Tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China Could Start This Weekend
Trump's second trade war has apparently arrived. There remains much uncertainty, but expect it to be costly.

Huge new tariffs on goods imported from Canada, China, and Mexico could begin as soon as this weekend.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at a Friday press conference that the Trump administration was prepared to impose a new 25 percent tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, along with a 10 percent tariff on imports from China. Aside from that statement, Leavitt offered few specifics and the White House has so far not released any further details about the new import taxes.
That leaves many unknowns, such as: Under what authority is President Donald Trump implementing those tariffs? Are there exceptions for certain goods, or are the tariffs being charged on all imports from the three countries? Do those tariffs apply on top of existing import duties—for example, is the new 10 percent tariff on goods from China imposed on top of the tariffs on many Chinese imports that Trump implemented during his first term—or in place of them? Will there be a process for certain companies and industries to seek relief from tariffs for goods that cannot be sourced in the United States, like tequila?
Adding to the confusion: Reuters reported earlier on Friday that those tariffs will be implemented on March 1. Leavitt called that report "false."
Canada, China, and Mexico are the United States' three largest trading partners. In 2023, the last full year for which data are available, the U.S. imported $475 billion of goods from Mexico, $426 billion from China, and $418 billion from Canada.
In her remarks to reporters, Leavitt said the new tariffs were being issued in response to the "illegal fentanyl that they have sourced and allowed to distribute into our country." In an interview with CNBC on Friday, Trump's trade advisor Peter Navarro also claimed that "fentanyl…that comes from China and Mexico" was the prime motivator for the new import taxes.
This makes very little sense. How will higher taxes on legal imports affect the flow of illegal drugs?
What the tariffs will do is raise prices for American businesses and consumers.
Though much uncertainly remains about how these tariffs will function, a full-fledged 25 percent tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico, plus a 10 percent tariff on all imports from China, would be a tax increase of $111 billion this year and would shrink the U.S. economy by 0.4 percent, according to estimates by the Tax Foundation.
"Several industries would experience severe disruption, including autos, oil & gas, and agriculture," wrote Erica York, vice president of policy at the Tax Foundation, in a post on X shortly after Leavitt announced the new tariffs.
Auto manufacturers, which rely on supply chains that stretch across the whole of North America—thanks to free trade agreements—figure to be some of the hardest hit. "Steep tariffs on vehicles would not only raise prices north of the border and shock the Mexican auto sector and its workers. They would also cost jobs in the United States," warned the Peterson Institute for International Economics, in December. "Because of the highly integrated value chains in the North American auto sector, a high share of US-origin parts are embedded in Mexico's motor vehicle exports. US suppliers of these parts could soon be caught in the crossfire of Trump's trade war."
Fruit and vegetable imports from Mexico will be another victim. "If you put tariffs on Mexican fruits and vegetables, there's no doubt about it, you'll have inflation in the supermarket and you will have bare shelves," Lance Jungmeyer, president of the Fresh Produce Association of the Americas, told The Packer, a trade publication, in November. "Consumers will not be happy with that."
Tariffs on crude oil imports from Canada will likely drive up prices at the gas pump. More than 50 percent of the crude oil imported to the U.S. comes from Canada, and analysts believe tariffs could cause prices to jump by 40 cents or even 70 cents per gallon. If those tariffs spiral into a broader trade war, energy companies are already warning about "volatility in crude oil prices, impacting refineries and downstream fuel markets, especially for gasoline and diesel."
There are also unanswered questions about how the other countries might respond. "All three governments have promised to answer Mr. Trump's levies with tariffs of their own on U.S. exports, including Florida orange juice, Tennessee whiskey and Kentucky peanut butter," The New York Times notes.
Make no mistake, this is a trade war of choice being launched unilaterally by Trump. It is a foolish and self-destructive move, one that (in the case of tariffs on Canada and Mexico, at least) directly violates a trade deal Trump signed during his first term and hailed as "the fairest, most balanced, and beneficial trade agreement we have ever signed into law. It's the best agreement we've ever made."
Tariffs are not a path to peace or prosperity, and igniting a trade war with America's three largest trade partners is sure to have negative consequences no one can foresee at the moment.
"Sound fiscal policy and effective incentives to work, save and invest can increase economic growth, but the implementation of broad-based tariffs impedes that growth and in a full-blown trade war would overwhelm it," warned economists Phil Gramm and Larry Summers, in a powerful op-ed published Friday in The Wall Street Journal. "We therefore urge Congress not to adopt the administration's proposed tariffs and urge the president not to implement those tariffs by executive order."
Congress should act immediately to block these tariffs, reassure America's top trade partners and other allies, and revoke much of the president's authority over trade.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Let’s see who the Trump defenders blame when prices go up. Ha ha, just kidding. We all know who they’ll blame.
Has anyone seen sarc lately? He told everyone he left.
Hopefully he went back to grade school to help educate him. He is almost never here.
He has an alert for any reason article with “tariff”.
So…… half of all Reason articles?
And 90% of Boehm’s.
We know Boehm furiously masturbates while he writes his anti Trump tariff propaganda. So does Sarc do the same thing reading it?
Well if the prices of Chinese EVs skyrocket this year. Biden’s 100% increase will have more do with it than Trump’s 10%. But who you gonna blame?
Congress should act immediately
to block these tariffstar and feather him like our Patriot Forefathers did and run him out of town on a pole.+++
I second the motion!!!
Thank God we had back to back tariff articles to offset that yucky regulations article.
I mean of all the breathless speculation and blathering over the last year, this is probably THE most appropriate article since they are actually going into effect tomorrow.
Still a drop in the bucket compared to regulatory policy. It is complaint about the price of pennies while the feds dole out hundreds of billions.
Maybe if people recognized the regulatory growth while it was happening there would be more push back.
Bet you anything the actual subsumed price of this is far more negligible than inflationary and regulatory increases next week.
Keep defending theft at all cost.
As has been explained to you elsewhere, tariffs cost a lot more than just the revenue they bring in. When they raise prices, sellers of domestic goods raise prices too. Restricting imports means we keep producing things where we don’t have a comparative advantage instead of things where we do, and that causes opportunity cost. Finally we produce fewer exports thanks to retaliatory tariffs. Tariffs have a cascading effect throughout the economy, and none of it is good.
You know this because it’s been explained to you many times.
That means you’re lying when you claim the only cost of tariffs is the tax revenue.
You’re obsessed with tariffs, because Trump. You’re not even a one dimensional moron anymore.
“”for example, is the new 10 percent tariff on goods from China imposed on top of the tariffs on many Chinese imports that Trump implemented during his first term—or in place of them? “”
Whatever it is, it’s on top of Bidens big 2024 tariffs on Chinese imports.
TEMU was shut down due to those tariffs. Was a mess.
How will higher taxes on legal imports affect the flow of illegal drugs?
The governments of China and Mexico are criminal enterprises in control of or abetting the manufacture and export of illegal narcotics. If the tariffs make them lose money on their legal products, it might be in their interest to cut back on the drug sales.
You’re funny!
If they lose money on legal products it would be in their interest to increase the drug sales to make up the shortfall. That’s the realistic outcome and in keeping with economics and profit motives.
Of course, Drug War illogic informs us that if we just BELIEVE hard enough, they might pleasantly surprise us and decide to act like scolded children, saying ‘I guess we’ve got enough money’ in an act of benevolence and contrition.
Trump’s looking out for the domestic opioid industry…and looking out for native born gang members to get the profits. Lucky for us his hair-brained plan won’t do squat to fentanyl smuggling.
Cool story bro. Got any other yarns you would like to spin?
Balloons, not yarns.
No worries. If fentanyl smuggling is affected, then Reason will write an article saying that we need to create visas for fentanyl smugglers so that prices can be reduced,
“This makes very little sense. How will higher taxes on legal imports affect the flow of illegal drugs?”
Trump is saying that these countries aren’t doing enough to stop the flow of drugs into our country. So he’s using tariff as leverage.
Canada should be left alone, their illegals aren’t flooding across our borders. The conservatives will probably gain more power in the future, so Trump might be receptive to making deals with them.
I say no tariffs on Canada and Mexico. China – that’s a different game.
https://www.newsweek.com/us-northern-border-crossings-break-record-2024-1921401
these countries aren’t doing enough to stop the flow of drugs into our country
That is laughable understatement. The governments of China and Mexico are directly involved in the narcotics trade.
“You’re not stopping the flow of illegal drugs, so I’m going to kick Americans in the nuts!”
Tariffs are taxes on the American people.
“Me got new dumb talking points from actblue, me smart, me pretend to care about taxing people.”
Probably got them second hand off of Bluesky.
So are domestic taxes are taxes on the American people.
I’m sure you’re completely against domestic taxes too huh?
Tell us how thankful you are about a Tax-Cuts and Jobs Act?
Another fifth grader chimes in.
So then you love tariffs. Except for icky Trump tariffs.
Meh. It’s Trump’s attempt to be smart. He threatens with tariffs, they renegotiate whatever NAFTA is called today, Trump gets minute concessions and claims major wins.
Trump was the person who negotiated the successor to NAFTA. He is violating his own treaty.
Violating? Treaties are meant to be continually renegotiated so that whoever has the power at any given point can get more. There is only one winner. Everyone else is a loser. If not now – tomorrow (or later today).
Member when reason wrote 300 articles about bidens terrif increases? Kuck dont
Good.
Maybe it’s time the ‘importers’ started paying some taxes.
After all; who do they think is suppose to be funding the international affairs government anyways.
Else; Maybe all the importers should’ve been denied stimulus checks when the ?free? ponies ride started running.
The ‘importers’ are us you fucking moron.
More likely it’s YOU not us.
Precisely why you insist YOU and nobody else gets ZERO-Tax in their trading market.
The fuck does that mean?
We all know that Democrats like to tax businesses and claim they’re fleecing the rich, but they’re not.
Those taxes are ultimately passed on to people who buy stuff, as in us.
Tariffs are just another tax on businesses. This time it’s Republicans, and they’re claiming they’re fleecing foreigners, but they’re not.
The taxes are still passed on to us, just like any other tax on businesses.
“just like any other tax on businesses” – Exactly…..
So it makes ZERO sense to be up-roaring about Tariffs specifically when they are just like any other tax.
If ‘import’ taxes are cutting domestic taxes only an ‘importer’ would cry about it.
Call me when the ‘importers’ are paying the same as domestic.
The new GOP slogan: What do we want? TAXES! When do we want them? NOW!
Oh? So that’s why they passed the Tax-Cuts act?
What do you think tariffs are, you moe-ron?
“The Tax-Cuts act are Tariffs..” – SRG2.
You leftards are really dumber than I give you credit for.
You still don’t get it, you ignorant peasant.
And, fuckwit, how can someone be on the left if they’re pro-capitalism and free markets?
Oh I get it. You have a severe case of TDS.
You won’t acknowledge those Tax-Cuts if your life depended on it.
Talk about the ‘ignorance’ with a topping of self-projection.
Funny how we had tariffs in the first Trump Administration and we allegedly had fewer of them in the Biden Administration.
Which one had better results overall?
Seems to me that the threat of tariffs, used to negotiate better trade deals or behavior might not be a terrible plan (see Colombia). Foreign competition is NOT a libertarian paradise of free market economics if the competition is using slave labor or subsidizing their businesses in order to destroy the competition. Libertarianism only works when everyone agrees to abide by the rules.
Columbia and China are different animals. If the US lost all Columbian imports, the effect would be negligible on the US economy. The US is entirely reliant on access to Chinese manufacturing. If China stopped all exports to the US, the US economy would be destroyed. This is because even products made in the US rely on Chinese component parts and sub-systems. A car “manufactured” in the US is often just assembled in the US, with sub-systems like transmissions and engines that are manufactured in China. 95% of consumer and industrial electronics are made in China. China’s only risk from a trade war would be financial, the US risk would be the loss of a huge amount of material goods effecting the day-to-day functioning of the US in terms of access to material goods.
Correction
“This is because” … The US thought it would be wise to ZERO-Tax China production while taxing their own into a grave.
Maybe it’s time to stop being nothing but a dependent of China before it’s too late.
Speaking of oceans –
Finally an answer to why the Earth’s oceans have been on a record hot streak
The two years of heat (since March 2023) have created a scientific mystery, with 450 straight days of record high global sea surface temperatures from April 2023 to July 2024 — a streak that exceeded climate scientists’ predictions even when accounting for climate change and the natural climate pattern known as El Niño. A study published on Tuesday by researchers at the University of Reading helps solve the puzzle and points to one prominent culprit: Greta Thunberg.
Isn’t it amazing how they can just keep blaming the same cooked up theories as the problem when all their efforts to cure the problem just make things worse and worse and worse…
Why it must be a political problem.
They always go that way.
1) Here’s a minute problem.
2) Throw politicians at it.
3) The problem just keeps getting worse.
4) Throw MORE politicians at it.
Repeat endlessly …. etc, etc, etc, etc, etc……………
It’s like these idiots think fixing a dam requires drilling holes in it.
Takes a quick look at temperatures over time.. Oh look. Global Cooling was the BIG political sh*t bucket during WWII with Leaded Gas and Airplanes dumping CO2 like nobodies tomorrow. Huh. Maybe the theories are just *ssbackwards. Heaven-forbid anyone actually consider the narrative is complete BS.
If you have grandchildren they will soon despise you for the world you leave to them
They won’t despise the CO2.
They’ll despise the [Na]tional So[zi]alist oppressive Empire.
As-if that’s not exactly what I despise of my grand-parents (FDR-era).
Are you even able to explain the basis for the global warming hypothesis?
Am I even capable of spewing leftard BS indoctrination?
The real question is why would I want to? So I can join the ‘end of days’ cult and predict the horror that will happen in 10-years that NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER has happened?
Environmentalists are just a cult-religion. They are wrong constantly but constantly refuse to admit they’re always wrong.
i.e., “I’m too stupid to be able to explain the hypothesis but I believe the right kind of people, and what do those climate scientists know anyway?
You elevate ignorance to a sacrament.
There’s no environmental sacrament going on…..
The only thing you’re elevating is your religion (i.e. “beliefs”).
The white house spokesperson yesterday said ‘promises made, promises kept’ on the tariffs on Canada and Mexico. But has the blanket 25% tariffs been implemented? She said it was coming today. Its about 1pm central and I keep saying articles about the promise of them happening. Has someone in Trump’s orbit got him to back off??
Maybe the maker of spray tan threatened a 500% tariff on bright orange hue.
Where are golf balls manufactured? Asking for a friend.
You do realize Chicago would be less windy if there were fewer lawyers ….
I do not understand why these Left-Libertarians aka Progressive Collectivists are OK! with Mexico, Canada and China placing restrictions on US goods but oppose the US doing the same thing? Of course, the best case scenerio is open and free trade between nations but that is not what’s happening. US manufacturing has been getting fucked by foreigners for decades. Tariff the shit out of them. The beatings will continue until morale improves!
LOL Leftards here at Reason.com are crying about higher prices. Yes, there will be a price to bringing the US back on line. Stop your whining communists and get a job.
Trump’s insanely ignorant imposition of tariffs will go down as one of the worst instances of self-inflicted injury in modern American history.
But what can one expect from someone stupid enough to think and publicly claim that trade deficits mean that the US is being ripped off?
From the WSJ, that hotbed of socialism:
The Dumbest Trade War in History
I’m surprised I haven’t heard of an initial retaliation. 1000% tariffs on any product made by the techbros and other donors to Trump. Alternatively – present any operations in those countries by those donors with a 100% excise tax on sales. To de facto nationalize their global supply chains.
The retaliation is coming. Presumably Mexico and Canada think it’s a good idea to think before acting.
Just stopped by to see whether there were libertarians defending literal price fixing by the government. Well, the authoritarian choad acting on behalf of it.
Certainly there will be people who have claimed to be libertarians who will tie themselves into knots rationalising why they approve of Trump’s – non-libertarian – idiocy.
Tell us how Libertarian Domestic Taxes are and how Non-Libertarian Trumps domestic Tax-Cuts are. Start tying those knots.
Tell us how tariffs make you freer.
By paying-off some of that spending leftard Nazi’s put into place and allowing Domestic Tax-Cuts.
Freedom to SPEND on debt and pretending PAYING for that debt is about freedom is completely leftard criminal mentality 101.
The great irony of Trump’s tariff plans is that America’s tariff system is the quintessential example of the Deep State. Tariffs are managed by opaque bureaucracies and manipulated by high-priced lobbyists in order to extract funds from American consumers. If the goal is to scale back the powers of the administrative state, abolishing the tariff system would be a good place to start.
Economists tend to be against tariffs not only because they prevent trade and raise prices, but because they increase what is known as “rent-seeking.” Rent-seeking is the money and effort required to get special favors from the government. Every dollar a company spends on lawyers arguing for a tariff exclusion is one dollar less spent on building things that Americans actually want.
Oh, the Trump supporters here are all in favour of the Deep State if it’s run by Trump. You don’t see any of them complaining about the replacing of career civil servants with Trump loyalists,
They’d cheer a Trump Enabling Act.
Domestic Manufacturing Taxes 80%
Import Taxes (Tariffs) 0%
Do tell us about those, “special favors from the government”
Scary, but all decent folk despise effreminate unmaly Trudeau and loathe Mexico, the home of untrammeled gangsterism.
I look at it as ‘now rather than later’. Still it is scary and Biden delievered this fully to us by his border laziness and his praising (!) of Trudeau’s leadership.
Just a little social engineering by fiat from the central planners on the Right, nothing to see here.
Oh wait, did you think tariffs were something else?
Not figurative—literal price controls.
The “socialist engineers” and central planners of the left have already been here.
Tariffs are being used to pay for that BS.
Nice demonstration of leftard self-projection though.
Hmm, if it ain’t Right it’s Left?
As a life-long libertarian I’ve encountered this type of “thinking” many times before.
Aren’t you the Gov-Guns guy? Here they are using their guns to influence buying behavior, you know, putting their armed thumbs on the scale.
And how many ‘armed’ thumbs are on the scale of Domestic Trade?
How many of those ‘armed’ thumbs were put there because of the left?
I’ve encountered this type of ‘selective’ (biased) thinking many times before as well.
You’re a “socialists engineers” [Na]tional So[zi]alist Empire consequences of $36,000,000,000,000 ($220,000/ea working citizen) too late to be wishing for a ZERO-Tax government now.
So you’re either shoveling *all* the Nazi-Empires consequences onto Domestic Trade entirely or trying to pretend the consequences just don’t exist.
Is this your libertarian case for tariffs?
Thanks for trying but, no thank you.
Aren’t you the Gov-Guns guy?
Yes he is. And he also approves of tariffs, restriction on selling property, including shares, restriction on raising foreign capital, restrictions on the activities of those he sees as not the right kind of people, etc.
Approves of NOT selling 4-D.C. sized states worth of US Land to Japan.
Approves of FAIRLY taxing importers at the same amount as Domestic.
Oh my…. What a horrible case you made against me. /s
Here’s a proposition for all those crying about Trumps Tariffs.
If you will all lobby your representatives to get all the UN-Constitutional “welfare state” (i.e. armed-theft domestically) repealed then I’ll lobby to end the Tariffs (‘import’ tax).
Deal?
You see; that’s how it works.
If you want to SPEND government money you have to PAY government money.
‘Guns’ don’t make sh*t. They just do THEFT.
It is in every sense of the word UNFAIR to make domestic traders pay for all the SPENDING importers want to take advantage of.
It’s truly a sad state of humanity when such simple realities as that has to be explained. ‘Guns’ don’t make sh*t. Too many have been religiously-indoctrinated with the [Na]tional So[zi]alist plague.
I think I’ll lobby to end excessive tariffs, thank you very much.
And I’ll lobby to end excessive domestic spending, thank you very much.
It is in every sense of the word UNFAIR to make domestic traders pay for all the SPENDING importers want to take advantage of.
What the fuck are you talking about, you hysterical little weasel?
It’s truly a sad state of humanity when such simple realities as that has to be explained.
Flat Earther complains that spherical earthers can’t see the simple reality of flatness.
The very Constitutional purpose of a “Union of States” government is to defend the nation within the arena of international affairs.
So how FAIR is having the import-trade (international trade) market pay 0% while the domestic-trade market pays 80%?