Ohio Legislature Passes Bill Ending Driver's License Suspensions for Court Debts
Media investigations found over 3 million active license suspensions in the state.

Ohio may soon reinstate the driver's licenses of hundreds of thousands of residents who lost the ability to drive because of unpaid court debts. The state General Assembly passed a bipartisan bill to end the practice last month.
Republican Gov. Mike DeWine is expected to sign into law House Bill 29. The bill would, among other provisions, end the state's practice of suspending driver's licenses for unpaid court fines and minor drug offenses; retroactively reinstate licenses previously suspended for those reasons; allow poor residents to enter into payment plans; and give a person who is in default on child support payments the opportunity to present evidence that suspending their license would prevent them from making future payments.
Ohio is currently one of over 20 states, according to the Fines and Fees Justice Center, that suspend licenses for court debts, but, as in many other states in recent years, criminal justice advocates convinced the legislature that debt-based license suspensions are unfair and illogical. The practice deprives people of transportation, which makes it harder to hold down a job and pay off their debts, or leads them to drive to work on a suspended license and risk accruing more fines.
"House Bill 29 is a monumental bill that will benefit Ohio workers, employers, and communities," said Lauren Krisai, executive director of the Justice Action Network, which advocated in favor of the legislation. "It will change hundreds of thousands of lives."
An investigation by The Marshall Project and WEWS News 5 published in 2023 found the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles issued nearly 200,000 new license suspensions the previous year for failing to pay court fines, missing child support payments, or other debt-related reasons. The news organizations reported there were over 3 million active license suspensions as of September 2022 in Ohio.
The bill is also notable because it passed by large bipartisan margins at a time when the consensus on criminal justice reform has been crumbling in some other states. The final version of the bill was unanimously approved in the Ohio Senate and passed the Ohio House by a vote of 84–6.
"The overwhelming amount of support this bill received from the General Assembly proves that bold, bipartisan criminal justice reform centered on improving workforce participation and economic outcomes is popular on both sides of the aisle," Krisai says.
According to the Fines and Fees Justice Center, in 2023 New Mexico became the 24th state to pass some form of legislation ending or limiting the practice in the past five years. If Gov. DeWine signs H.B. 29, Ohio would be the 25th.
Where state legislatures have refused to act, federal courts have stepped in, especially when states fail to consider whether someone is too poor to afford a fine in the first place.
In 2018, a federal judge in Michigan enjoined the practice when it's applied to the very poor, ruling that suspending licenses without determining the debtors' ability to pay likely violates due process. And in 2017, a federal judge for the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee reinstated the licenses of two residents in what may have been the first ruling of its kind.
"Taking an individual's driver's license away to try to make her more likely to pay a fine is not using a shotgun to do the job of a rifle: it is using a shotgun to treat a broken arm," wrote U.S. District Court Judge Aleta Trauger.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Give Government Almighty the power to protect the pubic from bad drivers, using driver's licenses, and the next thing ya know, driver's licenses will be yanked away from you for picking yer nose in pubic!!! Or for fucking Spermy Daniels w/o Dear Leader's spermision!!!
Twat to do about this udder SHIT?!?! I don't know; I give up!!!!
The law is a ass.
Shirley a debtors prison is in order
Revoking a drivers license for both outstanding fees and child support has always seemed counterproductive to me. How do these things get paid if you remove getting to work as an option?
Sone wpuld argue they cpuld take mass transit.
We're talking about Ohio.
So what?
Mass transit barely exists in Ohio.
Why have the fines at all? People have no incentive to pay them.
Suspending driver's licenses for court debts and child support sounds like such a stupid idea that no state could possibly be that dumb. But 20 (now 19) are exactly that stupid. That's our government at work.
They could take the bus.
So, I agree with the general premise here. I've often thought that since we've long past the days where driving was a new thing we were all more or less learning, vehicle safety in general continues to improve, and that we've intentionally built our cities and our suburbs in a way that both driver and vehicle licensing at this point are an unjustified encroachment on liberty.
Seven, eight decades ago, I might have said there's a compelling government interest in them both, but I suspect that interest is, for lack of a better term, obsolete in 2024. Jobs, schools, grocery stores, and the like are all well beyond walking distance, and - while I won't go so far as to say anyone is entitled by right the means to travel, it's not something that the State has any meaningful claim to gatekeeping anymore. So, in principle, I support this.
But with one important caveat. Because here's the thing:
failing to pay court fines, missing child support payments, or other debt-related reasons.
These may not seem like a big deal, but they are. And telegraphing that you shouldn't be meaningfully accountable for your actions is counterproductive to addressing and deterring them - and that DOES need some kind of serious consequence.
Like, missing child support payments? There needs to be some kind of consequence to that. Otherwise we just encourage deadbeats. Same goes with fines for drug crimes. Drug crime is a thing we want to stop, so people have to a real deterrent.
(Plus, there's the whole broken windows theory.)
So... deadbeat parents, druggies, debt defaulters (yay alliteration!) - what do they all have in common?
They're untrustworthy people. So, frame the consequence around that.
I would posit that a better (not saying perfect, but just better than license suspensions) would be to hit them in another meaningful area - one that dovetails with the trustworthiness problem itself.
Attack their credit score. I mean, we already do - but go at it harder. Much harder.
Make them non-dischargeable debts (so, no BKing your way out of it), the non-payment of drags down their credit rating. Let any lender know when they go to buy a house, or a car, or apply for a credit card that - instant disqualification, even if he's got 700 points to spare - this guy doesn't even pay his child support, how's he going to afford to pay back your loan; this druggie spends all his discretionary money on drugs, how's he going to prioritize his lender?
Oh, and under no circumstances whatsoever should anyone with this kind of debt be receiving entitlement monies.
Essentially lock them out of meaningful participation in society until they clean up their act and start living like a normal, decent human being. You will not get ahead in society if you abandon your children. You will not get ahead in society if you decide on a life of recreational drug abuse. You will not get ahead in society if you commit crime and don't serve your sentence.
Because why would we want to empower those kinds of people? You go down the dark paths, then you find your way out and back to the light. Otherwise, stay there.
Too harsh? Buy 'em a Dave Ramsey book.
That said, as always I'm open to compromise. A tour of military service will wipe the slate clean. Take a low-skill public service job - garbage man, bus/subway sanitation, animal control, etc. - whatever you make hourly will be matched 50% to your debt. I'm reticent, but I'd also be willing to consider organ swaps (well, not for the druggies) - you put your kidney up on UNOS, your debt is clear.
There's all kinds of options for this - but at the end of the day, whether it's child support or druggies or petty criminals - those deadbeats need to be hit hard. They're the broken windows.
Child Support and Feminism (Female empowerment) are entirely contradictions.
I wonder when that law about when a man 'bears' a Car they both participated in buying justifies charging the Woman car-support payments?
Perhaps, but that's neither here nor there. As the law stands now, if he owes child support, he should be compelled to make good on his obligations. If not, he can ruin himself economically.
How do you justify including fines for recreational drug use with debts for child support, etc? Not everyone who uses any recreational drug has chosen "a life of" such use or deserves to be called a "druggie".
Yes they do.
And the point is that they're not paying those fines. That should have consequences.
It would be smarter to confiscate the car (if owned) to pay the debt before yanking the license. Just saying.
I fear too many will only have the 'means' (I mean 'motivation') to pay their debt inside prison walls where it is required of them. Course probation / probation-officers is where the ('motivated' to pay) would fit.
Suspending licenses for anything other than moving violations is stupid and churlish.
-jcr