CPS Is Investigating an Influencer Because Her Son Flinched in a Video
Hannah Hiatt isn't the first parent to face child welfare investigations sparked by an internet mob.

Social media influencers who post their children online often face their share of criticism. But now, if their audience disapproves of their parenting decisions, they could also find themselves being investigated by child protective services (CPS).
The latest parent to face a CPS investigation for showing innocuous footage of her children is Hannah Hiatt, an influencer who has built an audience of half a million followers for videos detailing her life as a nurse with two young children. Last month, Hiatt posted a video in which her toddler-aged son appeared to flinch slightly as his father walked toward him to hand him a box of ice cream mochi. While most wouldn't think much of the clip, many viewers seized on the moment, arguing that it was proof that Hiatt and her husband were abusing their children.
The now-deleted video went viral, with many users making videos of their own debating the meaning of the clip. Angry internet users also found another video of Hiatt, in which her husband flicked her son's hand away from some french fries, again claiming that this too was evidence of physical abuse.
"The flinch breaks my heart," one TikTok user commented.
"Why are people like this allowed to procreate," posted another.
An Ogden, Utah Police Department spokesperson told People that an investigation had been opened against Hiatt and her family following "numerous reports through Child Protective Service and police."
While the investigation is ongoing, and it remains unclear whether Hiatt will be found guilty of any wrongdoing, she is far from the first person to face a CPS investigation after upsetting an internet mob. In April, influencers J.D. and Britney Lott faced a child welfare investigation after Reddit users became convinced that the newborn was being medically neglected—though a medical examination confirmed that the child was healthy. And in 2021, a father who tweeted jokes about his daughter's struggles to use a can opener ended up getting a visit from CPS after an enraged internet mob reported him for alleged child abuse.
Anonymous child abuse hotlines make internet outraged-induced reports like these more likely to happen. Designed to help authorities catch more abuse, anonymous reporting hotlines can end up attracting vindictive bad actors. Concerns about false reports have led states like Texas and California to remove their anonymous reporting mechanisms.
Impassioned internet users often argue that they're trying to protect vulnerable children by reporting their parents to CPS, but it's hard to believe them when the evidence of alleged abuse is so minor. More often than not, these mobs are driven more by the rush of seeing someone they dislike lose their kids than by any genuine concern for protecting a child.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"ANONYMOUS child abuse hotlines make internet outraged-induced reports like these more likely to happen. "
Funny thing, my copy of the constitution has an amendment that says "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him."
2 for flinching.
So these people have time to not only sit around and watch other people do mundane shit but also enough time to fuck with them by alerting the authorities over some trivial bullshit? These are, I suspect, the citizens who are unwilling to do the jobs that require the immigration of millions of illegal aliens to do. How many are federal employees who "work" from home? Will the ace reporters at Reason uncover the dark underbelly of government bureaucrats gone rogue? Or will they strategically and reluctantly leave us to be drawn into the Q Anon conspiracy theories that Jacob Sullum warned us about?
If those silly Reason.cum writers will SNOT udderly enthusiastically-spastically suck enough Orange Dick to satisfy Our Collective Right-Wing Wrong-Nut Self-RIGHTeous Spasms of Power Lusts, we swill have NO choice, udder than to leave us to be drawn into the Q Anon conspiracy theories, damn-shit-all!!!!
If they cannot intimidate or mesmerize you into aborting your child, they will seize your child. The State must indoctrinate your offspring before you can.
A certain commenter here had CPS called on him for "laying his hand on his daughter in a concerning manner".
Anyone want to guess who that was?
NGL, I have mixed thoughts on this one.
Y'know, ever since Myspace was in its infancy, I've warned of the dangers of oversharing on the internet. Even GeoCities had people rambling on about their lives, as if it was an important thing that demanded an audience, complete with an address and phone number. It wasn't as bad then as it is now, but you could see that the seeds were being sown. And when you voluntarily open your life (and all its supporting characters) and all the nuances to public scrutiny - they're going to scrutinize. And offer their hot takes. And maybe even incite a fracas.
I've never understood it the desire to open the door to such a thing. Well, OK, I mean it's obviously narcissism and a craving for desire and validation. We can all psych that one out from our armchairs. But how people can't seem to resist that compulsion, I don't get it. I really don't.
I also find this notion of being an "influencer" utterly repugnant. So, I'll admit some bias there for sake of total candor. Therefore if you want to hit me with an accusation of victim blaming - I'll accept a share of that. "Influencers" have chosen to live by the whims of a very fickle mob. Or die by them. And I don't feel sorry for them for that.
That said, I hope this is a real wake-up call for her, and that she puts that phone down and starts just starts enjoying her time with her son, rather than using him to try and shower attention upon herself.
Now, let's talk about the mobs. It's a weird narcissism going on there too, isn't it. Like some kind of strange hero complex that compels them to white knight and then pat themselves on the back for it. (And if they don't get the likes they're after, trust me - they'll keep coming back to that well.)
It's also this mentality of "Do Something"ism that progressivism has indoctrinated into these more... malleable generations. And wholly to be expected given that their Marxist ideology isolates it all as that whole "oppressor/oppressed" dynamic. "Baby flinched. OPPRESSED! MUST STOP OPPRESSOR!!! OBVIOUSLY PARENTAL UNITS ARE OPPRESSORS! CALL GOVERNMENT, THEY'RE HERE TO HELP!"
You can't tell me that's not the mind virus (h/t Elon) at work in the majority of TikTok viewers and "Influencer" followers.
Finally, let's talk about CPS. If they get reports, they pretty much have to investigate. Unfortunately, bureaucrats do not get (or want) the luxury of being able to think independently and - in this case - loading up the video, comparing them to other videos, and thinking to themselves, "Oh come on. The people reporting this are morons."
Because they're not allowed to independently think. And they take the job in the first place because they're loathe to doing so. When you hear people talk about mindless automatons and NPCs - I kid you not, nobody TRULY fits that definition more than a Child/Family/Social Services employee. (DMV employees come in a close second.)
So, if you're going to (rightfully) criticize the CPS on this - then make sure you're giving equal share to the mobs. Because they're taking advantage of the CPS's NPC bureaucratic nature in their quest for self-righteousness.
And BipHum makes a good point a couple posts up. They do want to assert control over your children. Because they genuinely believe that it "takes a village," and if you give them even the slightest excuse to blow anything out of proportion that allows them to call you unfit, they'll pounce on it to prove themselves right that "no parent should be trusted to raise a child without the village's input."
TLDR: I kinda hate everyone involved in this one, and side against all of them.
Social media influencing is just Reality TV 2.0. You still have people being paid to be """real""" on someone's screen except now the barrier for entry is lower, the pay is lower, and the amount of """reality""" required is higher.
Some people are willing to accept money to debase themselves. That's their right I suppose.
Maybe we should stop calling them "Influencers" and start calling them "Snookis."
Some people are willing to accept money to debase themselves.
Kinda wish ENB had written this article now, to explain that rationale and how it's so pervasive.