The Race for Last Place
We all know who won the presidential election. But who's bringing up the rear?

Robby Wells is a former football coach who has picked up a habit of running for president. He made his first bid for the job in 2012, aiming initially for the nomination of the remnants of Ross Perot's Reform Party and then seeing if the conservative Constitution Party was interested. (It wasn't.) In 2016 he tried for the Democratic nomination, then switched to running as an independent when he wasn't invited to any Democratic debates. ("The consensus," his website claims, "was that he was blocked out of fear of his debate skills.") He took another shot at the Democratic nomination in 2020, and this year he ran as the nominee of the Party Party, a group inspired by the rock singer Andrew W.K.
Wells was on the ballot this month in exactly one state: Rhode Island. According to the current count at Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections, he has 358 votes; the Rhode Island Board of Elections puts his winnings slightly higher, at 359. Either way, he's in last place.
There is a chance that could change, as Wells is running just barely behind Bill "Doc" Stodden of the Socialist Party USA, whose current total at Leip's site is 361. Stodden's party is descended from the famous Socialist Party of Eugene Debs and Norman Thomas, though strictly speaking it wasn't born until that group broke into three competing factions in the 1970s. But neither Stodden nor his running mate, Stephanie Cholensky, is a democratic socialist in the Debs-Thomas mold: Both of them are anarcho-communists. And anarcho-communists traditionally do not vote, which may help explain why Stodden is just a hair away from finishing last.
For now, though, the last-place medal belongs to Wells and his philosophy of "Eaglenomics," which—I am quoting again from his website—takes "the best ideas from the Left Wing and the Right Wing to restore Prosperity to the United States and to allow every citizen a chance at the American Dream." Unless you count write-in votes, in which case the last-place position is a gigantic tie between everyone whose name was scrawled on exactly one ballot. We do not, alas, have a national database of every single write-in across America, but Vermont does post its totals online. And in the Green Mountain State, the one-vote finishers include Doug Burgum, Steve Garvey, Clint Eastwood, Dolemite, presidential assassin Leon Czolgosz (for those who like the ballot and the bullet), JFK Jr., Randy Marsh of South Park, and "Dwayne Elizondo" (presumably short for Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Camacho, the president in Idiocracy), among others. There was also one vote for the Sinwar/Nasrallah ticket.
Before you tut-tut that those voters didn't take their sacred democratic duty very seriously, remember that there was never a serious chance that anyone but Vice President Kamala Harris was going to carry Vermont this year. If these citizens were wasting their votes, so was any Vermonter who voted for Donald Trump. And if it's defensible to send a signal by voting for Trump in a solidly blue state or for Harris in a solidly red one, then who are we to judge someone who sent a signal by voting for Dolemite?
At any rate: Say what you will about the tenets of either Eaglenomics or anarcho-communism, but whether it's Wells or Stoddard who ultimately lands in last place, you can rest assured that unlike the big-name pols, he won't do any damage.
Or at least he won't do any damage through the political system. I need to add that caveat because of what happened the last time I wrote one of these reports on the race for the rear.
Four years ago I interviewed Zac Scalf, an independent candidate whose 29 votes gave him the lowest total of the 2020 election. He told me the whole thing had been a social experiment to see how much support an obscure dude who didn't campaign could get just by being on a single state's ballot. It was all very charming, or so it seemed until 2022, when my story on the Scalf campaign suddenly got a second wave of traffic. Turns out the former candidate had just murdered a woman and then killed himself. Apparently, there's just a thin line separating charming Americana from the indigenous American berserk.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Chase didn’t come in the rear?
No, he fucked up.
Sarc said he was gay, I don’t know if that’s true.
I wonder about Ginger Rogers though. Something sus about abandoning Fred Astaire.
No he didn't.
You want someone behind you. I think?
I expected him to swing in from behind, but unfortunately he didn't have the reach.
A round of applause.
If he threw his bat around too much, he might have been tossed.
'We do not, alas, have a national database of every single write-in across America, but Vermont does post its totals online.'
Is this the same Vermont that had the highest voter preference for Harris (64%) of all states? And, of course, continues to send Bernie Sanders to Congress?
There must be something in the water up there.
Chumby’s postulation is that New Yorkers, tired of living in a state mutated by progressivism, moved to adjacent Vermont…but brought the same bad politics with them that made New York such a shithole. It has happened to a lesser extent here from New Yorkers and moonbats from woke New England states.
That’s the kind of thing open borders will do for you.
This kind of thing always makes me think of when George Michael Bluth finished behind "Bart Simpson" and "School Sucks" in his class election.
And if it's defensible to send a signal by voting for Trump in a solidly blue state or for Harris in a solidly red one, then who are we to judge someone who sent a signal by voting for Dolemite?
It is far more defensible to vote for Dolemite in that situation. Not even close.
A vote for loser DeRp is still a vote for DeRp. Someone who is listening to and responding to all the electoral manipulation that causes voters to believe that the mere act of spending 10 seconds voting is all that's needed to register consent to the abdication of citizenship to someone else (the winner DeRp). Someone who believes that citizenship is all about the emotion of being on the winning side - at some point. Whatever they vote doesn't matter one whit because they are all still part of the game and the game doesn't depend on any individual voter.
'Not voting' or voting for a third party/independent is the only action where a different message is sent from the voter to those Top Men who decide election outcomes and governance. 'Not voting' however can be confusing to interpret (too busy?, don't give a shit?, hostile to DeRp?). Actively voting - for nonDeRp - is a giant middle finger. It is why those people who claim/offer to trade votes - I live in a solid blue/red state so I'll vote third party if you (third party voter in a swing state) vote DeRp - are always lying sacks of shit.
If messages are sent to tyrants, what’s the chances they are listening?
If they are playing the electoral politics game - or the mass manipulation game - then they are 'listening'. That's what structuring/conducting polls - interpreting those polls to structure messaging - etc is. A manipulative form of 'listening'
2024 Presidential Election Trivia Question:
Which candidate, appearing on at least one 2024 state general election ballot, had the highest lifetime total of delegates awarded in Democratic Party Presidential primaries ?
I'm not 100% sure but there was at least one who did win more than zero.
Not so fast!
uselectionatlast.com says "Other" has 942 votes. The Rhode Island government site doesn't list as many candidates either. Surely "Other" could be broken down further.
Surely “Other” could be broken down further.
I swear to God if we ever wind up with a Supreme Court case to decide whether 'othering' is protected speech/association or violates the 14A or Voting Rights Act I am going to beat you to death with my bare hands.
Chase Oliver is an embarrassment.
After listening to both Fox and MSNBC I can state categorically that Jesse's column was by far the most incisive election analysis of the 2024 cycle.
JD Vance was wrong about who would finish last.
I came in dead last. I didn't vote for me. Not even my parents voted for me. I really, really suck as a presidential candidate.
/article
What an odd article, I guess they want to create a record that Oliver wasn't last.
"Oh yeah! 0.5%, Baby! Suck on that!"
Near spoiler