Trump Nominates Matt Gaetz as Attorney General
Gaetz is a loyalist, and that's the only qualification Donald Trump needs.

In a surprise move, President-elect Donald Trump announced today he is nominating Rep. Matt Gaetz (R–Fla.) to be U.S. Attorney General.
Gaetz, whose legal experience is limited to three years of work at a Florida law firm and being the subject of a Justice Department investigation, wasn't among the names circulated as potential attorney general picks, and his political career as an often unserious and widely-disliked backbencher makes him a bizarre choice to lead the chief federal law enforcement agency.
Rep. Mike Simpson (R–Idaho), summed up the general reaction among Capitol Hill, the media, and social media to the announcement:
Asked for his reaction to the Gaetz nom, Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho): "Are you shittin' me?"
— Jonathan Nicholson (@JNicholsonInDC) November 13, 2024
However, in a social media statement, Trump praised Gaetz as "a deeply gifted and tenacious attorney, trained at the William & Mary College of Law, who has distinguished himself in Congress through his focus on achieving desperately needed reform at the Department of Justice."
If confirmed, Gaetz would lead the same agency that investigated him for sex trafficking and obstruction of justice starting in 2019. The Justice Department announced in 2023 that it was declining to prosecute Gaetz, who maintained his innocence. There is still an ongoing congressional ethics probe into Gaetz over the same allegations.
As attorney general, Gaetz would have wide power to open and close investigations against Trump's enemies and allies, redirect the focus of civil rights investigations, and provide legal cover for the Trump administration's initiatives.
Although Gaetz is one of the most pro-Trump members of Congress, he's also one of the younger Republicans, and his politics sometimes stray from GOP orthodoxy. For example, Gaetz is one of the few House Republicans who consistently supports marijuana legalization, and he supported the bipartisan First Step Act of 2018, a major criminal justice reform bill.
But Gaetz's personal politics are beside the point. Trump nominated Gaetz because he's a loyalist who supported Trump's attempt to overturn the 2020 election and repeated his claims of a "deep-state witch hunt" against Trump by federal law enforcement agencies.
Now Gaetz will have to survive confirmation hearings, and Republicans will have to weigh their open contempt for Gaetz against their loyalty to Trump. If history is any indication, though, he should start thinking about decorations for his new office at the Robert F. Kennedy Building.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
>>Gaetz, whose legal experience is limited to three years of work at a Florida law firm and being the subject of a Justice Department investigation
clearly you have missed every opportunity to watch him question someone under oath.
Suddenly experience is a qualification for a federal office holder.
At least as a community organizer.
What? Brown skin and a uterus aren't qualifications??
JD Vance is wrong about Trump’s AG nomination
JD Vance is wrong!
What? Trump nominated someone who is loyal to him? What a kook!
Wrong on both counts.
You expecting a President to nominate an enemy?
And then you proceed to quote Trump's own list of qualifications.
You expecting a President to nominate an enemy?
No, instead, how about a president to nominate someone who is not only a loyalist.
And if you had read the rest of both the article and my comment, and not stopped at the subhed, you'd have seen just that.
How about LOYALTY TO WHAT?
Could we JUST FOR ONCE have loyalty to Truth, Freedom, and Democracy? And the USA Cunts-tits-tuition? Instead of to Dear Leader?
Twat's next, will the Armed Farces be required to swear personal allegiance to Der TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer instead of to the USA Cunts-tits-tuition?
Loyalty to your boss, to your company, to your business, your friends, your God, your community, your nation, your family, your honor.
But you don't understand that.
Loyalty to UNIVERSAL BENEVOLENCE TO ALL CONSCIOUS BEINGS!!! To SNOT be a provincial, self-interested, greedy, tribalistic RUBE! But you don’t understand that.
(The EVIL ones among us... THINK about shit now... REQUIRE some OTHER, NOT of Our Tribe, a SCAPEGOAT or ten or twenty scapegoats, to HATE, so ass to be loyal to OUR Tribe!!! And THAT stinks to the Highest Heavens!!! But you don’t understand that.)
He might be loyal to the orderlies.
Clinton was VERY loyal to Monica! And now Trump is loyal to Spermy Daniels!
(Chumpy Chump is loyal to his dead, decaying dog.)
How about loyalty to a USA that isn't a 'democracy' but a...
US *Constitutional* Republic.
His stance on getting the 'Fed' out of drug prohibition fits that bill.
Twat's next is an appointment of someone from WWE. Maybe Hulk Hogan. Much like was forecast in that Mike Judge movie from 18 years ago.
Good comment about the idiocracy!
Hooker Hulk Hogan pisses me off! Maybe I will have to wrestle him down into the ground...
See http://reason.com/blog/2016/03/18/florida-jury-awards-115-million-to-hulk# Florida Jury Awards $115 Million to Hulk Hogan in His Gawker Lawsuit… About Hooker Hulk Hogan… “Hooker Hulk” gets $115 MILLION, v/s “Spermy Daniels” gets only $130 K, for each of them being skanky hos. The MALE skanky ho gets almost THREE orders of magnitude more money!!! How is THAT for sexual equality?!
But what gets my bowels in an uproar even more, is that through the courts and policemen enforcing court orders and/or contracts here in these kinds of cases, Government Almighty is the Pimp Daddy and hit-man enforcer of it all! And then they go and jail $50 and $100 poor hookers, to “protect us from trafficking in sex slaves”.
If Government Almighty is going to be the Big Pimp Daddy and hit-man enforcer, for the rich and famous, then could they PLEASE stop being hypocrites, and stop punishing the “little people” for doing the same things!??!
SIDE-BAND SNIDE COMMENT:
As a socio-economic and sexual-political experiment, I think someone should get Hooker Hulk Hogan to fuck Spermy Daniels. Which of the two would owe how much money, to the other?
MAIN COMMENT:
I think I have fingered out WHY does Government Almighty play Big Pimp Daddy to the rich and famous, while punishing the dirt-poor hookers?! When $130 k or $115 million gets thrown around, Government Almighty gets to tax the payment and the lawyers, and grab at least 1/3 of it. Easy-peasy on the big transactions… When a small-time hooker turns a trick “under the table” (a kinky place to do it!), it is MUCH harder to collect! Especially if he or she is paid in smack or crack or Ripple wine…
I am UTTERLY crushed to have fingered out that Government Almighty (which claims to LOVE me and want to PROTECT me from sleazy sex), is actually just wanting to line its own wallet!!!
He did, you illiterate dumbass.
Matt Gaetz is a walking scandal magnet. I fully expect him to be caught in flagrante delicto and then I will enjoy seeing you and your team squirm when you try to defend him.
Just because you Leftists decide something is a scandal, or not, doesn't make it true.
And that is likely how the defense will begin. "It's not even a scandal! Why, every Attorney General has sex with 17-year-old girls!"
Dis the weaponized Biden DoJ prosecute him for that or are you just taking leftist accusations as fact? Fuck off you shill.
No, just his friend Greenberg decided to spill the beans in a pardon request to Trump.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210430003115/https://www.thedailybeast.com/joel-greenberg-letter-written-for-roger-stone-says-matt-gaetz-paid-for-sex-with-minor
You know, I am really starting to realize that you all don't read any news outside of your little bubble. Did you even know about Greenberg's existence?
True or not. I find it rather ironic it’s “My Body; My Choice.” until you find a way to weaponize it against a Republican. The leftard holy-crusade was just reborn.
According to Greenberg, Gaetz had sex with a 17 year old and paid for it. By THEIR standards, that is not only prostitution but child sex trafficking, and if it had happened in Arizona with the new referendum that just passed (which Team Red totally supported), both Greenberg and Gaetz would be thrown in jail for life. Those are their rules. As is typical for any tribe, they don't want to be held accountable to their own rules.
And the larger point here is, even if you don't believe Greenberg's story here, Gaetz made a whole series of bad decisions, including befriending Greenberg the slimeball, including accepting a trip to the Bahamas paid for by a campaign donor, which included 'escorts'. Even if you think it should all be legal, it shows a series of bad decisions, and it is why I say Gaetz is a walking scandal magnet.
"but, but, but ... those are the 'moral standards'!", the hypocrite party-loyal leftard on an instantly found holy-crusade.
According to your own source, neither of them knew that she was 17, because she lied about her age, and they then had no contact with her until she was 18. So, you keep making a lie of omission, that "they had sex with a 17 year old". They apparently thought they had sex with a 19 year old.
Unlike Pedo jeffy, who likes to diddle 8 year olds, or is it younger? Fat pedo jeffy.
Maybe they should have had the FBI investigate their hookers? ENB would be livid. How dare you try to prevent women from performing sex work!
Well, that sounds like rock-solid evidence presented there.
Some dude said he did it.
Air f'n TIGHT!
A Democrat run DOJ declined to press any charges whatsoever.
I should get a group together to e ail his DOJ to look into you and Shrike. He’s a proven pedo, and I suspect you are too. Maybe you can both plead out if you give them your NAMBLA connections.
Maybe it’s because it’s one of the departments that’s going to be shut down.
Gaetz is a loyalist, and that's the only qualification Donald Trump needs.
*flips ponytail*
Yeah, man, this is like, total bullshit, man. He should be picking dudes disloyal to him. If Trump were a serious president and shit, he'd be picking Biden and Obama neocons-- you know- extend the olive branch and stuff.
You think that there are only two categories, mindless Trump sycophants and Trump’s enemies?
You don’t think there are any hardworking, competent people that neither love nor hate Trump?
Let's agree to disagree, and nominate Gaetz.
Gaetz will bring the Democrat so much pain.
Democrats? Hell, Gaetz already has Republicans whining whimpering and wanting a safe space.
Good, the establishment must suffer.
Isn't that the funniest part of all? His own party members looked like they bit into a super sour lemon upon hearing of his nomination. That was hysterically funny. But not really.
There really is a UniParty.
You think that there are only two categories, mindless Trump sycophants and Trump’s enemies?
Let me flip that question back at you, Tony.
Not in D.C.
Was Garland that for Biden? Didn't seem to be the case.
Certainly was not the case with Holder for Obama.
Don't bitch about using the rules provided.
How about, a loyalist AND competent?
A loyalist AND experienced?
A loyalist AND not a total sleazeball?
Can we have more than one qualification here?
That would rule you out. Buh bye!
Jeffy is not competent, experienced, nor is he not a sleazeball.
No we can't. If you wanted any of those other 'non loyal' categories, then you are looking for either a RINO (competent but unaware of what principles are) or an ideologue (eg libertarian). Trump is neither an ideologue nor a RINO.
He is a narcissist and loyal is the ONLY possible attribute. He would have selected more loyal appointees in his first term but he's also lazy and has a thing for authoritarians in uniform and confused that with 'loyal' last time.
Aaaaawwwww….. poor baby’s party just got crushed in the election. Maybe you should go eat a Trumpburger and have a Trumptastic day.
That darn Authoritarian just KEEPS "Hollowing out [our] [Na]tional So[zi]alist institutions!!!" (De-Regulating & Cutting Taxes) /s
Gaetz will be fine. A million times better than that traitor trash Garland. And he will help make sure we get rid of all the illegals.
If we can get rid of one-tenth of the illegals, that would be huge.
I think that many may leave on their own by the time Trump is inaugurated.
he is competent. he is clearly competent.
He's just not on the side you like.
What did Obama call Eric Holder again? His wingman?
No. Holder called HIMSELF Obama's wingman.
Oh...*clears throat*
Tulsi! Tulsi! Tulsi! Tulsi! Tulsi!
Secretary of Hot Chicks?
He also put Tulsi in charge of the DNI. Looks like Trump is very serious about upending the deep state. Predictably the Reason statists will scream their heads off but I'm really having fun right now.
That is the real reason he was picked. He can be expected to be aggressive against the bureaucracy.
Funny how they want to quote establishment Republicans and ignore how many libertarians are excited about the pick.
This is one of several picks that are a giant middle finger to the left wing establishment who has been fucking over Trump and the country.
And even if most of these appointees last only a year, if they can disrupt things enough, the next wave of appointments can clean up and act "serious".
That was my thought too = Looks like Trump is very serious about upending the deep state and this That is the real reason he was picked. He can be expected to be aggressive against the bureaucracy
Reason doesn’t really have libertarians. It has leftist political hipsters who cosplay as libertarians to be ‘edgy ‘, but within leftist acceptable parameters. So Trump. And anyone associated with him has to be icky.
^this
Well well, looks like Trump decided to go full troll/revenge with his cabinet picks.
Am I the only one who gets the impression that he outsourced his cabinet picks to Jr.?
Are you the only one what cares?
As long as DC Beltway heads explode I'm all in. Trump is blowing up the Cathedral with his picks. Loving It
Likely not the way you intended the word, but a couple of my Episcopalian friends who go to the Cathedral Church of Saint Peter and Saint Paul (National Cathedral in DC) definitely lost their minds over the last week.
Side note - The Space Window there is pretty cool.
I thought they only held black masses there?
Isn’t that ‘African American Mass’?
Well well, looks like Trump decided to go full troll/revenge with his cabinet picks.
Thank god he isn't backing down. The last thing I wanted from a second term was quislings.
It really just comes down to Jeff demanding Trump follow the deep states wishes. Jeff has a consistent demand unelected bureaucracy should run the country, not the people.
Jeffy strikes me as a morbidly obese government workers, who works buy remote. Maybe EPA. They have some of the worst leftist kooks.
Matt Gaetz has little experience, would be in way over his head, and is a walking scandal magnet. That is a recipe for being taken advantage of by the Deep State which does have the experience and the tricks to subvert an inexperienced boss. He will be thwarted, no one will take him seriously, and he will be thrown under the bus the moment his ‘extracurricular activities’ make Trump look bad. I give it 6 months tops.
You know, Trump could have appointed someone who was actually experienced and competent and not compromised by scandal. But no. He went with the lackey.
And you all continue to defend him no matter what. It is cult-like, really. Do you think that you will be doxxed and canceled if you say mean things about Trump?
Sounds like Kamala = little experience, in way over head, walking skank magnet, easily taken advantage of by Deep State
But I’m betting Matt won’t blow Willie brown
I want people who don't give two fucks how DC presently runs, and will set the agencies abalaze with the fire of change.
Fuck all other considerations.
That's nice, but there is this little thing called the law that the AG is actually supposed to enforce.
If he did nothing but pinkslip all the staff, that would be a massive improvement.
The way Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and Kevin Clinesmith enforced the law?
My friends and I have been praying for Trump to be ruthless. So far we're pleased.
A pedophile for AG. MAGA turds are a joke.
"Gaetz, whose legal experience is limited to three years of work at a Florida law firm and being the subject of a Justice Department investigation"
Brilliant.
Look on the bright side. It could have been MTG.
You're a pedo. You're qualified. So is your buddy SPB2.
Well, that went downhill fast.
I'm sure when Gaetz the sleazeball gets into inevitable trouble of his own making, you will be the first to demand that a person of integrity be appointed to replace him. Right? Oh wait of course not.
He's right though, clowntits.
Hey ML, did you ever admit that what Trump asked Pence to do on Jan. 6 was actually illegal, even according to Trump's own lawyer who drafted the memo?
Do you have a citation that isn't from the DNC?
Learn to Google.
Ok, sarc.
Poor fat Jeff.
So, I did learn to Google, and I discovered that no, Joe Rogan did not interview Matt Gaetz.
I also learned to Google in ways that you could not, and I found John Eastman's memo in which he outlined his illegal plan to have Pence install Trump as the winner.
https://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2021/images/09/20/eastman.memo.pdf
From p. 2 of the memo:
So Eastman is explicitly admitting that Pence, if he did this, would be violating the law.
But because ML is a Trump cultist and a shill for Team Red, he ludicrously claimed that the "real reason" why Pence refused to go along with this illegal scheme, was because PENCE was the immoral one who was disloyal to his boss and wanted to use the opportunity to advance his own potential electoral prospects later on.
I am quite sure you will come down on the "Pence is wrong and Trump is always right, always".
Too fat, lazy, and worthless to even post links…….
If you don't like going downhill fast, then don't aim your sled downhill and invite others to pile on.
This makes no sense. Put down the bong.
It does. You’re just obtuse.
Or chase!
A pedophile for AG. MAGA turds are a joke.
Gee Shrike, why don't you explain to us how exactly Gaetz is a pedo, and also why you never gave a fuck while this was going on.
Creepy Joe Biden (D) showered with his daughter.
He also raped one of his senate staffers.
Well, an umbrella three-letter "agency" is OJT.
I cannot think of a better qualification for Attorney General than being the subject of a Justice Department investigation.
I think that's Trump's point. After decades of deep dive investigations into the evil chicanery of the DOJ Reason editors are baffled by this turn of events. Weird.
I think the Reason editors are deeply afraid the cocktail parties might just go away.
Ruh-roh! Matt Gaetz to be Attorney General.
Do I hear more heads exploding? I did not know how many were left after last Tuesday.
Yer owning the libs bro.
And hopefully aggressively prosecuting them for their endless crimes.
I have to say that was not on my radar. Remember though that often someone is nominated who has no chance of being confirmed to let all the talking heads and the opposition party get their moments in the sun and then the replacement is the real choice.
Trump already said he would make them temporary appointees if he needed to. He doesn't care about d.c. agreeing with his staff.
What does one say? Congressman Gaetz is very colorful and controversial. So what. What makes his colorful and controversial quality any (D)ifferent? The fact that a weaponized Team D DOJ declined to bring any charges whatsoever against him says a lot. And what a surprise, a Team D run House Ethics Committee is dragging their feet.
I would encourage Readership to check out Gaetz's interviews on Rogan, and Timcast. DOJ DC-based bureaucrats will shit their pants when he is confirmed.
This is an early test for Senator Thune. He wanted the job of Senate Majority Leader...very well, now deliver the goods John-Boy. The President gets to pick his team. Absent any blatant disqualifying aspect of a nominee, they should be confirmed. Nobody said the job would be easy.
Joe Rogan interviewed Matt Gaetz? Huh. I can't seem to find that episode.
Learn to Google.
Even better, I found Joe Rogan's episode list.
Looks like I can't post the link here, but it is jrelibrary dot com.
So please, do tell us all which one is the Matt Gaetz one.
No. No he did not.
Huh, so Joe Rogan didn't interview Matt Gaetz.
I wonder why a few people around here would claim that he did.
Or any interview with him. But you’ll be a fat cunt about it either way.
Seems like a weird thing to lie about, with no upside whatsoever.
I know, right? I guess it was to try to make Matt Gaetz more relatable or something.
Fuck you, you Nazi cum-goblin.
Doesn’t matter. You will, e seeing oke ty of Gaetz going forward, as the new AG.
Get ready for General Gaetz, you fat, sniveling, Marxist bitch.
I was completely mistaken about Gaetz appearing on Rogan. I thought he was part of a group of 2-3 that were on his podcast in the distant past. Nope. My mistake.
Well thank you for admitting that. That was brave around here.
Eat shit, shitbag.
I own my mistakes, chemjeff. It was the way I was reared.
At least commenter xy didn't brush it aside as a mere "gotcha" like a certain other commenter here.
We will give you that little crumb of a victory. Given how much you’ve lost, and will continue to lose.
I heard that Gaetz is possibly the only person who despises the so-called “Justice” Department more than Trump. Sounds like the perfect candidate for Trump’s AG.
He needs to clean house. Then go after filth like Jack Smith, Fauci, etc..
Its payback time.
Really interesting that reason has moved slightly left, while the commentariat has gone full MAGA, and shouts down the few commenters who question their bullshit.
I don't think it is "full MAGA" per se, but the commenters really do reflect a worldview on liberty that stands in contradiction to classical libertarian thought.
For example, I have long believed that liberty is the birthright of every human being on the planet. Everyone has liberty just by virtue of breathing, and it is the duty of a just government to protect that liberty. But, from what I have gathered, that is not the majority view anymore. It seems as though the majority view is the Hoppean view, which states that liberty is a cultural artifact of the Enlightenment only. We only have liberty to the extent that we have a culture that reflects Enlightenment values. And so the only way to preserve that liberty is to preserve that Enlightenment culture. That is why they are so hostile to immigration, because they really think that if non-Western people come here, we will lose liberty because we will no longer have an Enlightenment-based culture. That is why they are so supportive of social conservatism, because they want a society that is relatively homogeneous and uniform, obeying Enlightenment values. If society permits too many individuals to deviate from these values - like, say, permitting Drag Queen Story Hour at libraries - it means that society is moving away from 18th century virtues and we can't have that.
The big problem with this point of view, of course, is that it implicitly assumes that liberty cannot survive in any other context besides the one from which it originally sprung, and I don't believe that is the case.
We can empirically prove that freedom is a artifact of culture by pointing anywhere else on the map and asking: where has it lasted at least as long as us?
The answer is nowhere, not even it's source.
Well, I said liberty, which is different.
I would argue that every human being has liberty. A person from a non-Western country has just as much liberty as you and I.
It seems as though, the Hoppean view is that non-Western individuals don’t really have liberty because liberty only originates from an Enlightenment-type culture.
That’s the big difference here.
Do people in foreign places, do they have liberty which is their birthright, but live under an oppressive government that does not protect their liberty? Or, do people in foreign places not have liberty at all, because they don’t live in an Enlightement-type society, and have no real claim to liberty?
I already laid out a test, it's a super easy one. The vast majority fail, both in the present and past.
Their is no Liberty to invade another nation and destroy it with illegal ?free? ponies legislation. The USA has every right to invite or not-invite anyone they chose to their nation just like you'd have that right to your own home.
Leftards #1 character gift is criminal manipulation tactics ... "My Liberty to Your Stuff."
Choke to death on your own vomit.
That’s for pedo Jeff, obviously
Uninvited immigration is not libertarian. It may seem so for the immigrant, but it imposes all sorts of problems on the people who own the land into which the immigrant is arriving. It's trespassing, writ large. It goes agains property rights that are fundamental to each human being - moving into others' space isn't.
No, Reason has gone hard left. And we’re far more libertarian than any Reason writer. And this sounds like JeffSarc samefagging because you get the shit beat out of you for being a neo Marxist.
Poor jeffsarc.
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1856817761919356935
Collin Rugg
@CollinRugg
NEW: Reporter asks Rep. Thomas Massie about Trump’s nomination of Matt Gaetz for Attorney General.
Reporter: Will he be confirmed by the Senate?
Massie: “Doesn’t need to… we recess. He’s the Attorney General. Suck it up.”
Whoops. Not meany as reply. Meh.
I seem to recall that your team had a cow when Obama tried to use recess appointments. But I guess this time it's diffe(R)ent.
“Obama tried to use recess appointments”
It appears to definitely be (D)ifferent for you.
Tell us again what a P.O.S. Obama and the left is for doing this?
So just to confirm: You're totally fine with Trump using a recess appointment to appoint Matt Gaetz even in defiance of a Republican Senate. Is that right?
In case it wasn't obvious to you, a Republican senate doesn't equal a Trump one.
Incidentally, Trump tried to have recess appointments, but McConnell never actually put the Senate in recess. So maybe it will actually happen this time.
So you think the Senate should voluntarily relinquish its constitutional power on behalf of the Executive. Hmm.
Wouldn't be the first time they gave up that privilege. Or they could just confirm, because it sure as hell wasn't the party apparatus that dragged them into the majority kicking and screaming.
Or maybe they should not confirm, so that an Attorney General who becomes compromised in a scandal doesn't make every Republican look bad, including the ones seeking re-election in 2026.
Did you miss the kicking and screaming part?
Confirm or get primaried.
Interesting that you just assume Republican voters will just blindly follow whatever Trump says, or that Trump would even try to push a primary of any Senator who voted against Matt Gaetz.
Interesting that Matt Gaetz instantly resigned from Congress. Do you want to know why? Because once he resigned, the Congressional ethics investigation goes away. Interesting.
Very interesting……
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krD4hdGvGHM
Hmmmmmmm?
Damn. Massie isn't exactly best buds with Gaetz, but glad to see him fully supportive of that war.
The best part is Jeff’s freak out.
I’m loving it. That pedophile blob will be flailing endlessly with his concern trolling.
If we push him hard enough, will he have a coronary? Let’s find out.
Is Reason competing with the democrat propaganda press to see who can best determine what Trump is REALLY thinking, and be sure it is always evil?
The voters have spoken, and the name of the song is "We won't be fooled again".
Much in the same way that sticking a gun in your mouth is an effective way to not get shot "again".
The voters sure have spoken, and now we're all going to get what they want good and hard.
FOAD, steaming pile of TDS-addled slime.
Yep, the democrats are going to burn for what they’ve done. Freedom and justice are incoming.
the name of the song is “We won’t be fooled again”.
Maybe check the rest of the lyrics next time....
If Trump was a real politician, he would know how to pick a cabinet.
https://babylonbee.com/news/trumps-cabinet-picks-are-unqualified-says-party-of-pete-buttigieg-rachel-levine-kjp-sam-brinton
Those guys are always on top of their game.
Laura Loomer for press sec.
Make it happen.
No, Alex Jones.
Too much crying. I want a press secretary that can make Jim Acosta cry.
Joe Biden's greatest hits:
Kamala Harris, VP/Border Czar
Pete "Literal Train Wreck" Buttigieg, Transportation
Janet "Is That a 600 Dollar Deposit I See" Yellen, Treasury
Merrick "Just Be Glad I'm Not on the Supreme Court" Garland, AG
Nina Jankowicz, Disinformation Czar
Saule Omarova, Comptroller of Currency/Soviet Communist
Alejandro "Just Let Them All In" Mayorkas, Homeland "Security"
Kimberly "Slippery Sloped Roof" Cheatle, Secret Service
As a run-up to Mars, Elon should lend Trump a rocket ship to send MTG off to Mongo for seasoning in the dark arts of exodiplomacy as Ambassadress to the court of Ming The Merciless.
Well gosh, that sure sounds like an exciting story! You should write lots of democrat fan fiction about it. It will give you and your fellow travelers something to jerk off to.
Happy wanking pinko.
Should they be loyal to Hillary Clinton instead?
https://reason.com/2023/05/16/for-6-5-million-durham-report-finds-fbi-didnt-have-solid-dirt-on-trump-and-russia/?comments=true#comments
Yea ngl, that's weird pick.
His other ones have been pretty good though.
this one is 10x better than Rubio for state. Although I'm not too worried about Rubio for state because it's not like he wont be under Trump's puppet strings.
I like Rubio for State. Especially since this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAZJ2aQ2xFI
"Make sure you post that, please."
*micdrop*
Good for him, not playing that Hamas Shill’s game.
( Is that woman Misek’s mother?)
I cant imagine why any so-called libertarian would be opposed to this idea. He hates the justice department. This is great.
no one who ever supported Mr Levine as an appointment can say a word. Ever.
Well, that lives out Pluggo, Dee, the JeffSarc, and that retard Mod.
Guilty or not, having a former defendant run the DOJ could be just what we need to rein in the abusive excesses of some 3 letter posses.
I can't vouch for Gaetz though, I have paid any attention him. Is it wrong to conclude he's evil based solely on the picture of him at the top of this article? He's got a real " Wendy, give me the bat." look going.
Good, he need to beat the shit out of a lot of scumbags as he cleans house.
Hell, a PRESENT defendant is POTUS-elect! It will be great to see the payback. I hope Trump is thoughtful about it and makes them squirm for a long time rather than a quick crush.
John Bolton has come out highly critical of Tulsi Gabbard's appointment. I can't imagine a better endorsement of her.
Maybe?
"On September 3, 2020, Gaetz posted to X, formerly known as Twitter, "Pardon @Snowden."
A day later, on his podcast, Gaetz said: "As of today, the case has never been stronger that Edward Snowden deserves a pardon from President Trump. I would support a pardon for Edward Snowden. If it were not for Snowden, we might not know today that our own government was engaged in an activity that now a federal appellate court has deemed illegal." Newsweek
Love it. But that’s probably gonna lose him a bunch of Republican support. Lindsay Graham is probably already planning to lead the charge against this guy and Tulsi. Thune might even try to fight Trump on trying to put some of these folks through as recess appointments.
Skipping to here from the opening paragraphs...this type of criticism makes sense only if you think Trump's a faker like Nixon. When Nixon appointed lackeys, the problem was that it was in service of a faker like Nixon. When Trump appoints lackeys, that's a good thing because Trump is the real thing IMO. So articles like this are just veiled criticism of Trump, which is unjustified on the facts.
"Gaetz is one of the few House Republicans who consistently supports marijuana legalization, and he supported the bipartisan First Step Act of 2018, a major criminal justice reform bill."
Putting aside the allegations that the DOJ has declined to pursue, this sounds like the sort of candidate a libertarian or a Reason Magazine writer should like. A nominee without the scandal would've obviously have been better, such as Mike Lee, but it is what it is.
But not only the HyR bloggers, but also those commenters here who agree with them, prioritize opposition to Trump over all else. Blind measures like isidewith show they should be pro-Trump, yet they manage to defy the facts and be against him.
…
Which are items that on their own you would support. I hope.
So the crux of the problem is that Gaetz is more on board with Trump than he has been with the GOP in general…which is bad because I guess the GOP accomplished so much?
This is so fucked it’s hard to believe! You’d rather have a Republican establishment that’s been…the establishment…than to have someone like Trump steer the GOP in a much better direction for liberty!
Well, if P.J. O’Rourke could go from being a Republican party reptile to being anti-Trump because at least everything he’d been criticizing (e.g. Hillary) was “within normal parameters”, why not Reason, huh?
Well to be fair, there has been a deep state witch hunt against Trump for the past 8 years.
At this point, Trump is just trolling them, right? Gaetz will never get confirmed by the Senate.
And shouldn't the obvious pick be Giuliani?
Post of the day.
There's a theory floating around that's PRECISELY why he picked him. First we'll get a clear indication of what we're dealing with in terms of Congress' cooperation. Second, it gives Gaetz an out from Congress without sacrificing his seat. Third, it takes the wind of out the media's sails by making a follow-up nomination seem positively moderate by comparison.
"Gaetz is a loyalist, and that's the only qualification Donald Trump needs."
1. So what?
What POTUS didn't hire an AG that wasn't a loyalist?
2. Gaetz will make the criminal element in DC shit their pants on both sides of the aisle.
That alone makes me happy Trump nominated him.
Anything to keep this prick out of jail.
How did that happen that Matt Gaetz, who rapes underage girls, was selected? Someone got Gaetz on the airplane with Trump on his way back to Washington DC from Florida and cornered Trump in the back of the plane where Trump was isolated from his new chief of staff, Susie Wiles, who would not have let Gaetz anywhere near Trump. She may not even known that Gaetz was on the plane.
As a Histrionic, Trump is impulsive and very susceptible to flattery. Histrionics also have very little foresight of the long range impact of snap decisions. As a Narcissist, Trump has a grandiose sense of entitlement which means he is never, ever wrong and anyone who suggest he is becomes his enemy.
This will be Susie Wiles' first big test. She has to cut off at the knees whoever evaded her to get Gaetz chosen. Her entire tenure is now in jeopardy.