The Sad Quest for a Secret 'Epstein Client List'
The Trump administration’s spectacle rehashed information that journalists, lawyers, and victims had already unveiled.

The Trump administration had promised to reveal bombshell information on Jeffrey Epstein, the infamous sex trafficker who rubbed shoulders with the rich and famous before dying in custody in 2019. "It's sitting on my desk right now to review; that has been a directive by President [Donald] Trump," Attorney General Pam Bondi said last week. "Donald Trump doesn't make empty promises."
On Thursday, a group of conservative media personalities were photographed grinning outside the White House, binders labeled "Epstein Files: Phase 1" in hand. But the documents in question turned out to be underwhelming. The index of evidence seized from Epstein's homes has already been extensively reported on. So have the flight logs. The version of Epstein's phone book released on Thursday is actually more heavily redacted than the version circulating online. And the final document is completely pointless: a list of Epstein's 254 "masseuses," redacted with a black highlighter from start to finish "to protect potential victim information."
The haul was so unimpressive that the Republican House Judiciary Committee's X account posted a link to the "Epstein Files" that turned out to be a Rickroll prank video—a pretty tasteless joke, considering that the subject matter is sex crimes against minors.
After receiving a disappointed response from conservative media, Bondi tried to blame deep-state sabotage. "Late yesterday, l learned from a source that the FBI Field Office in New York was in possession of thousands of pages of documents related to the investigation and indictment of Epstein. Despite my repeated requests, the FBI never disclosed the existence of the files," she wrote in a letter to FBI director Kash Patel on Thursday afternoon.
The truth, however, is a lot more mundane. Journalists, lawyers, and victims themselves have already uncovered most of the people who Epstein surrounded himself with. These private sleuths haven't been forced to redact information by the restrictions of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or by judges' decisions.
The real damning information, the evidence of specific crimes by specific people, will have to be released as part of a criminal trial. (Some of it, such as the sexually explicit photos found in Epstein's mansion, likely won't be displayed to the public.) There is unlikely to be new evidence that's explosive enough to interest the public but harmless enough to release on a whim.
Epstein's contact list, known as the Little Black Book, was first published by the news site Gawker in 2015. Epstein wrote in an email, later revealed in court documents, that publishing it "should not be legal." Although Gawker later went out of business, the DocumentCloud page associated with the article still exists, and volunteers have made a website with a searchable version of the book.
At the time, Epstein was a free man. He had been given only 13 months in jail under a 2008 plea deal. The federal government arrested Epstein again in 2019 after a Miami Herald article and a lawsuit by several victims brought new public attention to the case.
Epstein flew his victims and clients around on a private jet nicknamed the Lolita Express, and journalists have worked assiduously to piece together who flew on the plane, using information from FOIA requests and lawsuits. In 2020, the Federal Aviation Administration denied Business Insider's FOIA request for the Lolita Express flight logs, then accidentally mailed the records anyway. Business Insider has put together an interactive database of the Lolita Express' known flights and passengers.
Some of the world leaders who rubbed shoulders with Epstein include Britain's Prince Andrew, former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, former U.S. President Bill Clinton, and Trump himself. Trump also shared a lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, with Epstein.
Of course, those lists only demonstrate who spent time with Epstein, not which ones were his "clients." Most of the people named insist that they never participated in his criminal activities. Specific allegations about his sexual abuse—and the men who participated in it—have come out in lawsuits by the victims. But many of these lawsuits have been settled, dropped, or dismissed.
TrueAnon, a podcast founded to discuss the Epstein case, noted last year that most of the relevant information had already been uncovered and there probably would never be a decisive revelation.
"There's still people talking about a client list, and I'm like, what list are you talking about? The list is out," cohost Brace Belden said. "Part of me understands the emotional appeal of that, because you want some final atom bomb that will incinerate your enemies."
There have also been rumors floating around for years that Epstein was a spy—and hopes (or fears) that opening the Epstein files would reveal his intelligence connections. Trafficking minors to powerful men, the theory goes, was a way to collect blackmail material for a government agency.
After all, Epstein, who had a fake Austrian passport that listed his residence as Saudi Arabia, reportedly boasted to many different people that he was involved in spying. Former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, who negotiated Epstein's plea deal in 2008, reportedly said during a cabinet vetting that "I was told Epstein 'belonged to intelligence' and to leave it alone." (When asked about the report, Acosta gave a bizarre non-denial.) And Epstein met with U.S. diplomat and future CIA chief William Burns in 2014.
These allegations are tantalizing—and their content points to exactly why they're unlikely to be proven or disproven in a big document dump. It's already known that Epstein had contacts with officials and shadowy figures. The content of those conversations is unlikely to have been written down, and even if it was, it's probably not in an FBI archive.
Chasing down the one last secret of the Epstein case might even be missing the forest for the trees. The information that's already out there about the powerful figures and institutions who enabled Epstein is damning enough in itself.
"The activities of the figures in this story, across sexual exploits and criminal activity and financial criminal activity and everything in between, are all products of a system," TrueAnon cohost Liz Franczak said last year. "All of that gets lost in this fucking meme spectacle of this bullshit list that doesn't even fucking exist."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Honk honk!
I think if they were to release some Epstein porn staring Bill Gates - it would shut everyone up for a while.
I would rather watch a grisly car wreck.
People really need to stop putting bears in their trunk.
Wonder what "Phase 1" means?
Guess that's everything. No more forthcoming. All done.
Also Maxwell has a case in front of USSC, restricting documents. And SDNY also apparently not following legal orders.
'Epstein Client List' (in full and in full-frontal-assault-weapons-with-pistol-grips modes) just MIGHT reveal that THIS is how Dear Leader "accessed" Spermy Daniels! So then THIS is why the Amphibian People will SNOT allow us unfettered access to said 'Epstein Client List'!!!
#FullyEqualAndDiverseAndPerverseEquityAccessToSpermyDanielsNowInTheNameOfMySacredLoveGun
Fuck off you lying leftist POS. The Epstein trial had him prostituting the victims to nobody which would mean they weren't victims and the entire trial was a sham... So there were either people they were prostituted to that have never been revealed or there was nothing but a State abuse of power, pick a lane but both mean you're lying for some reason.
"The Trump administration’s spectacle rehashed information that journalists, lawyers, and victims had already unveiled."
Really?
What information was that, because a lot of names on Epstein's list seem to be missing.
Can someone explain something very simple to me? Epstein was previously indicted by the DOJ and got a sweetheart deal. Ghislane Maxwell was indicted by the DOJ more recently and got convicted of essentially trafficking or assisting in the sex trafficking of minors with Epstein. Epstein was indicted by the DOJ and died under mysterious circumstances during Trump's first term.
How or rather why does Pam Bondi, who runs the DOJ, need to have the FBI give her office anything? Doesn't the DOJ already have everything from all the various indictments? It would have been turned over to defense in discovery. All FBI investigations, interviews, depositions, proffers, photos, whatever would all be in DOJ's possession before Bondi took office. Why doesn't she just redact what is necessary and release it? A lot of this stuff would have been scanned into pdf and stored on computers in DOJ' s possession. Its not like the prosecutors get to take this stuff home with them when a trial is over and its deleted forever. Its DOJ's property.
Doesn't the DOJ already have everything from all the various indictments?
You're asking the right questions.
I just don't understand why DOJ needs to track down documents from FBI when the FBI would have turned over everything to DOJ to prosecute. So either Bondi is lying or its some fake outrage to justify firing FBI personnel they wanted to fire anyway for not being transparent or some yet to be revealed Q conspiracy crap. But none of the excuses being bandied about make any sense.
You assume, for some inexplicable reason, that the Biden DOJ did not destroy records.
Biden DOJ? I think you mean the first Trump DOJ. The connections between Epstein, Barr, Acosta, and Kirkland and Ellis. Look up the Alumni of K and E. Also, under whose DOJ did Epstein die?
The DoJ/FBI who ran honeypot on him and were part of The Resistance?
You know who is common with all the Epstein trials and actors around it? Comeys daughter.
Comey was a Trump cultist right?
The Trump cultists refuse to draw the obvious conclusions. It is hilarious to see Bondi not realize she is just being used as a prop. Patel is a Trump insider, he can be counted on not to reveal the real dirt while Bondi parades on social media for the rubes
Read JesseAz's post above. The DOJ and FBI were never fond of Trump; don't need to be a "Trump cultist" to understand this.
Assumes fact not in evidence. The indictments happened. Maxwell was convicted in federal court by federal prosecutors. She appealed. The documents are in DOJ's possession. This is all fake bullshit for cameras thus far. But hey; DC Draino got a photo op and a MAGA hat. Big fkn deal. He got a binder full of redacted black ink. Way to go???
I see three possibilities
1: She has the documents, knows there's nothing, and is blustering
2: She thinks/knows there's more out there that was never given to the DOJ
3: She thinks/knows that files were destroyed on the DOJ side and wants the originals
Let's be honest. A client list HAD to exist. Some record of who went there. This also has three possibilities
1: It was destroyed before the arrest
2: It was hidden and still remains hidden
3: It was destroyed by the federal agencies sometime in the interim.
The treatment of Epstein certainly looks like someone was fearing blackmail, so I don't really believe item one, and the endless possibilities of power from the list (or a partial list) coming to light makes me think the last option is unlikely.
This last point also makes the article's suggestion that there was no list of people who definitively went to the island to molest girls patently absurd. Do you think someone already breaking so many laws wouldn't keep this evidence for blackmail leverage?
Or the DOJ always had the documents and when Blondie started looking into them she found some names that she woujld rather not expose - e.g., large GOP donors.
I am sure some Democratic characters aside from Bill C are there as well - after all, Krasnov was on the Democrats' side in NY for years (for sound pragmatic reasons) but Blondie couldn't separate them out.
Lol. That question in the 2nd paragraph said by someone who pretends to be a lawyer. Fucking hilarious.
Yes, the FBI is a law enforcement organization that gathers evidence on behalf of the govt for prosecutors who actually try the cases and secure convictions. The prosecutors have to copy all this information and share it with the defense. They have to retain all this information for years; not just to exhaust all appeals in case of a re-trial or remand but as a matter of sound policy [and sometimes by statute or court rule]. Just like any other criminal case where this is considered standard procedure.
I see you in other threads sucking Putin's cock perhaps if you focused on one topic at a time you would have something coherent to share.
Assumes everyone involved is pure and honest.
We know better than that, and so should you.
Wild claims given without any evidence can be dismissed without evidence. There is evidence of the indictments and DOJ prosecutions. There is no evidence Biden's DOJ erased it all. Epstein died in fed custody under Trump's watch. It seems to me a coverup at all would be directed at Trump. The raid on Epstein's island also happend on Trump's watch. Where is all that evidence?? Why would you blame Biden's DOJ for what happened on Trump's DOJ watch? Other than blind partisan hackery? The FBI is investigating 10yr old Mueller FBI activity. Bondi's DOJ can investigate Trump's first term DOJ for Epstein's stuff. The new DOJ personnel are the one's promising and promoting Epstein transparency.
In a case where preferential treatment of Epsein was so clear, bribery or blackmail can be assumed. And we can be absolutely certain that his suicide was allowed, if he was not actually murdered.
With these higher crimes already in play, I think lying and withholding documents is not an unreasonable expectation.
In fact, with so many clear crimes that had to be committed by insiders (because there is no other way they could have happened), I would say that your assertion that all documents would be properly transferred is the wild assumption
The FBI rarely gives the DOJ all of the evidence they have - just enough for the DOJ to make their case. This way, DOJ prosecutors can ethically claim not to have information about, say, how many agents, confidential informants, or other contract employees and sources, the FBI at the Capital, on J6. It’s wink, wink, nod, nod, as the evidence available to the DOJ is curated by the FBI before turning it over to them. Legally, it’s weird. Respondent Superior would suggest that the DOJ has constructive knowledge of everything that the FBI has, since the FBI is part of the DOJ. That’s essentially how it works with corporations. Just not the government.
There's a lot to this that Petti conveniently ignores. We want the Epstein client list released in full and people prosecuted for crimes against minors. It seems the SDNY is stonewalling. There is also supposedly a whistle-blower saying they are destroying evidence.
The story is bigger than the dumb "we already knew this and it's a good thing" response from Petti regardless of Bondi fucking up optics and underperforming on delivery. There is the bigger story of a weaponized branch of the FBI and bureaucrats shielding political and cultural elites. He can fuck right off with this bullshit take.
"We want the Epstein client list released in full and people prosecuted for crimes against minors."
Be careful what you wish for, Trump is on that list and admitted to participating in Epstein parties.
Cite?
Do you really think I care? If there are crimes then collect the evidence and prosecute them. I don't care if someone is on my team if they've done genuinely horrible things.
Think you don't care what crimes Trump committed. If you did you would never have voted for the traitor.
Trump didn't commit any crimes, that's the problem with your statement. You are lying.
Out of all people on this planet, Trump is the one person I am certain was never on Epstein's island. With everything they were throwing at him, do you think they would have held off on something so big?
Just like going to a sketchy car repair shop. If they DON'T try and sell you something, you know that's good.
When an article is written telling me that we should not even bother to look at what the FBI/DOJ has on a criminal who was a known associate of many highly influential people just makes me want to look more.
The result may have been disappointing, but a quest to round up evildoers should never be called "sad."
Reason doesn’t want it’s creepy friends being rounded up.
Ok, if there's nothing to hide, why are they hiding and reportedly destroying paperwork?
TrueAnon, a podcast founded to discuss the Epstein case, noted last year that most of the relevant information had already been uncovered and there probably would never be a decisive revelation.
I wonder when Republican voters are going to realize that the Trump Show is not intended to own the libs, but to keep them entertained so that they don't pay attention to what Trump is actually doing with government power and who is benefiting from it? Spoiler alert - it isn't Trump voters.
> I wonder when Republican voters are going to realize that the Trump Show is not intended to own the libs, but to keep them entertained so that they don't pay attention to what Trump is actually doing with government power and who is benefiting from it? Spoiler alert - it isn't Trump voters.
as long as they feel the right people are being harmed (minorities, leftists etc.), anyone who's still supporting the Musk Administration doesn't care about the looting of our government currently underway.
maybe on some level they wish they were in on the grift, but they don't disagree with the grifting.
they are dead inside except for the tiny glimmer of joy they can feel if someone they hate is being hurt
Lol. Everything Is So Terrible And Unfair, fuck.
a pretty tasteless joke, considering that the subject matter is sex crimes against minors
The youngest jailbait hooker would be at least 35 now. The oldest is pushin' 50.
What I really want to know is how Epstein was assassinated while in the custody of the USG. Cameras were turned off. His cell mate was resituated that night, etc. It was a fairly significant conspiracy to pull it off, but the official response was crickets. Did the FBI investigate? If not, why not? How thoroughly? Were they told to stand down? By whom? Most everyone on the right just assumed that it was the Clintons, with Crooked Hillary cleaning up, again, one of her husband’s messes. But maybe it was Bill Gates. Or MI6, protecting one of their Royals. Or MOSAD, which supposedly the Maxwells worked for. Etc. we just don’t know. And the FBI should at least have some information along these lines. And if they don’t, then why not?
Fuck the client list. How about federal government corruption in the 2008 "no prosecution" deal, total immunity for the four (now wealthy and semi-famous) groomer gals and of course the fact Epstein was running a honey trap for some combination of the Mossad, CIA, MI6 and whatever Saudi Arabia's intelligence agency is called. Many of Epstein's friends/guests are known. How 'bout some lowdown on his finances, money-laundering and his associates' suspicious payments to entities abroad?
Riiight. Nothing to see here!
https://www.steynonline.com/15070/the-plot-thickens
"A fortnight later, to the mystification of his cellmate, he was found on the floor with marks around his neck, and placed on "suicide watch", which required him to be checked on every thirty minutes. On August 9th, he was not checked every thirty minutes because the guard fell asleep. Fortunately, there was a second guard. Unfortunately, he also fell asleep. Fortunately, there was a camera. Unfortunately, it malfunctioned. Fortunately, there was a second camera. Unfortunately, that also malfunctioned...
So, a month after arrest by the FBI, the highest-value prisoner in America was dead."
The notion that Trump wouldn’t order Epstein’s murder is as absurd as the notion that he wouldn’t fuck up a pandemic response and kill a million Americans.
He stands there and says what he means, and the media are so incredulous that a person could be this monstrous outside of shithole countries.
He says he supports our enemies, out loud. He says everything in government should be transparent except the Epstein files.
Does Trump fuck children when he’s not jacking off Putin? Let’s hear both sides.
Oh, and the total release of FBI docs was 200 pages.
200 pages is like maybe *one* deposition of a nobody who knows nothing.
There should have been 20000 pages or more ...
No reason for Trump to block what his conspiracy-addled rube followers want. The Supreme Court will surely rule that fucking kids is an official presidential act and hence not a crime.
We can thank them for trimming the unnecessary bureaucracy of the legal counsel to the president. We’re getting more government efficiency by the day.