Trump Wants Lower Interest Rates. The Market Disagrees.
Even if the Fed tried to cut rates, inflation, investor reluctance, and a $25 trillion borrowing spree could keep them elevated for years.

President Donald Trump is reportedly considering firing Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for refusing to cut interest rates—a move Trump believes is necessary to boost construction, consumption, and job creation. But with lingering pandemic-era inflation and uncertainty over tariffs, Powell and the Fed fear that more cuts would only fuel inflation.
Even if Powell—or a Trump-appointed successor—wanted to lower rates, the market might not allow it. The U.S. borrows too much, and the bond market is getting picky.
Interest rates remain elevated by recent historical standards. The Federal Funds Rate, the short-term rate set by the Fed, is currently 4.25 percent to 4.50 percent, while the 10-year Treasury yield hovers around 4.31 percent.
Higher interest rates affect everything. First, they make servicing the debt more expensive. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), interest on the federal debt is one of the fastest-growing budget items—equivalent to 3.1 percent of gross domestic product in 2024 (more than Medicaid) and projected to rise to 5.4 percent of GDP by 2055, when its cost will be second only to Social Security. The more the government spends on interest, the less it has for everything else—and the more pressure there is to raise taxes.
Second, Treasury yields set the floor for all other interest rates, such as mortgages, car loans, and business loans. If the federal government pays 4 percent to borrow money for one year, no one will lend to a private borrower for less. It's not personal—the U.S. government has a military and the authority to tax. You don't.
Simply cutting rates risks more than short-term inflation. It could undermine demand for the trillions in bonds the government needs to sell, given that the national debt is projected to double over the next decade. According to the CBO, the federal government will need to issue $24.5 trillion in new debt, bringing the total to $50.7 trillion by 2034. If Trump enacts 2017-like tax cuts, this estimate increases by an additional $4.7 trillion over the next 10 years.
Who could lend us that much money? Only 31 percent of U.S. public debt is foreign owned. The rest is held by the Federal Reserve (27 percent), mutual funds (19 percent), banks, pensions, insurance firms, and state and local governments. Foreign governments are buying less than they used to. The Fed, historically the largest single buyer, has limited room to absorb more issuance without stoking inflation. Banks remain reliable buyers but are expected to face stricter capital requirements. That leaves yield-sensitive investors to close the gap.
Three factors determine U.S. government bond interest rates: inflation, credit risk, and supply and demand dynamics.
Inflation is perhaps the most important—and the most unpredictable. Investors demand higher returns if they expect inflation to erode real gains.
Credit risk (the risk of default) has traditionally been low, but ballooning debt and tariff uncertainty are making investors warier.
And supply and demand are becoming more influential. The debt is growing faster than the global economy. To absorb all the new bonds, investors will need to allocate more of their portfolios to Treasurys. But with Treasurys competing against stocks and real estate for capital, attracting buyers may require even higher yields. The market for "safe" assets has limits—you have to pay more to push past them.
High rates increasingly look like the new normal. The CBO assumes in its projections that rates will remain in the "high" range of 3.5 percent to 4 percent for the coming decades, citing "upward pressure from growing federal debt and downward pressure from slower growth of the labor force." Tariffs, by creating inflation, and tax cuts, by increasing the deficit and the need to issue debt, will only worsen this trend.
The national debt could push interest rates higher across the board: As Treasury yields climb to attract buyers, mortgage, business loan, and municipal bond rates must follow. Raising capital becomes harder, and the economy slows.
The national debt also limits the Fed's room to maneuver. To lower interest rates beyond market levels, the Fed could step in to buy up the debt—but that would fuel inflation and drive yields right back up.
So even if Powell—or a future Fed chair—wants to cut rates significantly, he may be constrained by the Treasury's massive financing needs. Selling $25 trillion in debt over the next decade may require keeping interest rates higher than the Fed—or the economy—would prefer.
Read full commentary here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
For every potential home buyer who wants low interest rates for his mortgage, there is a retiree who wants higher interest rates from his bonds.
Maybe just get on with the tax cuts and regulation reduction and department elimination; the interest rates will sort themselves out.
“Tax cuts are anti-libertarian!”
-The dumb shits of Reason
Trying to negotiate lower trade barriers with foreign countries is also anti libertarian.
But confiscating private wealth to redistribute amongst foreigners illegally occupying our country IS libertarian.
Congress better get the stick out of their ass and get in board with that.
We have the same interest rates now as we did during the height of the housing bubble. If anything, rates really need to be increased because inflation, especially in housing, is still so fucking massive.
I love it! I will die before the debt is a problem so cut taxes and increase deficit spending because it worked great in 2003 and 2017!! Oh wait, it didn’t increase GDP growth and so what’s the benefit of tax cuts??
Bot says what?
>>Trump Wants Lower Interest Rates. The Market Disagrees.
what's the logical fallacy describing "claiming knowledge of that which has not happened"?
Ffs.
What Reason says: President Donald Trump is reportedly considering firing Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for refusing to cut interest rates.
What its own link says: Trump Says He May Call Fed’s Powell About Interest Rates
I wonder where the discrepancy came from? Oh that’s right, Reason is parroting left wing rage narratives that were already debunked.
Bright side is I already know I can ignore this new writer after her first sentence.
They've been posting rumors about Trump unsubstantiated for a decade.
Remember when you thought Bernanke was “one of the good Jews” because he helped Bush slaughter innocent Muslims by keeping rates low in the face of elevated CPI?? That was weird, right?? Don’t you now believe his ancestors murdered Jesus??
"Remember when you thought Bernanke was “one of the good Jews”
No, I don't remember any of that because it didn't happen. You should ask your nurse for a prn.
Had to pause reading after the first sentence. Trump declared on live television from the Oval office that he has no intention of firing Powell. Is it possible for Reason to post an article on any subject without including blatant dishonesty?
There's been a number of these kinds of dire warnings about what Trump is thinking of doing, and then he doesn't do it. If you point it out to Lefty friends, their response tends to be "Well, we exposed it and caused Trump to backpedal. That's how vigorous protest and media coverage leads to victories for our side."
We refinanced our house at 2 1/8 percent interest when Biden was President. Eat your hearts out, MAGA trolls!
When did the spike occur?
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MORTGAGE30US
Chucky is so fucking stupid.
lol, you are poor!! The Biden inflation tripled the value of my real estate portfolio!! Poverty sucks!! 😉
Imagine how rich the average person in Weimar Germany got!
lol, you couldn’t feed your family because you are a loser!! In your next life get a job and buy a house instead of praying to Jesus to stop guys with smelly hairy balls swimming against girls in college! Lolololololol!!!
lol, you couldn’t feed your family because you are a loser!! In your next life get a job and buy a house instead of praying to Jesus to stop guys with smelly hairy balls swimming against girls in college! Lolololololol!!!
You don't own a house.
Why do you insist on being an unbelievable retard?
From the author's bio - "she worked in Treasury Market Risk at JP Morgan"
From LinkedIn - she was literally an INTERN at JP Morgan (3 months) and 4-months at CATO. JFC, Reason - deliver us from these lying/idiot children...
Haha, even their bios are dishonest.
The only way to lower interest rates and the deficit was to do exactly what Biden was doing…but that female swimmer with smelly hairy balls was more important to you!! Just like in 2004 when the idea of Bessent marrying his Prince Charming and hiring an Indian surrogate to crap out test tube babies made you pee your panties!!!
What does this have to do with dishonest bios?
Are you a defend Reason bot?
Bessent is married to a dude and he impregnated him via butt sex! Did I make you faint?? Hopefully you didn’t hit your head on anything hard. 😉
Now we know how you came into the world.
Good article. Except stop with CBO projections. They are complete fraud - and bond markets know that. The only purpose of those projections is to help Congress/pols sell the fraud they want to sell to the public. So that the public will be surprised when they become the bag holder in the next financial crisis.
Debt is never something that matters outside a financial crisis. It is the only thing that matters inside the crisis.
CBO scores only exist to be gamed! It’s 2025–one way exists to get the deficit to 3%…and that’s a top income tax rate of 39.6% and defense spending to what it is now and a Fed rate under 2%. Biden had us on that path by 2026 and Trump has derailed it like he did in 2017 after Obama had mostly hit Bessent’s 3% targets. I personally would take 2016 1.8% GDP and 3% deficit/GDP ratio over 2019 2.3% GDP and 4.5% deficit/GDP ratio…especially when the 1.8% was because energy prices were too low because frackers were too successful.
So which reason staff unleashed a beta AI on the commentariat?
That last several years when the deficit/GDP ratio was at or close to 3% was with 39.6% top rate. Sorry, if the deficit and debt are important to you then you must support the 39.6% top rate. Because in 2016-17 it was around 3% and then in 2018 with 2.9% GDP growth it was almost 4%. So the tax cuts juiced the economy a little but not enough to pay for them.
lol, you couldn’t feed your family because you are a loser!! In your next life get a job and buy a house instead of praying to Jesus to stop guys with smelly hairy balls swimming against girls in college! Lolololololol!!!
Winners with a lot of money like me want to get the deficit under control…losers like you don’t care about deficits because you don’t have any savings. That’s why you complained so much about inflation—Cheetos got more expensive and you had to eat less. My lake front property increased in value and I ate more steak and lobster!