Trump Admits Tariffs Could Create Shortages, Hike Prices
"Maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls," Trump said Wednesday. "And maybe the two dolls will cost a couple bucks more than they would normally.”

When President Donald Trump ordered the implementation of his so-called "Liberation Day" tariffs on April 2, he proclaimed that it was "now our turn to prosper."
Exactly four weeks later, Trump delivered a very different message to the American people: You'll get less and you'll pay more.
"Somebody said, 'Oh the shelves are going to be open.' Well, maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls," Trump said Wednesday during a cabinet meeting open to the press. "And maybe the two dolls will cost a couple bucks more than they would normally."
Some prosperity, huh?
You might conclude that the costs and consequences of Trump's global trade war are becoming impossible to ignore—even for a president who has stubbornly refused to acknowledge the reality of his own tariff policies. Even though Trump has previously warned about the possibility of some economic "pain" associated with the tariffs and retreated from the more aggressive plan he initially outlined on April 2, Wednesday's comments are the most direct admission yet that tariffs will directly reduce Americans' standard of living.
Did Americans accidentally elect Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.), who once railed against the wide variety of sneakers and deodorant?
Like Sanders, Trump is wildly out of touch here. "Suck it up and make do with less" is the sort of message you'd expect from a Soviet commissar or a Venezuelan dictator, not an American president whose whole identity is built around being wealthy.
But, of course, the tariffs were always going to sap Americans' standard of living. No matter what internally inconsistent and self-defeating logic Trump and his allies used, it was always true that tariffs are nothing more than taxes and it's impossible to tax your way to prosperity.
Unfortunately, the consequences won't be limited to fewer children's toys—though that is one sector that could be particularly hard hit by the dramatic slowdown in imports from China. "The alarm in the [toy] industry is palpable, with the companies predicting product shortages and higher prices," The New York Times reported this week. "Some business owners, citing how crucial holiday sales are to their bottom lines, are consulting bankruptcy lawyers."
"Now do this for clothing, shoes, food, appliances, consumer electronics, energy, construction materials, etc etc, and you start to see the problem," Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics for the Cato Institute, posted on X in response to Trump's comments. "Forced scarcity is not a pathway to prosperity."
Scarcity is the path that Trump has chosen, despite warnings from hundreds of economists. Now, having unilaterally created supply chain disruptions on a scale not seen since the COVID-19 pandemic in pursuit of supposedly populist goals, Trump is delivering an elitist shrug. If basic household necessities end up costing "a few bucks more," that won't be a serious problem for our elected leaders—or the lobbyists who are getting rich as businesses seek special favors within Trump's tariff schemes.
It will, however, be a problem for lots of other Americans, many of whom are more sensitive to price hikes after years of high inflation and rising interest rates. No wonder Trump's tariffs are deeply unpopular, and dragging his approval rating down with them.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Didn't read but clearly nobody needs more than 23 dolls.
Somebody needed to say it.
Can still buy all 23. Some may cost a bit more.
The republicans are toast. Good job guys.
But you do need at least one type of deodorant for each doll.
Remember when you believed a 20 year from Youngstown, OH enlisted in the Marines after 9/11 to bring democracy to Iraq and improve the lives of gays in Afghanistan?? That was weird, right??
Fuck off, fag.
So weird, right?
Every economics article Boehm rights seems to heavily hinge on the word could.
So brilliant. Genius, even. All unchartered territory here. Who could possibly predict any outcome using logic, data and history? Even adding 2+2, I mean, it Could equal 4.. who knows?
Show me the correlation data of tariffs and inflation from the past.
Hint. You aren't even smarter than sarc.
It's nearly universally agreed that increased tariffs helped turn a naasty recession into the great depression. When Bush II raised steel tariffs, it destroyed more manufacturing jobs than there were people employed by the entire US steel industry. Ditto Trump pt 1's steel tariffs. And Obama's tire tariffs. Raising taxes on sales raises prices, oof to the duh. You trying to be dumber than m.c?
Who could possibly predict any outcome using logic, data and history?
The author did not.
Neither does the shrike sock.
I think you need to check your scarcasim meter, not your sarc meter
...because only foreigners make sh*t. /s
And anyone has to wonder why the USA is going bankrupt.
The USA is just repeating the [Na]tional So[zi]alist curse of Venezuala.
Your ?Free? pony ride is over Demontrash...
Time to learn how to *EARN* sh*t again instead of endlessly trying to STEAL everything.
But Robin Hooding wins elections. Trump is setting up a debacle for the Republicans in the midterm. He can say goodbye to both houses of Congress.
Precisely why the US Constitution isn't written by general elections.
Or shouldn't be anyways. (i.e. the USA isn't a 'democracy'.)
When the Democrats own Congress, such philosophical conclusions won't matter. Trump could be cutting government spending, reigning in the bureaucratic leviathan and numerous other things. The economic hardship he will cause due to tariffs may save some American jobs (but will more likely just transfer blue-collar jobs from one industry to tariff protected ones) at the cost of every Americans' dollars being stretched further. And they will punish him (and congress) for it.
Why does USA manufacturing make "every American dollar" have to be "stretched further"? That doesn't even make sense. Perhaps that non-sense is exactly what Trump aims to correct.
In the big-picture it doesn't matter if Democrats own Congress. They can't keep spending endlessly on debt and refusing to make anything for payment (make value).
Trade deficits and government budget deficits are unrelated.
My Visa debt isn't really debt like my MasterCard is!!!!!
"Why won't anyone just LEARN my economics.", sarcasmic. /s
Wha??
Sigh... I know you're beyond hope, but at least clean up the punctuation and sentence structure. You're never going to sound intelligent, but at least look intelligent. I'm rooting for you.
"My Visa debt isn't really debt like my MasterCard is!!!!!", sarcasmic. /s
"Why won't anyone just LEARN my economics.", sarcasmic. /s
If you find what you read stupid it's because it's paraphrasing exactly what sarcasmic is saying.
He is proud of his willful ignorance. It’s his strongest trait.
Did you look in the mirror when typing that?
He uses the mirror for other purposes.
I'm not going to bother with another comment thread on this. But obviously you still believe your religious assertions - so here's the macrolevel accounting:
There are different definitions for GDP. Two of them can be used here:
GDP = (C)onsumption + (I)nvestment + (G)ovt + (N)et Exports
GDP = (C)onsumption + (S)avings + (T)axes
I won't bother with the details (and it does get more complicated) but those can be solved simultaneously - which results in:
(S - I) + (T - G) = (N)et Exports
If (N)et Exports is negative, we have a current account deficit
If T-G is negative, we have a budget deficit
If S-I is negative, then foreigners are financing investment. This is especially the case with a reserve currency where much of the 'investment' is short-term currency (more like savings) not long-term capital.
The two ARE directly related. In an accounting way not a this causes that way.
It is Trump who is as power mad and as erratic as Chavez and Maduro.
"De-Regulating and Cutting spending is Power-madness!", charliehall
"Why can't you people just LEARN leftard ?thinking? correctly.", sarcasmic
LOL.....
The False Prophet and his cultists always expect other people to pay for everything.
>>Scarcity is the path that Trump has chosen
to the fainting couches!
I think I agree with the author's criticism in spirit. However, we don't know what the actual end result will be. Big labor seems to be all aboard on trump's economic nonsense. The left has genuflected to them forever, but recently lost their standing amongst that constituency. The socialist wing of the democratic party is gaining steam at the moment. There is no way they are going to push back on this. Who exactly is going to contest this?
Based on history, yeah, we have a pretty good idea what the end result will be. Predicting that tariffs will cause job losses and higher prices is almost as controversial as predicting this rock will fall back to the ground if I throw it up in the air. There is no socialist wing of the Dem party. Even the ones who call themselves "socialists" are actually pushing for something much closer to Euro-style social democracy than socialism. Whether that's a good idea is very much open to debate, but they're not remotely the same thing.
2022: BIDENFLATION IS KILLING AMERICA!!!
2025: Higher prices and shortages are patriotic you leftist complainers.
You did it again!
The hilarious part is he called Biden's inflation a booming economy.
My real estate portfolio tripled in value under Biden!! You must be poor! Lolololoolol!!!
You’re dumb enough to write for Reason.
It's like you agreed with Jesse but thought you were getting him and it came out really bad.
Did what, spoke the truth? How evil.
Yeah, but isn't this all just theory? I mean, are prices REALLY going up?
The Trumptards are so devoted and tribal that apparently history didn't exist until January 2025.
What prices have gone up?
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/10/inflation-rate-eases-to-2point4percent-in-march-lower-than-expected.html
Groceries and gas are both seeing price drops where I live.
Must be nice. What color is the sky on your planet, and can I come live there?
Can't wait for him to raise tariffs even more and cancel income tax. I'm all for it.
Always thought a consumption tax was the preferred solution according to libertarians. But I admit I don't keep up with the Reason Institute and Cato so things may have changed.
Always thought that a MINIMAL consumption tax was the preferred solution according to libertarians... If ye had HALF of a brain and HALF of a twenty-seventh of HONESTY!!! Are Ye yet PERVFECTLY familiar with this cuntcept of HONESTY?
PervFection is ONLY available to PervFected Ones such ass Gears Grimy and Stripped... The REST of us must live in an ImpervFected World! Sad to say, Gears Grimy and Stripped swill SNOT help us in this endeavor!
(145% tariffs hardly qualify ass ANYTHING approaching "restrained" and "rational"!)
Not changed. Just (D)ifferent.
If "Team Rethugglican" reveals shitself to be hateful, foam-at-the-mouth Tribalists... Blaming EVERYTHING (Including SHIT'S OWN EVILS) on the Demon-Craps... Then that is (R)epulsive and i(RR)esponsible!
A ZERO-tax on domestic manufacturing / trade ????
You must be crazy! /s
Only foreign manufacturing rightfully gets that! /s
Every war has casualties. The U.S. casualties will be small businesses who can't absorb tariffs because they face competition from large companies who can. Small businesses are the financial backbone of the GOP. If Trump can't make a quick deal with Canada and Mexico and virtually every other country (except perhaps China) the Blue Wave will sweep the GOP under in 2026.
...because all US small businesses consist of nothing but importers or what? /s
Small businesses aren’t profitable or able to change directions quickly, unlike big companies who need dozens of meetings to change the color of the binders the meeting notes will go into.
Most of them are importers, either of products or of materials.
...because ZERO-tax for importers; 85% tax for domestic.
On varying levels =/= "consist of nothing but imports."
the Blue Wave will sweep the GOP under in 2026.
Yes, it will. Even if Trump changes course and makes deals as fast as he can, severe economic disruption is already in the pipeline and can't be stopped. COVID Theater taught us that you can't just shut off large parts of the economy, then just throw a switch and turn it back on. It takes time to recover—too much time to save the midterms for Republicans.
So do as Democrats do or lose to Democrats is the only options?
No, I said nothing of the kind.
>You might conclude that the costs and consequences of Trump's global trade war are becoming impossible to ignore
Mate, price of shit skyrocketed under Biden. I haven't noticed any additional price increases with all of Trump's tariffs. Maybe at whatever bouji stores you shop at, but Walmart-Americans aren't doing any worse than we were before.
I'm sure it hurts that your Birken and Gucci accessories are more expensive now that you can't massively overpay for cheap 'luxury brands' from Chinese sweatshops, but the price of eggs has been going down. I'm sure it hurts the Exxon can't make the same level of profit off of each barrel of oil, but the price of gas has gone down.
And, again, if tariffs are so bad - why does the rest of the world do them? Why does Reason never rail against the tariffs from the rest of the world?
The rest of the world does tariffs because the rest of the world is proud to be either socialist, populist, or a dictatorship. The US is supposed to be a free-market economy (in spite of what has been claimed about the commerce clause by progressives for the past 125 years).
We could offer tariff- and obstruction-free trade to any country that would reciprocate. My guess is there would be no takers.
Within the USA "free-market" economy....
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and amongst the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
It doesn't get much clearer than that.
Why did the founders grant that power? ...to provide a way in which the USA could prevent foreign government market-scams. Why was the power to tariff (export duties) granted? Because if the Union of States is going to prevent foreign government market-scams the foreign-market should pay for it.
But, of course, the tariffs were always going to sap Americans' standard of living.
Depends what you mean by 'standard of living'. If you go into debt to buy 30 dolls for your kid but can only earn enough for 3 dolls (let's say 2 dolls at inflated US prices plus 1 additional doll at China prices), then what is your 'standard of living'?
We have spent DECADES going into debt for consumption purposes rather than productive purposes. The only reason foreigners continually finance that shit is because the US continually bails out unproductive PRIVATE debt. That IS the dynamic behind perpetual trade deficit country - we are the buyer of first and last resort for everything. If the US consumer ever falters - or if the US debt (or for that matter any dollar-denominated debt) load hits a financial crisis, then the Fed bails out not only that consumer (via subsidized interest rates) but also bails out foreign producers (by keeping the US consumer coked up and on a consumption binge). So what is the US standard of living?
You've had some outstanding posts recently +100000000000.
So what is the US standard of living?
I can see you don’t do much international travel.
Does that "standard" include the $220,000/each-person DEBT or does endless borrowing pay for itself?
JFree is right ... "We have spent DECADES going into debt for consumption purposes rather than productive purposes."
Venezuala use to be the champion of luxury .......... till the Bill came in.
They embraced leftism. Turns out that shit doesn’t work.
You can’t give shit leftist an inch.
Where were you in 2020?? And wtf would you vote for Trump again?!?
Another acorn bopped Eric on the head, I see.
Like Sanders, Trump is wildly out of touch here. "Suck it up and make do with less" is the sort of message you'd expect from a Soviet commissar or a Venezuelan dictator
It's also what good patriotic morally upright Americans told less good degenerate scumbag Democrats when we freed their slaves and forbade Democrats from ever using it again.
The cotton still got picked, the tobacco kept growing, the sugar found its way into the coffee and baked goods. And so on and so on.
It's like you're so myopically obsessed with the idea that there's only one way to prosperity - and that it's on the back of a slave class who can produce cheap goods for mass consumption that's often for no reason other than consumption's sake (to say nothing of the first world's elitist mentality that everything is disposable so why bother taking care of it).
I mean, oh man, your kid isn't going to have THIRTY dolls? She might actually have to take extra-special care and be very protective of just two?
The horror... the horror...
What do you think would happen if China and India and Pakistan started paying their slave class workers whatever their garbage currency's equivalent is to $7.25/hr?
Same thing.
Because despite how much you hyperventilate "tariffs are taxes!!!" into your brown paper bag, they're not. What would your argument be then? "China's new $7.25/hr minimum wage is a tax on the American consumer!"
Actually, I could see you saying something that retarded.
The lower class wage gains under Trump were mostly because of $15 minimum wage regulations…they were part of the greatest economy in history!!! Suck it, Reagan!
How's that?
...because using a Gun (Gov-Gun) against your neighbor/employer is the only way you can raise your value?
Criminal mentality ... through and through.
"I don't like tariffs!"
+
"I love the minimum wage!"
=
Hypocrite.
Artificial overhead is artificial overhead.
This is, incidentally, why my support of Trump's tariffs wanes unless it's coupled with an all-out assault on the minimum wage. If we want production to resume in America, we have to give the American producer an incentive to profit by means of weighing value of that which he produces against the costs (including labor costs) it takes to produce it.
Put a regulatory thumb on that scale, and none of this works.
All-out war on minimum wage, and on unions too. But neither DJT nor JD will go down that path at this point. So, tariffs by themselves is all that we'll get.
Indeed.
And closing the border. The standard wage floor will rise once companies can't skip the minimum wage laws
Look, comrades. We just have to sacrifice a little bit more for the "common good" then finally the worker's paradise will be realized!
You're right. This is BS.
[WE] didn't do all the spending so why should [WE] all have to pay.
I propose all Tariffs (and Taxes) be specifically allocated according to party-responsibility and registered voters who pitched/passed the spending (Cares Act and ARP at the least.)
So that's Cares Act by Joe Courtney [D] signed by [R] Trump.
ARP Act by John Yarmuth [D] signed by [D] Biden.
Registered Democrats can pay 75% of Tariffs and registered Republicans can pay 25%.
As a registered Independent, I am 100% on board with this. I will henceforth dub it The Price of Partisanship.
Hey Fatfuck…….
https://www.oann.com/newsroom/ukraine-officially-agrees-to-mineral-deal-with-u-s/
“Ukraine has officially signed a deal with the United States, providing access to the nation’s rare earth minerals.”
So you lose….. again. Trump and America win……. again.
Minerals!! We’re rich, bitch!!! I’m buying a new Lamborghini!!
Hey bohem, move your chink ass to bejing and start bitching about Xi. I will bet you could only write 1 article
If the peasants have no bread, let them eat cake
Can we at least stop importing MORE peasants?
Trump's careless language gives away the truth: "will cost a couple bucks more than they would normally" . The word he should have used to keep his narrative focused was "previously". The use of "normally" indicates that something has changed from the way it is supposed to be. I doubt this level of verbal lack of editing means anything in this case, but the choice seems to come down to sloppy language vs sloppy thinking.
“We have to take some temporary hits for a more prosperous future. Stay with us. I have a plan.”
whether true or not, this is a better way to sell than, “you’ll just have to learn to live with less, you’re spoiled anyway”.
Whether true or not. Just reeks of the sustainability shit I voted for him to get us the fuck away from.
Over 80% of Democrats support significantly raising corporate taxes which encourages American companies to invest overseas to avoid the tax. Over 80% of Democrats oppose tariffs which are essentially taxes on companies that buy products from foreign sources that would encourage them to invest in America to avoid the tariff.
The tariffs imposed by Trump is not permanent at least for countries willing to balance trade with America. Over 100 countries are now attempting to get a session with the White House to discuss trade to find a way to keep America as a customer. If prices go up for a few months or some products increase for a few months the question is will it be worth it to balance trade and bring more wealth back to America and rebuild the middle class.
After the last few months of the DNC's fake news outlets 24/7 negative articles about tariffs they use to brainwash the sheep many people are now uncertain about their support or opposition. We now have a choice. Vote Democrat to raise the corporate tax and encourage them to invest overseas or vote Republican to balance trade and rebuild the middle class.
Just for the record:
Communist China cutting off strategic minerals could lead to shortages and price hikes, and the end of the USA.
China ending exports of strategic materials would cause an economic disaster in China. Stalemate.
The Chinese government is already fucking China. How exactly is fucking ourselves going to help that?
Most of us will just have to make sacrifices. Not the President of course, he is rich. I expect he will continue to skip the golf course in the Washington DC area and will still have to be flown to one of his golf courses.
"Trump admits the Sun rises in the East."
"Trump admits water is wet."
Gotcha, Orange Man Bad! Another 'reason' triumph!
And yet he still wants to pour water on the sun. Welcome to Trumpland, where up is down and black is white.
What do you expect from a man who has spent his entire life living on other people's money? If Trump had been spending his own money all these years, he'd be living under a bridge.