Is Trump's Trade War Causing a Recession?
The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow forecast plunged into recessionary territory, stocks wiped out $4 trillion in value, and consumers are pulling back. How long will Washington ignore the warning signs?

Any hope of robust economic growth resulting from unleashing energy abundance, deregulating the private sector economy, or pro-growth tax policy may now be doused by the economic fallout of a pointless trade war.
It started as a murmur—a slight downward revision, nothing alarming. But within five days, the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta's GDPNow forecast for the first quarter of 2025 went from mild optimism (2.3 percent growth) to outright recessionary territory (-1.5 percent). By March 3, the number had plunged to -2.8 percent, the kind of contraction that doesn't just signal weakness but outright economic distress. Eight months of stock market gains were wiped out in less than four weeks.
Yet there is deafening silence from Washington. The Trump administration remains deeply committed to its protectionist crusade, under the misguided belief that tariffs and trade barriers come at no cost to Americans. But reality is setting in, and the numbers don't lie. The ongoing trade war, with its uncertainty and economic distortions, is now visibly hammering investment, exports, and consumption—three pillars of growth.
A significant downward revision in the real gross domestic product (GDP) forecast in late February was the first real shock. The trade imbalance increased dramatically, cutting almost four percentage points off GDP growth in one stroke, as businesses accelerated imports in anticipation of tariff hikes. This "front-loading" behavior has been observed in previous trade wars—companies rush to stock up on foreign goods before new tariffs raise costs, causing a temporary import surge.
Personal consumption, which has been an engine of growth since the pandemic, was revised down from 2.3 percent to 1.3 percent. That was the warning sign: consumers—who have been remarkably resilient—were starting to pull back. The economic data only worsened when the March 3 numbers came out. Private fixed investment, which includes business investment and residential investments, collapsed dramatically from 3.5 percent to near zero, while consumption also fell to near zero.
The most recent real GDP forecast update didn't signal much of an improvement—personal consumption fell again, with net exports continuing to reduce real GDP by 3.9 percent. It turns out protectionism and economic central planning have a very real price, and the bill for undermining free trade has come due.
It's not just GDP numbers flashing red. As anyone with a retirement account or personal investments would have noticed, the stock market has had a bad month. Economic uncertainty created by the tit-for-tat trade war has had a dramatic impact on investor sentiment. The S&P 500 has lost over $4 trillion in market value so far.
In the three short weeks ending March 13, the S&P 500 dipped 10 percent, commonly referred to as a market correction, wiping out billions in household wealth. Retirement accounts, pensions, and personal savings have taken a direct hit as confidence evaporates in the face of declining economic fundamentals. This is not just an academic debate about GDP growth rates—this is real money disappearing from Americans' portfolios.
GDPNow is not an abstract model—it's a real-time gauge of where the economy is headed. Such a significant collapse in economic fundamentals in such a short time frame is incredibly rare and signals a notable deterioration in business and consumer confidence. Investment doesn't just evaporate unless firms are genuinely worried about future demand and profitability. Consumption doesn't flatline unless households are beginning to feel squeezed.
Global supply chains are rattled, businesses are reluctant to invest in capital, and consumers are cutting back on purchases. Tariffs—pitched as a way to bring jobs back—have instead choked growth. The administration's bet that protectionism would insulate the economy from foreign competition is proving to be precisely the opposite: a self-inflicted wound.
The very politicians who decried economic stagnation in previous decades are now actively promoting it through top-down economic planning. This is industrial policy in practice—where Washington's heavy hand tries to override the natural forces of markets.
We can't say that we weren't forewarned about this possibility. My colleague Veronique de Rugy wrote back in September that we shouldn't expect a return to the Trump economy. As she observed, "several of his policy ideas are destructive."
GDPNow is a real-time gauge of the health of the economy, and it is sending a loud message. The movement in the stock market is reinforcing this message. The question is: Will the Trump administration listen, or are we heading into a government-induced economic recession?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
STOP TALKING ABOUT TRUMP'S TARIFFS!
How many articles about Trump's tariffs is this? Too many.
And how many did you write about Biden's tariffs? None.
That invalidates all your criticism and makes whatever Trump does ok.
So shut the fuck up already!
I don’t think you’re quite deranged enough, Sarc. Maybe add in a few more words and sentences in all caps? That ought to do it.
WHAT WOULD MICHAEL HIHN DO?!???!
snort.
snigger
sneer
(Rest in peace, sweet prince)
Whoever thought there'd be a day when we'd gladly trade a Sarc for a Hihn?
More wishcasting from the usual idiots.
Maybe we should encourage more bank robberies? By my calculations that would make the GDP go up.
GDP is a useless metric until government spending is removed from it.
Now wait for the usual leftists here to use GDP to attack Trump while claiming they want to cut government spending in the same breath.
As we have seen since 1/20 --- literally none of them want a penny of spending cut.
You know it!
If someone wants Congress, the people with the power of the purse, to cut spending, then they don't want any spending cuts.
If someone points out that executive orders will be undone by the next Democratic administration, then they don't want any spending cuts.
If they question the legality or Constitutionality of what Trump is doing, then they don't want any spending cuts.
Anyone who questions the how opposes the what.
You're so right.
Sarc, fuck you. Cut spending.
“Not that spending!”
Cutting ANY spending is exactly what Nazis do!
That’s what they were known for!
"YOU'RE CUTTING SPENDING WRONG!!!
You need a bipartisan congressional committee to do a three year budget review and come up with recommendations for the 121st Congress to review, and then propose legislative measures!
Just closing departments and cutting the fat is irresponsible, and in the future some other president might-maybe-perhaps reverse the decision!" - t. sarckles
If we replace every dollar of government spending with a dollar of other forms of robbery - the GDP should remain constant.
GDP is a useless metric until government spending is removed from it.
I've been saying that for years. Which means you have to start defending GDP now because you can't be seen agreeing with me on anything.
If the economy started booming you’d call it Biden’s economy.
Well Biden did plant the seeds for a booming economy. He said so.
you can't be seen agreeing with me on anything.
You make a true statement every few months. You haven't reached stopped clock accuracy yet, but keep trying.
No.
"We're just asking the question, to lead you to our answer."
Man, I am shocked to see vox.com taking over Reason.com.
Well, the staff of both pubs are in the same book club.
Is it one of those book clubs where everyone just gets really drunk on wine and then whines about stuff?
You don't understand. Comparative advantage and opportunity cost are myths. Protectionism is where it's at. I'll show you by taking it down to an individual level. When you're self sufficient then you're rich. Look at people who live off the grid and do everything themselves. They're rich! Now compare that to people who specialize in one thing and then buy stuff from other people. They're poor. I mean, look at all that money they spend. All that money goes out, and all they get is stuff. So what if they've got a lot of stuff? Now they don't have money. They had to part with money to get it, and that made them poor. They're running trade deficits with everyone except their employer. That means they're getting taken advantage of. But that granola with solar panels drinking rain water, they're rich because they're not giving away their money to other people for mere stuff. Now if we extrapolate that to a national level, riches come from doing everything yourself. To prevent giving a way money for mere stuff, a nation erects tariffs. This way we keep our money and make everything ourselves. That makes us rich as a nation, just as self sufficiency makes us rich as individuals.
I count 14 strawmen and 8 false equivalencies in that screed. Are you trying for a record, Sarc?
He's just trolling, but it's after five and he's been four sheets to the wind since noon, so we can't really expect anything coherent out of him,
I do think tariffs on energy, steel, and aluminum are all stupid. Those are all raw inputs to manufacturing.
The liquor tariffs probably have little to no effect beyond shifting consumer preferences around.
no. please don't be those people.
A recession will happen in-spite of what Trump does because we are due for a recession with the massive increase in dollars during the COVID fiasco. Blame as you will, but the problem isn't with any president, but more to do with the Federal Reserve and the spineless legislature who can't balance the budget let alone deal with the deficit.
Can't say I disagree on that point. The bill for that fiasco is going to come due, and probably sooner rather than later given the sheer size of it.
If the government has to continue spending like a drunken sailor to keep the economy going, we're already fucked. Keyes would agree on that point, I think.
At this point we're more or less just choosing the form of our destroyer.
Household credit card debt is up. Interest rates are up. Stagnation was almost inevitable.
How many of these tariffs have even taken effect yet? The loss in GDP is probably more due to the shutting down of USAID and associated government spending on NGOs.
The leftists, Including Boehm, pretending to want to cut the deficit to zero don't realize removing 2T of excess spending will lower GDP which includes government spending. It is amazing.
This time it is a good recession, because the evil people are starving this time.
Reason: Four years of Brandon yielded no inflation, no impending recession, no grossly-inflated and inevitably revised job creation numbers.
Also Reason: less than two months of Orange Man Horror, and recession looms!
Reason absolutely depends on Gell-Mann amnesia as a business-model apriori. Why do you want readers to hate your publication so very, very much?
2024: BIDENFLATION IS DESTROYING THE NATION!!!!!!
2025: So what about higher prices? Suck it up buttercup.
/Trump defenders
Sarc: two months! We will all die!
Democrats: 48 months? Hah! This will take many years! Green New Deal equity reparations will take a lot of time.
A majority: we all voted to get a big bite of shit sandwich now, instead of giving to our children? Sucks to suck, but cheaper now than later.
There is a reason in keep mentioning how sarc has more in common with democrats Keynesian economics than he does actual free markets.
A sort of domestic Fifty-cent Army stank that is worth noting, at least.
The narrative might say that, but I sure didn't.
However it's a fact that you guys blamed Biden for all the inflation, despite Trump's CARES Act, and are now attacking and belittling anyone who points out how Trump's tariffs increase prices.
Prices increase while a Democrat is president and it's the end of the fucking world.
Prices increase while Trump is president and "You didn't complain when Biden did it. Nya nya nya you poopy head. Your criticism is hypocritical which makes whatever Trump does ok."
Democrats: we need to increase the price of oil to decrease its use, whether of not that cost effects every single aspect of a productive economy.
Also Democrats: we will mercilessly bring government censorship to bear on unapproved thoughts expressed on social media platforms regarding the costs inflicted by the clampdowns inflicted on society by machinations of censorious government officials regarding effects of a likely government-funded human-engineered virus, for which the CARES act was designed as an expensive sop.
Sarc: addressing the literal and metaphorical dung and debt littering the landscape as a result of government COVID depredations and neglect is Trump puffery, so shuddup!
Is it $0.50 a post, or has there been an inflation adjustment?
Sarc pays them. He's no good at it but he is very lonely and craves attention.
I'm almost curious to see what ITP has to say. Almost. Being that he's never made a good faith argument I'm just not interested. He'll tease at an intellectually honest discussion, then say something mean about my family. So fuck you Insane Troll Posse. I don't care.
No one says anything mean about your family, we just want them to be safe from you.
Reason needs to make up its mind. Either the low interest, bloated money supply, ever-increasing debt policy we've had since Clinton/Greenspan is going to blow up in our face and kicking the can down the road by continuing it will only make things worse, or Trump should continue that policy in order to avoid a recession.
I thought Trump was at one point complaining that interest rates should be lower; and floated replacing fed chair Powell to get somebody who will lower them to do it.
Surprised there isn't an executive order about it yet. Maybe by next week.
You left out
Under Dem's - the president doesn't control the stock market so it shouldn't matter. Those Wall Street meanies deserve to loss money.
Under Trump - it's all his fault. Think of the poor Wall Street. Think of all the government spending that won't be done.
This is nothing more than a market correction. Anyone following economic knew that the markets were overvalued and valuations were unrealistic.
This is what it looks like when things land back down onto reality.
I’m pretty sure the commenters leading economist, shrike PBUH, has reminded us many times that a recession requires two or three quarters of slow or no growth.
Seeing as we’re in quarter 1 of 2025, the premise of this article seems a tad premature.
No Taxation without Representation!
No way Trump could cause a recession in such a short time, just not possible. Chill the hell out people and let us see if things get better. Why do these people say this now? People have been screaming for years how bad the economy is, but you want to blame Trump. How shocking!
Recession? Maybe. The government has spent like crazy over the last ..well 2000s. Trump 45 was no hawki.
Tariffs though to even the playing field with other countries? Not a bad thing. Oh no my Chinese garbage is going to cost more. Remember when quality was something people wanted?
After you take out the fake jobs from last year, all job growth came from government jobs. What would the GDP without government spending? You left out Biden throwing 300 billion out the door to help Harris (as well as 1 trillion deficit in the 1st quarter)
This TDS is really out of hand. Trump has broken so many people being a business man and not a pol
Trump "broke people"? Whom? When? How?
ALL recessions are "government-induced."