Joe Biden Flip-Flopped on Immigration and Embraced Trump's Tactics
The Biden administration continued many of the same immigration enforcement measures he lambasted Trump for using.

In the January 2025 issue of Reason, we're giving performance reviews of Joe Biden's presidency. Click here to read the other entries.
When Joe Biden described his vision for the U.S. immigration system in 2020, the presidential candidate painted himself as the antidote to Donald Trump's cruel restrictionism. "Trump has waged an unrelenting assault on our values and our history as a nation of immigrants," Biden's campaign website charged. He promised to "take urgent action to undo Trump's damage."
In some ways he did that. On his first day in office, Biden rescinded Trump policies restricting the entry of people from several Muslim-majority and African countries and revoked the Trump administration's immigration enforcement priorities, which had dramatically expanded the pool of immigrants prioritized for deportation. Biden sent Congress a comprehensive immigration bill, which included a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and retention measures for foreign STEM graduates of U.S. universities, among other sensible measures.
Since those early days—and even in those early days—Biden's commitment to a kinder, gentler immigration system has wavered. Faced with a chaotic Mexican border, his administration has repeatedly reverted to the very tactics he lambasted Trump for using.
Biden maintained Trump's legacy by renewing the pandemic-era Title 42 order, which allowed U.S. border agents to expel migrants quickly without letting them seek asylum. In 2023, the administration waived federal laws to allow border wall construction in South Texas, despite campaign trail promises of "not another foot." Biden revived many aspects of a Trump-era "transit ban," which barred migrants from applying for asylum in the U.S. if they didn't do so in another country before reaching the border. And Biden, who once charged that Trump was "fighting tooth & nail to deny those fleeing dangerous situations their right to seek asylum," did just that in June when he significantly restricted access to the asylum process. He's on track to match his predecessor's removal numbers, according to the Migration Policy Institute (MPI).
Some of Biden's immigration moves have been humane and innovative. His administration allowed private sponsorship programs to welcome thousands of migrants fleeing dire circumstances in Afghanistan, Ukraine, Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. The Welcome Corps, which launched in January 2023, allows private sponsors to help refugees from all over the world. In FY 2024, the U.S. resettled 100,000 refugees, the highest number in 30 years. A new policy will protect half a million undocumented spouses of American citizens from deportation (though it has faced legal challenges).
To many of his critics, Biden's immigration record will be defined by the border chaos he oversaw. The border has overshadowed nearly everything else that Biden has done in what has been a very active immigration presidency—by the three-year mark, his administration had taken 535 executive immigration actions compared to 472 during all of Trump's first term, the MPI reports.
But Biden is complicit in making the border the centerpiece of his immigration policy. He has joined a mostly Republican, but increasingly bipartisan, group of politicians who see lower border crossings as the primary measure of success and higher border crossings as a sign of crisis. After years of Trump and members of Congress claiming that the president can simply "shut down the border," Biden essentially tried to do just that, legal and humanitarian constraints be damned.
Biden has spoken of immigrants in much friendlier terms than Trump has and has offered an optimistic vision of immigration that echoed America's longstanding principles on the issue. But he hasn't been the stalwart defender of immigration he purported to be on the campaign trail.
Immigration policy performance review: poor follow-through
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Biden's Immigration Flip-Flop."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Of course Biden renewed Title 42. He wanted to maintain the pandemic restrictions on society as long as possible. Having an open border while maintaining masking and social distancing policies, and such is a blatant contradiction.
The abuse of asylum claims overwhelming the government's ability to evaluate such and the downstream effects of how to house the waves of dubious legal immigrants apparently is not an issue that has any reality to Fiona. Biden had to ma8ntain Trump era policies because just letting everyone in who wants to is not a viable option with no undesirable downstream effects.
Give 100% of your wealth to illegals.
No, give 100% of your wealth to the ruling elites in DC so they can give it to the illegals.
It's all about procedure.
And bureaucracy.
the education and health care systems in the US are failing and piling on millions of illegals is accelerating the decline
Feature not a bug for the progressives. They want to blow it all up & crush the middle class.
LOL
New York Times: Recent Immigration Surge Has Been Largest in U.S. History
"Polls suggest that the immigration surge was Ms. Harris’s second biggest vulnerability, after only the economy."
Open borders is toxic among almost everyone except silver spoon billionaires and the hacks on their payroll. Democrats pretended to care about border security as the election approached. Voters weren't fooled, however.
Just part of the regime normalization.
"Polls suggest that the immigration surge was Ms. Harris’s second biggest vulnerability, after only the economy."
I would suggest it was her 3rd biggest vulnerability. First was her incompetence.
Apparently all those democrats finally seeing the actual costs of their wishes caused some outrage.
How are those illegals on Martha's Vinyard doing?
all those democrats finally seeing the actual costs of their wishes
caused some outrageTURNED THEM INTO NAZIS.Fixed to accord with chemjeff
There's the old saying: "A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged."
In other words, people usually change their views when reality gets in the way. Biden was mugged by the millions of migrants crossing the border and overwhelming our legal system and our shelters with bogus asylum claims. As a liberal, he would prefer to be known as the generous savior, contrasted with mean old Trump. But he quickly found out that migrants are going to come whether we want them to or not, and give them an inch, they will take a mile. He didn't expect that they would take him literally when during the debates he said "migrants should surge the border".
But minimalist (to the point of "none" practically) restrictions on immigration is Fiona's pet issue, so conceding to the bad effects of such policy in reality offends her ideological purism. That is, it does not matter if no restrictions on immigration has bad consequences, reneging on it is a betrayal.
Private? Yeah right...straight from the Welcome Corps website. You know damn well most of the funding is from taxpayer subsidy.
"Partners
In January 2023, the U.S. Department of State, in coordination with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services launched the Welcome Corps. This groundbreaking new program is made possible through the joint work of various partners working alongside government agencies."
True libertarians (Trump defenders) see the word "humanitarian" in the context of immigration and scoff. The only humans worthy of any concern are native born citizens. Everyone else can fuck off and die.
By definition, a state's first priority is its responsibilities to its citizens. Aliens are not entitled to the privileges of citizens. Your rhetoric, while inflammatory, is not entirely wrong. It is the proper ethical position for a state between citizen and non-citizen.
The purpose of government is to relieve people of needing to use force in their daily lives so they can focus on being civilized. This is done through courts to settle disputes without violence and a military to repel armies. That is completely independent of the status of someone's papers.
""The purpose of government is to relieve people of needing""
No it's not.
Btw, that's a liberal point of view.
To be more precise, a socialist point of view.
Not much of a difference these days.
Liberal as in classical liberal, yes.
Sarc is a leftist democrat through and through.
He hardly puts up a mask anymore.
He is a real sad sack, is sarc.
That’s weapons grade stupid.
Sarc, no open borders. You democrats lost big, and the border is getting sealed up. Nothing you can do about it. So why don’t you stop wasting your time and get back to binge drinking.
That's Sarc for you.
Always defending those who invade our country illegally and put their interests before native born citizens.
He should run for Border Czar the next time a democrat gets into the White House.
What about a Run for the Border czar? I see a corporate sponsor opportunity.
ps. That running could be in or out.
That’s a Trump defender for you.
Prioritizing papers over everything else.
Question for you, do you think “Papers please” sounds better in English or the original German, and which would you prefer our standing army to use when they set up checkpoints?
So passports are the tools of Nazism?
Then every country on Earth is Nazi to some extent, as what country does not have some restriction on immigration?
You are going to come into some kind of shock if you travel abroad.
Now you’re defending president Wilson.
Always think of this when reading a Fiona article.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuRo6SLY44k
I always think of a simple open-borders generative text Fiona-bot.
Fiona is a gaslighting cvnt and can fvck right off. The entire premise here is laughable, as per usual with her dreck
FH;dr
"The Biden administration continued many of the same immigration enforcement measures he lambasted Trump for using."
1. Too little, too late.
Just ask Laken Reilly.
2. Why does the word "hypocrite" just leap to mind?
>>Biden ... hasn't been the stalwart defender of immigration he purported to be on the campaign trail.
just be happy he only lied to you
Thinking of writing a book, working title: Road Trip To Martha's Vineyard, How 50 Migrants Changed the National Conversation on Immigration.
3/4 - MOST of Immigrants support US Socialism.
Maybe the 10-Million/yr immigrants could pay for their 'supported' political preference.
"8 million or 10 million — are totals of all migrant encounters at the border" in 2021.
https://www.factcheck.org/2024/02/breaking-down-the-immigration-figures/
Current US Debt $36T / 10M immigrants = $3,600,000/ea
And there you have it. US-Citizenship for $3.6M each.
Payment plans accepted so long as the principle balances with their preferred political spending bills.
There is a reason their home-land is broke.
If they hadn't broke it they wouldn't be looking to escape it.