Rand Paul: Businesses and Workers Think Tariffs Are a Bad Idea
"I really haven't had anybody come up to me and say, 'Please, please, put tariffs on me,'" says Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.).

President Donald Trump's broad-based tariffs on imported goods from Canada and Mexico have drawn support from some businesses that stand to benefit from the federal government artificially raising the prices of their competitors' products. But Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) is urging the president to listen to the many, many American businesses—as well as their employees and their customers—that will suffer because tariffs drive up operating costs.
"I haven't had a single business person or individual in my state come up to me and say the tariffs are a good idea," says Paul.
The senator from Kentucky appeared on Rising, the news show I host for The Hill, on Wednesday to discuss Trump's tariffs threats, the firings of federal workers, and why so many of his Republican colleagues refuse to do the tough work of actually cutting government spending.
He was particularly outspoken on how tariffs will negatively impact businesses in his home state.
"I have had people come up—farmers which are a big presence in our state—and say they export 20 to 25 percent of their products and this will hurt them," says Paul. "They are still suffering from some of the tariffs and retaliation from 2018 and 2019, when the previous Trump administration did tariffs," Paul said. "I have home builders and real estate brokers who say if the price of lumber goes up, if the price of steel goes up, the prices of homes will go up and we'll sell less homes. I have the bourbon distillers coming to me, which is a big industry in my state, and they say due to the retaliation that Europe is placing on us and Canada is placing on our bourbon, we will export less bourbon. We have shippers in our state, people who ship internationally as well as across the U.S."
Watch the full interview on Rising below.
It's a shame that more Republicans are not listening to Paul and to Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.)—who are virtually alone in their desire to actually codify the spending cuts identified by Trump and Elon Musk. Massie was the lone Republican "no" vote on the House of Representative's Tuesday decision to continue funding the government at current levels. When the continuing resolution comes up for a vote in the Senate, Paul intends to put forth a rescission plan; whether other members of the GOP are similarly ready to get serious about the deficit remains to be seen.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Tariffs are a bad idea. This is easily one of the biggest failures of Trump's admin so far. Hopefully it's mostly a ploy, which is a common thing with him.
Per sarc, this comment doesn't exist.
You voted for this. You deserve to get it good and hard.
2024: BIDENFLATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA!!!!!!
2025: Higher prices? Whatever.
Trump defenders only care about high prices when Democrats do it.
Trump says that tariffs are going to make us all rich so Paul must be wrong.
Do you ever tire of strawmen?
Massie and Paul should draft a budget. I agree with them, but talk is cheap.
If Europe is going to increase tariffs on bourbon maybe we should just have sanctions and not allow Europe to have any bourbon. If they can't buy it they can tax it. Take that Europe.
Fuck Donald Trump, thieving bastard.
"Fuck Joe Biden" is a prayer. "Fuck Donald Trump" is blasphemy.
"Fuck, Sarcasmic is retarded" is just a fact of the commentariat.
I have the bourbon distillers coming to me, which is a big industry in my state, and they say due to the retaliation that Europe is placing on us and Canada is placing on our bourbon, we will export less bourbon. We have shippers in our state, people who ship internationally as well as across the U.S.
Did you know that it is *illegal*, not just tariffed or taxed and regulated, but ee-lee-gull, em-bar-goed... to sell alcohol from out of state, directly, in Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Mississippi, and Utah?
At 15M people consuming 1:1 with Canadians (give or take a Utah); that's well more than a straight up 25% loss on 40M Canadians (which the tariff definitively isn't pure loss the way embargo is). Why is the greater loss across borders that *should* be more free ignored while the insistence that we placate Canukistan is as great as ever?
Edit: At the very least, can we ban the direct sale of bourbon to CA and NY? "Your material support of these people comes at all of our expenses. You might call it a tariff but, here's your bill." -
Climate Activists Are Passing Laws To Tax the Past
A New York law demands fossil fuel companies pay $75 billion for carbon emissions dating back to the year 2000. Other Democrat-controlled states plan to follow suit.
All those tasty cocktails made from bourbon - denied.
They could put a 1000% percent tarrif on Canadian whiskey and I wouldn't care. Most of that stuff is crap. I'm sure good stuff exists, but I've never met it.
Except that Trump's stated goal (of threatening to implement tariffs on other nations and/or selective products) is to sharply reduce the enormous tariffs and unfair taxes (including the VAT) that other nations have imposed on American goods for decades.
Rand Paul also claims to want Canada to slash its outrageously high tariffs on many American products, but Trump has actually brought the Canadian government to the negotiating table (by threatening reciprocating tariffs) to achieve those goals.
Except that Trump's stated goal (of threatening to implement tariffs on other nations and/or selective products) is to sharply reduce the enormous tariffs and unfair taxes (including the VAT) that other nations have imposed on American goods for decades.
Your rose colored glasses are diminishng your peripheral vision.
Isn’t it better to have hope?
I wouldn't know. Life-long pessimist, here.
Debating specific economic measures of the govt. is a wasteful distraction.
Paul notes the unapologetic run-away spending of dems and the hypocrisy of the "conservative" right that also spends and blames the left. Conclusion: "Govt. is the problem NOT the solution."
If you disagree, you ignore the overspending made possible since 1913 when the Federal Reserve (central bank) was created to fund WWI and the continued deficit since. Clearly, it's the system.br>
Why do you allow yourself to be "governed into poverty"? Why don't you stop voting for the failed political system? Are you economically suicidal? How about your loss of life, liberty, property, happiness? Is this citizens hurting citizens? Or a despotic govt.? Think, answer, and decide.