Trump Claims He Ended the Green New Deal
It's not clear he has.

American energy dominance was an important theme in President Donald Trump's address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday. "As you heard me say many times, we have more liquid gold under our feet than any nation on earth, and by far, and now I fully authorize the most talented team ever assembled to go and get it. It's called drill, baby, drill," he said.
Energy policy in the first 45 days of the Trump administration has indeed followed this mantra. On his first day in office, the president signed an executive order to streamline oil and gas drilling and reverse former President Joe Biden's ban on offshore oil drilling in most of the United States. The executive order also "ended the [Biden] administration's insane electric vehicle mandate, saving our auto workers from economic destruction," the president said in his speech.
The president exaggerated many of his energy claims, including saying that the regulations implemented under Biden closed 100 power plants—an arbitrary number. While regulations do play a role in power plant closures, many shut down due to economic factors or aging infrastructure.
One of Trump's biggest energy-related lies came earlier in his speech when he claimed, "I terminated the ridiculous Green New Scam," referring to the Green New Deal, which was originally introduced in 2019 and again in 2023. The resolution never passed through Congress or received a "yes" on the Senate floor.
The closest bill to the Green New Deal that has been signed into law is the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which expanded and introduced tax credits and subsidies for new energy sources and established technologies like electric vehicles and solar power. The extension of these provisions could add as much as $3 trillion to the federal deficit through 2032. The IRA also supercharged the lending authority of the Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office, which has led the agency's Inspector General to deem the program as "high risk" for waste, fraud, and abuse.
While Trump ordered federal agencies to "immediately pause the disbursement of funds appropriated through the Inflation Reduction Act," which has been challenged in court, the president has yet to work with Congress to repeal the bill outright or reduce federal favoritism toward certain energy sources. Instead, his administration has pursued tariffs and protectionism, which will drive up energy prices in the United States.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sigh
Do what you can w/o congress and follow up by bending them to your will.
LOL
Only a Trump speechwriter of small hat size would elide a diatribe against green energy with demands for increased rare earth production when their main use is in magnets for wind turbine generators and Tesla motors
Rare earth minerals are extremely important to battery production. While electric vehicles are a major use of such batteries, our world is becoming more and more dependent on portable electronics- all of which require batteries.
Many are used in the semiconductor industry as well.
Guys, he's an entelectual. He must know more than us.
Folks, you're engaging a low-watt bulb who is stupid enough to think we're all gonna die because of automobiles.
Check that; sub "ignoramus" for "low-watt bulb"; the asshole wishes he was a low-watt bulb.
Here's the real story: https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1896928497043648637
And it's not just those three clowns: https://x.com/reddit_lies/status/1896948432620945685
Word. For. Word.
The Democrat Party is plainly a bunch of NPCs. Question is: who's programming them?
Space Man Bad wants to know as well.
So Trump has done what he can to shut down the green new deal initiatives, including those already passed in the Orwellian named "Inflation Reduction Act."
It's fair to criticize him rolling out a "mission accomplished" banner, but he is at least moving in the right direction. Efforts would be better expended to criticize those in congress who passed this shit and lobby the current congress to revoke the regulations and remaining money.
No, I think they are saying there was nothing of the Green Deal passed, so what is he bragging about? The closest thing being the IRA, which isn't the Green Deal.
Biden called it the Green New Deal. The congresscritters who inserted those clauses into the IRA called it the Green New Deal. The media friendly to climate causes all called it the Green New Deal embedded into the IRA. Who are you to disagree now?
The New Green Deal needs to be terminated...but it is my understanding only Congress can do that...and they should.
The New Green Deal is an excellent example of do-gooder leftists trying to turn our beloved republic into a third world outhouse with them in power to oppress all us peasants.
But the injustice is calling outrageious spending of other people's money doing good !!! WHen there is NO grasss roots call for something and someone yells 'Emergency!!" I think someone is getting bribed --- and so it is
The Department of Justice is investigating the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, a $27 billion program that was part of Joe Biden’s $740 billion Inflation Reduction Act. Created in the spring of 2023, and managed by the Environmental Protection Agency, the fund was supposed to be a first-of-its-kind program to address the climate crisis while revitalizing communities that it considered “historically left behind.”
But it appears little of the $27 billion revitalized anything—except the coffers of a range of environmental nonprofits associated with former Obama and Biden administration officials."
https://www.thefp.com/p/a-20-billion-slush-fund-nonprofits
So I get a paper in class like this and I writer
YOU Claim He hasn't Ended the Green New Deal
It's not clear he hasn't
This is an article based on no positive viewpoint and giving no points for anything except total elimination. Why?