Trump's Tariff Threats Can't Win the Unwinnable War on Drugs
After promising to stop the flow of drugs during his first term, the president blames foreign officials for his failure.

"I'm gonna create borders," Donald Trump promised during his 2016 campaign. "No drugs are coming in. We're gonna build a wall. You know what I'm talking about. You have confidence in me. Believe me, I will solve the problem."
Trump did not, in fact, solve the problem: The annual number of drug-related deaths in the United States rose by 44 percent between 2016 and the last year of his first term. Now Trump blames foreign officials for his failure, which is why he decided to impose punitive tariffs on China, Mexico, and Canada until they take "adequate steps" to stop "dangerous narcotics" from entering our country.
That benchmark, which is now the focus of negotiations aimed at avoiding a potentially disastrous trade war, is deliberately vague, with good reason. The huge profits generated by drug prohibition give criminal organizations a powerful incentive to find ways around government-erected obstacles, which explains why politicians have never managed to "stop the flow" of illegal intoxicants.
That challenge is magnified by illicit fentanyl, the main culprit in drug deaths. Fentanyl production, which does not require crops, is much cheaper and easier to conceal than heroin production, and it can be done anywhere in the world.
"At present," the Congressional Research Service (CRS) noted last year, "most U.S.-destined illicit fentanyl appears to be produced clandestinely in Mexico, using chemical precursors from China." Trump wants the Chinese government to crack down on companies that produce those precursors.
As The New York Times reported in December, Mexican cartels already have a backup plan. They are recruiting "chemistry students studying at Mexican universities" to synthesize fentanyl precursors, "freeing them from having to import those raw materials from China."
Trump thinks the Mexican and Canadian governments could do more to shut down fentanyl manufacturing within their countries. But to the extent they succeeded in doing that, production would simply shift elsewhere, as has happened repeatedly with drugs such as cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine.
Despite his manifest failure to keep drugs from "coming in" during his first term, Trump is still holding out the vain hope that, with the coerced assistance of Mexico and Canada, he can "seal the border." That mission was always impossible, and it is further complicated by fentanyl's potency, which allows traffickers to transport large numbers of doses in small packages.
Mexican drug cartels "move illicit fentanyl into the United States, primarily across the southwestern border, often in passenger vehicles," the CRS noted. "The U.S.
Department of Homeland Security asserts that 90% of [seized] fentanyl is interdicted at ports of entry, often in vehicles driven by U.S. citizens. A primary challenge for both
Mexican and U.S. officials charged with stopping the fentanyl flow is that [the cartels] can meet U.S. demand with a relatively small amount."
Finding those small amounts among the hundreds of thousands of cars and trucks that cross into the United States from Mexico and Canada each day is a daunting task, and even attempting it in a serious way would impose intolerable burdens on international travel and trade. Despite Trump's promise to "seal the border," the White House concedes that "federal officials are only able to seize a fraction of the fentanyl smuggled across the southern border."
It gets worse. Although vehicular transportation across the southern border currently seems to be the main route for fentanyl, that is not the only option. Fentanyl also enters the United States by mail, and it is not feasible to intercept all of those shipments, especially given their small size and the enormous volume of packages.
"Drugs are pouring in at levels never seen before," Trump complained in December, explaining the motivation for his new tariffs. He was referring to drug seizures, which rose dramatically after he left office.
That trend, Trump assumed, was a sign of failure, indicating an increased supply. Yet now he is claiming that more of the same will somehow mean victory in the unwinnable war on drugs.
© Copyright 2025 by Creators Syndicate Inc.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Nirvana fallacy.
Also JS;DR
I honestly think the idiot has lost his mind.
Imported fentanyl only kills people dumb enough to use it.
Addiction has nothing to do with intelligence.
I'm sure it does. A person has to be intelligent enough not to get addicted to their own self-destruction.
That's just silly. History is full of self-destructive geniuses.
Clearly you're not a genius.
I seriously suspect he's this guy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDYNVH0U3cs
(I'm assuming Jake is trans, obviously - because why wouldn't we?)
No wife, no kids, and....autistic I presume.
Poor sarc sock.
Nice of you to admit to your issues. Now you can fix them. Admittance is your first step lol.
You defend yourself as if you have a reputation that matters here, but you don't anymore. You've left a record of metadata for years now proving how broken you really are. Sometimes I'm sad that I partly owe my blessings to folks like yourself who abdicate their own potential in favor of self-immolating on the internet. Other times, I'm just glad that I'll never need to step over you in the real world -- less competition. I'll try to stop pestering you from here on, Jessica, and will let you fulfil your dream of being king of the rats.
lol
Poor sarc.
You too fuckface
Poor sarc sock lol.
You're coping quite badly buddy. Maybe do like the other democrats and get a therapist?
Here's the thing scottie. Nobody has ever cared what idiots like you think. The world isn't like your angry reddit threads.
Lol.
You don't pester anybody. Because literally nobody here cares what you think sarc. You're pathetic.
Did that make you feel better about yourself?
JesseBahnFarter-Fuhrer is a high school dorp-out... Which also helps to explain why it keeps right on dorping out, all day, every day! Butt it is an EXPERT on EVERYTHING, and is sure to let all of the lesser beings KNOW that!
He read a book about game theory, and now he knows about economics than every economist who existed over the last two and a half centuries.
ALL the commenters above your post are whackjob MAGAts few subscribers see once they discover the (X) Mute Loser button. These ani bring to mind the SockPuppet episode of Homeland, where God's Prophet Alec Jones fills a space with bleating Orangopox spammers flinging electronic ordure on social media. So, welcome to uninspected entry.
Was he trying to win the drug war?
Or just establishing a pecking order, and using a convenient excuse.
Yes, the Pussy-Grabber in Chief also lusts after being the Pecker in Chief! Any excuse will do, so long ass shit appeals to sore-in-the-cunt cuntsorevaturds!
Pecking order?
Well, it was a game of chicken and Canada and Mexico end it by giving only chicken scratch.
Always, ALWAYS, with you all, it is giving Trump the infinite benefit of the doubt. For once I wish you all could treat Trump not as some Pope-like infallible figure, but just as a normal politician. You know, someone who practices politics and might not always have pure motives. Is that too much to ask?
How dare you question the infallibility of Political Jesus!!!!
Trump is far from infallible. But compared to the creatures your side has put up, he comes out looking like a genius.
Observe that Gull strawfoil injects, mainlines actually, the assumption that there are only two sides: Orange Hitler and Bolchevik judyism.
Well, obviously Chase Oliver was out, because gay.
I know right? That’s only something we should do for Democrats and career bureaucrats.
I refute this article-farticle by SNOT reading shit!!! Also, Sullum is icky-poo!!!!
There, am I now a True Cuntsorevaturd in good standing? A Kool Kid maybe even?
You are the PerVFeckLess Mean Squirrel.
SuLLUM Eats Poo
and so do YoU
Squirrel HaiKu
JS;dr
JS;dr
JS;dr
Are y'all ADDICTED to bragging about the articles that Ye PervFectly did SNOT read? Does this addiction of Yours involve ANY free will choices at ALL, or is it just a reflection of Your genetic programming, ass meat-puppets and bags of biochemicals?
Careful Plucky Squirrell... These faceless sockpuppets you jeer are engineered to be blond like Hitler, tall and light-footed like Goebbels, slim and fit as Goring--clearly specimens of Christian Aryan Superiority. Reason hides their IDs lest the Bolshies and Libruls capture them for some fact-checking.
Jacob , put this on a billboard outside REASON HQ to staunch the lazy immoral cowardice in just accepting this horrible drug mess
Nobody made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little.
Edmund Burke
Yes, THIS is why we must ALL beat our wives, girlfriends, children, cats, and dogs EVERY DAY, just a LITTLE bit harder! Just a WEE tad more self-righteous PUNISHMENTS just might make a difference!
Christians call that "tough love," not torture or girl-bullying.
Yes, this! This is also why Jesus turned the water into wine at a wedding... So that a few sinners would DRINK the wine, and then ALL of those non-drinkers in the crowd (those who were without ANY sin at all) could have a GREAT time, self-righteously throwing the first stones at the drinker-sinners!!!!
Reason / Sullum don't just ACCEPT the horrible drug mess. They want to expand it as aggressively as possible.
Portland, Denver, Seattle, San Francisco... These aren't warning signs or proof of the failure of easy access to drugs without personal responsibility. They are a road map to the great libertarian future: A kilo in every pot; a tent encampment on every corner; an "out of business" sign on every Walgreens. Freedom!
It is as I said earlier: Trump, and every other drug warrior, knows that the drug war cannot be won in America without subjecting Americans to police-state tactics that they would never approve of. So instead, Trump is exporting American *domestic* drug war policy and demanding that everyone else implement the drug war for him, using tariffs and "economic might" as his weapon of choice. It is imperialistic garbage.
For now, we'll settle for reduced supply and fewer illegal aliens. Let's see what the illegal alien numbers are in a month. Is the flow stopped?
Let's see what the illegal alien numbers are in a month. Is the flow stopped?
I have no doubt Trump will reduce the flow of illegals with his domestic policies like stronger border enforcement and deportations, which makes coming here look less attractive.
Everything I've read so far about the deals with Canada and Mexico focuses on the drug war, not immigration. Fentanyl does not get across the border the same way as illegals so stopping one does nothing for the other.
Maybe you read something I missed?
Fentanyl has legs?
No. But it will give you wings!
Lol
Trump, and every other drug warrior, knows that the drug war cannot be won in America without subjecting Americans to police-state tactics that they would never approve of.
It can't be won, period.
I'm not sure if he's going to back down on his promise to erect tariff barriers to trade that he believes will bring wealth (tax ourselves into prosperity, yay), or if he's intentionally set an impossible condition for lowering tariffs because he plans on keeping that promise.
Oh it can be won. I doubt there is very much fentanyl in North Korea. But Americans will not tolerate North Korean-style policies and rightly so. So America is going to demand everyone else adopt police-state tactics to fight the drug war on America's behalf while America can still claim to be the "land of the free". It is a bit nauseating.
You don't think we live in a police state now?
This matches my observations (though I've never been to Korea). But DEA saboteurs siding on the coattails of State and SOCOM make every South American country they infiltrate and control a slum like the Philippine Islands or Sumatra under Christian National Socialist subjugation. Every inhabitant of dollarized Ecuador is $4k in debt by foisting, not agreement. Nearly all asylum seekers flee torture and imprisonment because of plant leaves banned by the same U.S. prohibitionism that caused the Great Depression and elevated Hitler to power after July 1931. Hitler was Herbert Hoover's birthday present to FDR.
They are recruiting "chemistry students studying at Mexican universities" to synthesize fentanyl precursors,
Gutierre Blancos abound.
Reason: nobody can do anything about the importation of illicit drugs, and nobody should do anything about illegal immigration. If you do you are bad.
That should keep those coveted journalism awards coming in.
Reason: nobody can do anything about the importation of illicit drugs
Well someone should try, I guess.
Banning safe drugs like weed and acid put profit into the simple meth, smack and fentanyl rackets. These sell for 4 times as much thanks to the elimination of safe-but-subtle competition.
Yes. Millions of Americans have and continue to abuse alcohol and opioids (instead of using far less harmful weed) because THC remains detectable in blood for 30 days (while alcohol and opioids disappear more rapidly), and people don't want to lose their jobs or face mandatory drug treatment for smoking weed on weekends.
The idea that fent is killing between 90,000 to 100,000 Americans every year must be very appealing to people like Bill Gates and of course liberals who believe all drugs should be legalized.
When someone in your family dies from fentanyl laced meth just consider it a plus for the libertarian cause.
The rule should be , anyone caught attempting to smuggle fent across the border gets executed immediately. See how long the smuggling continues after the first hundred or so are caught and executed.
Let's see, what is more delusional? A president who wants to enforce strict borders or a president who wants to eliminate borders? Which would Reason prefer?
No need to guess. They told you who they collectively (but strategically!) voted for, and it wasn't Trump or even Chase. This place is Salon with guns.
I can (and do) find Trump at odds with many basic libertarian principles. But I can also acknowledge that the Biden/Obama party is diametrically opposed to every individual freedom beyond the sexual.
Nothing is more illustrative than the COVID response. We all know which party intentionally weaponized the pandemic to gain power over you, your body, your schools, your churches, your company, and your basic autonomy. And who stood in their way? Not the LP. Not Chase. And sure as fuck not Reason.
Oh my... Now 'Tariff' = 'Drug War'???
Next thing you know you're are going to die! ...because Tariffs. /s
Are all the illegals being exported just because of ....... "fentanyl"?
Pretty sure the association with Tariffs is a purposely deceitful narrative being painted.
If Trump is such a Drug Warrior why is he not trying to ban gasoline like the left is?
Gosh; Anyone can get high on $3/gas.
Not Unwinnable
The War on Drugs is not unwinnable. There is a documented, successful way that Americans never will use. Harsh? Yes. but either use it or drop the entire endeavor.
The Only Rational Scheme
Decades of trying and failing to control recreational, mind-altering drugs has proven that the only rational choices are to render possession a capital offense as is the case in Southeast Asia or to render their use legal. To paraphrase President Reagan, in the War Against Drugs, drugs won.
Excerpt from the semi-fictional novel, Retribution Fever:
Seven. In the matter of drug abuse, such abuse represents a willful action not a passive happening. Prohibition has proven a failure. It had failed with alcohol. It failed with other recreational drugs. It only increases the price of such drugs and promotes corruption of political officials and law-enforcing agents on a vast scale; thereby, destabilizing entire social systems . . . foreign and domestic. Unless we make possession itself a capital crime as is the case in Southeast Asia, it will continue to fail. So-called rehabilitation has a low rate of long-term success at high cost, representing a poor investment.
Will decriminalizing recreational, “mind-altering” drugs increase their abuse? There exists little credible evidence that long-term it does . . . however, it remains the official policy of the federal government to discourage abuse of any class of recreational drug including alcohol. Accordingly, distasteful as it may be to many, we shall abolish federal criminal penalties for all recreational drugs. All recreational, “mind-altering” drugs previously deemed illegal under federal law, such as heroin and marijuana, no longer will be. States will be free to pass their own laws in this regard, including setting age-limits. Previously illegal drugs will be manufactured or imported only through the usual, legal channels and sold only through licensed pharmacies and medical clinics. Competition will set prices.
All recreational, “mind-altering” drugs will be subject to a federal tax proportional to the direct costs incurred by the federal government as a consequence of their abuse. Proceeds will be used only to offset direct costs for the following: Effective medical treatment in federal hospitals and clinics of drug-overdose not ineffective treatment of drug-abuse itself, penal incarceration in federal prisons for crimes committed directly related to the abuse of these drugs, and social services by the federal government for those rendered unable to support themselves as a consequence of having abused these drugs. In the future, we expect such costs to the federal government to be minimal. Each State may impose its own tax and regulations regarding usage.
https://reason.com/2024/09/15/the-psychedelic-emancipator-of-kentucky/
Can This Psychedelic Help Cure Opioid Addiction?
This Kentucky Republican won't stop until he finds a state willing to make legal room for ibogaine, a drug he calls "God's medicine."
Ibogaine would be a damned good (not perfect) fix!!! Now get our smugly superior voters and politicians to approve of our freedom to use it...
Owsley's graddad was Governor of Kentucky and Senator. Kentucky was one of the states slated for subsidized Republican "narcotic farm" concentration camps before Bert Hoover lost to FDR.
Dr Tim Leary used psilocybin to wean alcoholics off of gin.
And the TDS-addled steaming pile of shit Sullum can't grow up.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
That's true, it isn't winnable, but the status quo isn't an option either Sullum. Try harder to be a dolt.
The status-quo of an incompetent law enforcement.
or the status-quo that Government should be banning things?
Almost every drug abuser will manage to find themselves in prison under general law enforcement. If they don't break a single law short of just doing a drug why would you care what they're doing in their own personal life? Are you everyone's parent?
It’s impossible to live the life of a drug addict without breaking other laws.
Not true, if you are an alcoholic and you don't drive you could stay within the rule of law.
Acidheads drive slower than juice freaks, but with negligible loss of control. See George Harrison, Jerry Garcia. When I was a kid hardly anyone drank. Cigarettes were the most dangerous drug in the Haight and among conscripts in Vietnam. Nixon and Reagan, Biden and Bush² sure fixed THAT! Prohibition changed China from Qing empire to communist Trilby camp.
Precisely the point.
A competent law enforcement is the basis of the issues not "drug abuse".
Blaming/Banning the 'drug' is exactly like banning the 'gun'.
Did the 'gun' / 'drug' break the law or did the user of the 'gun' / 'drug'?
No, it isn't.
Truthteller is like many short-sighted people exemplifying thoughts of today's drug warrior. Drugs, fentanyl and others cannot be stopped by focusing only on the supply side. Reducing supply only raises prices and encourages the black-market sales. This country needs to bring down demand and that only way to do that is to focus on the user. Help those who can get off drugs. Help those who cannot get off drugs to get to functional levels. Finally accept we will lose some, sad but inevitable.
Only way to eliminate demand is to change human nature.
Why does everyone want to change everyone else's "human nature" at the end of a Gov - 'Gun'?
What happened to being the land of the free?
Addicts are not free.
Kris Kristofferson wrote the words, and Janis Joplin made them famous. "Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose". None of us are truly free.
Musicians are better at rhymes than definitions. Freedom is what coercion destroys and displaces.
Musician and poets often speak the truth more than others. People, myself included, forge the chains that bind us. I have a small device in my pant's pocket that connects me with the world and that tethers me to it also. No one forces me to carry that smart phone I do that myself. So, I am not sure that I am any less free than an addict.
The way to create it is to make all safer choices illegal via international Gestapo tactics. That way only gin and cigarettes, meth and addictive downers are out there--but selling for 4X as much.
Most addiction is escapism. Improve the quality of life for folks and there will be less ppl desiring an escape from their misery. Not all, but it will cut down on a lot.
The quality of your life is of your concern, not mine.
Then quit wasting money on trying to make druggies live like you want them to live. Or spend money on actually helping them. Bitching while wasting money on gov-gunning hasn't worked yet, and isn't likely to.
ONLY opiates and their copycats are addictive. The best part is that sane people don't like their effects--other than as analgesics. This was virified in double-blind experiments back when Thorazine was a new thing. That new thing fairly emptied U.S. asylums so at the time of the Korean War these opiate-vulnerable folks were loose and approachable. Giving them scrips for cheap and legal dope is the solution Deep State crime abhors. It's a wonder they've not found a say to make insulin illegal.
People who trouble to READ Sullum's exemplary article will notice the dudden upswing in addictive downer deaths coinciding with Trump being elected thanks to Gary Johnson's spoiler votes and Dem dereliction. That's Figure 4 in the CDC paper Sullum links. It's as if the "SLACKING BAD" mariachi spoof were a factual exposé rather than an AI Cheech and Chong act.