As the Economy Tumbles, so Does Trump's Approval Rate
There isn't much public enthusiasm for the president's chaotic style.

President Donald Trump's approval rating has dropped to 40 percent, lower than all other presidents at this point in their terms, new polling released by Pew Research Center on Wednesday shows. Americans want Trump to govern less by executive order, listen to the courts, and don't like tariffs.
Trump is losing ground with people on the fence. From February to April, his approval rating fell from 88 percent to 75 percent among people who supported him in the 2024 election but "not strongly," and from 44 percent to 31 percent among nonvoters.
Of course, partisans will be partisans, and Trump polls just as well with Republicans (and badly with Democrats) as you would expect. But there's also been some unexpected movement, especially when it comes to the economy and trade. The poll was conducted from April 7 to April 13, at a time when the Trump administration was frantically announcing and canceling trade tariffs.
Perhaps most worrying for the Trump camp, 49 percent of Americans overall said that his policies were making the economy weaker compared to the Biden administration. In 2021, a plurality of Americans said that President Joe Biden's policies were making the economy stronger compared to the last Trump administration.
The economic chaos from tariffs is clearly wearing on Trump's own supporters. Republican confidence in Trump's ability to "make good decisions about the economy" fell from 92 percent at inauguration to 80 percent now. A majority of Republicans still said they approved of tariffs, but Republican support was not as strong as for other policies, with 29 percent disapproving.
The polling was not all good news from a libertarian perspective, however. A majority of Americans said that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cuts to federal agencies were too careless and would make the government worse at meeting people's needs. Of course, part of the problem is DOGE's own false promises, chaotic methods, and shady behaviors.
Trump's crackdown on immigration is also one of the more popular parts of his agenda. A slim majority of Americans (52 percent) said they were confident Trump would make the right decision about immigration policy, higher than the 43 percent who said so in 2019. Some of that growth came from Democrats, a sign of the anti-immigrant vibe shift in the country. Asked what they like most about the Trump administration, 20 percent said immigration actions, more than any other issue.
On the other hand, a supermajority of Americans (78 percent) said that Trump must obey if a court rules that his actions are illegal. It was a larger consensus than on any other issue. And courts have been ruling against Trump's immigration actions, such as invoking the Alien Enemies Act against Venezuelans and sending immigrants such as Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the infamous Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) in El Salvador. On Friday, the FBI arrested a judge for allegedly blocking Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents from her courtroom.
Overall, Americans seem to like stability, predictability, and the rule of law, whether it's about the economy or other issues. They don't like disruption or one-man rule.
A slim majority (51 percent) of Americans also said that Trump was doing too much by executive order, including 20 percent of Republicans. And on the question about what Americans like most about Trump, one answer beat immigration: "Nothing."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
the economy is tumbling is next week's marry a carrot.
Not a single economic metric in the article.
Metric? Since when do you cultists care about metrics?
The economic metrics for Donnie v.1 were terrible.
#CheesyPoofsTooHigh
More stupidity from the pedophile.
Should we expect any less from Turd?
I was rewatching the Southpark episode about the 2008 recession the other day and it struck me how much our economy runs on hope and faith.
And then it struck me how both of Trumps terms now, the left and the media (but I repeat myself) try to discourage people, going so far as to actively root for a recession, or worse.
it's awful they're despicable people.
on the bright side, new South Parks in a few weeks ...
I’m not sure how you parody life right now, so I’m hopeful for just silly hijinks.
There isn't much public enthusiasm for the president's chaotic style.
He was elected to throw bombs and pwn the libs and force everyone to pay attention to his childish tantrums and narcissistic babble and nonsense. We saw this shit four years ago - kicked the clown out - and elected a dead man instead.
I think the problem is far deeper than either Trump or Biden. It's that we are the clowns who elect those clowns. So good- I say let's have four more years of this shit. Maybe Americans will learn something this time.
"...childish tantrums and narcissistic babble and nonsense..."
Projection, JFucked.
Don’t you have some Jews to harass?
Any opinions on the idea that the “economic chaos” is just another angle of stakeholder capitalism/ WEF moving along with the Great Reset?
I’ve seen some decent arguments that I shouldn’t be panicking (yet) about Tariffs in this comment section.
But things like Jeffrey Sachs suddenly becoming a darling of certain conservative circles, and the overt hostility many of the post-liberal set have to free markets makes me think there might be something to it.
As I've mentioned a few times. Reason doesn't want change. They want the globalist status quo. It isn't a free market.
I think something has to be done about the China factor. My main concern is are we going to have the time and the amount of runway for things to gel.
And If we are going to be shaking things up, I would like to see a little more aimed at the ESG cartel and getting us the hell away from the UN and Agenda 2030. Because I think the whipsaw effect of dems getting back into power will heavily involve that coming back big time.
So far the only thing I’m hearing on that end is Trump offering Blackrock a controlling interest in the Panama Canal. And America hating, WEF sustainability wonk Sachs being a right wing hero on twitter right now because he pwned NATO, or something.
The polling was not all good news from a libertarian perspective, however. A majority of Americans said that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cuts to federal agencies were too careless...
This is bad news if you're a libertarian who desperately wants unelected bureaucrats to DO SOMETHING!
If, however, you grant that the current State was a bipartisan effort built over generations, and with generous public support, you might advocate for a more considered and durable approach. The Donald had plenty of time during the Reign of Biden to create the framework for a legislated deconstruction. To gain public support for structural change by proving he had a plan based in principle, and not in spite. Instead he's relying on executive actions that will be easy to reverse when Team Blue puts their next idiot into the Oval Office.
I know right. Americans love the 30T in us debt, government taxation, ever increasing welfare state. They just love it.
If they don't love it, then they should stop voting as if they do.
I'm trying to maintain the optimism I had when Trump won. I'm more hopeful for some actual change happening than at any other time. But it's getting harder to maintain that optimism on economic matters. Trump should have at least tried to get legislation for what he's trying to do rather than abusing or overusing emergency powers and EOs. We can't count on Democrats not winning in 2026. Now is the time. I hope I'm wrong and there's a plan and it will work out. But I'm not seeing the clear path forward.
They did vote against it. Last year. Why judges have had to step in to stop it all.
A very slight majority of Americans who voted voted for Trump for a variety of reasons. The legislature is still in the hands of people who have amply demonstrated that they are unwilling to do anything about the debt or reduce the budget in any significant way. I remain unconvinced that Americans have voted against 30T of debt and high taxes (even if they will say that they hate those things).
The only thing I can see sticking is the closed border. I doubt we'll go back to open borders any time soon.
Economically, I predict a disaster (unless these tariffs are overturned quickly) that will hasten our demise, but I have TDS.
There is potential for positive backlash like more free trade, or congress pulling back some authority. History suggests this is unlikely though.
FWIW, it’s pretty obvious to me you don’t have TDS (unlike some people here), as you don’t fly into a blind rage at every mention of Trump.
You do seem rather pessimistic, at least on the economy, but I think that is totally rational if you lean that way naturally. I don’t share the hate on tariffs, so I remain optimistic on the economy as a whole.
I would love to see some real cuts come out of Congress though. Which reminds me, I should look on how Rand’s recission bill is moving.
FWIW, it’s pretty obvious to me you don’t have TDS
Well thanks. Yeah, I still think we'd be worse off if Kamala won, but I'm extremely pessimistic about the tariffs. I'm a long time follower of Mises via Ron Paul and drank the free trade and anti-imperial presidency Kool Aid. I really wish the GOP in congress would push back on Trump's excesses.
On the plus DOGE, anti-DEI is great. Reducing regulations and taxes too.
I would love to see some real cuts come out of Congress though..
Me too! And how about gutting the FBI?
So you're saying they voted for it.
I'm entertained seeing Jesse go after Zeb. It's like watching a yapping Chihuahua nip at the feet of a calm German Shepard. The big dog will occasionally glance at the little pain in the ass, sometimes even gently play, but always refrains from the instant evisceration of which it's capable.
I think you're wasting your time with your partisan one liners on Zeb. From my observation, he's is way beyond your propaganda. He's a critical thinker capable parsing complicated and nuanced ideas. He's too nice to point out you've thoroughly discredited yourself.
>>To gain public support for structural change by proving you have a plan that is based in principle, and not in spite.
that was the campaign. everyone has a plan until a punch is thrown.
George Santos - sentenced to seven years.
He is talking Trump pardon for loyalty and devotion.
Donnie pardoned worse (Jan 6 terrorists)
Cite?
"Perhaps most worrying for the Trump camp..."
Worrying why? Polls do not matter at all during this time of year. At best, once mid-term primary season is in full throat there may be a little concern if low polls remain that Trump may not be able to get Maga types voted in. But reality is, polls won't really matter for anther 18 months; it is then that you need the moderates to be happy.
Another thing too... elected leaders shouldn't rule by poll. The fact that they do very well may be one of the country's biggest reasons why we are where we are today. One of the major appeals that people have to folks like AOC, Bernie Sanders, Ron Paul, John Fetterman, Trump, and a few select others have is that they don't come off as if every issue has been focus grouped is is poll approved.
"The polling was not all good news from a libertarian perspective, however. A majority of Americans said that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cuts to federal agencies were too careless and would make the government worse at meeting people's needs."
when did libertarians start placing a priority on the government meeting peoples needs ... must be auditioning for job at Jacobin or mother jones
A decade back is when I think Reason first demanded no ACA but it must be replaced with something equivalent.
Was that all of Reason or just Suderman specifically?
That seems like a weird way to interpret that paragraph. As I read it, the bad news for libertarians is that people think that the kinds of cuts they tried to make were a bad thing and not a good thing.
Who could have predicted that intentional trashing the economy, threatening war on three allies, going on TV and saying you don't believe in basic constitutional principles would tank your approval.
Better question what type of moronic fuck would still support such raving man-child.
Did the economy tank or are they just now reporting on the downward trend that started before this year? The stock market took a huge hit in the short term but is recovering. Another article wishcasting for reasons to hobble the current administration
Considering how many outlets refused to acknowledge we were in a recession from late 2022/early 2023, I’m betting they’ve just now realized the economy isn’t as great as the gaslighting fucks like shrike were making it out to be.
Another idiotic comment that bends the knee to the current administration. The article is simply detailing what a sample of people believe, in one of the latest poles - not "wishcasting" anything. And polls show that most sensible people (i.e. non-sycophants) can see the limiting and destructive nature of tariffs (and taxation) in general.
So much of economic activity depends on predictability and forecasting. And with Trump's mercurial nature, companies inevitably slow spending, consumers stop buying, and it all trickles down over time and effects those at the bottom the most. And yet idiots here support tariffs because, you know, "They do it to us!! So, so.. ugghh.. ya know.. we'll do it to them!"
You are not smarter than me.
Or me.
And I'm going to outright Derp you.
The article is simply detailing what a sample of people believe, in one of the latest poles - not "wishcasting" anything. And polls show that most sensible people (i.e. non-sycophants) can see the limiting and destructive nature of tariffs (and taxation) in general.
"The most sensible people." lol. Who "poles (sic) show."
Doesn't get more Bluesky than that, does it.
You ever notice how weird it is that they can't ever explain the "limiting and destructive nature" of those tariffs? They just declare it as such and don't expect anyone - trying really hard not to throw your word "sycophants" right back in your face - to question it?
So much of economic activity depends on predictability and forecasting.
Again, this is such a Bluesky thing that's totally ignorant of even the most basic of economic knowledge. Economic activity depends on two things: cost and value.
The Western World has long enjoyed value because we've long empowered belligerent enemy nations to abuse cost. This harms our ability to compete economically because we rightfully reject things like slavery and child labor. Democrats (and other globalists) wrongfully support that kind of thing because they've always, to this day, been the party of slavery and child abuse. Orange Man Bad is throwing a monkey in that globalist wrench by demanding that value be determined by AMERICAN standards - namely, NO SLAVERY OR CHILD LABOR. And start working with us instead of against us. Also, pay your fair share for global peacekeeping. And if you're a nation that utilizes slavery and child labor (or is otherwise just kind a dick to America), we're going to make it REAL hard for you to do business here.
What exactly is it you object to about ANY of that, Mr. Average?
Seriously. Articulate it. I triple-dog-dare you.
You think you're smarter than I am? Go for it.
lol the economy isn't tumbling you crackhead.
“The United States was more than just a nation. It’s a brand. It’s a universal brand, whether it’s our culture, our financial strength, our military strength …. America rose beyond just being a country. It was like an aspiration for most of the world. And we’re eroding that brand right now.”
“In the financial markets, no brand compares to the brand of the US Treasuries — the strength of the US dollar and the strength and creditworthiness of US Treasuries. No brand came close. We put that brand at risk.”
Spot on, Ken Griffin.