25 Tech Laws Slated To Take Effect in 2025

There's a lot not to like here.

When it comes to technology, free speech, and new laws, the big question going into 2025 is whether the U.S. Supreme Court will allow a TikTok ban to take effect on January 19. Along with that possible change, a bevy of lower-profile tech laws—some good, mostly bad—are slated to take effect across the U.S. in the upcoming year, with many going into effect on January 1.

For today's newsletter, I've rounded up some of the most notable ones, which include bans on teens using social media (Florida and Tennessee), age verification requirements for porn websites (Florida and Tennessee), a law ordering online platforms to remove "deceptive" election-related content (California), and a law limiting law enforcement use of images collected by drones (Nevada).

This list is not comprehensive. But I looked through a lot of laws taking effect in various states, so it's a decent overview of what's coming.

Age Verification and 'Protecting' Minors From Social Media, Porn

Florida is banning younger teens from social media and requiring ID checks for online porn: House Bill 3—a law with implications for both adult websites and social media platforms—takes effect on January 1, though part of it won't be enforced yet due to a legal challenge. The law bans anyone in Florida under age 14 from using social media, and it requires parental permission for 14- and 15-year-olds to have social media accounts. It also requires online platforms that publish "materials harmful to minors"—by which it means all sorts of depictions or descriptions of sexuality—to ban visitors under age 18, which of course requires checking the ages of all visitors to porn websites.

"The law adds hefty fines and civil liabilities for any social media sites that knowingly violate the law," reports The Palm Beach Post. "Hefty fines" will also be levied against web publishers in violation of the sexual content portion. Florida's attorney general said the social media part will not enforced yet, pending a decision requiring a motion for a preliminary injunction against that part. A hearing on that motion is scheduled for February.

Tennessee is requiring ID checks for social media, online porn: House Bill 1891—the Protecting Minors From Social Media Act—requires social media companies to age-verify users and prevent those under age 18 from opening accounts without parental permission. Senate Bill 1792 says adult content platforms must verify user ages.

California is coming for social media algorithms: Assembly Bill 976 takes effect in January. It "prohibits online platforms from knowingly providing an addictive feed to a minor without parental consent," per Gov. Gavin Newsom's office. The state defines an addictive feed to be basically any feed that relies on a personalized recommendation algorithm. "The bill also prohibits social media platforms from sending notifications to minors during school hours and late at night," Newsom's office says.

In 2025, social media platforms are required to implement these rules only when they have "actual knowledge" that an account is held by a minor. But beginning in 2027, "the law expands this threshold to when the social media platform 'has reasonably determined' a user is a minor," according to Global Policy Watch.

AI Regulations

(Hector Amezcua/TNS/Newscom)

California is regulating election-related "deepfakes," digital replicas: California lawmakers in 2024 passed a slew of new laws aimed at AI-created content. Assembly Bill 1836 "updates current law to prohibit the use of a deceased person's voice or likeness in digital replicas without the prior consent of their estate," according to the law firm Fisher Phillips. "The law imposes statutory damages of either $10,000 or the actual damages suffered (whichever is greater), and removes existing exemptions for film, TV, audiovisual works and more when it comes to digital replication." Assembly Bill 2602 deals with contracts related to services that involve digital replicas. Assembly Bill 2355 says political ads that use AI-generated content must contain a disclosure saying "This ad was generated or substantially altered using artificial intelligence." Another new law (Assembly Bill 2839) relates to malicious distribution of "materially deceptive audio or visual media of a candidate within 60 days of an election." Additionally, the state passed a law (Assembly Bill 2655) concerning "deepfakes" that would require online platforms to label or remove "materially deceptive content" related to elections. It is supposed to take effect in January but in October a federal judge put it on pause.

Illinois is banning AI-generated child porn, nonconsensual digital replicas: Two new Illinois laws related to artificial intelligence (AI) are slated to take effect this week. House Bill 4623 bans AI-generated sexually explicit images of minors. House Bill 4875 bans using an AI-created version of someone's voice, image, or likeness for commercial purposes without obtaining the consent of the person replicated. Both laws take effect on January 1.

Miscellaneous

California sets out to manage money of influencers: Two laws taking effect in January deal with money earned by minors who make money from online videos or other content. Senate Bill 764 says that when adults monetize online video or photo content in which "at least 30 percent of the…content includes the likeness, name, or photograph" of a minor, they must put 15 percent of their gross earnings into a trust for that minor.

Meanwhile, Assembly Bill 1880 sets out trust requirements for money made by minors themselves online. This expands an existing law (the Coogan Law) concerning child performers "to include minors who are employed as content creators on online platforms, such as YouTube," per Newsom's office. "The Coogan Law is a decades-old statutory scheme that protects child performers and creators by ensuring that their employers place at least 15 percent of their gross earnings in trust till they reach adulthood."

California lets schools limit cellphone use: Senate Bill 1283 says that "the governing board of a school district, a county board of education, or the governing body of a charter school may adopt a policy to limit or prohibit the use by its pupils of social media while the pupils are at a schoolsite or while the pupils are under the supervision and control of an employee or employees of that school district, county office of education, or charter school."

Nevada limits law-enforcement use of drones: "Beginning the first of the year, Nevada state government and local law enforcement cannot purchase a drone which is not approved by the federal government," notes Fox 5 Vegas. "The law also deals with drones used to check building compliance and fire codes. Images captured cannot be used in criminal or civil litigation to prove reasonable suspicion or probable cause."

Vermont is requiring digital access to government meetings: Staring in January, "all state decision-making bodies will be required to hold all regular and special meetings in both a physical location, and on an electronic platform," reports Vermont Public Radio.

Data privacy laws are taking effect in 8 states: I haven't had time to look closely at any of these, which vary in their particulars. But from a very cursory glance it seems that much of these new mandates will simply force compliance headaches on tech companies while making very little difference for consumers and perhaps requiring us to check yet more permission boxes each time we visit a website.

---

More Sex & Tech News

(Markus Gann/Newscom)

• An Ohio bill banning students from using multi-person bathrooms that don't match their biological sex takes effect on January 1. Called the Protect All Students Act, it applies to kindergartens through colleges. The law says schools—including private schools— must designate bathrooms, locker rooms, and overnight accommodations as either exclusively male or female. Schools may still offer bathrooms designed for a single person and/or family bathrooms.

• Rep. Shri Thanedar (D–Mich.) is calling for the decriminalization of sex work. "We should decriminalize sex work to maximize sex workers' legal protection and their ability to exercise other rights, including unionization, justice, and health care," he wrote on X last week. "Decriminalization and regulation would prevent trafficking and exploitation of minors."

• A federal judge has struck down an Arkansas law that opened librarians to criminal penalties and could be used to limit books related to sex, gender, sexuality, or any adult themes. "The law deputizes librarians and booksellers as the agents of censorship; when motivated by the fear of jail time, it is likely they will shelve only books fit for young children and segregate or discard the rest," wrote U.S. District Judge Timothy Brooks.

• The Verge explains the European Union's new USB-C charging mandate.

• At Wired, Angela Saini argues that plummeting fertility rates will be bad news for women's autonomy.

• A California law taking effect in January raises the penalties for certain solicitation offenses involving a minor. (This newsletter covered the controversy surrounding this measure, Senate Bill 1414, earlier this year.)

Today's Image

Christmas cat is disappointed by all these bad new tech bills.

ENB/Reason

Comments

[BYODB]

Unionized hookers...yeesh.

[mad.casual]

It would prevent the trafficking and exploitation of minors that we should repeal the anti-prostitution, sex trafficking, and age verification laws forbidding because it isn't happening now.

[Restoring the Dream]

"I can't even touch that-- that's another union's job!"

[SQRLSY]

"Unionized hookers...yeesh."

Will Government Almighty enforce my RIGHT to access the hooker-scabs who will want to break the union lines, and ACCESS me ass a customer? They are all BEGGING to service MEEEE, even at $1.53 per job! WHERE is ecumnomic freedom when ye NEEEEEED shit SOOOO badly?!?!?

[markm23]

You think your hooker is far too old? Shut up, she has seniority.

[Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)]

Will ENB be the first boss for the whore’s union?

[TrickyVic (old school)]

""But from a very cursory glance it seems that much of these new mandates will simply force compliance headaches on tech companies while making very little difference for consumers and perhaps requiring us to check yet more permission boxes each time we visit a website.""

Without a glance I'm guessing it's a path to make your phone a form of ID proofing.

[mad.casual]

States May Reconsider "Virtues" Of Right To Pre-Emptive Infanticide, Non-Reproductive Women and Non-Birthing Persons Hardest Hit

Women, along with gender and sexual minorities, will see their rights come under fire.
...
History tells us that all freedoms are conditional. In 1920, the Soviet Union became the first country in the world to legalize abortion, as part of a socialist commitment to women’s health and well-being. Sixteen years later, that decision was reversed once Stalin was in power and realized that birth rates were falling.

Maybe RuPaul and the drag queens dressing up as clowns in woman face have a pretty accurate take on things.

Edit: So we're all clear that the "feminist libertarian" citing an article that comes out swinging as to the virtues of socialism isn't really a libertarian at all, right? And that the only reason she would adopt or advance that position is to either advance socialism or the irresponsibility of women's behavior being foisted onto other people (or both), like some sort of demonic ghoul or succubus, right?

[SQRLSY]

"...the irresponsibility of women's behavior being foisted onto other people..."

Is THAT shit The Way that Spermy Daniels mind-cuntrolled The Donald? If Dear Leader could SNOT resist, then TWAT hope is left for the cummon man (or woman, she, he, they, zey, donkey, elephant, or dead skunk) to be able to resist the likes of Queen Spermy Daniels, Who Art Glazed in Vaseline? (Twat a scene, twat a scene!!!)

HELP ME ALL YE REASONOIDS AND TREASONOIDS, TO REMAIN STRONG, AND TO RESIST THE MIND CUNTROL OF QUEEN SPERMY DANIELS, I PRAY CUNTO YE ALL!!!

[Medulla Oblongata]

"Right To Pre-Emptive Infanticide, Non-Reproductive Women and Non-Birthing Persons Hardest Hit"

You must mean this "guy"? P.S. I'm trying to figure it out...is his boyfriend gay but having regular vaginal sex with his "boyfriend"? It seems the boyfriend may have predated the transition, so was in a relationship with a woman, who is transitioning to become a man, so will the boyfriend "become" gay if he stays with "him"? It's so confusing, I was told for decades "you're born gay", but these days it seems to pivot on a whim.

https://time.com/6977604/trans-pregnancy-florida-abortion-law

Jasper never considered he might be pregnant. Despite the nausea, the stomach pain, the fatigue, the possibility never crossed his mind. He was about six months into testosterone therapy, a form of gender-affirming care.

Ever since puberty, he had never had regular periods. Their absence didn’t even register.

In June 2022, Jasper caught COVID-19 while traveling with his boyfriend’s family, and between the viral symptoms and newfound back soreness, it became, through no fault of his hosts, one of the most miserable vacations he’d ever taken. When he returned to Orlando, Jasper kept waiting for the pain to get better. When it persisted a month later, he visited a doctor who still couldn’t figure out what was wrong. Nobody thought to check for pregnancy.

Then the nausea began, followed by mysterious new stomach pains. After enduring an additional month of discomfort, he scheduled another doctor’s visit. Maybe, they told him, he had an autoimmune condition; perhaps it was rheumatoid arthritis, which ran in his family. But the stomach pains posed a mystery. They referred him for an ultrasound. In August, Jasper scheduled the appointment, choosing a Saturday so he wouldn’t need to take time off work.

He was lying on the table when the clinician broke the news. “Well,” she said. “Of course, you know that you’re pregnant right?”

Jasper sat up. “You’re joking.”

The telltale symptoms he’d struggled to place were actually something so simple. Still, Jasper couldn’t believe it.

She showed him the screen. “I’m surprised nobody told you,” she said, “because you’re so far along.”

From the clinician’s reading of the ultrasound, it looked like Jasper was about 12 weeks pregnant, already through his first trimester. He’d heard about Roe v. Wade being recently overturned but hadn’t yet learned what that meant in his home state—that as of July 2022, while abortion in Florida would still be legal, the state would begin enforcing a law that prohibited the procedure for anyone past 15 weeks of pregnancy. When the nurse told him, it sank in how little time he had.

[TJJ2000]

The patriotic question would be....
And which one of these Laws ensure Individual Liberty and Justice for all?

This nation has no need for MORE dictators.
It needs MORE Individual Liberty and Justice for all.

[Vernon Depner]

But...think of the CHILDREN!

[TJJ2000]

Indeed. The communist mega-horn of [OUR] children.
Goes right along with the [WE] horn used to kill Individualism.

[AT]

California lets schools limit cellphone use

Every school that has done this has shown insanely positive results.

[DaveM]

That a "law" is even needed is the real problem. Schools should be empowered to take any necessary steps to achieve their goals. It is, after all, what we are paying them to do.