No Other Land Won an Oscar. Miami Beach's Mayor Is Trying To Evict a Movie Theater for Screening It
Miami Beach Mayor Steven Meiner says "disseminating antisemitism" in a taxpayer-owned building is "unjust to the values of our city and residents and should not be tolerated."

The mayor of Miami Beach, Florida, is trying to terminate the lease of a movie theater for screening No Other Land, an Oscar-winning documentary about the Israel-Palestine conflict.
The Miami Herald reported that Miami Beach Mayor Steven Meiner introduced a resolution to terminate the lease of O Cinema, an independent film theater that rents space from the city, and discontinue more than $60,000 in promised grant funding. The legislation comes after Meiner tried to pressure the theater to cancel the screening.
Florida civil rights groups and First Amendment experts say such government retaliation against the theater for the content of the films it chooses to screen would be unconstitutional under the First Amendment.
"Simply put, the First Amendment does not allow the government to discriminate based on viewpoint or to retaliate against anyone for their speech," says Daniel Tilley, legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Florida. "Pulling funding from an independent, community-based cinema under these circumstances is patently unconstitutional. The government does not get to pick and choose which viewpoints the public is allowed to hear, however controversial some might find them."
The Miami Beach mayor's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
However, in a newsletter to Miami Beach residents earlier this week, Meiner wrote: "I am a staunch believer in free speech. But normalizing hate and then disseminating antisemitism in a facility owned by the taxpayers of Miami Beach, after O Cinema conceded the 'concerns of antisemitic rhetoric,' is unjust to the values of our city and residents and should not be tolerated."
On March 5, Meiner sent O Cinema a letter on official city letterhead expressing outrage at the cinema's decision to screen the film, which documents the destruction of Palestinian homes in the West Bank.
"Here in Miami Beach, our City has adopted a strong policy of support for the State of Israel in its struggle to defend itself and its residents against attacks by the terrorist organizations Hamas and Hezbollah," the letter read. "Airing performances of the one-sided, inaccurate film 'No Other Land' at a movie theater facility owned by the City and operated by O Cinema is disappointing."
This is flagrant government jawboning—an attempt to use the mayor's bully pulpit and the implicit threat of government action to cow the theater into self-censorship.
O Cinema initially complied.
"Due to the concerns of antisemitic rhetoric, we have decided to withdraw the film from our programming," Vivian Marthell, CEO of O Cinema, wrote to Meiner the following day. "This film has exposed a rift which makes us unable to do the thing we've always sought out to do which is to foster thoughtful conversations about cinematic works."
However, the theater then reversed course and told the Miami Herald it would continue the screenings after all.
"Our decision to screen NO OTHER LAND is not a declaration of political alignment," Marthell emailed the Miami Herald last week. "It is, however, a bold reaffirmation of our fundamental belief that every voice deserves to be heard, even, and perhaps especially, when it challenges us."
It's unclear how the Miami Beach commissioners will vote on the resolution, but at least some of them see the obvious legal peril that Meiner is courting. In a statement, Miami Beach Commissioner Kristen Rosen Gonzalez said:
"The O Cinema has screened over 50 Jewish films, hosts a monthly Holocaust screening with the [Miami] Jewish Film Festival, and has been the host of the festival since 2014. It has a long-standing commitment to the Jewish community, and knee-jerk reactions that threaten its future will lead to costly legal battles that waste taxpayer dollars."
No legal action in response to the letter has been taken yet, but Tilley says the Florida ACLU "is closely monitoring this issue and remains committed to ensuring that a variety of voices on issues important to Miami Beach residents can continue to be heard."
There was one entirely predictable outcome of all this. The Miami Herald reported that, "after receiving media attention for the film controversy, the theater sold out screenings and added two more dates later in March."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If you don't support Israel then you're a terrorist.
/Trump and his defenders.
If you support the murder, kidnapping and rape of Israelis to advance a political goal, then you are a terrorist supporter.
If you support killing Gaza noncombatant women and children you are a war crimes and crimes against humanity supporter.
Supporting Hamas = supporting terrorism.
/Anyone with a brain.
Support has a legal meaning you lying retards. And it's not voicing unpopular opinions about a war on the other side of the globe. Fact is that you guys are just like the leftists you hate in that you only support the 1A when you agree with what is being said.
Other words with legal meanings:
legal
lying
retard
And you only support the constitution when it's Trump fucking it up. Point to any single comment you wrote about Biden's student loan shenanigans, or his pardons for non-crimes that hadn't even been investigated, let alone prosecuted or convicted.
At one point I considered bookmarking comments of mine that are contrary to the narrative about me. But I realized two things. First I don't want to be a loser like Jesse, and second it wouldn't matter. Before you started posting I had been impersonated by someone. I didn't know what was going on, but Jesse and ML would start attacking me for things I didn't say. ML, trying to prove that I was running socks, accidentally found proof that I was the one being socked. He found comments from 'sarcasmic' that when muted did not mute me. It did mute other names though. What do you think happened? If you think that ML and Jesse refused to accept that as proof and then continued to lie about me for years then you'd be correct. You're just another piece of shit like them, the only difference is that you understand economics. So I'm not going to waste any time trying to prove anything to you because I know that you, like them, will not accept anything as proof.
Poor sarc.
Were you using "support" in its strict legal meaning in your original comment at the top of this thread? If not, you have no call to criticize others for not sticking to the strict legal definition when responding to you.
I know it's part of your user name but maybe you should reconsider whether sarcasm is an effective means of clear communication.
If his name was an indication of what type of posts to expect, it wouldn't be sarcasmic, it would be retardnik. Sarcjeff wouldn't know what sarcasm was if it smacked him upside his lying, good-for-nothing, empty head.
+1
So you feel that screening a pro terrorist propaganda film is NOT supporting terrorism???
Perhaps you did not think this through?
And if you don't support terrorists, then you're an Israeli. Right?
Perhaps the city shoukd not be giving grants of taxpayer money for entertainment at all.
Seems obvious to me and I would add the obvious libertarian position.
Too obvious for Reason, apparently.
^+1
And what exactly does "No Other Land" winning an Oscar have to do with this issue? Winning an award does not launder away a noxious message in the film.
I don't know, the Oscars are more a ceremonial celebration of woke virtue-signaling than they are a celebration of the craft of film-making, these days.
And nothing is more woke virtue-signaling today than promoting HamasNazi terrorism and hatred of Jews.
They're a sales-award ceremony; how many people do you keep employed last year?
I think you can write an Oscar-winning scrript pretty easily now with ChatGPT if you ask it to include characters who are:
Trans
Nonbinary
Gay
Lesbian
Muslim
Obese
Wouldn't that violate the Writer's Guild's most recent collective bargaining agreement? Oh, the horror!
Perhaps governments shouldn't own theaters in the first place. Honestly, what good does anyone expect from the city owning a theater?
ETA This is what pisses me off so much about modern Reason. Not a single mention in the article about the wrongness of a city owning a theater. Where is the libertarian angle in this, about minimal government?
Nothing. Nada, zip, zilch. This article could have been written by any number of "reporters" for any number of web sites. If Reason wants to be known as a libertarian web site with libertarian articles, put some goddammed libertarian slant in them.
Fire KMW.
Get out of DC.
Write libertarian articles.
And being too late to edit again, WTF does an Oscar have to do with the quality of a movie, and what does the quality of a movie have to do with 1A complaints? How many of these same people, including this "reporter", would have been so freaked out if the movie was "Am I Racist?" which Hollywood expressly ignored even though it was probably more popular than all the nominated "documentaries" combined?
Since the quota system replaced merit, "winning" an oscar is a good indication a film should be avoid.
+1
How about just requiring it only be shown as a double feature with "Birth of a Nation"?
I think that one also won an Oscar.
You beat me to it
Hell, they wouldn’t dare show “Gone With The Wind”
It should be book-ended by Blazing Saddles.
So, the film shown in this theater won the Oscar for "Best Documentary", just like Inside Job, An Inconvenient Truth, Bowling for Columbine, The Panama Deception, or Down and Out in America?
Well, then, I do want to severely criticize Miami Beach. There should already have been a clause in the lease specifying its automatic termination in the case of any screening of an Oscar-winning documentary.
Having to scramble about like this, after-the-fact, is an indicator of a gross lack of foresight by the city government.
No Other Land Won an Oscar.
A what?
I think it's that furry green fucker who lives in a garbage can.
>>"Our decision ... is not a declaration of political alignment," Marthell ... "It is, however, a bold reaffirmation of our fundamental belief that every voice deserves to be heard, even, and perhaps especially, when it challenges us."
your bold reaffirmation of fundamental beliefs is a declaration of political alignment dummy
I can't be the only one enjoying the irony of the leftists clamoring for hate speech bans whining about hate speech bans.
Why is every comment here (except Sarc's) more insightful and more libertarian than the piece itself? This fucking rag is more like an aggregator of columns, most from the left, with the occasional libertarian-leaning piece sprinkled in accidentally.
There once was an organization called "Reason" in Santa Barbara, and it published a pretty decent magazine.
That's been a loooong time ago.
The Miami Herald reported that Miami Beach Mayor Steven Meiner introduced a resolution to terminate the lease of O Cinema, an independent film theater that rents space from the city
*cue needle skidding across vinyl record*
I have an...*clears throat* extremely libertarian answer to this. The answer is right on par with the answer that is given after proof is shown that illegal immigration is not a zero-cost proposition.
*clears throat second time, leans into mic* What we really need to do is get the city out of the property leasing business.
I hope a Miami Jewish temple or synagogue which believes in the First Amendment agrees to show it with a meaningful public discussion afterward.
Oooh, the movie won an Oscar! Well, that changes everything! Now it's 'Art'! In the room the women come and go talking of 'No Other Land'!
Except that these days, an Oscar is prima facie evidence that a movie is a sewer-dwelling piece of libterd propaganda.
Biased?
Could Mayor Steven Meiner of Miami Beach be biased. A Jew in favor of political censorship? Should we ban the sale of Mein Kampf?
Jews of The Left do in themselves and the rest of American Jewry. Is Meiner a Jew of The Left? Probably. Originally registered as a Democrat, re-registered as a Republican, now a NPA. Whatever the case, he does his fellow Jews no favor by promoting political censorship. Has he head of the Constitution of the United States?
https://www.nationonfire.com/jews-and-anti-semitism-part-one-of-two/ .