The Logical Contradictions of Trump's Case for Tariffs
Taxes on imports cannot possibly deliver all the benefits the president is promising.

Tariffs "will always be the best way to max out our economic power," President Donald Trump declared during his first term, predicting that his trade war would "MAKE AMERICA RICH AGAIN." Not rich enough, apparently, because Trump is still touting the magic of tariffs, which he says will "pay off our debt" and "MAKE AMERICA WEALTHY AGAIN!"
Judging from the dizzying array of tariffs that Trump has imposed this time around, he believes what he says. But his faith is rooted in claims that are logically inconsistent as well as economically implausible.
Trump argues that tariffs will stimulate the U.S. economy by boosting domestic production, which is possible only if tariffs make imports more expensive. Yet Trump is loath to admit that tariffs collected from importers translate into higher prices for U.S. businesses and consumers.
"China is eating the Tariffs," Trump claimed during his first trade war. The upshot, he said, was that "cost increases have thus far been almost unnoticeable." If so, there was little reason to expect that tariffs would help U.S. companies at the expense of their foreign competitors.
Trump is still pushing these contradictory claims. The White House claims tariffs "do not raise prices" yet somehow "create new incentives for US consumers to buy US-made products."
During a recent interview, by contrast, Trump admitted that his 25 percent tariff on imported cars might make them more expensive. "I couldn't care less if they raise prices," he said, "because people are going to start buying American-made cars."
Even that concession was misleading, because those "American-made cars" frequently incorporate foreign-made parts, which are also covered by Trump's tariffs. Overall, Yale's Budget Lab estimates, Trump's tariffs will raise car prices by 13.5 percent, adding $6,400 to the cost of "an average new 2024 car."
Trump seems to recognize that problem. But his solution defies the economics of international car production chains. During a conference call this month, The Wall Street Journal reports, Trump warned the CEOs of major U.S. carmakers they had "better not raise car prices because of tariffs," saying "the White House would look unfavorably on such a move."
In addition to making us rich, Trump says, his tariffs will generate enough revenue to "pay off" the national debt, which currently exceeds $35 trillion, including $29 trillion in debt held by the public. Even according to the administration's own projections, that math does not add up.
Peter Navarro, Trump's senior counselor for trade and manufacturing, estimates that "tariffs are going to raise about $600 billion a year, about $6 trillion over a 10-year period." As Reason's Eric Boehm notes, that would amount to "the biggest peacetime tax increase in American history."
It is still not enough to eliminate the $2 trillion annual budget deficit, let alone make a dent in the national debt, especially since Navarro says the tariff revenue will be needed to cover the cost of extending the income tax cuts that Congress approved in 2017. And if the tariffs work as advertised by reducing imports, the revenue stream that Trump is counting on will dwindle over time.
Trump ignores that tradeoff too, pretending tariffs can be a reliable source of easy revenue even though they are designed to shrink the flow of the products on which they are levied. As Trump tells it, we can tax ourselves to prosperity at no cost to Americans and use the windfall to tackle the federal government's looming fiscal crisis.
If all that is true, it is a mystery why Trump also presents tariffs as a bargaining tool that can be used to extract concessions from other countries, such as assistance in border control and the war on drugs. Such threats work only if Trump is willing to forgo the supposedly unalloyed benefits of tariffs.
"Tariffs are the greatest thing ever invented," Trump says. But as he presents it, that invention consists of clashing parts held together by nothing but wishful thinking.
© Copyright 2025 by Creators Syndicate Inc.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Truly, does anyone care at all about anything Jacob Sullum writes any longer?
Reason has turned into a contest between the myriad "editors" to see who can discredit libertarian philosophy the hardest.
Shit is the fascist, AuthorShitarian, and TotalShitarian TrumptatorShit-worshitting group-thinking and group-stinking, Orange-DicktatorShit-Sucking imbeciles cummenting right HERE who TRY to discredit libertarian philosophy the hardest, by shitting all over it! Shit is oblivious to the casual observer!
S;AP (SQRLSY;About Poop)
He will claim that is part of a smear campaign.
Twat You so PervFectly say, Chumpy-Chump, is just an itty-bitty shitty-cummittee turd in the punch-bowl!
Trump claimed during his first trade war [the tweet that this link takes me to doesn't have this quote, please update].
It appears they need more 'editors.'
I care because Sullum is still writing for Reason. Let me point out what I see as Jacob's problem from his writing:
"Trump argues that tariffs will stimulate the U.S. economy by boosting domestic production, which is possible only if tariffs make imports more expensive. Yet Trump is loath to admit that tariffs collected from importers translate into higher prices for U.S. businesses and consumers."
Politicians are salesmen: selling favors to big donors, and selling policies to citizens, and what Trump is doing is selling the benefits of tariffs to consumers by promoting the benefits and dismissing the costs. Jacob is complaining that Trump is not telling the whole story via omission of important facts. If only he was as outraged at Democratic lies (too many and too consequential to list here).
Where Sullum really goes wrong, is ignoring the benefits of tariffs over other taxation (and the fact that all taxation raises prices, not just tariffs). Yet, it appears Sullum "is loath to admit that tariffs collected from importers" stimulates local production. Nor does he discuss the fact that the federal government ran on almost entirely tariff income until about 1910 before there was an income tax, or Trump's desire to eliminate the income tax (something that will lower cost of goods/services in the US) via revenues from tariffs.
Yeah, Sullum has a bad case of TDS. If I were in Sullum's shoes and hated Trump like he does, I'd stick to criticizing Trump for his desire to give favors to specific groups such as "no tax on tips" (if we're going to tax income, tips are income, and isn't that promoting strip clubs?), his suggested favor to the auto and banking industry of allowing individuals to deduct interest on car loans, or his idea to bring back the SALT deductions.
Trump, who was uneducated about government when first elected IMHO, has plenty of anti-libertarian ideas to criticize in Reason. Yet, Trump is the most libertarian president since long before I was born. Glenn Reynolds on substack defends Trump as a libertarian. That is so unlike Sullum, who writes for an alleged libertarian magazine which won't be considered libertarian with articles like this.
Sullum isn’t in any way libertarian. He’s a far left globalist moron.
I come here for you guys!
To local?
https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2025/03/21/consumers-energy-receives-153-8m-electric-rate-hike-increase/82595254007/
This will effect me much more than tariffs. I'm having a hard time understanding how tariffs are more important than a fascist takeover of energy.
I don’t get the math. If they serve 2 million customers but are hiking rates by 154 million, that’s roughly $77 per customer, not $2.78. Even if you take that as yearly, that still equals $6.40 per customer per bill.
Am I missing something?
To local?
Recall you brushed off concerns of price increases from tariffs with the retort that you are not going to buy a Civic. So by your own standards, yes, too local.
Civics are built in the U.S. That may not be a great retort.
Yeah, the thread I alluded to was about a new Civic producing factory in the US.
I'm in Michigan also. Gretchen's edict that we all get power from wind turbines and solar panels is what's driving these cost increases.
I have property in the thumb and they're trying to destroy our landscape by forcing these giant windmills. In my little township, the board of supervisors voted to allow them (thanks to farmer lobbying), and in the next election, the entire board was replaced.
Yet Michiganders continue to vote Dems in. I still don't get it.
"Yet Michiganders continue to vote Dems in. I still don't get it."
Seems it's possible that farmers find installing windmills profitable, so lobbied for this via cash donations to board of supervisors' candidates. And your post suggests voters replaced the board with new Democrats who are against the windmills, which seems unlikely given the discipline that Democratic leadership demands from their party members by cancelling those that disagree.
If you want to understand politics, you need to understand why politicians put government in the middle of civil transactions among people and demand the right to prohibit the transaction or take a cut: it's for the money.
If you don't want farmers lobbying for windmills on their farms, you should oppose wind power subsidies. Then farmers won't want them and won't lobby for them.
Everything isn't law....
Called a 'scab' during the campaign, Donald Trump wins UAW backing on tariffs
Cast your mind back to Kamala:
2024 Election
Harris calls Trump’s tariff proposals a ‘sales tax on the American people’
Harris also said if elected she would raise taxes on corporations: "It’s about paying their fair share.”
Double tax on shareholders, many are pensions and normal families--- can you say that isn't 2 times worse
Notice they never define 'fair share'.
Using old Adam Smith's comparative advantage I think tariffs accomplish 3 things at once
On Tuesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Office, Finance Ministry, and Economy and Industry Ministry announced that it would end all tariffs on the U.S. to encourage greater market competition, diversify the economy, and lower the cost of living for Israeli citizens.
1) It shifts trade to those who are our friends. Trading with a Russia that would gladly wipe us off the map might make sense to you but it can only be economic sense, sure isn't sane on any other standard.
2)Complanies that look to the bottom line will open shop here -- to avoid tariffs
3) Even Jefferson (as I recall, don't have the citation) was for protective tariffs so it is hard to say that there is never a place
The reality is that politicians have been selling out US producers to foreigners in foreign countries for cash in their pockets for at least 50 years, via trade deals they make. BTW, they get more money the worse the deal is for US citizens. This isn't good policy for Americans.
Trump is using tariffs to make foreign countries more civil and above board, sweeping away favors only the politically connected get, not only in the US, but also globally. This is good for Americans, and everyone else in the world, except those getting money they didn't earn (e.g., Hunter Biden's job on the Burisma board, and the owners of Burisma).
JS;dr
JS; dr
JS; dr
JS;nr. (Jacob Sullm, never read)
VD;dr. VD (Venereal Disease) is some BAD shit! Go see the Dr. if you've got the VD!!! THAT is why I say VD;dr.!!!
Tear If Needed
Netanyahu's office: Israel has lifted all tariffs imposed on US products.
- Bellum Acta
Sarc says this is awful for producers and consumers because of some bumpersticker.
This is I believe the 6th country to do this.
But the fools who fell for unilateral trade is free trade lies will never admit these instances.
We are seeing many countries realize the tit for tat strategy and reduce their tariffs on the US, leading to less barriers between entities. The countries most dug in right now have the biggest advantage through current agreements.
But they can never admit these advantages of one market actor over another because globalists want the advantage.
Been fun watching.
Trump is successfully eliminating the ability of elites, politicians and the politically connected, to buy favors (of the import/export duty kind) from politicians (remember how Obama "gave" Biden Ukraine and what Biden did there and how its exposure led the political class to impeach Trump for asking Ukraine to look into what the Bidens did and if it was legal - which is Trump's job to investigate and prosecute crimes by Americans against America's laws).
It's a win for everyone except those in the political class who want money they don't earn via free exchange.
And yeah, we won't hear reports of the countries lowering their tariffs and the US doing so for them in return, because it's not in the interests of the political class. Instead, you'll hear that tariffs raise costs (and they do) while ignoring that all taxes raise the cost of goods/services and they'll falsely blame high prices on Trump because he's cutting spending and taxes.
See, tariffs are great because it permits the US government to manipulate consumers' spending choices and direct them to places where the US government thinks they should go.
You want to buy cheap shit from China? Sorry, the government has decided that your choice is the 'wrong' choice and will tax you for your wrongthink. If it means that you must pay higher prices for the same products produced domestically, than from China, then that is just the price you must pay for being a good loyal patriot of the USA. It's our patriotic duty to buy from American manufacturers even if their prices are too high. That is what the government has so decreed.
It just kills you that Trump is successful. So you just flail and gibberish idiotically. And as I write this, even more of your precious illegals are being rounded up and deported.
Seethe harder Jeffy.
Does your allowance let you buy stuff?
Taxes on imports cannot possibly deliver all the benefits the president is promising.
Only open borders can do all things - Reason
Only TrumptatorShit-Worshitting can do all things - Spiritual Malpractice
I'm not new here, but I lurk now and then. Do you ever have anything somewhat logical to say?
Bunches!!! Read on...
I for one can’t STAND the idea that a casual reader here of a libertarian news and commenting site would read the vapid and vile comments, and conclude, “Oh, so THAT’s what libertarians are all about!” No, it’s just that REAL libertarians (and VERY few others) still believe in free speech, so the troglodytes come HERE, where their vile lies & vapid insults will NOT be taken down!
The intelligent, well-informed, and benevolent members of tribes have ALWAYS been feared and resented by those who are made to look relatively worse (often FAR worse), as compared to the advanced ones. Especially when the advanced ones denigrate tribalism. The advanced ones DARE to openly mock “MY Tribe’s lies leading to violence against your tribe GOOD! Your tribe’s lies leading to violence against MY Tribe BAD! VERY bad!” And then that’s when the Jesus-killers, Mahatma Gandhi-killers, Martin Luther King Jr.-killers, etc., unsheath their long knives!
“Do-gooder derogation” (look it up) is a socio-biologically programmed instinct. SOME of us are ethically advanced enough to overcome it, using benevolence and free will! For details, see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Do_Gooders_Bad/ and http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/ .
Then they crucified Jesus, 'cause Jesus made them look bad! ALSO because Jesus made them look bad FOR THEIR STUPID, HIDE-BOUND TRIBALISM! "The parable of the Good Samaritan" was VERY pointed, because the Samaritans were of the WRONG tribe, in the eyes of "Good Jews" of the day.
Instead of KILLING Jesus, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., etc., we’d be better off VOTING for these kinds of people! But we will NOT, ’cause they Hurt Our Precious Baby Feelings, by giving tribalism and do-gooder derogation the disrespect that they (we self-righteous tribalists) SOOO thoroughly deserve!
Really longwinded way of saying "No I don't"
You resent the hell out of the fact that many other people are flat-out, better, more honest people than you are, right? More “live and let live”, and WAAAY less authoritarian?
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-love-and-war/201706/why-some-people-resent-do-gooders
From the conclusion to the above…
“These findings suggest that we don’t need to downplay personal triumphs to avoid negative social consequences, as long as we make it clear that we don’t look down on others as a result.”
SQRLSY back here now… So, I do NOT want you to feel BAD about YOU being an authorShitarian asshole, and me NOT being one! PLEASE feel GOOD about you being an evil, lying asshole! You do NOT need to push me (or other REAL lovers of personal liberty) down, so that you can feel better about being an asshole! EVERYONE ADORES you for being that asshole that you are, because, well, because you are YOU! FEEL that self-esteem, now!
Did it do ‘Tim the Enchanter’ again?
Morons are too stupid and lazy to read for shitselves, then beg their only-slightly-less-lazy-and-stupid fellow-travelling fascists to do their reading for their shitselves!!! Twat an udder slurprise!
Once in a blue moon he gets coherent.
Lol. So fucking true.
As Reason's Eric Boehm notes, that would amount to "the biggest peacetime tax increase in American history."
We have the 'biggest' peacetime debt:GDP ratio in American history. Cutting spending will only stop the bleeding. Biden's inflate the deficit away has been disastrous.
Boehm seems to miss that just the interest payment is more than the defense budget
Sullum writing about logical contradictions is a logical contradiction.
JS;tr;dr
Trump defenders want higher taxes and higher prices.
No, we just understand that the world is a different place now, and for a country to survive, it needs to take care of its own. There may be some adjustments people have to make, but in the long run, it's necessary.
There is an economic theory that has buttressed globalists for decades. Unfortunately their beliefs have leaked into even institutions like CATO. This push is primarily by globalists and corporations.
They have instituted unilateral trade and advantage seeking at the expense of others. They have claimed this is free trade when it is not. Very few countries realized what was happening, but ironically China was one. So they went with it while creating a dependency. This has allowed China soft global power.
The theory is one claimed to be comparative advantage and unilateral trade, but it is solely advantage seeking.
It is to raise production costs on the rich western world while moving production to more state controlled societies still even using slave labor. This has made some corporate and globalist entities rich. It has given power to countries who don't have freedoms as an ideal.
Offshore manufacturing. Allow uneven trade advantage, high tariffs for some while demanding none for western countries. Increase regulatory costs while excusing it for poor countries.
Every production advantage has been taken from western countries and given to entities like china. See Paris climate deal as a grand example.
All of this done under the false claim of free trade.
Then on top of that Marxists saw what was happening and started demanding western countries also take on global poverty. Funding from western countries to poor countries. Mass migration. This is all to allow disruption and try to take down the global economic system built the last few centuries.
People like sarc just aren't informed enough or care enough to understand this.
He’s also Kiley too brain damaged at this point to learn anything. Sarc might be a pathetic joke, but severe lifelong alcoholism is not.
You mean you have no understanding of economics and want a return to the protectionist and mercantilist policies that Adam Smith debunked nearly two and a half centuries ago. Just like the idiotic grey box that I'm not going to waste brain cells reading.
The idiotic grey box says it read a book on game theory and now knows more about economics than Nobel winning economists.
What's your excuse?
You're an absolute professional at shooting whatever argument you may have in the foot. I mean, I against ad hominem attacks so I don't like the way a lot of people respond to you. However, the strawman moniker is really fitting.
Ok Soiler, whatever you say.
Being frequently inebriated and having little emotional control plus the reliance on strawmen is a perfect storm for poor arguments. Maybe one day he’ll be able to fail up.
Reminds me of when Democrats raise the minimum wage and think corporations can just use their profits to cover the raise without prices going up. Trump just used that same logic. He is assuming foreign companies have so much extra profit they can absorb the tariffs and not raise prices.
Why doesn't RINO catch on for this guy?
Republicans understand that when Democrats tax corporations, the tax is just another expense that gets passed along to customers in the form of higher prices.
Republicans also understand that when Trump taxes corporations in the form of tariffs, if you say the tax is just another expense that will be passed along to customers in the form of higher prices then you're a leftist with TDS.
See? It's totally different when Trump does it.
Ontario to drop all tarriffs
Sullum because he is a dishonest hack ignores 3 things:
1) Other countries impose all kinds of tariffs. That's ok right? 250% for butter by Canada
2) Higher import tariffs make businesses decide on where to build. No where do you talk about the what's it around the trillion dollars being invested by companies in the US - just look at auto plants for example. You talk auto parts made all over, but don't discuss that they will be made here.
3) Sullum seems not to be able to process it's a negating tactic. Being the number 1 economy, he's using it to get concessions be it illegal immigrant to drugs.
Yes, tariffs raises prices in the short term. Long term we will see.
2022: BIDENFLATION IS KILLING AMERICA!!!
2025: Stop whining about Trump raising prices, it's for your own good.