Trump and Congress Target 'Efficiency' Rules That Hobble Home Appliances
Make dishwashers great again.

Taking up space in my kitchen is a G.E. dishwasher. We rarely use it because, frankly, it sucks. Too often, dishes must be rewashed after a cycle long enough that it might scrub the glaze from the ceramic, obviating the point of having an appliance dedicated to that task. My complaint isn't isolated; Americans have complained for years that appliances which once saved time and energy now produce frustration—largely because of regulations that hobble their ability to function. To their credit, the Trump administration and members of Congress are rolling back red tape and liberating appliances. The result should be expanded choices in labor saving devices that do what we want and do so more affordably.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Rescinding Rules That 'Make Household Appliances Less Effective'
"Today, President Donald J. Trump signed a memorandum to eliminate restrictive water pressure and efficiency rules that make household appliances less effective and more expensive," the White House announced May 9.
The order directs the Secretary of Energy to "review and rescind—or revert to the minimum standards required by statute—rules that limit water use in showerheads, faucets, dishwashers, toilets, urinals, and washing machines," to clarify "the scope of federal preemption of state rules for water use" in appliances, and to "pause enforcement [of any] rules mentioned in the memorandum until they are rescinded or revised." It also directs the Secretary of Energy to work with Congress to repeal intrusive laws that dictate water usage and efficiency standards to Americans.
This recent regulatory move follows an earlier action addressing deregulation of showerheads.
It's no secret the federal government has been trying to make our household appliances greener for many years and that, despite innovation by manufacturers, regulatory intervention has had an unfortunate effect on performance.
Absurd Energy and Water 'Conservation' Rules
"Why do today's dishwashers typically take more than 2 hours to run through a normal cycle when less than a hour was common in the past?" George Mason University economics professor Alex Tabarrok wrote in January of 2024. "The reason is absurd energy and water 'conservation' rules. These rules, imposed on dish and clothes washers, have made these products perform worse than in the past, cleaning less well or much more slowly."
Supporting his point that washers have become less effective, Tabarrok cited a 2007 article from Consumer Reports that noted:
Not so long ago you could count on most washers to get your clothes very clean. Not anymore…. As of January, the U.S. Department of Energy has required washers to use 21 percent less energy, a goal we wholeheartedly support. But our tests have found that traditional top-loaders, those with the familiar center-post agitators, are having a tough time wringing out those savings without sacrificing cleaning ability, the main reason you buy a washer.
Writing in 2019 for the American Institute of Economic Research, Jeffrey Tucker added: "Dishwashers used to wash all the dishes in under one hour. Now they take two hours, three hours, and four hours, and still don't get the dishes clean…. All of this is directly due to government regulations."
Modern appliances attempt to make up for restrictions on water use by stretching out the cleaning time, but experience in the kitchen suggests that's not doing the job.
Interestingly, Tabarrok's January 2024 post celebrated a Fifth Circuit court ruling against efforts by the Biden administration to undo deregulatory actions Trump took during his first term to expand choice in appliances. While Biden was unable to fully reregulate through executive action what his predecessor had deregulated that way, a lot of red tape remained in place, especially rules passed by Congress. That means Trump's memorandum directing executive agencies to back off "efficiency" rules could run up against limits established by statutory law and could again be challenged through actions by his successors—that is, if it was unaccompanied by matching legislation.
Congress Acts To Free the Appliances
Fortunately, Congress sent to the White House, and Trump signed, laws repealing Biden administration's energy conservation standards for commercial refrigerators and freezers, restrictions on gas-fired tankless water heaters, and an energy conservation program for appliances. In terms of freeing the market from government interference, these legislative changes come closer to permanence than presidential directives to executive agencies can by themselves.
"From increasing the costs of refrigeration equipment used by small businesses to regulating reporting requirements for appliance manufacturers to banning gas-fired water heaters, the Biden-Harris Administration attempted to impose a far-left agenda that put Green New Deal-style policies ahead of the American people," commented Rep. Brett Guthrie (R–Ky.), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, upon the signing of the bills into law.
Responding specifically to Trump's executive action, Devin Watkins, attorney at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), observed: "Federal limits on water and energy use have made appliances slower and less effective, frustrating consumers and limiting their choices. The water restrictions on dishwashers and clothes washers were found to violate the law by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, yet the Biden administration imposed them anyway. President Trump's new executive order marks a return to consumer choice—allowing Americans to purchase appliances that are faster, more effective, and better suited to their needs."
CEI has done a lot of heavy lifting over the years to fight rules and laws that limit choices in appliances, showerheads (another Trump concern), and light bulbs. The regulatory change during Trump's first term that expanded options for faster dishwasher's was initiated by a petition submitted by the organization, which Watkins co-wrote. CEI emphasizes that government intervention doesn't only reduce the range of options available to consumers even as it harms performance, it also raises costs so that we often end up paying more money for lousier products.
So, it's encouraging to see members of Congress and the Trump administration rolling back "efficiency" rules that render many appliances largely ineffective. A combination of legislation and executive action is exactly what's needed to trim back a federal government that has intruded too far into our choices and our homes.
It's too late to save my dishwasher. But I hold out hope that I'll eventually replace that waste of space with a device that actually washes dishes.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
One of the latest consumer surveys revealed that 67 percent of the people polled tried to repair their computer at home, while 57 percent believe that everyone should be able to do that if they want to.
RIGHT TO REPAIR laws
In Jan 2024 The Right to Repair Act passed as law in four states
Now is harder to find out but supposedly
Six states have passed right to repair laws: Massachusetts, Colorado, New York, Minnesota, Maine, and California. Additionally, all 50 states have either filed or considered right to repair legislation.
Yes, but in MA you can't repair your own plumbing.
People who repair their own gas pipes tend to die when their houses blow up.
Okay but where is the relevancy ???????
I see CD players out for the trashman and all that is wrong is that that laser istn't tracking. Computers where the drive went, (easily replaced) , radios where the knob is not working but the radio probably is.
You're engaging a lying pile of lefty shit; facts and truth are a mystery to charliehall.
Fuck off and die, charliehall.
Big Government strikes again. Right to Repair interferes in the contract between the computer manufacturer and the owner. Libertarians used to think that was unconstitutional.
NO, it doesn't. I want to be able to take the module that doesn't work and replace with one that does. You get a message that the disk drive is failing. Okay replace it.
You are pushing to an extreme. My radio knob on my espensive Sanjean doesn't work must I toss the whole thing
My dishwasher also sucks. I hand wash most everything. Using more water. I'm in the shower longer because the pressure isn't strong enough to rise my hair efficiently. These "water saving" regulations don't save water.
HOw many people flush TWICE the low water-use toilets.
Biden the Stupid
I find that decent quality ones work fine. Cheap toilets can be pretty bad that way.
Low flow toilets are a scam…..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4f0MeoV5pQ
The commercial ones that are required to have the sensors for auto-flush, often flush twice because of that feature.
A friend is an Engineer with the local Sewer Authority. The reduced water flow from commodes is actually causing problems with the sewer lines. They were designed for a certain flow rate and now that has been reduced, leading to clogs and other problems.
Watermelons don't do engineering, let alone physics.
My GE dishwasher is great! Uses hardly any water -- much less than washing by hand. We never have to run it a second time. The author must have bought the cheap model.
Does it have to run for 2 days for a small load? These things take HOURS to do the job!
A Reason writer, in this case, CLEARLY sides with Trump over Biden!
This article does SNOT exist!
Exactly.
Yawn
The awesomeness just keeps getting better.......
More efficient appliances are a good thing. Saving water is a good thing. Huge numbers of Americans live in areas where water is scarce, so they need to use less. We are all living in a world with a changing climate, so we all need to use less energy.
Molly, you head to dumb conclusions like a coyote after a gunshot
Scarce water, what would be a major cause. I am sure you will hate this factual
2007study
Divorced households in the U.S. could have saved more than 38 million rooms, 73 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity, and 627 billion gallons of water in 2005 alone if their resource-use efficiency had been comparable to married households. Furthermore, U.S. households that experienced divorce used 42–61% more resources per person than before their dissolution.
Making water-saving appliances available to people who live where water is scarce is a good thing.
Forcing water-saving appliances onto everyone, including people who live where water is abundant, is immoral.
Exactly. Water is a very local resource. There's no good reason why I should have to use a kitchen faucet that takes twice as long as it needs to to fill a pot with water. Or a shower that won't give me whatever water pressure I want. I have water flowing out of the top of my well right now, FFS.
I grew up in Michigan which is almost completely surrounded by fresh water and what you can't get out of the lakes you can get right out of the ground. After a few years in Southern California I moved to Illinois where I have more fresh water than I could ever need at a well head in my front yard. People living in deserts should have the choice to buy water saving appliances if they think it's to their advantage. There is absolutely no reason that the rest of us should put up with this bullshit. Water is the original renewable resource.
Yet the opposite is the case.
How to make it easier for a kid to waste money ? ANSWER Give him more money
Water is scarce where politicians have not done their job. Water saving devices should be called politician-saving devices. Compare California or Arizona with Israel : Israel is a desert, and water resources are scarce, but today it produces 20% more water than it needs. What can the world learn from Israel’s experience?
And we need a humorous spicing of galactic stupidity to round things out
Biden Says Intentional Power Outages Caused Water Shortages During Los Angeles Wildfires
Every state in the West created markets for water, as libertarians would have advised had the movement existed in the 19th century.
The problem is that the federal government decided to subsidize farmers by providing cheap irrigation water -- and California did the same thing in the 1960s. Farmers are a big powerful special interest group -- and they mostly vote Republican. MAGA complained that water wasn't available to fight wildfires in Los Angeles. The only reason that there is any water in Los Angeles at all is because of Big Government, but the water that might have been used to fight the wildfires was owned by the farmers. Should the government have stolen it?
Blow up all the dams, and destroy all the aqueducts. Los Angeles and Phoenix will become ghost towns, and every farmer in both states will be out of business.
And your food prices will skyrocket, you pathetic waste of protoplasm.
I don't know if it's immoral but forcing people to buy products that don't work is silly. People should be given a choice. If you pay for your water you are more inclined to buy a low use washer than if you have a well. We have a well but bought a low use washing machine to save on the well pump. We ended up having to run clothes a few times or much smaller loads just to get the clothes wet. We finally donated the washer to Goodwill and bought a regular top load which works fine.
More efficient appliances are a good thing if and only if they do their jobs. Otherwise, their apparent "efficiency" is a mirage.
Saving water is a good thing if you live in an area where water is scarce. People in those areas are perfectly capable of passing applicable laws. Applying those rules to those of us who live in the rest of the country where water is easily and cheaply available is wasteful and stupid.
"People in those areas are perfectly capable of passing applicable laws. "
MAGA wants to have the lenient federal regs override state and local laws.
So do you live in a cave
When they calculated the cost in terms of increased utilities and unused housing space per capita, they discovered that divorce tosses out economy of scale. Among the findings:
In the United States alone in 2005, divorced households used 73 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity and 627 billion gallons of water that could have been saved had household size remained the same as that of married households. Thirty-eight million extra rooms were needed with associated costs for heating and lighting.
In the United States and 11 other countries such as Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Greece, Mexico and South Africa between 1998 and 2002, if divorced households had combined to have the same average household size as married households, there could have been 7.4 million fewer households in these countries.
The numbers of divorced households in these countries ranged from 40,000 in Costa Rica to almost 16 million in the United States around 2000.
The number of rooms per person in divorced households was 33 percent to 95 percent greater than in married households.
"Saving water" is meaningless if you live in a place with abundant ground water like I do. The water is always there. If I flush the toilet 100 times a day, it's still there in the ground where it needs to be. If you live in a dry place dependent on surface water or aquifers that don't refill quickly, it's a bit different. But there is no need whatsoever for universal regulations, even if you think it's any of the federal government's business to be regulating these things.
People aren't stupid. If you live in a place with lots of water you can get away with regular washing machines. If you live in a place where it's scarce or you are charged for it then you will reduce your use to save money. The problem is the government which thinks everyone is retarded so must make more and more rules for you to live by.
This stupidity would be enough on it's own to label Molly as a fucking retard, if anybody didn't already know.
"Save the WATER! Save the SKY! Save the Birds and the Bees! /s"
"That's ?why? [WE] have to Gov-Gun U down like tyrants! /s", Molly.
And if it wasn't the 'water' or the 'sky' or the 'birds' it would be BFUTW.
E = mc^2. The mentality isn't saving anything but their tyrannical Gov-Guns against you.
How does me saving water in one of the most water-abundant areas of the country help out anyone living in an area where it's scarce?
They aren't banning the more efficient models, they are adding options back to the market.
But that's not what the market is getting. Manufacturers are making appliances that meet "efficiency" requirements in testing, but when put to actual use are far less efficient and effective.
It has rained over 4 feet in my town since October. Our water is supplied from a reservoir that went over the spillway in, yes, October. If you want to save water, it's up to you. Fining me for not doing so in 2021 is not. Yes, people in LA can stop watering lawns. Here, no one waters theirs anyway. Ever.
Saving water is a good thing.
Desalinate or STFU.
Desalinization is VERY expensive.
So was solar and wind, but we figured it out.
You know what else is very expensive? Everything new.
Are you arguing for the status quo now?
"Huge numbers of Americans live in areas where water is scarce, so they need to use less. "
No, shitbag, the government needs to provide more rather than protecting some little fishes and providing succor to those claiming to represent obsolete cultures.
And you need to fuck off and die.
There aren't really water shortages even in California or Arizona. The problem is that most of it is owned by farmers, who won't share with the much more populous cities -- even though the dams and aqueducts were built by the government. Farmers are the most obnoxious recipients of every form of corporate welfare imaginable. And they vote Republican.
"Will AI Kill Our Freedom To Think?"
"Thinking?"
Thinking is not encouraged or considered acceptable in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic of America.
Thinking is best left to the ruling elites in the District of Corruption.
Besides, thinking always leads to dangerous ideas like freedom, capitalism and personal responsibility.
No socialist wants that for the masses.
Screw that, I'm buying all new appliances as soon as these more effective ones hit the market.
Sorry, a fairly ridiculous load of nonsense. Your dishwashwer sucks because you bought a bad dishwasher, not because of the regulations. I own a Bosch. In fact in every house I have owned (3) I took out the GE or Whirlpool or LG dishwasher and replaced with Bosch. They all wash well, no sound, use little water and are low energy. They have that nice Energy Star designation and meet or beat those regulations. And they are built well and last. What is not to like? Oh, they are made in Germany where appliances are even more regulated.
Oh, they are made in Germany where appliances are even more regulated.
No. From their website:
As of 2020, Bosch appliances are manufactured worldwide. The Group's 40 production sites are located in Europe, the United States, Latin America and Asia.
And from what I can tell their dishwashing division is 100% China.
What is not to like?
Yeah, i love waiting hours for a dishwasher to finish a load of dishes my monocle polisher could finish in 10 minutes.
PHOSPHATES.
Put phosphates back in my detergent.
If you're worried about the algae, give some border jumping criminals in custody a snorkel and have them start scraping the sewer walls. We don't even have to PAY them. It's part of their due process while they await hearing. If they refuse, straight to CECOT.
The current administration may act as if water is infinite in every jurisdiction across the land, but those of us who were educated know it's not. I urge manufacturers to continue making water-conserving devices and consumers to continue purchasing these devices.
Where has all the water gone? LoOOOOng tiiIIIime passing...
Water, like energy, is never created or destroyed. The laws of conservation and mass are always in effect - regardless of the hopes, feelings, and neo-Malthusian fantasies of watermelons.
Desalinate or GTFO/STFU.
You want instant payback on a plethora of environmental issues. Start boosting marriage and not divorce and abortion and homosexuality. REALLY do you dare look at the facts, been out for 18 years AND NO ONE WILL TOUCH IT
When they calculated the cost in terms of increased utilities and unused housing space per capita, they discovered that divorce tosses out economy of scale. Among the findings:
In the United States alone in 2005, divorced households used 73 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity and 627 billion gallons of water that could have been saved had household size remained the same as that of married households. Thirty-eight million extra rooms were needed with associated costs for heating and lighting.
In the United States and 11 other countries such as Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Greece, Mexico and South Africa between 1998 and 2002, if divorced households had combined to have the same average household size as married households, there could have been 7.4 million fewer households in these countries.
The numbers of divorced households in these countries ranged from 40,000 in Costa Rica to almost 16 million in the United States around 2000.
The number of rooms per person in divorced households was 33 percent to 95 percent greater than in married households.
The enormous price range of water provides ample reason for consumers to save the stuff where it's in short supply, and water companies public and private to invest in everything from desal to canals.
Now more than ever, in the deserts and badlands out wet, whisky is for drinking, but water is for fighting over, but it still militates for national water research to keep the commons cheap, because interstate commerce shifts products and commodities that are water intensive around the nation.