Environmental Protection Agency
Trump's Next EPA Administrator Is a Lawyer, Not an Environmentalist
Lee Zeldin’s legal prowess may lead to a shrinking of the administrative state.

President-elect Donald Trump is picking former Rep. Lee Zeldin (R–N.Y.) to lead the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in his next administration. The pick came as a surprise to many who expected Andrew Wheeler, Trump's former EPA administrator, to lead the agency again, according to the Washington Examiner. While not considered an energy and environmental policy wonk, Zeldin could bring a fresh perspective to the EPA and reduce the scope of an agency that has become a behemoth that regularly oversteps its statutory authority.
In June, the Supreme Court struck down the Chevron doctrine. This decades-old precedent forced courts to defer to an agency's interpretation of ambiguous laws, which empowered agencies to implement broad, overreaching regulations. The June decision means that bureaucrats must act within the authority given to them by Congress. In a post-Chevron world, where any changes to Joe Biden–era regulations must pass legal muster, Zeldin's "governance and legal expertise will make for a successful tenure at the EPA," Nick Loris, the vice president of public policy at C3 Solutions, a free market energy think tank, tells Reason.
The Biden administration's greenhouse gas power plant rule will likely come under fire. Finalized this year, this directive forces all coal plants (except those that will cease operating by 2032) and new natural gas turbines to capture 90 percent of their greenhouse emissions by 2032. The cost of this regulation will drastically outweigh the perceived environmental benefits, according to David Kemp, a policy analyst at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. The Supreme Court has allowed the rule to stand as it is litigated in lower courts.
Rule making and programs by the EPA, especially in the past four years, have rewarded politically favored technologies and special interests. In March, the agency finalized a tailpipe emissions rule whose stringent regulations equate to a de facto ban on internal combustion vehicles. The top-down mandate denies consumer choice—many drivers don't want an electric vehicle—and will increase costs, especially for low- and middle-income families.
Meanwhile, the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund passed in the Inflation Reduction Act gives the EPA $27 billion to dole out to nonprofits and state governments for environmentally focused projects. This program is duplicative of other wasteful federal initiatives and rife for fraud and abuse, according to the EPA's inspector general.
While the selection of Zeldin could represent a downsizing of the EPA's reach, federal agencies have been playing regulatory pingpong for more than a decade, which has given the administrative state more power, caused uncertainty for businesses, and increased the size of D.C.'s lobbying apparatus. All of this "speaks for the need for Congress to step up rather than cede so much authority to the agencies," according to Loris.
During his time in Congress, Zeldin, who received his J.D. from Albany Law School before joining the Army Judge Advocate General's Corps, served on the House Financial Services and Foreign Affairs committees. While there, the majority of legislation he sponsored focused on international affairs and the armed forces, but he did support efforts to repeal the EPA's Renewable Fuel Standard—a program that has increased gas prices, distorted food markets, and hurt the environment.
As a New York gubernatorial candidate in 2022, before his loss to now-Gov. Kathy Hochul, Zeldin's energy messaging toed the party line of embracing an "all of the above" approach that includes natural gas extraction and the expansion of nuclear power. New York has outlawed hydraulic fracking and nuclear power is banned in some parts of the state.
With many of the EPA's edicts being redundant to the function of state and local agencies, which are better-equipped to protect communities and handle environmental challenges, it is well past time to reform the agency and bring power back to local communities, the private sector, and Congress.
In a statement to the New York Post, Zeldin said that as EPA administrator he will "slash the red tape holding back American workers from upward economic mobility." For the sake of taxpayers and the environment, hopefully Zeldin holds firm on this commitment.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The progressive airwaves will be polluted with opines about this.
Could make for a hostile environment.
Or it could be a gas, gas, gas...
Poor Sullum.
Poor Ron.
…Zeldin could bring a fresh perspective to the EPA and reduce the scope of an agency that has become a behemoth that regularly oversteps its statutory authority.
That’s just what we need. Hope it works.
As I believe in miracles, I expect he will be able to tell all the other lawyers there to stop setting government policy via sue-and-settle, and fight each case to the end.
News flash, Jeff Luse, most EPA administrators are lawyers, usually ones with ties to the Sierra Club or some other such nutty group. Zeldin is probably more likely to tame the agency than those twits were.
Personally, I’d choose someone who’s been an environmental consultant who has to deal with the idiocy of the EPA day in and day out while trying to navigate through their retarded system for a client.
Eliminate the EPA . Problem solved.
That would be the smart move, but as we all know, intelligence is severely lacking in the DC swamp.
This seems like a wise choice. Environmentalists shouldn’t be anywhere near the federal government, let alone in key positions.
Look, at the end of the day, we’re all environmentalists. We all want clean air and clean water and a safe and healthy place to live and raise our future generations.
But a true environmentalist – as opposed to an Environmentalist™ – is a rational person. They understand basic things like, “Wind power doesn’t generate enough energy to be meaningfully sustaining and worth the deaths of avian/sea life.” They understand things like, “Yea, there are some risks with nuclear – but they’re highly mitigated an the benefit far outweighs the cost.” They understand things like, “Y’know, if you flood the market with electric vehicles when the technology is premature and the infrastructure hasn’t been laid, it’s going to cause some serious problems.” They understand things like, “Human activity isn’t going to make the sun god angry and turn the planet uninhabitable.”
A real environmentalist tempers a concern for the environment with practical concerns. They understand that limiting pollution is important, but so is energy creation. They understand that emergent technology may have fantastic applications, but they don’t put the electric cart before the internal combustion horse. They understand that factory farms may flirt with the humane treatment of animals, but they also know you don’t affordably feed a first world nation on highly cost ineffective and limited supplies of free range organic heirloom livestock (let alone whatever the freaks who deny their genetic omnivore eat).
Those are the kinds of people that should make up the EPA. Not the Politicitized Scientists who constantly beclown themselves with their end of the world predictions of which they’ve had a 0% accuracy rating to date. Not Cultists who think that because they can happily live without air conditioning and a gas stove that such a lifestyle should be forced on others. Not Narrative Peddlers who dress up their loathing for America – the greenest nation on the planet per capita – with environmental stewardship as they harangue Americans for their “lack of awareness” while turning blind eyes to India, China, and South America.
So, yea – maybe a lawyer is a good choice. Certainly better than an Environmentalist. The Environmental Protection Agency is the absolute LAST place we want any of them.
>>Lee Zeldin’s legal prowess may lead to a shrinking of the administrative state.
shockingly few exclamation points at the end there.
Appointing a lawyer makes sense. Check for compliance with the environmental laws passed by Congress, don't run a crusade to save the planet from an overblown supposed crisis.
"Trump's Next EPA Administrator Is a Lawyer, Not an Environmentalist. Lee Zeldin’s legal prowess may lead to a shrinking of the administrative state."
Luse misses the point.
The EPA should be defunded and disbanded.
Environmental issues are best addressed by state and local officials, not some nameless, faceless bureaucrat in DC.
But that would require an act of Congress. The point here is, what can the administration do without that?
I would recommend to president-elect Trump to get all the members of the GOP to sell the idea of eliminating the EPA and other needless and expensive bureaucracies.
At least it could be said Trump tried to remove the EPA unlike his predecessors.
Day One (too late but a man can dream): End the regulations imposed by John Kennedy (R)etarded granting the EPA control over HFCs. AIM act passed in 2020, signed into law by Donald Trump.
The AIM Act authorizes EPA to address hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) by providing new authorities in three main areas: to phase down the production and consumption of listed HFCs, manage these HFCs and their substitutes, and facilitate the transition to next-generation technologies through sector-based restrictions.
- EPA summary
Step 1: Relocate all EPA offices to Utqiaġvik Alaska. (one of the
oldest towns in North America)
Step 2: All regulations expire 5 years from issuance. The process for renewing a regulation is identical to the process for first issuance.
Step 3: All remote work for EPA employees is forbidden. Field work outside of Utqiaġvik would only be permitted 2 days per month.
Step 4: All energy requirements for the nation apply to publicfacilities and personal properties in Utqiaġvik andsurrounding areas.
.
I predict that even before regulations get reworked, the EPA would become less and less of a problem.
What's the carbon footprint of the EPA? There should be an audit of how much carbon the EPA emits vs. how much it reduces.
I’m still looking for the part of the USA (Constitutional) where the Union of States was tasked to Gov-Gun down the people because the weather changes.
So far the most HONEST evaluation is the EPA is nothing but an ILLEGAL (UN-Constitutional) [WE] gang of Sun-God Religious [Na]tional So[zi]alist worshipers packing Gov-‘Guns’ to STEAL and DICTATE with.
The only thing I need to hear out of Zeldin is how he plans to put the EPA out of business. Same for the ATF, TSA and Dept of Ed for starters.