is weird having strangers name themselves after me and have entire conversations about me.)
Trump repeats lies, but he believes them when he says them. So he could easily pass a lie detector while he makes contradictory statements.
That's not why they're following him.
They're following him because they know they Democrats - and in particular their media vassals - are lying even more, provably and brazenly so, and without apology.
Joe Biden's mental fitness is a perfect example. I knew. You knew. EVERYONE knew. But the Democrat Party and their media vassals claim they were "fooled". Hoodwinked by the White House! Played for suckers.
Yea. Right.
And Donald Trump is the only one with a meaningful voice calling BS on that. And on every other piece of BS that comes out of all their collective - literally collective - mouths.
It's why he's subverting them, and talking to The People directly. Now, yea, maybe he's lying - but people are flocking to him because a "maybe lying" (puffery, exaggeration, and dramatizing is more accurate) is 1000% better than the "definitely straight lying to your face" that the Democrat/Media has proven about themselves in their words and deeds.
And for some extra salt in the wound, JD Vance is going to be the next President. Because not only does he not lie to you, he doesn't sugarcoat the truth either.
Americans know which way the scale tips between Trump/Vance and Democrats/Media when it comes to lying to our faces. The only reason you're upset is because you're a terrible human being who craves the lies.
Those leftist lies are what you built your life - if not your entire identity - around, and having them challenged is something you'll deny reality to fight against.
Same reason it's so hard to deprogram cultists. Their reality IS a lie. Pointing that out forces them to lose their imaginary grip on reality, and it terrifies them.
Most people here mock you to your face, Molly. I've even done it occasionally. Truth is, you don't understand and you don't want to. And you come to a place like "Reason" with that in your head.
I pity you.
You are correct. And this is why we ultimately have to get rid of these people. They are a social cancer. They will never stop, no matter what. So they must be dealt with.
Elections and the courts aren’t enough, and often fail us, thanks to their cancerous corruption.
THe fact is that the "clean food" wankers are just rebadged bullshit from the Progressive era, which are now part of the Republican coalition due to political coincidence.
Gov-Gun-Gods who think pointing guns at you will save you from yourselves by destroying your Individual Liberty...
It's power-madness run-amuck. It is now a religious pursuit to stop vaping in HS. Not even a mention towards any health consequence is being discussed anymore; of which can certainly be done w/o point Gov-Guns at the people.
Just more consequences of allowing an ILLEGAL [Na]tional So[zi]alist Health Empire to grow within the USA.
But you're too much of a cultist hypocrite to note that it's a Trump pick who's grossly overstating the case, and the CDC - horrors! - who're providing the evidence against his position.
paraphrased, "Why won't you hate Trump!!!" /s
Maybe because it was Trumps statement to, ""save vaping again."
Why does everything anyone does or say have to be all Trumps fault?
Just to join the TDS gangsters for apparently no good reason than joining a cult?
There is apparently a growing group of people who are pushing the idea that vaping is worse for health than smoking tobacco, as tobacco is "natural" and not artificially produced chemical.
There are negative health effects associated with inhaling products of combustion, regardless of what it is that's combusting.