Was the Las Vegas Bombing a Case of the Afghan War Coming Home?
Matthew Livelsberger’s alleged manifesto highlights an infamous U.S. drug raid.

Master Sgt. Matthew Alan Livelsberger was clearly shaken by what he saw in Afghanistan. In the last few days of his life, the Special Forces soldier wrote in a note released by authorities, "Why did I personally do it now? I needed to cleanse my mind of the brothers I've lost and relieve myself of the burden of the lives I took." Livelsberger was found dead after his rental car, filled with fireworks and gas canisters, exploded in Las Vegas on New Year's Day.
Livelsberger had also allegedly emailed a "manifesto" to military podcaster Shawn Ryan explaining his motives. (FBI Special Agent in Charge Spencer Evans told reporters that the bureau hadn't "conclusively proven" who the email was from, though it had "strong evidence" that "lead us to believe that it was in fact him who wrote it.") The message was rambling and fantastical, claiming that China was poised to attack the White House with antigravity drones and that Livelsberger had nearly been kidnapped by the government.
But it mentions a real incident from the war in Afghanistan. The email's author claims to have been involved in "war crimes that were covered up during airstrikes in Nimruz province Afghanistan in 2019 by the [administration, Department of Defense, Drug Enforcement Administration] and CIA….The [United Nations] basically called these war crimes, but the administration made them disappear."
The Nimruz airstrikes were an infamous crossover between the war on terror and the war on drugs. Working under the theory that the Taliban's war effort was funded by "profits from narcotics," the U.S. military announced an air campaign in November 2017 to destroy alleged "drug enterprises" under Taliban control. On May 9, 2019, warplanes bombed 30 alleged drug labs in Nimruz Province and neighboring Farah Province, killing dozens of people.
Soon afterward, the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) said it received "specific and detailed information" that 89 civilians were killed in the airstrikes. In a report released in October 2019, the agency was able to confirm 30 of those deaths, including several children, and found "reliable and credible information to substantiate" another 30 deaths.
The military, of course, investigated itself and found no wrongdoing.
One point of dispute between UNAMA and the U.S. military was whether workers in the drug trade should be counted as civilians. While the U.S. Department of Defense argued that the drug labs were controlled by the Taliban and therefore people inside were "lawful military targets," UNAMA countered that many of the drug labs were "owned and operated by criminal groups" rather than the Taliban, and in any case, "involvement in illicit drug activity would not qualify as direct participation in hostilities."
Even if the drug trade counted as Taliban military infrastructure, though, many of the victims had nothing to do with it. Out of the 30 verified dead, only 17 of them were confirmed by UNAMA to be drug workers. The UNAMA report states that "some of the targeted structures did not appear to have any connections to drug-processing activities, including residential homes."
It's not clear whether Livelsberger had personally "conducted targeting for these strikes," as the email claims. At the very least, he was in Afghanistan at the time with the 10th Special Forces Group, which lost two soldiers in June 2019. The anti-drug air campaign must have stuck out as a particularly wasteful chapter in a particularly violent year.
The U.S. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction found that the U.S. government was giving "totally exaggerated" statistics on the success of the campaign. The International Drug Policy Unit at the London School of Economics concluded in April 2019 that the U.S. military had spent millions of dollars to inflict only hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of damage on the drug trade.
There was a more fundamental problem to the theory of choking the Taliban by choking the drug trade. Everyone, including the Taliban and the U.S.-backed Afghan republic, sustained themselves from the opium economy, because that was the local economy in large parts of the country. Earlier in the war, U.S. troops had realized that they had to leave opium farms alone in order to gain Afghan farmers' trust.
The sudden shift to bombing drug production was inspired by the campaign against the Islamic State group in Syria, where the U.S. military choked Islamic State funding by attacking oil smugglers. The theory was that the Taliban had a similarly vulnerable stream of revenue, Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Harrigian told The Wall Street Journal. Yet Harrigian himself admitted that the Afghan air campaign was "not working as well as in Syria."
The oil trade in Syria was a small, lucrative, and conspicuous part of the economy that could easily be isolated and targeted. On the other hand, Afghans took the anti-drug airstrikes as an all-out attack on "the local population and their property," according to interviews conducted by the London School of Economics.
In fact, the new Taliban government is running into similar problems today trying to stamp out the drug trade.
The U.S. military officially announced the end of "Operation Iron Tempest," the first stage of the air campaign against drug labs, in February 2019. But the air raids continued.
The attack on Nimruz was, in fact, worse than what came before. Rather than the usual strikes on empty buildings at night, the U.S. military bombed buildings full of people during the day, and it was "the first time that UNAMA had received allegations of civilian casualties of such a scale," according to the UNAMA report.
Two years after the Nimruz airstrikes, U.S. troops withdrew entirely and the Taliban overthrew the Afghan republic. The war on terror in Afghanistan turned out to be a massive waste of lives and resources; combining it with the war on drugs only compounded that waste. And as the tragedy in Las Vegas demonstrates, Afghans and Americans alike are still suffering.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It’s funny to read a manifesto and to acknowledge the stuff that’s clearly either bs or insanity (gravities propulsion drones used by US and China), and then to point to other stuff and say “yeah, but this is totally true.” Maybe the crazy guy wasn’t really involved in that operation at all?
The article already says that 'maybe the crazy guy wasn't really involved in that operation at all'. But it also says that yes, it was a real operation (and it was) and that he was in Afghanistan at the time and with the right organization for the claim to be plausible. What more do you want? Yes, crazy people do sometimes also tell the truth. The only people who "always lie" are in logic puzzles and riddles.
Of course, it's not a lie despite being totally incorrect if you are delusional and believe it to be true.
Well, that puts a new twist on all those logic puzzles.
Out of the 30 verified dead, only 17 of them were confirmed by UNAMA to be drug workers.
DRUG WORK IS WORK!
looks like a total setup from where I sit and I semi-retract my "what kind of idiot Green Beret ..." comment from last week now.
The USA fought a Forever War to support the GOOD drug dealers against the BAD drug dealers!!! All Hail USA Government Almighty!
In his defense, I'd say that every airplane, helicopter, or drone is in fact "anti-gravity".
It's a question of mechanism of flight. Antigravity is a theoretical propulsion that creates an inverse of a gravity wave and Cancle it out.
An airplane uses an air foil and speed to create lift due to pressure differentials.
A drone operates basted on a rotating moving air foil to generate lift,
And a helicopter generates lift by being so ugly the earth repels it
Not the Afghan War come home. All war come home. The difference here is that with a volunteer army and invisible permawars by choice and a permaMIC making all the necessary deep state decisions to make it happen, there can never be accountability. Not for the funding. Or the operations. Or the mission creep. Or the PTSD of the grunts.
What's the proportion of ww2 Korea and Nam vets that blew up their cars?
No one knows because we carefully didn't collect that data - and still don't.
But anecdotally, we know that lots of WW2, Korea and Vietnam vets committed suicide and that more than a few took others with them (though the anecdotes I'm aware of are far more often family members than random public).
Military service is the single largest predictor of becoming a mass casualty offender. Higher than mental health. Soldiers and veterans were involved in roughly 25% of mass casualty events. That's 2.4x higher than would be demographically expected.
We deliberately ignore the problem. As we also do re the suicides of veterans.
Why yes, I totally believe anything put out by the UN.
This is just sad.
The guy was a nutjob. It's not exactly rare for these loons to detail historical atrocities in their rambling manifestos. Yeah, he actually served in AFG, but so what? Are you going to give credence to some right wing murderer who blew up innocent people in protest of illegals killing Americans?
The lesson in AFG is that some (almost always Muslim) societies are beyond saving and seeing the light of modern world. AFG was never going to be another Korea or Japan. And you better believe road to modernization there involved atrocities and bloodshed. It almost always involved forceful western intervention. Let's not pretend that we didn't FORCE lesser nations to trade with us. Path to freedom is not pretty.
Just stay away. Stay away from societies that still replay 17th century religious sectarian violence and civil war that kill 100,000 people over a decade. We wouldn't have been at AFG if lunatics didn't ram two planes into our buildings. We wouldn't be at Syria if they didn't gas thousands of its own people to death. Keep their backwards people off our land, outside of the most desperate refugees and people committed to being part of cilvlized society.
Livelsberger was found dead after his rental car
What kind of rental car was it, Matt? And why, despite being filled with fireworks and gas canisters, was the damage largely contained only to the vehicle and its occupant?
I said what kind of car was it, Matt. Say it. Say his name.
FBI Special Agent in Charge Spencer Evans told reporters that the bureau hadn't "conclusively proven" who the email was from, though it had "strong evidence" that "lead us to believe that it was in fact him who wrote it."
LOL. That's right up there with, "It was a sloped roof!"
Working under the theory that the Taliban's war effort was funded by "profits from narcotics," the U.S. military announced an air campaign in November 2017 to destroy alleged "drug enterprises" under Taliban control. On May 9, 2019, warplanes bombed 30 alleged drug labs in Nimruz Province and neighboring Farah Province, killing dozens of people.
https://tinyurl.com/yc3arnnc
Seriously. Everything about that paragraph is awesome!
In a report released in October 2019, the agency was able to confirm 30 of those deaths, including several children, and found "reliable and credible information to substantiate" another 30 deaths.
Yea well they like to hide behind women and children. You'd think the women and children would like, kick them in the nuts or something, but they don't. Can't tell whether that's cowardice or complicity, but... well, it's one of them, isn't it.
On the other hand, Afghans took the anti-drug airstrikes as an all-out attack on "the local population and their property," according to interviews conducted by the London School of Economics.
Why in the world did we try to nation build that worthless sandbox again?
The war on terror in Afghanistan turned out to be a massive waste of lives and resources; combining it with the war on drugs only compounded that waste. And as the tragedy in Las Vegas demonstrates, Afghans and Americans alike are still suffering.
lol, wut?
"A man, angry at the fact that Pluto is no longer regarded as a planet, attempted a poorly-conceived terror strike in a vehicle that is basically a consumer-available tank. Obviously we should turn our attention to the foolishness regarding the designation of the planet Pluto and try to understand that what this terrorist did was a result of it, and therefore... if not justified, at least understandable. Laudable, even."
LURL I AM MURTHEW PATTI. I RITE 4 RAISON.
Cybertrucks are male gendered now?
Well I was referring to the aspie space man.
This all reads like a terrible Disney movie script.
Maybe this guy considered American citizens as “lawful military targets”, to use DOD’s own terminology. We seemingly invade, bomb, and kill in any sovereign country we choose to without a declaration of war or the backing of the United Nations. We then fabricate our own justification for these actions. How would we feel if other countries did this to us? Is it any wonder why so many people around the world despise us?
We all can be sure the esteemed FBI will get to the truth of this incident and report it directly to the American people.
As we all know the FBI is concerned only with the facts and the American people can trust the FBI to inform them .
And Joe Biden is fully cognizant.