Trump Ends Program for Legal Migrants From Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela
Over 500,000 migrants used the program to enter and work in the U.S.

The Trump administration announced Friday that it would end a program that allowed hundreds of thousands of migrants to live and work in the United States. Established under President Joe Biden, the initiative offered legal status and work authorization to Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans (CHNV) who passed security screenings and secured U.S.-based financial sponsors.
Over 500,000 migrants used the program to come to the U.S. legally—suggesting that many people will choose an accessible legal pathway over illegal entry. Getting rid of the CHNV program eliminates that choice for future migrants and penalizes those who came to the country "the right way."
The Biden administration launched the CHNV program in January 2023, building on an October 2022 program open only to Venezuelans. It allowed sponsored and vetted migrants to stay and work in the U.S. for two years under an immigration authority known as "parole." The president may extend that status to migrants for humanitarian or public benefit purposes. Republican and Democratic presidents have leaned on parole over the years, granting it to Hungarian refugees in the 1950s, Chinese immigrants in the 1960s, Soviets in the 1980s, and many others.
The CHNV program was one of several private sponsorship schemes created by the Biden administration. They allowed groups of private citizens to join together to sponsor migrants, reducing the government's financial and logistical burdens. Private sponsorship models encourage integration since sponsor groups act as a built-in network for migrants. They also incentivize sponsors to help migrants become employed and self-sufficient more quickly since they're financially responsible for them.
The CHNV program came as migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela were crossing the U.S.-Mexico border in record numbers, many fleeing authoritarian regimes, economic ruin, and persecution. The program hit several obstacles, including a 2023 lawsuit brought by 20 GOP-led states seeking to end it. In a somewhat surprising move, the Biden administration declined to extend the legal status of CHNV beneficiaries last fall, advising them to seek other immigration benefits.
It's not clear how many CHNV beneficiaries have managed "to secure another status that will allow them to stay in the country legally," CBS News reported. Those statuses are narrow (and narrowing). One possible avenue, asylum, is limited to people who can prove that they faced or may face specific kinds of persecution in their home country. The Trump administration has rolled back temporary protected status designations for Haitians and Venezuelans, which shielded them from deportation. With CHNV benefits set to expire on March 25, many of the program's half-million beneficiaries could soon find themselves living and working in the U.S. illegally.
The CHNV program's end doesn't come as much of a surprise. In February, the Trump administration halted all applications to the program over "fraud and security concerns," CBS News reported. That followed a move to allow "federal immigration agents to seek the deportation—including in an expedited fashion in some cases—of those permitted to enter the U.S. under the CHNV program and other Biden administration policies."
Writing for Reason in August, Cato Institute immigration policy analysts Alex Nowrasteh and David Bier argued that "oddities and errors" among CHNV applications were "not evidence of fraud," but rather "part and parcel of large administrative datasets, especially those compiled by the government."
While "there is likely some fraud in CHNV," they wrote, "to undermine" the program would be to "undermine American border security, reduce the economic gains from immigration, and impose huge humanitarian burdens on migrants fleeing totalitarian socialism in Latin America and the Caribbean." That's the choice the Trump administration is making now.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Trump Ends Program for Legal Migrants From Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela
Doing the job he was elected to do.
Was this program even approved by Congress. Sarc needs to know. Curious as to why reason isn't asking the question.
From Fiona, it seems to have been by EO.
I bet dollars to donuts that if it had been created by legislation, she'd have said it loud and proud.
Trump did not run on kicking legal immigrants out of the country. And it does not matter if he did for the legal arguments now don't care what he ran on.
Trump did not run on kicking legal immigrants out of the country.
But that’s not what’s happening.
What legal argument?
Because what Fire and Mary are saying upend decades of understanding that visas and green cards have conditions. So please cite the statutory law.
He ran on kicking undesirables out, and is base is rejoicing.
Who’s more undesirable than you?
To be fair to the lad, Pluggo is more undesirable. Chemjeff. Sullum.
All the brown people ?
That evil Joe. Not renewing the program last year. Democrats are such racists.
It boggles the mind how inhumane, actually vicious, the government can be, while at the same time sabotaging the economy and encouraging the immigration black market.
Not just Trump or Rs.
Shut up, cuck boy.
Well... Biden didn't extend their 2 year parole visas last October. Damn you trump!
I guess the autopen wasn’t working that day.
It was likely in for repairs.
Overheated and seized up.
Like sarcs liver.
Hers another gem……
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/03/25/trump-administration-ends-taxpayer-funded-housing-programs-illegals/
Sarc, Pedo Jeffy, and Tony Godiva hardest hit.
I don’t really care, Fiona. Maybe the soon to be out of work federal government employees can take their place and do those jobs?
Problem solved
Martha’s Vineyard farthest from hardest hit.
Yeah it's just a big joke until you need a food truck.
At least they don’t have to worry about being invaded by another four dozen illegals ever again.
https://www.newsweek.com/venezuelan-migrants-parole-lapse-joe-biden-chnv-1963608
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/immigration/3177979/biden-ending-parole-migrants-admitted-cbp-one-app-haiti/
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
By the way. This was one of the most fraud filled programs in immigration history. Each applicant required a sponsor. Thousands claimed to have the same aunt for example.
"used the program to enter and ?work? in the U.S."
Right.. /s That's why 51% of immigrant households are on welfare and 75% will vote for more welfare when given the chance.
Pitching a headline that represents but a mere 25% of the immigrant population.
Meanwhile the migrants employers were heavily subsidized by tax dollars by paying for their housing, welfare, etc.
You know it! Immigrants are magic. They don't work at all while stealing jobs. They don't contribute while paying taxes. They vote while not being eligible to vote. They're truly magical beings.
^Sarc the Self-Projecting Collectivist Judge.......
Who likes to run around accusing everyone else of identity prejudice while he insists the 25% stealing jobs must be the exact same as the 51% collecting welfare and the 75% who will vote for socialism when given the chance.
The only contradiction you have is your own collective prejudice on display.
Got any proof of these numbers? Seems like something you pulled out of your ass. Besides, you've said that you refuse to learn economics, logic or math because you say they're leftist, and if you learned those things you might change your tune. Based upon all of that I need a lot more proof before I'm going to believe something from someone as willful and deliberately ignorant as you.
https://cis.org/Report/Welfare-Use-Immigrant-and-Native-Households
And again. What is this like 3-Times now?
Sarc is fond of his strawmen and false equivalencies. It’s all he’s got.
CATO's response
https://www.cato.org/blog/center-immigration-studies-exaggerates-immigrant-welfare-use
Always nice to hear from those frauds.
Which doesn't disprove a single claim in the study.
Just a BS "what-if" immigrant households are all chuck full of natives fairy-tale.
It showed that they deliberately twisted and ignored data so they could arrive at their predetermined conclusion in a masturbatory way.
Stop describing yourself.
CATO didn't supply any data so how could the study 'ignore' any data that doesn't even exist???
They literally pulled a "what-if" scenario to discount the data without even collecting the "what-if" data they needed to support the "what-if". Did they collect data on how many natives are sucking off immigrant household welfare NO............ You're not based in data what-so-ever. You're based in pure imaginary BS "what-if".
2024: BIDENFLATION IS KILLING AMERICA!!!!!11!11
2025: Only pussies complain about higher prices. Suck it up, Buttercup.
When is that happening? Inflation dropped.
Just glad all those federal dollars going to your favored class of immigrants has zero effect on inflation. That would make you look silly if it did.
Did congress directly approve these visas and program?
I don't know who or what you're arguing against, but it ain't me.
Did congress approve this program? You keep saying they are supreme and nothing can be done without them. Or is this (D)ifferent?
Nice job editing your comment to not look like a retard BTW lol.
Fucking dishonest shit. What a pathetic pathalogical shit.
I prefer high fences and wide gates. You like low fences and very narrow gates.
Meaning that I'd rather those who want to work be able to legally come here to work, freeing border police to catch the bad guys.
You want to strangle all immigration while expecting border police to catch the criminals amid the flood of people risking the consequences of coming here to work illegally.
I just want people who want to work to be able to come to work. Not to go on welfare. Not to get handouts. But to work and grow the economy.
You oppose that tooth and nail.
Sarc: fuck you cut spending
Also sarc: fuck you, not the tens of billions on immigrants.
Also sarc,: fuck you, not waste fraud and abuse.
Jesse: I make shit up to argue against and lie about what people say, attack people instead of what people say, try to gaslight them by saying they don't know what strawman or ad hominem means, and get applause from strangers on the internet. I can prove it with my THOUSANDS of bookmarked comments. But I'm not a loser without a life. Nope. Not me.
If I respond to this comment are you going to edit it again?
You just used a lot of words you don't know the definitions of btw. See this mornings thread lol.
Ask the voices in your head. See what they say. Because you argue with them more than you argue with me.
Your Jesse Derangement Syndrome is really getting the better of you, dudette.
Ideas™ !
GOOD.
Biden and Kamala - and their leftist NGO lickspittles - weaponized this program to dump tens of thousands of immigrants into deep red areas - such as Springfield, Ohio - similar to what Putin and Lukashenko have been trying to do with Middle Eastern immigrants directed against the Poles. If Biden and Kamala were truly altruistic and interested in only the well-being of these poor waifs, why did they not put them in pretty much any major city that could more easily have accommodated them (and are also mostly "sanctuary" cities)? And as others here have mentioned, they provided cheap labor for greedy companies while sucking up lots of government freebies and overtaxing the local education system and infrastructure, so to say they only brought sunshine and rainbows with them is utter bullshit.
So Biden set up a temporary backdoor immigration scheme accomplished through an App because his open border policies had overwhelmed the system and it was found to be rife with fraud to the extent that he had to pause it. By definition these people are not here permanently and subject to deportation. You can like or not but just be honest about it if you can bring yourself to face reality.
Readers added context: Food truck deficit threatens DC government zoomers well being. Cato warns of mass starvation as Reason editors forced to survive on cocktail party snacks.
I'm trying to figure out why I'm supposed to pay for and support fast-tracking 500,000!!!!! migrants from these countries.
Don't you know giving extorted tax money to illegals was written on the tablets handed down from Mt. Liberty by Ayn Rand (praise be upon her)?
Well, socialism is so great that those living in Cuba and Venezuela don't need to flee. Haiti is full of BIPOCs so it has to be doing great.
"Immigrants" from countries in chaos, or those from countries that are hostile to the USA, cannot be "vetted".
Good.
The Biden Administration was overwhelmed at the border, so they made a program to magically transform 500,000 people into temporary legal immigrants. And then paused the program. But the Trump administration is shutting it down completely so he's the bad guy?
So Dementia Joe killed off the program, but it's Trump's fault for not reinstating it? Sheesh -- this is TDS on mescaline.
And by the way, Fionna, how many Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan, and Venezuelan immigrants did you sponsor?
Probably thousands—their Aunt Fionna.