The Federal Government Is Spending Over $15 Billion To Push Electric Vehicles
Despite the wasteful spending, E.V.s remain unpopular with large portions of the country.

Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) has released his annual Festivus Report, highlighting over $1 trillion in wasteful federal government spending.
This year's report includes a $12 million pickleball court in Las Vegas, $10 billion in maintenance and rent for mostly empty federal buildings, and hundreds of thousands of dollars for censoring nonliberal media (including Reason). Unsurprisingly, the federal government also wasted billions of dollars on clean energy and climate change projects.
Paul's Festivus Report identifies a $10,000 grant from the National Endowment for the Arts to "support a cabaret show on ice skates focused on climate change," $3 million from the Department of State to fund "girl-centered climate action" in Brazil, and $20 million for the Department of Agriculture to "advance fertilizer use in Pakistan, Vietnam, Colombia, and Brazil." The largest energy and climate spender was the Department of Energy, which used "$15.5 billion to push Americans toward electric vehicles they don't want," in Paul's words.
The primary mechanism of the federal government's electric vehicle (E.V.) push is the Loan Programs Office (LPO), which finances energy projects that would likely not receive funding from private institutions. Under the Biden administration, the program's lending authority has grown from $17 billion in 2021 to more than $400 billion. Some of the projects that LPO has financed include $2.5 billion for lithium-ion battery production in Rust Belt states, $362 million to improve vehicle wiring for E.V.s and other cars, and up to $2 billion in conditional loans for battery recycling.
With the incoming Trump administration hinting at a potential clawback of these funds and $290 billion of the $400 billion set to expire in FY 2026, the LPO is quickly pushing projects out of the door. Funding for E.V.s in the last two months alone includes a conditional loan of up to $6.57 billion to E.V. manufacturer Rivian (which has already received billions in state financing), $9.63 billion to BlueOval SK (which makes batteries for Ford), and another conditional loan of more than $7 billion to battery cell maker StarPlus. The Department of Energy also awarded EVgo a $1.5 billion loan to build public chargers this month. This is after the federal government spent $7.5 billion to build only eight public charging stations in three years.
Other projects that have recently received LPO funding include $1.45 billion for solar cells and more than $860 million for Puerto Rico's grid. In total, there is more than $56 billion awarded to active projects and nearly $43 billion conditionally committed.
Direct financing is only the tip of the federal government's E.V.-funding iceberg. The Inflation Reduction Act extended tax credits for E.V.s and plug-in hybrids. These credits, coupled with those for clean energy, are expected to add more than $1 trillion to the federal deficit by 2032.
Despite the federal government's fascination, E.V.s still aren't as popular as internal combustion vehicles. For many rural parts of the country, these vehicles, which tend to have less range and fewer available chargers, are simply not practical. Consumer preferences and technological innovation could change this, and in some cases they have; E.V. sales have climbed since 2018. However, needless subsidies won't make E.V.s more attractive to Americans. It's time for the federal government to stop trying to be a car dealer.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"It's time for government to stop ..." Anything you put after that is highly likely to be true. If only we could get Americans to stop demanding stuff from government and stop electing politicians too!
Except for all that money to illegal immigrants you support as you attack those calling it out.
Seems like you have false arguments.
Is loaning money the same as spending?
Is asking a stupid question the same as answering it?
LOL
Yes. See, for example, student loans.
It's worse, because they're assigning the note to someone else (us) to pay back later, with interest. And making the money we do have on hand worth less, by inflating the money supply.
Sure. When they don't pay it back and the Government forgives them for it because the Politicians don't want to admit that they screwed up. Look at all of the "shovel ready" jobs the Obama Administration says that they funded.
Is "claw back" the same as stopping funding? You're letting your bias show Jeff.
And the BIG [D]emocratic Master-Plan....
"It's time for the federal government to stop trying to be a car dealer."
Oh... It's not. It's trying to be a bureaucratic plantation owner of civilian SLAVES.
How does the D.C. plantation spend $7.5 billion building 8 public charging stations ($7.5B/8=$937.5M/ea)????
It doesn't. It STEAL $937M from the civilian SLAVES and pockets it.
Now grip yourself. This will make you sick.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_GDP
Click on Nominal GDP per capita for 2024.
#1 Washington D.C. $263,220
#2 New York $117,332
#51 Mississippi $53,061
What is nominal GDP? Well it certainly is production because D.C. doesn't have any production to speak of. It is but $ received per household encapsulating more than just "W2 taxable income".
The plantation owners in D.C. full-income is 263,220/117,332 = 2.24 TIMES more than the richest non-D.C. state and 3 to 5-TIMES more than *ALL* civilian states below the Top 5%.
Your FULL TIME job in one day gets you what D.C. plantation owners get in 2-hours and plantation owners produce NOTHING - NOTHING at all but centrally planned 'armed-theft'.
"Well it certainly is production because D.C. doesn't have any production to speak of."
Neither does Mississippi. Their biggest industry, apparently, is the cultivation of catfish, a popular local dish that even white Mississippians will eat.
And compared to the catfish production in D.C. or any other cherry-picked product you want to chose??? D.C. produces nothing; nothing at all 'more-than' any other State other than Gov-Gun 'armed-theft' of the civilian SLAVES.
"And compared to the catfish production in D.C"
Why would anyone in Washington want to get into the catfish business? According to your own figures, their per capita GDP is over a quarter million, 5 times that of the catfish consumers of Mississippi, without producing anything.
Why would anyone in Washington D.C. want to produce anything?
When they have all the Gov-Guns of armed-theft to STEAL all they want?
Indeed. That is the 'sickening' part. The 'Gun-em-down' for the ?poor? in D.C. are taking 5-TIMES more than those who actually produce something.
Washington D.C. is an administrative city, the nation's capital. It has been since it was planned and built. I'm sure if you looked at the state capital of Mississippi, you'll find it's not as productive as the rest of the state, for much the same reasons.
Do you think it would be non-sickening if all the (capital) Jackson, Mississippi residents got 5-TIMES the amount of salary as everyone else in Mississippi for not producing a GD thing?
Which Jackson, Mississippi does produce. Jackson is home to several major industries; these include electrical equipment and machinery, processed food, and primary and fabricated metal products. Nissan North America, C Spire and Amazon.
"Mississippi residents got 5-TIMES the amount of salary as everyone else in Mississippi for not producing a GD thing?"
As I said, they are managers and administrators. They always get more than the people they manage or administrate. Look at the private sector where the managers and administrators produce nothing but get paid salaries vastly greater than 5 times the employees who actually work and produce. Look at Rex Tillerson, head of Exxon and Trump's first choice of secretary of state. Salary $US27,400,000 a year. His employees would have only received a fraction of that. What did he produce? Nothing. He sat behind a desk and told others what to do.
Does Rex Tillerson get to legally poke 'Guns' at his employees for profit?
Obviously he does something to EARN his salary else where else would it come from?
Are Bank robbers excused because they claim they had a managed and administered 'plan' to rob the bank?
Blatant ignorance and white-washing 'Gun' THEFT crime management and administration is all you're selling.
Nothing left to cut....
Can't try austerity now, we're on the brink of recession.... and no need to try it when the economy is booming....
"The largest energy and climate spender was the Department of Energy, which used "$15.5 billion to push Americans toward electric vehicles they don't want,"
If it makes you feel any better, until recently, every third car sold in Mexico was an electric vehicle made in China, imported essentially duty free. That's all changed now thanks to the Biden administration's pressure on Mexico to staunch the flow of these vehicles on the grounds that they are a threat to (American) national security. Mexico has now put a 20% tariff on these imports, and made it more difficult to open Chinese EV factories in Mexico. Now, only about 10% of vehicles sold are Chinese EV imports.
Now, only about 10% of vehicles sold are Chinese EV imports.
Millions of Mexican lives have been saved.
Careful what you wish for.
Oof
We might actually succeed at pretending to save the planet if government would get out of the way.
"The Federal Government Is Spending Over $15 Billion To Push Electric Vehicles."
EV's are a joke.
No sane person wants them, and yet the elitist vermin in DC demand all us peasants to have one.
Perhaps when the governors, members of Congress, the Senate and heads of our federal bureaucracies own a couple, we should starting think about purchasing one.
In the meantime, the ruling elites who trying to force the EVs down our throat can go F themselves.
EVs are great as long as you don't drive very far, don't live where it gets cold, don't mind hunting for a charging station and then waiting forever for them to charge, don't mind batter degradation, don't mind the cost...
Yeah, they're a joke alright.
The one plus about national socialist whackos replacing Fabian communists is a reprieve from screeching and dinning about Climate Sharknados. The looter kleptocracy halves take turns screeching about Sharknado weather, then losing, then howling Reefer madness, forfeiture-wrecking the economy and being beaten by the other faction. And so it goes...
This reminds me of an old episode of Night Court where some wacko is saying shit that doesn't make any sense, and Bull has a conversation with him. The judge says something like you can understand what that guy's saying, and Bull gives and affirmative and adds that he understands the meaning behind A Horse With No Name.
In other words, I wish he was around to translate your gibberish.
We actually agree on this. And here’s the best part. Trump will almost certainly kill most, if not all, EV subsidies.
And mandates.
Hey Jeff....
https://www.wsj.com/articles/green-energy-climate-loans-49fda73b
This program has little oversight and has loans to other countries including China.
Reasons weird focus on pennies while ignoring dollars is just strange.
And predictable.
Reason 2021: Thank god the adults are back in the room. You're Welcome. Just glad to be doing our job for liberty.
Govt spending is not wasteful until DOGE says its wasteful. Elon Musk
The presumption should be that every dollar government spends is a waste.
Funny how when Democrats push shit like this it's the Federal Government but push the same crap for Republican priorities and it gets laid squarely on Republicans. Leftist bias at Reason continues unabated.
JD Vance is wrong about bias at Reason.com. Also, Democrats never pounce.
"Republicans claim Democrats pounced"
“Anonymous sources say Republicans Pounce - without expert evidence”
The difference between an ICE and an EV is a minor consumer choice. Nothing worth subsidizing.
"The difference between an ICE and an EV is a minor consumer choice."
The differences are greater than that. ICE is a long established format and EV is the new comer. EV's share is growing and ICE's is shrinking. I think the subsidies are inevitable for much the same reasons China is desperately subsidizing its semi conductor business.
I was hoping to be in the audience for Biden's reelection inauguration, "You get a new car and You get a new car and You get a new car!". Hope dashed by mega MAGA.
Seems like a Harris campaign event. Oprah showed up, her production company got paid, Democrat grifters profited.
No free cars for the chattel.
If it quits moving, subsidize it. To hell with deleting bad planks, repealing bad laws or cutting taxes. Those are cute libertarian chimeras.
Whatever you've been ingesting recently, kindly continue. Those three sentences were understandable, marking the first time you've been able to convey an idea coherently in years, Hank.
Double the amount of whatever substance it is. Maybe it'll rewire your broken, dumb hippie brain. Or kill you.
This article is not true anymore. China is the leading car market and it is buying 68% EVs, Norway, 96%. Why? Cleaner air.
ALL the legacy makers are going broke, deep in debt, can't make a profit on EVs, and cutting back production of the ICE.
Big Oil is enjoying $Trillion subsidies, but still going under.
"Govt. is the problem, not the solution." - Ronald Reagan.
"Big Oil is enjoying $Trillion subsidies" - That's a blatant LIE.
Not a lie, but misleading. Most of it is in countries other than the United States, and not just oil but all fossil fuels. And the trillion number was for 2022; the amount deopped in 2023.
https://www.iea.org/topics/fossil-fuel-subsidies
Don't post easily debunked claims. But do note the worst offenders are enemies of the US.
LMAO... IEA Lobbying Group ... "helping the world transition to clean energy".
As-if that's not purposely looking for pure BS propaganda.
And there's the BS right there, "By April 2023, these expenditures reached some $900 billion in tax reductions".
That ?subsidizing? that any sensible person calls standard any-business deductions.
I've seen the BS games the "war against plants" gang does.
Did you really think referencing a Lobbying Group had merit?
Meanwhile the link btwn fossil fuel consuming AUTOS and pollution is barely anything - it’s a lie bc most of it comes from CHINA industry, not cars.
Green Scam going strong!
(For proof; once we all have EVs will the pollution problem be solved? NOPE! “There’s always more work to be done!”
Just like repetitions don’t end racism - it’s a Leftist grift playing on emotion and not backed up by data.
"Meanwhile the link btwn fossil fuel consuming AUTOS and pollution is barely anything"
The problem with cars and climate isn't pollution. It's their CO2 emissions. CO2 from burning fossil fuels isn't pollution. It's a necessary by-product. Soot, the left-over of poorly burnt carbon, is a better example of pollution. CO2 is not. Cars etc account for some 15% of global CO2 emissions.
"Just like repetitions don’t end racism - "
What the fuck are you talking about? It's not just like that at all.
"it’s a Leftist grift playing on emotion and not backed up by data."
?
Coastal urban socialists have no idea how rural people use automobiles. That's why they're clueless about why we don't want EVs.
Some of them drive past farms on the way to their beach houses. Kinda the same thing.
And we need costal urban socialists because why?
Seriously, let’s just get rid of them if they can’t live in accordance with our constitutional republic.
"girl-centered climate action"
Yes, let's have an honest discussion about this: being female is ecologically irresponsible. Women use up far more resources than men in almost every consumer category—clothing; home furnishings; food; personal care products; personal care services (hair, nails, spas, gyms, etc.); home beauty products; appliances; single-use products like bottled water and "wipes"; and most especially, medical care. Reforming female behavior with regard to resource consumption, or reducing the proportion of females in the population, would be a major boon to the environment.
An argument for banning M2F transitions?
Absolutely. A male-to-female transsexual increases his lifetime resource consumption by an order of magnitude.
You know, if the voting patterns of the genders were flipped they WOULD be making this argument in public.
Don't tell that to Scientific American.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-feminism-can-guide-climate-change-action/
But logically the question is, do they consume more than they should. And again logically, since almost all males are raised by females, and the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world ---wouldn't women be responsible for the LESS that males consume?
Yes,of course they would
This is the famous bifurcation syllogism, where everything depends on where in the string of causes you enter to make your analysis
Gibberish.
We don’t have a pollution problem but a Female problem.
Lefty’s will unironically make a “Muh PaTriArChY” argument as (typical women) blame everything on men.
Women are not predisposed to take responsibility.
The founder of "Just Facts" did an exhaustive study of EVs and they are FAR more polluting than are gas vehicles. FAR. Most stuides did not consider the full lifecycle of production. FAR
Well, even if we were to give them every benefit of the doubt, the simple reality is that environmentalism always wants to try and go mainstream while the tech and infrastructure is in its infancy.
This is ultimately counterproductive because it sours the public on the efficacy of it while at the same time pushes it on them with no support outside of the pat on the head for their virtue signal.
They have the same problem with wind/solar energy creation. A fine idea, a laudable one no doubt - but they haven't figured out how to make it meaningfully work. Yet they still insist this is the way, and have no problem blowing a kajillion bajillion dollars (assuming it isn't slush fund to begin with) with nothing to show for it.
And California made it worse (as usual), with tax subsidies for EVs, and HOV lane stickers for EVs (which doesn't reduce emissions, since the gas guzzlers are still stuck in the slower non-HOV lanes, to pollute more.) Getting rid of HOV lanes completely would reduce emissions more, by letting traffic flow faster.
Welp that’s bc the batteries (which the Dems are hoping to mine from Ukraine) wear out and need disposing of.
It’s such a fucking scam.
Wrong. The Just Facts report simply reviewed existing research. And the major source was an analysis in Spain that is outdated, as Spain has since then almost completely eliminated the use of coal for electricity production.
Charliehall, "Gov-Guns make research ... NOT collecting data!!"
Yep. Sounds like a leftard.
And coal is hardly used anywhere else for power generation?
Dems gonna need access to Ukraines precious metals for all the batteries for their Green Scam - Dems are at war for resources yet again!!
Cheaper and quicker to just buy Greenland.
Well, REASON has been enabling this EV bullshit for over 3 years and now that eveybody but them is bailing j--- O, we don't really llike EVs .
Yet even recently you have published on Julian Simon , the economist who would have nothing to do with EVs. And abortion is shrinking our best resource. Listen, Reason, maybe you need a "Purpose Statement"
We now have in our hands—really, in our libraries—the technology to feed, clothe, and supply energy to an ever-growing population for the next seven billion years.
Julian Simon
"$10 billion in maintenance and rent for mostly empty federal buildings"
A lot of that is because many government employees are now working remotely. Trump wants to end that, which means he will have to cough up tens of billions for more office space.
Or just FIRE the Gov-Gun packing criminals.
Yup, the "E" in DOGE stands for Efficiency, and working from home is more efficient. Kind of dumb to want to end it.
I'm sure the new DOGE department will get right to cutting these inefficient and wasteful subsidies :^)
Just. Really. Popular.
What a waste. 15 billion dollars could buy 300,000 new SUVs for transportationless people. And give them a place to live, should they ever become unhoused.
https://www.caranddriver.com/rankings/best-suvs/under-50k
Free SUVs for All.