Detroit Police Wrongly Arrested Woman After Facial Recognition Tech Misidentified Her as Shooting Culprit
This isn't the first time Detroit cops have arrested the wrong person after using facial recognition software.

Last year, Detroit police wrongly arrested LaDonna Crutchfield after facial recognition software incorrectly identified her as the culprit of a shooting, according to a lawsuit filed on February 21. While police did not even have a warrant for Crutchfield's arrest, they handcuffed, detained, and jailed her anyway. The officers had conducted no investigation, relying fully on a facial recognition database. Police released Crutchfield only when it became obvious that they had arrested the wrong person. Crutchfield's suit argues that her wrongful arrest was a violation of her Fourth Amendment rights.
According to the suit, Crutchfield was at home with her children, resting between work shifts, when six police officers knocked on her door. One of the officers, Anthony Williams, allegedly demanded that she step out of the house, after which he told her "that she was going to jail today, and he didn't want to arrest her in front of her children." According to the suit, the officers would not tell Crutchfield why she was being arrested.
"So basically, you had to go to court," the suit says one officer told Crutchfield. "They summoned you to court and you didn't show up. I don't know if it got lost in the mail or whatever, but it says that you have a warrant for your arrest. All this means is that you have to come to court." However, the suit says this isn't true—the officers didn't have a warrant for Crutchfield's arrest.
"No investigation was conducted to determine if Ms. Crutchfield was the suspect, and a facial recognition database was used to identify her," the suit reads. "The detective in charge conducted no investigation."
Even so, Crutchfield was handcuffed and placed in a police car, where she learned that she had been arrested on suspicion of attempted murder. Crutchfield was booked at a local jail, where it soon became clear that police had mistakenly arrested her. According to the suit, Crutchfield was shown several blurry photos of the actual suspect. When Crutchfield denied that the pictures were of her, one of the officers allegedly told her, "You got to admit it—that looks like you," to which Crutchfield replied "Why? Because I am fat and black like her?" As officers told her more details about the shooting, Crutchfield told them that she was at work at the time of the crime. Soon after, officers concluded that she was not the culprit and decided to release her.
While Crutchfield was released around six hours after being arrested, the experience was still harrowing. The officers "knew or should have known that their conduct would cause severe emotional distress to [Crutchfield], especially in light of the public nature of the arrest," the suit reads.
But Crutchfield isn't alone. In 2023, faulty facial recognition tech led Detroit police to arrest Porcha Woodruff—who was eight months pregnant—on robbery and carjacking charges. In 2020, Detroit police arrested Robert William after facial recognition software wrongly identified him as the culprit of a shoplifting spree. Police held Williams for over 30 hours, even as it became obvious that he had not committed any crimes.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Skynet is not a reliable source - - - - - - - -
The version of The Terminator where Arnold comes back from the future, asks Sarah Conner to step out of her home, and then detains her for six hours before releasing her unharmed and then goes off to apprehend the other Sara Conner after she was involved in a shooting sounds a lot less... entertaining... and a lot more... morally ambiguous than the real one.
She's fat, and she's Black, Jack!
Likely voted for Demon-Craps!
No sympathy from Trumpists!
With her, to the dumpists!
The Science proves it: they all look alike.
That's probably what the CEO techbro of the face recognition software company said too.
An entire precinct of white cops in Detroit and neither them nor the AI could tell the one fat black woman from another. Must be their uniquely distinct shining personalities that differentiate them.
Can you just post a link to the complaint so we do not have to pretend we actually read your drivel?
You only cite the complaint as is, so let us read the primary document and not what a not-bright dunce thinks.
Notice that Damned-and-Sick is TOO Good to bother and find some links for us, to Fix Shit's PervFected (and Neglected and Brain-infected) bitchings!
(I'm not looking, either, but I trust Reason.com a boatload more than random sore-in-the-cunt cuntsorevaturds around here!)
"You got to admit it—that looks like you,"
Probably not. They lie about this kind of stuff all the time. If you admit any remote resemblance , however minute, they will use that to justify their shoddy arrest.
If you think the most important question in the article titled "Detroit Police Wrongly Arrested Woman After Facial Recognition Tech Misidentified Her as Shooting Culprit" is something like "Where did they get the photo of the wrong woman?" or "How did the facial recognition software know where she was?"... that's because you're a racist.
The most important question is how racist were the obviously white cops who 'performed no investigation' for 6 hours (because they didn't get enough time keeping black slaves locked in cages) to determine they had the wrong person and released her.
Lemme guess, 6 hours *and* they let her have her phone call.
Go fuck yourself you racial-grievance-ambulance-chaser-chasing hack.
Cops who do this shit should be jailed. Or sued to the point they need to go live under a bridge. Or both.
The voters of Detroit need to remove all those white racist Republican city officials from office.
according to a lawsuit
EMMA CAMP MEME *drink*
OK, let's read this thing.
...
OK, let's not read this thing. What friggin' AOL-using shyster wrote this? I can see why Emma loved it though - it's written more for the media than it is for the court.
...
FINE, I'LL READ IT.
You know, when you answer a complaint, there's basically three responses: Admit, Deny, or Without Sufficient Knowledge. This complaint begs for a fourth one:
"Oh my GAWSH *sob*"
Cannot roll my eyes any harder at this claptrap.
wearing no shoes!!!!!!
...
being handcuffed behind her back might affect her breathing
Every black criminal suspect from May 25, 2020 to the end of time will forever say nonsense like this.
Oh, and get this - OK they arrested her. They took her downtown, she alibi'd out, and they IMMEDIATELY recognized their mistake.
Look her own attorney even admits it: 66. DEFENDANT THOMPSON told PLAINTIFF that he needed to get back to his office to turn some paperwork in, so that PLAINTIFF could be released immediately. 67. DEFENDANT THOMPSON told PLAINTIFF that if she was not released that night, that he would personally come back to the Detroit Detention Center the next day to take PLAINTIFF home.
Basic human kindness. From a mustache-twirling evil cop man.
69. PLAINTIFF was told by another female officer that she could be released if she agreed to have her fingerprints taken, and agreed to have a DNA swab performed. 70. PLAINTIFF was forced to get fingerprinted and give her DNA, although PLAINTIFF was not involved in the alleged crime.
Wait, make up your mind. She could be released if she consented, or she was forced? Which is it, shyster.
PLAINTIFF explained to her children that she was fine and that it was a case of mistaken identity.
Which is where it should have ended. It happens. It sucks, I hope it never happens to anyone - but mistakes can be made. In this particular case, they arrested the wrong person, immediately realized it, and processed her release right after. Why are we incapable of understanding and forgiving this sort of thing anymore?
And I'm not just talking about cops. I'm talking about anything. This society carries around its grievances and milks them for anything the might be worth. What kind of LIFE is that for anyone?
PLAINTIFF’s crying continued while at work and she was of no assistance to the mentally challenged adults that she cared for
...
DEFENDANT THOMPSON apologized and explained to PLAINTIFF that his sergeant informed him that PLAINTIFF should have never been arrested
Because that's never friggin' good enough in this society anymore, is it. Sincerity, humility, repentance - noooo, show me the money!
I hate stuff like this. I hate it with every fiber of my being. This whole complaint is just another dumb trashy black person who thinks they have a lottery ticket. This is the kind of crap that keeps the black community willfully yoked and intentionally ignorant. "Plaintiff explained to her children that she was fine and that it was a case of mistaken identity."
But then she went after them dollarbucks. Naming first the guy who showed her the most consideration. Consistent messaging in the parenting there, lady.
"Victim" is the currency in this de facto Marxist society.
It's also its slave chains. And don't think for a second that when she loses this case, she won't have that "victim" mentality brainwashed into her even further. That's how progressives keep their people on the plantation.
I don't think we can just write this off as a mistake if, as alleged, they told her they had a warrant for her arrest but they didn't. That would be intentional misconduct.
That's not going to stop me from complaining about the complaint, though. For example:
>The Department of Justice must enter into another consent decree with the Detroit Police before an entire city is traumatized.
Consent decrees require, you know, consent. That's not relief you can seek from a court. It doesn't belong in the complaint.
The false light claim is ludicrous. Merely being arrested does not suggest to those viewing the arrest that you are a violent criminal.
I don't think we can just write this off as a mistake if, as alleged, they told her they had a warrant for her arrest but they didn't. That would be intentional misconduct.
Mm... not necessarily. Cops lie all the time in order to elicit consent. She was a person of interest in a homicide. And I'm willing to bet they knew that facial rec wasn't enough to GET a warrant, but that they also knew that if they asked nicely they wouldn't get her cooperation.
I mean, think about it. "Ma'am, would you please accompany me to the police station, we have some questions for you." "What for?" "We think you may have killed someone." "Oh, sure, let me call a sitter and go get my purse."
Obviously, MMQing it, the correct response would have been "Show me the warrant." But as it pertains to this... ridiculous complaint, if we awarded damages to every Dick and Jane that got hauled downtown for questioning and then immediately released after having been cleared because it's a "civil rights violation?" I mean, that's ludicrous.
Are you trying to justify violating 4A ?
And you punish every infraction of police misconduct until it stops or until you run out of police to fire. Think of it as "broken windows" Internal Affairs.
If you obtain a person's consent, even by deceptive means, it's not necessarily a 4A violation.
'Can't wait to see what will happen when the police start trusting AI to do their work for them.
The failure will be absolutely magnificent!
What's the difference between people and machines misidentifying someone?
Systemic racism vs. sudo systemctl enable racism.
As a comparison, how about writing an article about the times Detroit cops have arrested the wrong person after eyewitness accounts.