Trump's Tariffs Target Uninhabited Islands, Economic Dead Zones, and Individual Regions of France
The nonsensical list of territories subject to the White House's new "reciprocal" tariffs shows how amateurish the administration's new trade policy is.

If you've ever played the online game Worldle, where players guess a country based on its silhouette, you'll know the frustrating experience of failing to accurately identify the day's blob that turns out to be some insignificant island territory.
Frustrated Worldle players (at least American ones) can now have their revenge on these random statelets, thanks to President Donald Trump's newly unveiled tariff regime.
FULL LIST: Liberation Day pic.twitter.com/ZBiRuJBCAr
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) April 2, 2025
Included in the White House's "Liberation Day" list of countries to be hit with "reciprocal" tariffs are a host of uninhabited islands, economic dead zones, and administrative subregions with no independent trade policy of their own.
Heard and McDonald Islands, an uninhabited Australian territory, will now pay a 10 percent tariff on any exported goods the penguins there manage to export to the U.S.
So will the British Indian Ocean Territory—a U.K. overseas territory that (thanks to a mid-century ethnic cleansing) is depopulated but for military personnel and contractors at the island's British and American bases.
The White House's list also includes the French overseas departments and regions of French Guiana, Reunion, Guadeloupe, Martinique, and Mayotte—all of which are legally part of France proper, and therefore have their trade policy set by the European Union.
How exactly uninhabited islands and administrative regions of France ended up on the White House's tariff list isn't exactly clear.
All do have their own two-letter country code on the United Nations Code for Trade and Transport Locations (UN/LODE), which is used to facilitate trade and generate trade data.
It's possible then that the White House just cut and pasted from this list to create its own tariff targets.
To be sure, there are about 50 countries and territories on the UN/LODE list that don't appear on the Trump administration's tariff list. The White House's list is at least curated enough to exclude U.S. overseas territories, the Vatican, and Palestine—all of which have their own UN/LODE code.
Reason has written prolifically on the economic illogic of Trump's tariffs. Social media is aflame with posts pointing out the administration's ludicrous formula for calculating the "reciprocal tariffs" it will charge other countries.
Amazingly, the inclusion of uninhabited territories and administrative regions of larger countries and trade blocs fails to even match the administration's own protectionist logic.
If the new tariffs are supposed to equalize bilateral trade balances between the U.S. and every other country, it makes little sense that the White House also levy tariffs on places that have no economic activity.
It also doesn't make a lot of sense that it would tariff European overseas regions that don't set their own trade policy.
If the White House is trying to create an equal balance of exports and imports with French Guiana, as opposed to France as a whole, why not also have Paris-specific tariffs?
(E.U. law does allow for reduced taxes on locally produced products in its overseas regions, but Trump's tariffs don't reflect this. France's overseas departments get their own tariff rates, but Spain's Canary Islands, which has reduced taxes on locally produced goods but doesn't have its own UN/LODE code, don't.)
The cut-first, paste-next, and ask-questions-later nature of these new tariffs is just more evidence of how Trump's global round of tariffs is not just impoverishing, but also silly and amateurish.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
No one wins a trade war when you tariff non-existent goods!
You never complained about Biden's policies you hypocrite. That invalidates your criticism and makes whatever Trump does ok.
Biden never came out with anything this objectively stupid. I am not sure any president ever has.
No just thinking a man in a wheel chair could walk, Jackie was still alive, he was top of his class in law school, and unvaxxed were going to face a severe winter of death.
It's a sad day when a geriatric president with dementia did a better job of running the country #nobodyforpresident.
I wouldn't quite go that far. The Democrats remain the evil party. But Trump appears to be torpedoing the GOP's chances of retaining Congress in 2026 for no good reason at all.
That's what bothers me the most. I don't mind the Dems impeaching Trump again, they'll probably find some actual reason this time, like tariffs and emergencies. The real problem is trashing things so badly that the Dems win in 2028.
It's like you openly despise free trade.
If the "you" here is Trump and-or Trumpanzees at large, no sane, data-driven person could possibly disagree with You!!!
Quiet spaz. The adults are talking.
It's like you openly have no fucking clue what the term means.
Language.
Well go ahead and enlighten me, Albie. By all means, the floor is yours.
This is what he does. He acts all crazy then asks for something reasonable and people happily agree.
How professional was Biden's?
I mean, you're not wrong, but you spend a lot of time over the last decade tearing into Trump while never comparing him to his predecessors.
You don't even acknowledge any of the things he's doing that libertarians should want (outside of eliminating the DOE - you guys were all over that) just tariffs tariffs tariffs.
Ah, so by including those Australian and UK territories as part of Australia and the UK, Trump is behaving oddly?
Do you also think including Guam as part of the US is odd?
Of course there are places that are uninhabited or sparsely settled that get included with the tariffs on the nations that control them.
Exactly how stupid ARE you people anyway?
What will Hunza, Sikkim, the New Hebrides and Biafra do with all money they'll save as tariff exempt non-existent nations?