Will Trump's Labor Secretary Pick Be a Big Win for Public Sector Unions?
Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer has backed bills to abolish right-to-work laws and overturn state-level reforms that limit the power of public sector unions.

As a member of Congress, Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer (R–Ore.) teamed up with Vice President Kamala Harris and teachers union bosses to push a proposal that would effectively override state-level reforms to limit the power of public sector unions—like those championed by Republicans in Wisconsin and Florida.
That might seem like it would make Chavez-DeRemer an unlikely choice for secretary of labor in a Republican administration. But President-elect Donald Trump is reportedly considering giving her exactly that gig.
Politico reported earlier this week that Chavez-DeRemer was "in the mix" to run the Labor Department, and she has the backing of some high-profile labor union leaders including Teamsters President Sean O'Brien. Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), tweeted approvingly of Chavez-DeRemer's consideration for the job on Thursday.
The outpouring of support for Chavez-DeRemer from labor unions probably reflects her record as one of the most pro-union Republicans in Congress. She's one of three House Republicans to endorse the Protecting the Right to Organize Act (PRO Act), a grab bag of big labor agenda items that would extend some of California's awful independent contractor regulations nationwide, abolish so-called "right to work" laws in the 27 states that have passed them, and expand the powers of the National Labor Relations Board, among other things.
She's also one of a handful of Republicans to cosponsor the Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act, which is best described as a federal power grab that allow public sector labor unions (like the AFT) to force their will on states that have limited the power of those unions. As Dominic Pino notes at National Review, the bill would "effectively rewrite labor-relations law in roughly half of the states, many of them Republican-governed, which currently either prohibit collective bargaining by public employees or don't explicitly authorize it."
Trump's rise to political power has been helped by a shift in voting patterns among union workers, who are no longer the solidly Democratic cohort they once were. That shift, combined with Trump's willingness to make unorthodox staffing decisions, likely explains how someone like Chavez-DeRemer ended up on the transition team's short list.
Even so, choosing Chavez-DeRemer would signal that Trump believes it is more important to signal support for labor unions than to stand up for American workers. The right-to-work laws that Chavez-DeRemer would like to use federal power to overturn merely ensure that workers cannot be coerced into joining unions—or funding them, via dues taken directly from workers' paychecks.
"To represent workers does not mean to copy the views of union bosses," wrote Mark Mix, president of the National Right To Work Committee, a nonprofit, in a letter to Trump on Wednesday, urging the incoming president to nix Chavez-DeRemer as labor secretary. "The next Trump Administration should seek to expand choice for workers so that every American can freely choose whether or not a union deserves their financial support."
Chavez-DeRemer won't have a chance to vote for those pro-union bills in next year's Congress, because she lost her reelection bid earlier this month. There's no reason for Trump to throw her a political lifeline now.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
As a member of Congress, Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer (R–Ore.) teamed up with Vice President Kamala Harris and teachers union bosses
Axis of Evil
Teamsters President Sean O'Brien. Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), tweeted approvingly of Chavez-DeRemer's consideration for the job on Thursday.
All she needs next is Liz Chaney and she'll be a shooin.
There's no way Trump is going to pick this lady to be Secretary of Labor. I mean, she doesn't even have her own Fox News show.
Rs look like they are now distinguishing between private and public sector unions. That's a good thing. Hostility to private sector unions IS what led to millions of jobs being outsourced to China/Mexico. It didn't do shit to reduce the growth of govt or the power of pink-collar unions
Actually, private sector unions are responsible for more outsourcing than restrictions on them can be.
Unions are government taking sides:
* When employees quit, euphemistically called striking, employers are not allowed to replace them, but must hold their jobs open for when/if those former employers decide they want back the job they themselves voluntarily have up.
* Unions are not just allowed to be monopolies, but almost mandated to be such, such as one UAW for all car manufacturers, one ILA for all East and Gulf Coast ports and a separate one for all West Coast ports.
* If workers want to sign a pact with each other to quit together, or to not work for less than a certain wage or specific working conditions, that is their right. But government allows them to force these choices on other workers who have different goals.
DOGI
Maybe wait for the nomination before giving a shit?
This would be a far worse pick than Gaetz.
Swamp creatures doing swampy things.
For governments to contract with public employee unions should be outlawed.
Eliminate the Labor Department and fire all of its officials and employees. Repeal or nullify all federal labor laws as unconstitutional. If we can find a constitutional way to ban government agencies from negotiating with federal employee bargaining units, I would support that also. Fire any employee who fails to show up for work without a legitimate excuse. Of course, that would not eliminate the political stranglehold that unions hold over elected officials, who might continue to give those unions whatever they want in their ongoing incestuous relationship anyway - only the voters could punish elected officials, which is unlikely - but at least it could then be labeled "corruption."
"Will Trump's Labor Secretary Pick Be a Big Win for Public Sector Unions? Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer has backed bills to abolish right-to-work laws and overturn state-level reforms that limit the power of public sector unions."
Reason answered its own question.
So, why is Reason asking all us peasants?