Are the News Media in Their Onion Era?
The lessons "America's Finest News Source" could offer the rest of the press.

Long before it became a pejorative to describe claims you don't like, "fake news" was a comedy genre. Its flagship for years was The Onion, a satirical weekly newspaper founded in 1988 that grew to become a cultural institution.
Calling itself "America's Finest News Source," The Onion published realistic-looking news reports with facts either skewed or invented for satirical effect. Many of these articles were "stories where people are seemingly talking to reporters where there's no rationale for a reporter to be there," as James daSilva, who maintains a Substack newsletter devoted to the publication, put it in 2013. This became The Onion's signature "area man" template, as in "Area Man Always Nostalgic For Four Years Ago," "Unattractive Man Just Like A Brother To Area Woman," or "Area Cockroach Fucking Huge." As with much good comedy, decorum and good taste were not required. A case in point: "Ugly Girl Killed: Nation Unshaken By Not-So-Tragic Death."
That acerbic wit also targeted public figures. In January 2013, when a prepresidential Donald Trump was spreading unfounded rumors about then-President Barack Obama's birthplace, The Onion ran an op-ed purportedly written by Trump, titled "When You're Feeling Low, Just Remember I'll Be Dead In About 15 Or 20 Years." (The piece prompted Trump's attorney to threaten a defamation suit.) The Onion used its signature tone to address national tragedies, too. Its first issue after September 11 ran a surprisingly moving tale about trying to feel helpful in the face of sorrow, headlined "Not Knowing What Else To Do, Woman Bakes American-Flag Cake."
The paper was a success, expanding in just over a decade from a two-man college paper to an operation with 50 full-time employees and a print circulation of over 200,000. By 2006, its website received 4 million unique visitors per month. It later branched out into audio and video production, gaining significant video traffic when YouTube was still a novelty. It spawned spinoff sites, such as ClickHole, which satirizes traffic-chasing outlets like BuzzFeed and Upworthy.
With popularity came influence. After Jon Stewart took over The Daily Show in 1999, he hired a former Onion editor as head writer; they turned Comedy Central's nightly broadcast into a pop-culture juggernaut that simultaneously covered current events and satirized TV news shows, earning Stewart the honorific "the most trusted name in fake news." Many articles from The Onion and its spinoffs have become memes: When a public figure expresses an uncharacteristically salient thought, for example, you should expect to see people sharing the headline"Heartbreaking: The Worst Person You Know Just Made A Great Point"—or just the instantly recognizable photo that ClickHole ran with the story. The Onion's "Drugs Win Drug War" headline became so iconic that they sell it as a T-shirt.
But as traditional media outlets struggled and died, The Onion also saw its share of ups and downs: layoffs, restructuring, and acquisitions. The paper famous for satirizing the media experienced the same trajectory as those it was lampooning.
Yet unlike many legacy outlets, The Onion today appears to be thriving: After being sold for parts and shuffled between private equity balance sheets, it was purchased in April 2024 by fans keen to restore the paper to its former glory. The new owners are bullish on the publication's future, even as they face a landscape that has grown largely indifferent to media outlets. Could America's leading outlet of explicitly fake news offer a vision of the American news media's future?
***
The Onion began in a dorm room in August 1988, the creation of two students at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. The following year, they sold the paper for less than $20,000. One of the buyers, Scott Dikkers—a cartoonist who had been one of its first hires—became the editor in chief, a role he says he was more or less performing already.
At the time, The Onion was printed weekly in black and white, and distributed for free around campus. All revenue came from ad sales, and early cover pages had restaurant coupons printed along the bottom. The format was a "hodgepodge" of styles, Dikkers says: "We were parodying the Weekly World News, The Sun, those funny grocery store tabloids." There were also cartoons and satirical contests; its most popular recurring feature was "Drunk of the Week," in which staffers would find a well-lubricated patron in a Madison bar on Friday night and take their picture with a plaque to "celebrate" the achievement.
"We didn't have design guidelines—we didn't have a consistent headline font or anything," Dikkers recalls. "It didn't look like a newspaper. It looked like a wacky college humor publication."
But Dikkers hoped to turn The Onion into more than just a college paper. In 1995, he spearheaded a complete creative overhaul: Gone was the chaotically shifting style, replaced by a consistent aesthetic that resembled a real newspaper. The covers would print in color, mimicking full-color, image-heavy broadsheets like USA Today, and the articles would employ a dry, newsy writing style akin to the Associated Press.
The new tone would become another Onion signature. "A part of the humor is in the tension between what is being said and how it's being said," then–Managing Editor Robert Siegel, who developed the new writing style, told the Los Angeles Times in 1999. "If you take something you wouldn't normally read in a newspaper, and write it in that hack, deadpan AP style without ever winking, there's a comedic tension, a juxtaposition at work that makes it funny."
Owing to this dry delivery, articles were sometimes mistaken for fact—perhaps the greatest compliment a satirist can receive. In May 2002, The Onion published "Congress Threatens To Leave D.C. Unless New Capitol Is Built," lampooning professional sports teams that threaten to relocate unless taxpayers build them a new stadium; the story included a cartoon diagram of a new Capitol building with a retractable stadium roof. Days later, the Beijing Evening News translated and reposted the story as fact, even using the same image. In 2011, The Onion published "Planned Parenthood Opens $8 Billion Abortionplex," about a fictitious Kansas facility that "will allow the organization to terminate unborn lives with an efficiency never before thought possible." Then-Rep. John Fleming (R–La.) shared the article on Facebook, bemoaning "abortion by the wholesale."
The professionalized Onion proved successful, with wide national appeal. While the paper remained free, it opened distribution offices in major cities across North America. It also sent copies and free subscriptions to Hollywood talent agencies; Dikkers reports that one recipient, the comedy musician "Weird Al" Yankovic, "really liked it and he told all his friends," providing some early cultural cachet.
The American newspaper industry was also booming. In 1997, just two years after The Onion took a swipe at USA Today by aping its layout, USA Today's parent company Gannett enjoyed a 26.6 percent pretax profit margin; as a whole, publicly traded newspaper companies averaged nearly 20 percent margins that year, while U.S. manufacturing averaged 7.6 percent margins.
In those days, newspapers had long been considered a safe investment. After World War II, with the advent of television, many smaller local newspapers closed or merged with a competing paper, but the publications that survived typically thrived, with annual profit margins between 20 percent and 40 percent. Papers had subscribers, but income was mostly driven by advertising; at the peak in 2005, newspaper ads netted $49 billion, making up 82 percent of papers' total revenue.
Modern readers may find it hard to believe, but at the time, newspapers were a cash cow. The early days of the internet only supercharged the trend.
***
In 1996, with a weekly print circulation of 100,000, The Onion went online—mostly to defend its intellectual property. Even with the mass internet in its infancy, Onion articles went viral as early web users shared funny headlines across email chains and Usenet forums, without attribution. (One particularly popular example, written amid war in the Yugoslav region: "Clinton Deploys Vowels To Bosnia: Cities of Sjlbvdnzv, Grzny To Be First Recipients.")
The Onion was a natural fit for the internet "just by the nature of a news story's inverted-pyramid structure," Wired's Mike Tanner wrote in 1997. "Surfers can enjoy the site as a list of unlikely headlines, get the kernel of the joke in a story's lead, or read as deeply into a piece as they have an inclination for." The Onion was creating content perfect for social media, a decade before Facebook or Twitter went live.
Take, for example, the November 2008 Onion article, "26-Year-Old To See Every Asshole He Ever Went To High School With On Night Before Thanksgiving." The headline on its own is funny and relatable, but reading on yields further gems: "For the fifth straight year," the article begins, employing a "NEW YORK" dateline for a further air of authenticity, "Jordan McCabe will return home for the holidays and spend the night before Thanksgiving running into every smug and unlikable asshole he ever went to high school with, the 26-year-old reported Monday." Readers who stay to the end are rewarded with a delightful capper: "Several Marshall High School alumni have expressed similar misgivings about running into former classmates on the night before Thanksgiving. 'I can't believe McCabe is coming back,' said local resident Ricky Cook. 'That guy's such a fuckin' asshole.'"
The Onion thrived online. By 2001, five years after the website launched, it logged more than 750,000 unique monthly visitors. Meanwhile, print circulation doubled.
That same year, The Onion moved from Madison to Manhattan's Chelsea neighborhood, in what The New York Times called "part of a plan to expand from simply a humor newspaper into a full production company." It moved again in 2005, to what the Times called "an airy new space in SoHo." New offices brought new studio space, enabling expansion into both audio and video. The paper started Onion Radio News, a minutelong daily radio segment that topped download charts the week it premiered on podcast platforms.
In 2007, just months after Google acquired YouTube and with streaming video in its infancy, the paper launched the Onion News Network site, featuring short videos spoofing cable news. Within 18 months, it received more than 5 million monthly video views. At the beginning of 2011, two Onion-helmed shows premiered on cable TV: a half-hour Onion News Network on IFC, and the SportsCenter parody Onion SportsDome on Comedy Central.
It was a banner time for digital media. Vice had started in 1994 as a free Montreal punk magazine; by the end of 2009, it was a burgeoning Brooklyn media empire. Amid nine-figure investments from such companies as Disney and News Corp, Vice Media would continue to expand, launching a news division and a cable network, and winning multiple Emmy and Peabody Awards for its TV documentaries. It also significantly grew its real estate footprint, in the process displacing several beloved Brooklyn music venues by taking over their building (and in the process netting an estimated $6.5 million in state incentives).
The gossip site Gawker operated out of its owner's Manhattan loft before moving to a SoHo walk-up in 2008, then a three-floor office space on Fifth Avenue in 2014—all on the basis of ad revenue, driven by tens of millions of monthly page views across both its flagship site and numerous spinoffs. BuzzFeed launched in 2006 as a dedicated aggregator of viral trends before later expanding its remit with BuzzFeed News, a full-fledged newsroom that won a Pulitzer and was a finalist for three others. In 2014, Vice Media reported annual advertising revenues of $175 million, while Pew Research estimated BuzzFeed's at $60 million and Gawker Media's at $15 million to $20 million. That same year, the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz valued BuzzFeed at $850 million.
There seemed to be no better time to be a digital media outlet. But as they would soon find out, success can't last forever.
***
In September 2011, after a decade in New York, The Onion announced its newsroom would move once again, this time to Chicago. Then-COO Mike McAvoy told The Atlantic this was a cost-saving measure: The corporate office was already located there, and besides, Illinois offered a film production tax incentive that would apply to web videos. But Onion features editor Joe Garden told The Huffington Post the staff was "a little bit blindsided" by the news. Of the paper's 16 full-time writers and editors, only five made the move. During the relocation process, after just a year on the air, IFC canceled Onion News Network. Comedy Central had canceled Onion SportsDome the previous year after airing only 10 episodes.
In Chicago, The Onion refocused its efforts as a digital-first publication. "Everything about the Onion is bigger and faster than it was a year ago" and it "publishes twice as much content," wrote Slate's Farhad Manjoo. At the same time, Manjoo noted that—like Stewart's The Daily Show—the paper was becoming "a little scoldy, oversmart, and lacking much nuance. In an attempt to make a viral joke, the new Onion often makes an easy one."
In 2013, The Onion solidified its digital-first status by ending its free printed paper. The distribution network had already shrunk to just three major cities, from nearly two dozen at its height. ("Sources close to print, the method of applying ink to paper in order to convey information to a mass audience, have confirmed that the declining medium passed away early Thursday morning," the paper "reported" earlier that year. "The influential means of communication was 1,803.")
Discontinuing the print edition "will make little difference to the bottom line," Lynne Marek of Crain's Chicago Business wrote at the time: The publication was increasingly focused on "content production, including video, for the Web," including partnerships with established brands to develop advertising campaigns. But this proved short-lived: In October 2015, amid layoffs, The Onion announced it was seeking a buyer. "We have less demand" for advertising and branded content, Onion COO Kurt Mueller noted in a staff memo. "There's demand, but we just overestimated what the demand is."
It was a tough time for many digital media companies. In 2023, just six years after achieving a $5.7 billion valuation, Vice Media filed for bankruptcy; it would ultimately accept a buyout from its creditors for $350 million. "Vice had a pitch—we know how to engage young people—but they never found a way to turn that pitch into a business," one media analyst told Press Gazette. BuzzFeed also shuttered its news division in 2023, just two years after winning its Pulitzer; the company had lost 90 percent of its value since going public two years earlier.
***
The Onion then entered a period faced by many news outlets: acquisition. The Spanish-language broadcaster Univision purchased a controlling stake in January 2016; that same year, it snapped up all of Gawker Media's non-Gawker properties in a fire sale, when a nine-figure invasion-of-privacy judgment forced the gossipmonger into bankruptcy. Univision later bundled these holdings into a new media company, which a private equity firm purchased in 2019 and named G/O Media.
Over the next four years, G/O Media shuttered two sites and offloaded several others. Two Onion spinoffs, The A.V. Club and ClickHole, were sold to the publication Paste and the makers of the game Cards Against Humanity, respectively. In January 2024, Digiday reported that G/O Media was looking to sell all its remaining assets—with a particular emphasis on The Onion.
This, too, is a trend affecting corporate media, as large companies gobble up smaller outlets. In the 1980s, many large corporations with no obvious journalistic purview had bought up major media outlets while newspaper conglomerates acquired dozens of smaller local papers. The difference today is profitability. Gone are the days when Gannett could pay $305 million to acquire two Louisville newspapers, secure in the knowledge that the papers had previously averaged 12.6 percent profit margins. Now, digital outlets struggle and legacy newspapers wither. Where Gannett once enjoyed healthy double-digit operating margins, it recorded a $6 million operating loss in the third quarter of 2024. A 2022 report by Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism noted that since 2015, more than a fourth of America's newspapers had closed—and by 2025, that figure was on track to be a third.
The 21st century brought private equity firms into the mix, acquiring struggling news outlets and trying to turn them around to be sold for a profit. A 2023 paper from New York University's Stern School of Business found that "private equity ownership is associated with a lower chance of newspaper closure"; at the same time, the authors found that a local newspaper's acquisition by private equity led to declines in "civic engagement and political participation," "news content about local government," "the absolute amount of local news," and "employment of editors and reporters."
But for The Onion, things suddenly started to look up: The paper was sold again in April 2024 to what G/O Media CEO Jim Spanfeller called "four digital media veterans with a profound love for The Onion and comedy-based content."
The new owners brought back the print edition, though it was now offered by mail to subscribers rather than distributed for free. Executive Editor Jordan LaFlure told The New York Times that he hoped the print edition could appeal to younger readers the same way vinyl records have a niche in an age of streaming music. The Onion took a shot at the Gray Lady in its redebut issue with the article, "'New York Times' To Cease Publication." ("With the struggling newspaper admitting this was the final nail in its coffin, The New York Times announced this week that it would permanently cease publication, saying there was no way it could compete with The Onion's newly relaunched print edition.")
Ben Collins, The Onion's new CEO, says many internet media companies in the 2010s "came into a lot of cash very quickly and just kind of threw it at the wall." He says the new leadership hopes to abandon many of the industry's bad habits, like catering to Facebook algorithms or chasing clicks at the expense of content. He likens The Onion under private equity ownership to a dog in an animal shelter, saying "the dog was done being in the fucking crate."
"The vast majority of their income was from programmatic advertising from those weird chumboxes," Collins says, referring to ads that serve up spam and clickbait. He says the "staff mandate" prior to the acquisition was to prioritize "jokes in slideshows," which require readers to click through multiple pages per article and thereby see multiple ads.
The new guard kept the entire staff and reinvested in projects that had been left to languish, such as video production. They also made more audacious moves: In late 2024, the paper won the rights to conspiracy-monger Alex Jones' Infowars, including all its holdings and trademarks, at a bankruptcy auction. They intend to relaunch Infowars as a parody of conspiracists, though courts have since stalled the sale.
***
For now, the shift seems to be working. People are subscribing to the newspaper, and Collins says the video team is "self-sufficient" from YouTube monetization. On Election Day 2024, he notes, The Onion had "the number one trending video on YouTube…above Beyoncé." The video: an Onion News Network sketch in which an election analyst assesses the state of the race by using a giant cable news–style touchscreen to scrutinize a single Pennsylvania swing voter, drilling down to assess his voting patterns on a cellular level—before finally zooming all the way out "to the edges of our cosmos, where we see ultimately how meaningless this whole race really is, and how insignificant all of our tiny little lives really are."
Could The Onion's newfound success offer any advice for other news outlets and media companies struggling to adapt to the digital world?
"We're obviously an edge case here because we're a stupid fake news website, and that's great," Collins advises. "But don't be afraid of your own shadow….If you're a newspaper that's withstood 150, 200 years of this stuff…it's an amazing feat. Lean into that and lean into the people you've already hired and the people that you're trying to talk to."
Collins advocates a model in which readers and content providers engage more directly with one another. "You're not going to be a mega company monolith," he says. "You're not going to be like MGM in the 1940s, but you're going to be able to make the thing that you want to make. That's what I would say to everybody else, is just, don't you like the product that you work on all day long? Show off that stuff. Be as in love with it as people are with consuming it."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Please not that Hillary was the one who pointed out Obama non US birth place. And I believe Obama said he wasn't born in the US.
And the onion is now a shit leftists rag. Unless they fired everyone there, they will still fail.
Be fair. Like most religious zealots, Onion writers (and other liberals) can't poke fun at their own tribe, and struggle with humor in general.
The Babylon Bee has surprised me many times with poking fun at Republicans and even Trump, and Christians. They still have a righty bias, but it doesn't cloud their judgment on what is worth making fun of as much as the lefty Onion.
100%. The Bee is what the Onion and SNL were in the 90s. Rightish instead of leftish, but biased mostly towards humor. Their Trump jokes are actually funny because they mock all the stupid shit he actually does on camera, not the things lefties claim he's doing in his secret lair. (Except when they mock the left's paranoid mockery of Trump, which is double funny.)
Fuck Nick's stupid Alton Brown rehash. Find the TRIGGERnometry interview with the Babylon Bee head Seth Dillon. The guy is thoughtful, smart and post-partisan. He's also brave. Biden and his Meta-Google goons tried to shut them down over a trans joke, but he refused to retract it.
The left (and Reason) likes to cosplay at being edgy. Amazing that it takes a bunch of evangelist Christians to show what actual edginess looks like.
It’s hard to parody what you don’t even try to understand. And several studies have shown that shit leftists don’t try to understand where anyone else is coming from.
SNL was pretty merciless towards the Clintons………
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_388QadYYg
They absolutely were. Probably not a coincidence that half that cast turned out to be right of center. As opposed to the last 15 years of SNL, when you couldn't even have a host who was right of center without the cast throwing a baby fit.
Their CA couple moves to TX and then back again is gold.
The Onion is in their Babylon Bee era.
I haven't read an Onion article in ages. The Babylon Bee got my attention with three spot-on jibes at Biden in 2020: his first podcast was going to be released as a 45 rpm, he was going to push vote by telegram, and I forget the third.
TFA says the Onion was bought a year ago. I'd think if they'd turned around their lefty bias, I'd have seen people posting links to unbiased actually funny stories by now. Since I haven't, it seems safe to assume they still have that lefty bias.
The guy who is the current CEO of the Onion is "disinformation expert" and former NBC reporter Ben Collins ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Collins_(reporter) ).
He has mentioned that his explicit goal in taking over The Onion was to stop Elon Musk from buying it, and that one of the things he likes about satire as opposed to political journalism is that he doesn't have to engage in any kind of balance.
The best jokes the Onion ever did were the retard jokes, but then they hired a staff of retards and they didn't want to make fun of themselves anymore.
That's the reason The Babylon Bee long ago surpassed The Onion in humor. The Onion is frothing at the mouth anti Trump and it got so bad they nearly went out of business. I don't recall anyone quoting a headline from them anymore but tons quote The Bee.
^THIS!^
It actually annoys me when i see a headline that reads "Not an onion article" as if the Onion stands for anything other than being a mini Stephen Colbert or Jimmy Kimmel blog.
Pravda era.
Not funny to serious people. Maybe to Reason Libertaritards.
We all know you hate the media because they exposed to the world the huge child sex abuse problem your church has.
Children's services, the public schools and little leagues have 1000 times the child sex abuse problem that the Catholics ever had, KAR.
Pretty funny that a goat-worshipping, child castration fetishist like you thinks he can cast stones at the Catholics, though.
If KAR didn’t have his bigotry, he’d have nothing at all.
I’m bigoted against people who choose to believe discredited, bigoted nonsense.
You’re bigoted against people because the color of their skin, or what they do in their own homes.
Not the same thing you stupid fuck.
Roman church sex abuse is well documented. Public schools too. Children’s services and little leagues? Haven’t heard that before.
It’s a huge problem. Luckily there are people out there fighting it. However there are plenty of groups fighting tooth and nail against any reforms or safeguards to protect kids. The church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Roman church are two of the main groups doing everything they can to protect abusers.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/catholic-church-excommunicate-priests-following-wa-law-requiring-child-abuse-confessions-reported
It’s liberals who are trying to pass laws to protect kids, and bible humpers are doing all they can to enable and protect the abusers.
I wonder how many Métis anthropologists there are at college of New Caledonia or UNBC. The American and Canadian public hates pedo enablers. It won’t be hard to find you.
TTTRRRUUUMMMPPPP!
Just don’t make fun of Trump if you know what’s good for you.
Alcohol induced paranoia.
Just don't praise Trump or a certain drunken retarded troll will shitpost the same rant under every article.
And you were the first to bring up Trump here. He really does live totally rent free in your head, Sarc.
Il hoping for an Indian food thread so sarc can tell us the good trick for a Marsala is adding ketchup.
Honey on sauerbraten.
I’ll bet Sarc would use ketchup for Pad Thai.
Just curious: do you feel compelled to post this every day? Is it some kind of religious ritual?
Seems to be for Sarc.
1. Wake up and take a long swig of a Colt 45.
2. To appease his cardboard box gods, make a statement on a comment section about Trump.
3. Take yet another long swig of Colt 45.
4. To further appease his cardboard box gods, say something about how Jesse always lies or some such shit.\
5. Pop open a bottle of Boone's Farm while white knighting Jeffy, Tony, Molly, KAR, or any of the other assholes who oppose his supposed "mean girls".
Why do you find so offensive when I say what you guys would say if you were capable of honesty?
This response doesn't make sense at any level.
You mean honesty makes NO sense to the dishonest?
Twat an udder slurprise!!!
Makes no sense to the sane or unimpaired, anyway.
To YOU, PervFected and Mind-Infected Necrophiliac, benevolence and good will makes NO sense to Ye Servants and Serpents of the Evil One!
If you ever come around to wanting to work on your affliction, EvilBahnFarter-Fuhrer, start here: M. Scott Peck, The People of the Lie, the Hope for Healing Human Evil
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0684848597/reasonmagazinea-20/
People who are evil attack others instead of facing their own failures. Peck demonstrates the havoc these “people of the lie” work in the lives of those around them.
Gibberish.
"Hang Mike Pence" for his honesty, yes!
"Hang Sarcasmic" for his honesty, yes!
"Do-gooder derogation"... Look shit up!
Because it was pretty lame the first 100 times, and has not gotten better since then.
You're not offensive; you're idiotic. You also aren't honest.
Yes he does. He's an attention starved drunkard.
DickTaters everywhere do SNOT like shit when cumedians portray them too honestly!!! Thou shalt SNOT make fun of their Dick-Shit-Oral ways!!!
(Shit HURTS Their Precious Baby FEELZ and Self-Righteous, Self-PervFected Image, ya know!)
Unread
Says the Dick-Shit-Oral One, Who BRAGS for ALL to see, about Dick-Shit-Oral One's Fierce resistance to honesty!
Two attention starved lunatics.
Another lame-ass copypasta piece of shit comment, Sqrlsy. Just enough all caps to be deranged, but while showing complete mental retardation at the same time.
We should all starve him.
The Babylon Bee has, and it hasn't turned them into drooling lefty retards like you.
Perhaps you missed the memo, but understanding economics makes someone a drooling lefty retard, you drooling lefty retard. And as long as you refuse to renounce the dismal science and become a mercantilist protectionist, you will remain a drooling lefty retard.
I do love how you continue to claim you understand economics after everyone of your predictions turns out wrong. You're worse than Jim Cramer lol.
Don't make fun of Trump if your not funny about it.
Do people still read The Onion? They were hot back in 2003, but the Onion lost its mojo when it started reinforcing and promoting establishment narratives instead of mocking them. You can't parody the people you're sucking up to.
Then the Bee came along and ate their lunch.
Unless they're willing to attack the establishment's sacred cows again, they have no future.
Yeah, the new guy's didn't learn anything.
"They intend to relaunch Infowars as a parody of conspiracists, though courts have since stalled the sale."
Someone else being snotty and sarcastic about Alex Jones isn't exactly paradigm smashing. How's that different from some anal retentive at the NYT? I mean, the blue haired Xers on Bluesky do that all day long.
This is just more reinforcing of imparted narratives instead of mocking them.
I kind of want them to. They'd likely be accidentally admitting the truth.
Here's the thing about InfoWars. If you relaunch it as a parody, what would actually be different from the original version.
Indifferentiable or worthless.
Yeah, there are some one-off jokes about people who still believe in Bigfoot and you can make some moderately popular narrative fiction based on these 'legends' but as any sort of earnest parody you're just going to be mocking, or trying to avoid mocking, your own neuroses.
The Onion hasn't been funny for a good two decades. What's interesting is to note the difference between The Onion and The Babylon Bee. As you note, the Onion won't touch any of the sacred cows of the left, the establishment. Were they do to so, it would be a blasphemy that would get them canceled. The Bee, on the other hand, is more than willing to poke fun at the left/the establishment, and the right, and turns the sacred cows into sirloin steaks on the grill. I'm surprised anyone in 2025 is even bringing up the Onion anymore.
^FBabylon showed nothing. Any article praising the once and future Onion which doesn't mention the Babylon Bee is just as biased and useless as the once and future Onion.
Any article about [something I don’t like] that’s doesn’t mention [something I like] means whatever the author says is [insert insult here].
Jesse and ML have been using that flavor of ad hominem for years.
All you’ve got to do is renounce economics and you’ll be peas in a pod.
Do you have a citation?
Or your usual bullshit?
Any article discussing Apple's near death and resurgence which didn't mention the PepsiCo transplant CEO or Microsoft would be useless.
Any article discussing Microsoft's rise without mention CP/M and the anti-trust trial would be useless.
Any article discussing fast food which didn't mention McDonald's would be useless.
And as I said, any article discussing the Onion's rise, fall, and alleged rebirth which doesn't mention the Babylon Bee is worthless.
That you try to twist this into some TDS bullshit says more about your TDS than eother the Onion or the Bablyon Bee.
It is an argument used by Trump’s Deranged Supporters to dismiss what was said by attacking the author for what was not said. Not saying it means you have TDS. Just that it’s another you have in common with Jesse, ML and the other fallacy flingers.
By the way I reject your argument that an article about X that doesn’t discuss Y is useless. It’s just an excuse for you or Jesse or ML to whine and attack the author for not mentioning what you feel is important. Your feelings aren’t a measure of the usefulness of an article.
You're the one who brought up Trump. Everyone else brought up the Babylon Bee.
I brought up Trump because he has a history of using government force against people who say things he doesn’t like. What I did not do was use that as an excuse to attack the author and dismiss the article.
Poor sarc
"I brought up Trump because"
You brought up Trump because you're a drunken troll. That's it. No other reason.
You cry like a bitch a lot lol.
Jesse and ML have been using that flavor of ad hominem for years.
Use it correctly, just once, retard. Even if by accident, just try to get it right once.
Lol. The earth will be swallowed by the sun before that ever happens.
This is the more culturally relevant story. It's at least worth noting how it lost its way
We need more articles about former food network personalities.
We need more RECYCLED articles about former Food Network personalities that already ran three months ago. I guess they can lean into it and call them "Leftovers".
Sarc has it as his home page I'm sure.
'Are the News Media in Their Onion Era?'
Maybe. But they are definitely in the "two days behind the Bee headlines" era.
Speaking of Onion like stories that Sullum believed and defended...
Smartmatic is famous for its 2.7B lawsuit against Fox News. They eventually settled for 700M.
They hid from Fox and the judges the fact they were hemorrhaging clients and funds way before Fox mentioned them. Losing their clients in Veneula and such.
The judge never forced discovery on their Financials, blindly accepting tbeir valuation.
https://thefederalist.com/2025/05/16/legal-filing-smartmatic-was-hemorrhaging-cash-long-before-2020-election-controversy/
And in regards to Boehm... turns out ports and shipping schedules aren't collapsing.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/hapag-lloyd-sees-50-surge-containers-booking-china-us
The reason The Onion fails is the media already acts as the outrage version of The Onion. Hard to mock people when the media is already pushing false narratives. But hey, there are a lot of morons like sarc out there.
Another good example of Reason as the Onion. For years they've called Polis governor mcdreamy, a true libertarian.
Yet this year he has removed gun rights. And now has made misgendering a crime.
https://kdvr.com/news/politics/colorado-politics-news/kelly-loving-act-signed-into-colorado-law/?utm_campaign=snd-autopilot
Has he tried to deport anybody?
No?
Then he's still Reason's libertarian dreamboat.
And Polis also nails the weed and ass sex causes, so the perfect Reason trifecta.
Polis is a piece of shit and really always has been. He hid it better in the past when he was lying through his teeth about what he planned to do.
He's also making threats to cities that don't want to follow his idiotic housing policies. Go figure.
He has been terrible on property rights for a decade. He has added somewhere near 15% to the costs of new housing with required development regulations.
Yeah, there's a reason why a starter home that would be ballpark 150-250k in most of the rest of the country starts at around 550k here.
The real failure of this article is the ommission of The Onion's acquisition of Reason in January of 2020. When you realize their coverage of COVID, Biden and Trump were all parody, everything starts to make perfect sense.
Lol
"parody"
Speaking of parody, I'd like to take a moment saying something I never thought I would: Rubio is a viable 2028 pick.
Whilst I still don't trust him on immigration (his current role isn't germaine), his foreign policy has definitely changed. I believe that when Zelenzsky blew up at the first deal signing he expression was severe disappointment. In his previous role as a Senator, he had no problem giving him money. But since then, he's even been involved in talks with Iran.
While he could be just being a good boy following orders, I don't accept that. The old Rubio would never do such a thing, which leads me to believe that he's sincere.
Agree. I'm liking little Marco a lot more lately.
After the water drinking incident he seems to give a less of a shit as to what corporate media says about him.
Funny seeing Reason hitting with the hip new site of...the early 2000's.
So, libertarians are lamer than I thought.
But are they gayer than you thought?
I remember the Onion of yesteryear and they were, for a time at least, pretty funny.
Then their own politics got in the way and they were no longer funny, they were just another lame one-sided publication that couldn't be bothered to make fun of their own side.
I'm sorry, if you can't bring yourself to make fun of your own side you have no business being in satire. If you want to take a look at publications or authors who are willing to go after both sides, and are much better because of it, take a look at South Park or Babylon Bee.
Also, this article fails one of the tests for newsworthiness I.E. timeliness. This author would get a bad grade on this assignment from their journalism Professor.
I remember the Onion of yesteryear and they were, for a time at least, pretty funny.
To this day, one of my all-time favorite articles, that I repeatedly laughed at was their "Study Confirms: Babies Are Stupid." Paraphrasing, it was all like "We left the baby in a room full of life-giving nourishing food and it just drooled all over the jars. Attempts to pick up can-openers resulted in self-inflicted injuries which they made no effort to treat or even mitigate." Or something like that.
It's been long since memory-holed, but I remember laughing at it 20+ years ago.
Joe, how many times has the pejorative "fake news" been 100% correct? It's not news I don't like but a recognition that modern journalists don't believe in truth, just power.
You leftist scum have thrown out truth as a value and you get called out on it by those who haven't gone down the post-modernist rabbit hole to hell you have.
Yes Reason has fully adopted the view that journalism is no longer constrained by the pretense of non bias. I get that it's an opinion publication that purports to represent a libertarian point of view. But whatever the issue all we get is a wall of noise and zero acknowledgement of alternate and also libertarian arguments. Add to that the blatant outright dishonesty and you end up with a publication as irrelevant as The Onion.
The comments section is like a small remnant of good bacteria archived in the appendix waiting to leaven the rest of the publication when the time comes... but the host may just die before that happens.
And of course, by good bacteria I'm referring to the ability to delve into actual issues and sort the wheat from the chaff. This happens in a mostly partisan environment but it achieves the goal of laying bare truth more often than not. Truth of dishonest representation of events, truth of the actual ideas involved, etc.
I really do like the idea of crowdsourcing the critique of articles rather than having a monolithic thesis presented with follow up rebuttal or supportive articles by others. Here you have a no-holds-barred food fight over the ideas (and personalities both in the commentary and in the bloggers themselves ) that gets most of the overlooked implications and ideas served up without having to go into paywalled sites and biased search results.
Try doing a google search for a conservative value and you'll get 3 pages of results on the topic by progressive sites 'debunking' said values. [i generalize but i think people here know the kind of thing i'm referring to]
Haven't read The Onion since the turn of the century. Haven't watched The Daily Show or SNL since 2016. Just screeching Trump is a big poopy head over and over again isn't comedy. One of the many things that leftism destroys is a sense of humor.
Obamabots tolerated zero criticism of their Dear Leader and attacked comics with accusations of racism.
Trumptards tolerate zero criticism of their Dear Leader and attack comics with accusations of derangement.
That’s what a cult of personality looks like.
What was the point of that non sequitur, retard, other than trolling.
Maybe his drink dispenser is rigged to give him a shot for every reply that mentions Trump.
Just pointing out the fact that being a humorless douche when the jokes are about Dear Leader is not partisan. It’s one of the many things you have in common with the leftists you hate.
Who are you kidding? Everything you do is in defense of the Democratic Party.
You're the humorous douche right? Because you've never said anything actually funny.
Can you tell us why Joes classified documents were different again?
That’s…that’s not what Gaear said. It’s not even what he implied.
Goddamn man.
Are you just totally retarded or something? Gaear never said anything like that nor implied it, dipshit. You, on the other hand, belong to another cult, the TDS cult, where you can't live your life unless you have your daily two-minutes hate for Trump just because Orange Man Bad.
True, but only to non-socialists. Left&Right collectivists recognize none but each other, like fenced dogs
>America's leading outlet of explicitly fake news
That would already be the diarrhemedia. They've painted themselves into a corner -- even if they printed the truth, who would believe it?
Former President Joe Biden diagnosed with aggressive form of prostate cancer
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/former-president-joe-biden-diagnosed-prostate-cancer-rcna207571
Gosh, that’s too bad. No wonder his thought process is scrambled, the cancer being so close to his brain.
HA! yeah just a perineum away
I sincerely hope he recovers. He's an evil man but I wouldn't wish cancer on anybody
You are too nice.
I wonder how many years he’s had it.
agreed... was just about to amend my laugh post above with an addendum
I'm curious if Reason will cover Colorado's new law making misgendering a crime. Like in what contexts it is a crime and what are the punishments for violating the law? I wonder of the governor knows she is being a cunt by signing this law? Will Reason still consider her a Libertarian?
"she"???? "she"???
did you just assume her gender?
Can a man be a cunt? Can a woman be a dick?
Sure, the Governor penned a law that will effectively compel spoken titles to a legally privileged class but, really, I hope we get another article about the real free speech crisis that affects us all: Priscilla Villarreal.
My faves are The Onion's front-page archives, with stories like Al Capone the evader and the surprise atack on Pearl Harbor. https://theonion.com/front-page-archive/
At the same time, Manjoo noted that—like Stewart's The Daily Show—the paper was becoming "a little scoldy, oversmart, and lacking much nuance..."
Has it reverted back since then. I don't see much from them anymore.
Sadly, the Onion was at its best when it was a small publication in Madison. I miss that Onion.