The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers
Residents of the United Kingdom will get lower tariffs, while Americans are stuck paying higher ones.

The White House is hailing a new trade deal with the United Kingdom as "a great deal for America."
But is it a great deal for Americans? The specifics of the deal seem to suggest otherwise.
The agreement maintains the 10 percent universal tariff that President Donald Trump imposed on nearly all imports to the United States. But even the president admits this is a tariff hike on American consumers, rather than a reduction.
The point of comparison should be the average tariff rate on imports from the U.K. before Trump took office. In 2023, the most recent year for which full data are available, the average U.S. tariff on British goods was 3.3 percent.
That means this "deal" charges American consumers a 10 percent baseline tax on goods that were previously taxed at 3.3 percent. That's not a win for free trade or lower prices.
Meanwhile, it is British consumers who will benefit from lower tariffs. According to the White House, the deal means that American exports to the U.K. will now face an average tariff rate of 1.8 percent, down from 5.1 percent before the deal. (In 2023, average U.K. tariffs on American goods were 3.8 percent, so that 5.1 percent figure seems inflated).
The lower U.K. tariffs are certainly good news for some American businesses, which will have easier access to the U.K. economy. American cattle farmers, for example, stand to benefit from the elimination of a 20 percent British tariff on American beef.
But since tariffs are a tax on consumers, it looks like it is British consumers who are the primary winners here, as they will have lower taxes on and more access to American beef (and lots of other things). Meanwhile, American consumers are facing significantly higher taxes on machinery, pharmaceuticals, and other major imports from across the pond.
Take automobiles as an example. The White House is touting one part of the new deal that will supposedly lower tariffs on British-built cars to just 10 percent—for the first 100,000 vehicles imported each year. After that, a 25 percent tariff will apply. That 100,000 figure is based on the number of cars imported from the U.K. last year, so the new rules effectively lock in that level of imports and make any increase prohibitively expensive.
Trying to freeze markets into stasis is bad news for the dynamism that drives economic growth, of course. At a less theoretical level, this is yet another example of the White House claiming to be cutting tariffs on Americans when, in fact, the deal increases them. Before Trump hiked tariffs earlier this year, the U.S. charged just 2.5 percent on cars imported from Britain.
In other words, the "deal" means tariffs on British cars have been quadrupled for American buyers. That's hardly a win for Americans.
If the agreement with the U.K. was supposed to demonstrate that Trump is a master dealmaker who is wielding tariffs to bend the global economy toward Americans' best interest, it falls well short.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Too much TDS. Trump is a masterfaker.
Ok fag.
You're a grand old fag,
You're a high-flying fag,
And forever your penis I crave.
You're the macho man that I love,
The homo that’s free and the brave.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
I should research this more thoroughly before commenting but I think Trump's strategy is to open markets to US exports which would seem to be the case here as even idiot Boehm admits. Trump's primary goal is to equalize the balance of trade. Simply calling tariffs a tax over and over again and claiming that the current trade deficits are either inconsequential or actually a good thing doesn't answer the bigger questions. Just more lazy crap from Reason.
Boehm will never understand secondary effects caused by his views. Such as the increasing welfare state from job loss, costs associated with supply chain risks from foreign markets, etc.
“ Such as the increasing welfare state from job loss”
You have some sort of evidence to believe poverty comes from trade? Because there’s a much stronger correlation between conservative governance and poverty, since red states dominate the poorest, least educated, and least successful states in America. So what’s your evidence that trade leads to poverty?
“ costs associated with supply chain risks from foreign markets”
Risk is factored in to landed costs. For example, insurance on the orders themselves as well as the delivery of the goods are both included in the landed cost of a product. So no, supply chain risks aren’t part of the “secondary effects” of trade. Plus, of course, the risk is exactly the same regardless of whether the tariff is 3.3% or 10%.
You keep showing how clueless you are about supply chains and international trade. Yet you keep saying stupid things. How many times do you have to smack your proverbial head on the metaphorical low spread before you learn?
But just for shits and giggles, since your first two examples were laughably false, what is the “etc” you are referring to and why would a 6.7% increase in tariffs change them?
Hey it's Nelson. He's back to be retarded.
Has welfare increased since the unilateral free trade mantra occurred, yes or no? What was share of GDP for the middle class in the 70s as compare to now? How many jobs have been off shored? What's the unemployment rate of able body men compared to the 70s?
It is amazing how ignorant you are buddy. Every job gains under Biden went to a foreigner for the most part. What happens when someone can't get a job?
It’s all Reagan’s fault!! Bring back Jimmy Carter!! 😉
Reagan was basically a free trader, as was the case for every Republican President from Eisenhower to the second Bush.
Put SBF and charlie in a barrel and roll it down a hill. There will always be a TDS-addled slimy pile of shit on top.
Great no break down that poverty rate by county and tell me the demographics of the people on welfare.
“ Has welfare increased since the unilateral free trade mantra occurred, yes or no?”
This is a logical fallacy called “post hoc ergo propter hoc”. It’s well known by people with at least a 10th grade education, so obviously Jesse doesn’t understand it.
“ What was share of GDP for the middle class in the 70s as compare to now?”
Wait, there’s been stagnation of middle class wages? No way!
That’s easily attributable to the decrease in collective bargaining in the private sector. It allows companies to push a larger percentage of labor costs into the upper salary levels. Especially the compensation packages for the C-suite, which has grown immensely in the past 50 years while the wages of the lower 2/3 has stagnated.
“ How many jobs have been off shored?”
And? The total number of jobs in America has grown. Why should we hold on to jobs that can be done much more cost-effectively elsewhere? It makes no sense to make things in America for several times more than they can be made elsewhere. All that does is make American companies less competitive.
“ What's the unemployment rate of able body men compared to the 70s?”
https://www.investopedia.com/historical-us-unemployment-rate-by-year-7495494
The lowest unemployment rate in the entire decade of the 1970s was 4.9% (1973) and the highest was 8.2% (1975). In the last decade the lowest unemployment rate was 3.5% (2022) and the highest was 6.7% (2020). So much better now than the 1970s.
“ It is amazing how ignorant you are buddy.”
Well since I keep smacking you and your stupidity down, how does that work? I keep using facts, figures and provable theories and you have weird, baseless beliefs like unemployment being lower in the 70s than today. The most inexplicable things is that you say stupid things that are easily looked up and disproved, like the unemployment rate in the 70s being lower than today.
You sure are a glutton for punishment.
“ Every job gains under Biden went to a foreigner for the most part”
Really? And your basis for this bizarre statement is what, exactly?
“ What happens when someone can't get a job?”
I don’t know. I’ve never had that problem.
But since the unemployment rate is historically low, most people are like me and don’t have that problem, either.
The UK market is open to US products and the US has a large trade surplus with the UK. As the article notes, this is merely a tax increase designed to punish us.
Strategy my ass. He hasn't a clue about trade if he thinks foreigners pay the tax and that he can increase foreign investment at the same time he reduces the trade deficit.
He may think flailing and lying and being ignorant is a strategy. His fanbois may think so. But self-delusion is a piss poor substitute for an actual strategy.
Trump's fanbois would praise him here if he decided to increase income tax rates to Eisenhower levels, and claim that Trump is the most libertarian President ever.
“ Trump's primary goal is to equalize the balance of trade.”
Then he isn’t very knowledgeable about trade, because a trade deficit is an indication of a healthy and thriving economy. So not only are American companies paying more for anything they get from Britain, American consumers are also paying more for them.
The only way to view this as a win is to believe that trade deficits are bad. And that’s wrong.
“ Simply calling tariffs a tax over and over again”
Because it is. Do you think companies are going to say, “Oh, well. Our profit margins have been slashed, but we’ll just eat the cost.”? Or will they say, “We need to be profitable, so raise the price.”. If you think the former, you don’t understand the for-profit part of business.
“ again and claiming that the current trade deficits are either inconsequential or actually a good thing doesn't answer the bigger questions.”
That IS the answer to the bigger question. If the question is, “Are trade deficits bad?” ( which is about as big as a trade question gets), the answer is “No”.
A trade deficit just mean we bring in more goods from another country than we send out. It applies to everything, from raw materials to components for cars to finished products. So an American company (like, say, Tesla) will have to raise prices on their products (or lose profits) because many (if not most) components in the car are built elsewhere. This not only hurts American consumers, it hurts American companies as well.
Do you know what a country that doesn’t buy a lot of stuff is called? Poor. That’s the only reason companies and people don’t want bananas from Costa Rica and coffee from Sumatra and chocolate from Indonesia and cinnamon from Vietnam: because they can’t afford it. Trade deficits are a sign of economic activity, wealth, and a thriving market.
And you continue to be wrong again as your ideals are an inflationary policy lol.
Remember when your solution for inflation was to invade Iraq?? And it ended up costing $3 trillion and 4500 troops and exacerbated inflation??? Oops. 😉
You’re talking about your never Trumper allies again.
Trump campaigned against "stupid wars", one of the few areas where I totally agreed with him. Remind me again, just how many "stupid wars" did he end in four years? (Spoiler: I can count those on the fingers of no hands.) So far in his first term, his record managed to get worse. His Yemen adventure burned billions of dollars and at least a year's production of missiles we really couldn't spare. We lost two fighter jets and had several people injured or killed, none of them by enemy fire. Oh, and neither Biden nor Trump even pretended to ask for congressional approval before waving their dicks around.
“ And you continue to be wrong again as your ideals are an inflationary policy lol.”
Do you ever get tired of saying stupid things that are transparently untrue?
Do you?
Edit: After reading your eminently sensible post above, I'm going to apologize. Mostly.
" Simply calling tariffs a tax over and over again"
Only a blithering idiot or a shameless lying propagandist would claim that tariffs aren't taxes.
There you go again, trying to confuse the Shit on Reason crowd with facts and logic. It won't work, the steel plates in their heads deflect reality.
Well they left the majority of the trade deal out of the article, giving us a single sided view. The deal also opens numerous markets that we were previously not able to sell into. It also lowers tariffs on our goods by around 4 points, removes non-tariff barriers. There are a lot of good things in there that for some reason weren't mentioned at all in this article. I've said it numerous times, Reason is just becoming the print MSNBC. I have good news and bad news, but all I'm giving you is the bad news.
They told me everything I need to know: Brits got tax cuts, Yanks got fucked. Fucking the vast majority of Yanks to benefit a handful may be good politics, but it's shit policy in my book.
Trump's "strategy" is a figment of the imagination. The "balance" of trade is utter bullshit, and expecting benefits from the government "managing" it is lunacy. If tariffs aren't a tax, then WTF are they? Trade deficits are inconsequential or actually a good thing. Using tariffs to "open markets" means asking all Americans to punch themselves in the nuts just to benefit a few. Jeebus Crow, learn some real economics. I suggest Thomas Sowell's Basic Economics, which is light on jargon, charts and graphs but heavy on real, historically sound economics. It's a bit of a doorstopper, but you don't have to read it cover to cover to learn a lot.
you don't want a Land Rover anyways 🙂
Would have been a Jaguar (had one back in the day), but they're all ugly electrics now so I'm good.
Remember when you supported invading Iraq and you didn’t care that Bush failed to kill Osama Bin Laden?? That was weird, right?
That was your neocon allies.
Well, Boehm has never been wrong before...
Damiksec is wrong about Boehm being wrong.
Were you wrong about Dick Cheney?? Didn’t you say he could shoot you in the face any time he pleased…or was that blow a wad in your face?? I forget.
Cheney is your ally.
Republicans in Congress voted Lizard Cheney into leadership in January 2021. Oops. 😉
Ignores the last 4 years of political alignment.
Nope, that was after Trump served a term and lost. Republicans in Congress wanted DeSantis and Crenshaw and Cheney to lead them out of the wilderness. It’s so hilarious.
Yep.
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
Trump: first President since Herbert Hoover to lose both houses of Congress and the White House in a single term. He only slimed back into office because the dithering DNC waited until the last minute to replace the worst possible candidate with the second worst.
"higher ones" - some world-class writing there Reason...
OMG! American consumerism will have to pay a little more taxes than nothing at all when buying "across the pond" but American makers/creators production will get a tax-deduction!
Why it's almost like Trump is trying to build a productive America instead of the pile of Debt-Riddled consumerism it currently is.
Course the "Where's my ?free? ponies..." crowd will certainly cry about it.
“Course the "Where's my ?free? ponies..." crowd will certainly cry about it.”
Especially the retarded drunks, and the morbidly obese pedophiles.
“ but American makers/creators production will get a tax-deduction!”
American companies buy things from overseas. Lots of things. Tariffs tax them, too. How much additional business would they have to get to cover the tariffs on the goods they import for their products?
You do understand that international supply chains mean that American companies are getting screwed, too. Right?
It's amazing how you can use 'American' to describe NOT 'American' goods and services (which is all Tariffs apply to).
And No. I don't consider not being Tax-Exempt in the face of Domestic Manufacturing rates as high at 85% screwing the importers. In fact I'd say the screwing is the other way around.
The tariffs chicanery has already cost us $500 billion in increased interest payments as Powell has delayed a rate cut. Tariffs won’t ever raise enough revenue to pay for several years of increased interest payments because uncertainty delays Fed rate cuts. People can think Biden was the worst president in history but the only path forward in 2025 was to continue what Biden was doing the last several years and then increase the top income tax rate to 39.6%. Republicans other than Trump are all starting to come to terms with this reality now.
INCREASE taxes on American Production!!! /s
DECREASE taxes on Foreign Production!!! /s
What could possibly go wrong.... /s
I nominate 'Sam' to be the basis of the next "What could possibly go wrong" Reason article.
3% deficit/GDP ratio is the only thing that matters right now. Obama had it at 3% and Trump hacked it up to record levels.
Getting the US Debt under control is the only thing that matters right now and the only way that'll ever happen is if America creates VALUE (production) and DECREASES borrowing a ton.
One thing leftards seem to have in common is they think their number-games can somehow result in VALUE without any actual creation of VALUE. Any game they have to play to scam someone else out of their Labors.
Nope, 3% is the goal for people that live in reality. Obama achieved it and Clinton had a surplus and Biden was on track to hit 3% by 2026. Trump failed once and the fact he is open to a 39.6% top rate shows he might be serious this time.
Yep.
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
Fuck off and die, slimy pile of TDS-addled lefty shit.
You, "Nope. DEBT doesn't matter."
As long as you get your ?free? ponies. /s
Yes. That is *EXACTLY* what is wrong with the criminal left.
Just how the hell is raising prices for ordinary Americans and US manufacturers "creating value"? The only way to get debt under control is to reduce spending. Trump did less than nothing to accomplish that the first time and shows zero sign of being any more serious this go-round. It's painfully obvious to those of us sitting in the non-stupid seating that when he says he hopes to balance the budget in the near future, "near future" means he's out of office and doesn't have to make any hard choices.
Oh, and please feel free to shove your "leftard" shit right back up your ass. Calling names does nothing to disguise your fundamental ignorance.
How does, "US manufacturers 'creating value'" ?
- How dumb can one be?
"reduce spending", 1/3rd the Deficit (-Cares Act) as Biden.
"reduce spending", -8% less spending than last year.
- How much LYING can one do?
Sam seems to have a better grasp of basic economics than most Reason commenters, very much including you.
Leftarded 'economics' ..... Where's my ?free? ponies!!!! /s
Lol. Hey, remember that time ^ when you took a break from your 25+ year old irrelevant references to imply that forever ultra low interest rates and higher confiscation rates by our bloated government were the only way to delay the collapse of the debt house of cards that has accumulated over decades?
That was weird, right?
Bessent’s goal. Trump appointed Bessent. Trump inherited 3% and tax cuts did bump GDP to 2.9% in 2018…but the Fed increased rates which made the ratio get closer to 4%. So the tax cuts were counterproductive because I would rather have 2016 numbers than 2018 numbers.
^Leftarded 'economics' ..... How can I cook the book for my ?free? ponies!!!! /s
Otnos amazing watching the retard left demand regulations and taxes for all domestic industry while demanding full exemption for foreign ones.
You're not very smart are you buddy.
Keep whacking that strawman, you'll get him one of these days. Punching ourselves in the nuts isn't going to alter domestic tax and regulation policy anywhere else. Letting poor people get a little richer just might.
Trumps Domestic Tax-Cuts don't exist!!!! /s
Well they didn't even mention 90% of the deal, they gave us one point which they made sound as bad as possible and left out the vast majority of the good that's in the deal. It's like telling us he praised white supremacists as fine people and completely cut out where he said he was NOT talking about white supremacists. It's the kind of garbage article you'd find on MSNBC.
Trump is an absolute moron.
+100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
I love it when the writers visit the comments.
If the fucktards stopped visiting the comments, the comments would be about 90% shorter. Come to think of it, I could live with that. I remember a time when the comments here were more serious debate than 24/7 shitfest.
Yeah! /s ... "Trump is an absolute moron", "+100000000" and "fucktards stop visiting the comments" certainly is an intellectual discussion....
Leftard Self-Projection 101.
"Residents of the United Kingdom will get lower tariffs, while Americans are stuck paying higher ones."
This is the bottom line, and shows the udder madness and brainlessness of Der Dear TrumpfenFarter-Furher! He who makes his tax-slaves pay the HIGHEST tariff-taxes WINS!!!
Damned Limeys import more from us than we import from them? This non-problem MUST be solved by PUNISHING Americans!!! All problems AND non-problems are solved by PUNISHING people MORE!
Starmer rolled Trump and neither Trump nor his cult realize that.
Expect a lot more of this.
Yep.
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
Fuck off and die, steaming pile of TDS-addled lefty shit.
Whoa, just LOOK at fact-based, logical reasoner here! How persuasive, Cumrade!!!
Trumps Tax-Cuts don't exist!!! /s
How many times does the [WE] TDS-gangster cult have to say it! /s
"The tariff's are going to hurt the economy!"
"The economy is fine."
"OK, but where are these so-called trade deals then?"
"They're right here."
"I DON'T LIKE THE TRADE DEAL."
We get it, Eric. You don't like Trump. Stop being such a blubbering baby about it.
It’s so hilarious that Trump supporters believed the goal was getting other countries to the negotiating table to reduce tariffs…what does NAFTA mean?? Trump supporters are such idiots…most of them are limpdicks and women married to limpdicks with nothing better to do than watch Fox News which is just the same talking points over and over delivered by different people. Omg, there is a War on Christmas! Islamofascists!! Benghazi!! Dudes with smelly hairy balls playing women’s sports!! OUTRAGE!!
Aren't you supposed to be in jail?
Here is a typical evening in a Trump supporters household:
Oh look Bob, a commercial for boner pills!
A million boner pills couldn’t make me hump you! I would need pills that changed your looks and age and personality and even family! I get my self esteem from Trump humping Melania!
Aren't you supposed to be in jail?
Here is a typical evening in the household of a TDS-addled slimy pile of shit:
TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Fuck off and die, asshole.
"The lower U.K. tariffs are certainly good news for some American businesses"
Yes, that's the key to reducing the trade deficit. We get more access to their market while higher prices on imports encourage domestic consumption.
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say we don't buy that many British products. From the link that shows UK imports, it looks like prices on pharmaceutical will be impacted, but those are already on the pricey side and are often covered by insurance and government.
Why do you think Britain agreed to this deal? It's bad for them on paper that cheap American imports now compete with homegrown products, while tariffs on their exports mostly remain. Given what's going on in their country and Europe, I don't think I have to explain.
"those are already on the pricey side and are often covered by insurance and government."
Higher health insurance costs! More spending on Medicare and Medicaid!!!
Can we have more of this "winning"?
You have got more losing than you can stand, obviously. Fuck off and die, asshole.
Yes we can have more of this winning as long as your ilk stays in the shadows where you belong.
"Why do you think Britain agreed to this deal? It's bad for them on paper"
Britain agreed to the deal to allow Americans to continue to buy LandRovers and Jaguars rather than American cars, and to improve the UK economy which is in the tank because of Brexit.
Yeah, middle class Americans really love buying Jaguars. Rolls eyes.
They need our beef more than we need their cars. The green policies that constrain their farming will be felt soon enough.
They left the EU and then governed as if they were still under central management. If they tried to expand trade the way Trump is doing now right after Brexit, they'd be in better shape.
You do know there was a lot more to the deal that is left out here? They gave us one part of the deal, which they shit on as a bad deal, and left 90% of the deal completely out of the article. Does Boehm work for MSNBC?
"OMG water is wet! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
Does the author of the article, Reason or the average libertardian understand what a tariff is, what they are used for and how they work?
Say what you will about the strategy to use a form of protection with industries (not applicable to UK) we no longer have as a means to regain them. Without the the public government investment needed to speed things up, or at least use of the tariff money to do so. (We are still a republican generation away, that is a retire/die-off away, from a sane conservative political majority willing to allow that sadly.. the old guard are in for a rude surprise on this front and general views about government, going forward with younger gens of conservatives and the right) Still better than just sitting back and continuing to sell out the future in the name of making the parasitic trade markets a few extra bucks.
I HATE deals. Especially the ones Trump makes for me.