Rand Paul: Businesses and Workers Think Tariffs Are a Bad Idea
"I really haven't had anybody come up to me and say, 'Please, please, put tariffs on me,'" says Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.).

President Donald Trump's broad-based tariffs on imported goods from Canada and Mexico have drawn support from some businesses that stand to benefit from the federal government artificially raising the prices of their competitors' products. But Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) is urging the president to listen to the many, many American businesses—as well as their employees and their customers—that will suffer because tariffs drive up operating costs.
"I haven't had a single business person or individual in my state come up to me and say the tariffs are a good idea," says Paul.
The senator from Kentucky appeared on Rising, the news show I host for The Hill, on Wednesday to discuss Trump's tariffs threats, the firings of federal workers, and why so many of his Republican colleagues refuse to do the tough work of actually cutting government spending.
He was particularly outspoken on how tariffs will negatively impact businesses in his home state.
"I have had people come up—farmers which are a big presence in our state—and say they export 20 to 25 percent of their products and this will hurt them," says Paul. "They are still suffering from some of the tariffs and retaliation from 2018 and 2019, when the previous Trump administration did tariffs," Paul said. "I have home builders and real estate brokers who say if the price of lumber goes up, if the price of steel goes up, the prices of homes will go up and we'll sell less homes. I have the bourbon distillers coming to me, which is a big industry in my state, and they say due to the retaliation that Europe is placing on us and Canada is placing on our bourbon, we will export less bourbon. We have shippers in our state, people who ship internationally as well as across the U.S."
Watch the full interview on Rising below.
It's a shame that more Republicans are not listening to Paul and to Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.)—who are virtually alone in their desire to actually codify the spending cuts identified by Trump and Elon Musk. Massie was the lone Republican "no" vote on the House of Representative's Tuesday decision to continue funding the government at current levels. When the continuing resolution comes up for a vote in the Senate, Paul intends to put forth a rescission plan; whether other members of the GOP are similarly ready to get serious about the deficit remains to be seen.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Tariffs are a bad idea. This is easily one of the biggest failures of Trump's admin so far. Hopefully it's mostly a ploy, which is a common thing with him.
Per sarc, this comment doesn't exist.
You voted for this. You deserve to get it good and hard.
2024: BIDENFLATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA!!!!!!
2025: Higher prices? Whatever.
Trump defenders only care about high prices when Democrats do it.
Shows you don't evaluate things by any standard. ALWAYS a bad idea? "mostly a ploy? -- that only the super-intelligent like you can discren ??? "a common thing with him" -- now there is a stupid pointless non-statement.
Trump says that tariffs are going to make us all rich so Paul must be wrong.
Do you ever tire of strawmen?
Massie and Paul should draft a budget. I agree with them, but talk is cheap.
If Europe is going to increase tariffs on bourbon maybe we should just have sanctions and not allow Europe to have any bourbon. If they can't buy it they can tax it. Take that Europe.
$2 TRILLION in new investment counts for nothing with you morons.
Maybe it will all go to shit , but only you and Hillary argue for that non-existent perfect solution. You take into account everything but actual people
Fuck Donald Trump, thieving bastard.
"Fuck Joe Biden" is a prayer. "Fuck Donald Trump" is blasphemy.
"Fuck, Sarcasmic is retarded" is just a fact of the commentariat.
President Trump, who has donated his presidential salary to charity for as long as he has held any elected office and whose investments have lost value while he was serving as President of the United States, and whose parents were married when he was conceived and born, must fit some new (demented) definition of "thieving bastard," previously unknown to sentient humans.
I have the bourbon distillers coming to me, which is a big industry in my state, and they say due to the retaliation that Europe is placing on us and Canada is placing on our bourbon, we will export less bourbon. We have shippers in our state, people who ship internationally as well as across the U.S.
Did you know that it is *illegal*, not just tariffed or taxed and regulated, but ee-lee-gull, em-bar-goed... to sell alcohol from out of state, directly, in Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Mississippi, and Utah?
At 15M people consuming 1:1 with Canadians (give or take a Utah); that's well more than a straight up 25% loss on 40M Canadians (which the tariff definitively isn't pure loss the way embargo is). Why is the greater loss across borders that *should* be more free ignored while the insistence that we placate Canukistan is as great as ever?
Edit: At the very least, can we ban the direct sale of bourbon to CA and NY? "Your material support of these people comes at all of our expenses. You might call it a tariff but, here's your bill." -
Climate Activists Are Passing Laws To Tax the Past
A New York law demands fossil fuel companies pay $75 billion for carbon emissions dating back to the year 2000. Other Democrat-controlled states plan to follow suit.
All those tasty cocktails made from bourbon - denied.
It was government a la Biden and Obama that DESTROYED absinthe. NOW LEGAL LEGAL LEGAL
They could put a 1000% percent tarrif on Canadian whiskey and I wouldn't care. Most of that stuff is crap. I'm sure good stuff exists, but I've never met it.
Except that Trump's stated goal (of threatening to implement tariffs on other nations and/or selective products) is to sharply reduce the enormous tariffs and unfair taxes (including the VAT) that other nations have imposed on American goods for decades.
Rand Paul also claims to want Canada to slash its outrageously high tariffs on many American products, but Trump has actually brought the Canadian government to the negotiating table (by threatening reciprocating tariffs) to achieve those goals.
Except that Trump's stated goal (of threatening to implement tariffs on other nations and/or selective products) is to sharply reduce the enormous tariffs and unfair taxes (including the VAT) that other nations have imposed on American goods for decades.
Your rose colored glasses are diminishng your peripheral vision.
Isn’t it better to have hope?
I wouldn't know. Life-long pessimist, here.
You don't have hope NOW because of the the THENs you didn't have hope. That is a sign you will die hopeless unless you change.
“Hope has two beautiful daughters; their names are Anger and Courage. Anger at the way things are, and Courage to see that they do not remain as they are.”
― Augustine of Hippo
Those without hope are the lead weights of the world, pulling things down to the bottom of the sea.
Debating specific economic measures of the govt. is a wasteful distraction.
Paul notes the unapologetic run-away spending of dems and the hypocrisy of the "conservative" right that also spends and blames the left. Conclusion: "Govt. is the problem NOT the solution."
If you disagree, you ignore the overspending made possible since 1913 when the Federal Reserve (central bank) was created to fund WWI and the continued deficit since. Clearly, it's the system.br>
Why do you allow yourself to be "governed into poverty"? Why don't you stop voting for the failed political system? Are you economically suicidal? How about your loss of life, liberty, property, happiness? Is this citizens hurting citizens? Or a despotic govt.? Think, answer, and decide.
Businesses don't think. They are legal fictions created to allow the accumulation of capital and the protection of the law.
Workers probably don't know any more about whether tariffs are good or bad than anyone else, including most of the commenters here. Some tariffs good if it protects your job, some tariffs bad if it raises prices. We have, after all, let Canada get away with 250% tariffs on some dairy products. Why would that be, if tariffs destroy the economy?
Anyway, just observing that the headline doesn't make much sense.
If Trump wants to retaliate for specific targeted tariffs he should negotiate around those particular tariffs and retaliate in a proportional manner. The extreme broad tariffs or tariffs on materials common to multitudes of products are just plain inflationary.
Already Trump tariff talk has prompted returned manufacturing capacity in the USA, and there is more to come, particularly as moronic restrictions on hydrocarbon fuel production and use disappear. Producing materials in the USA eliminates support of countries that have profited from US overregulation and multinational outsourcing, and provides employment in America that will grow domestic wealth and support the cost of producing goods here. Demand for transfer payments to individuals will fall, and consumers will have more disposable income to pay for domestic goods. Globalist investors hardest hit.
Pure Bullshit, the great mass of small and mid-size businesses are the real economic thinkers. The big money guys don't have to. Bezos can destroy Washington Post and not miss the pocket change
In the US, small businesses (defined as those with 500 or fewer employees) make up 99.9% of all businesses, totaling approximately 33.2 million, while mid-sized businesses (between 500 and 1,000 employees) are a smaller percentage.
Why did Biden's insanely stupid and wasteful Inflation Reduction measures merely INCREASE inflation???? Because all those small and mid-sized business were met with DEI, climate regulatinos, intense red tape and Kafkaesque regulatory bureaus that made their own laws and judged their own cases.
History proves tariffs are a good idea when accompanied by freedom from income taxation. Until the great progressive experiment of the 20th Century, our properly sized federal government existed on tariff and excise tax income without taxing individual income. Weaning welfare dependent states and individuals by returning the federal government to its Constitution-permitted functions can restore this level of freedom in the USA. Continuing the massive overreach of the federal government will bring the whole nation into penury as the cost of servicing deficit spending forces runaway inflation or sovereign debt default. We cannot persist in the present mode of squandering our future to pay for a sugar high right now.
About Reason Plus. No more comments coming from Yogis-dad. Your loss.