Jane Coaston on Democrats, Republicans, and Freedom
"It is very smart to be the people who are like, 'We are normal moms and dads who love football, freedom, and faith, and we want to keep your freedoms intact,' " the New York Times contributor tells Reason.

Jane Coaston is a contributing opinion writer at The New York Times who describes herself as having "libertarian tendencies." Coaston appeared on Reason's Just Asking Questions podcast during the 2024 Democratic National Convention to discuss the Democrats' rebranding as the party of freedom while the Republicans are being pulled more and more to the right. In September, Coaston joined Crooked Media as host of the daily news podcast What A Day.
Q: What do you think of Democrats talking the language of freedom?
A: I think it's rhetorically intelligent. It is very smart to be the people who are like, "We are normal moms and dads who love football, freedom, and faith, and we want to keep your freedoms intact. And these other strange people over here don't want to do that." That does not mean it is accurate.
I think that they're going to continue using this messaging. I also think that the Norman Rockwell-esque version of freedom—from want, from fear—what that looks like is so appealing to people.
Q: Do you think Democrats will be able to pull off this rebrand successfully? People have proven that they have weirdly short memories with regard to COVID-19 when Democrats were the party of meddlesome people telling you how to live your life. Have we just totally forgotten all of this?
A: Yes, we have. If you go back to after the Spanish flu epidemic in the United States, what you see is 1919, 1920—gone. People didn't want to talk about it. People didn't want to think about it.
I think something else that's coming up here is that a lot of Republicans responded to COVID by being like, "We're going to run the fucking craziest person you've ever heard of in your entire life. Like Blake Masters. We're going to have him record an ad in the desert massaging a German gun and then shooting it into a ravine and then that's an ad."
Republicans could have run someone who responded to COVID by talking about the need for limited government and the need for thinking through the impacts of policies on kids and what that would mean. That's not what happened.
I do think that [the Democrats] are going to be able to move away from COVID because everybody wants to move away from COVID.
Q: There's something quite disturbing about the types of things that a lot of this New Right feels the need to attack. For example, no-fault divorce or in vitro fertilization. There's a bunch of issues that Republicans could ostensibly be running on right now, and instead they're choosing to go after some of the most batshit things that nobody was asking for. But I wonder if Roe v. Wade actually being overturned now leads them to wonder what other things could possibly happen that before seemed unthinkable.
A: There is a sense of, "Is everything on the table?" Because you can always find somebody—Clarence Thomas might have said it in a dissent—you can always find somebody who's prominent enough to be like, "Yeah, actually we should make marriage equality illegal again." There's always going to be somebody.
Q: What is a question that you think more people should be asking?
A: I would like people to be asking themselves: What can I be doing outside of politics that would benefit my family, my life, and my community? How can I be a less political entity?
Something I've really enjoyed is when you get to know someone who has very different political views from you, but you are—on this other subject—really pretty in kind.
Jeffrey Blehar, who writes for National Review, also hosts a music podcast. I've gone on to talk to him about Nine Inch Nails and Jimi Hendrix, and someday I will get the Bob Marley episode.
Social media is inherently flattening; people just become their politics. No. Go get really excited about [something]. I will never make fun of people who are super into anime or something like that. Go do that! What is something you can do to make yourself less politicized? Just, I don't know, get a hobby.
This interview has been condensed and edited for style and clarity.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
People have proven that they have weirdly short memories with regard to COVID-19 when Democrats were the party of meddlesome people telling you how to live your life. Have we just totally forgotten all of this?
A: Yes, we have.
FUCK YOU! WE HAVE NOT!
The reason for conflict between people is their stubborn refusal to value, discern, accept and share the truth aka reality of every and any issue.
This delusion is demonstrated by the use of ambiguous and often hypocritical dog whistles that each opposing side recognizes as the irrefutable truth, required for peace.
But the ambiguity in those dog whistle statements contradicts each other resulting in perpetual conflict instead of peace.
Here’s the solution. Say what you mean as clearly, specifically and unambiguously as you can about the issue you want to comment on.
Then apply the same process to replies from others to discern what you can refute, prove as wrong, from what you can’t claim as true.
You’ll probably find that the intellectual process of eliminating ambiguity often changes your recognition of truth about that issue. That’s good. That’s real truth.
Don’t fall back on your comfortable dog whistle bigoted perspective. That’s perpetuating conflict.
To relate this to the above comment, try to remove the dog whistle ambiguity from the topic of covid.
Fuck you too Adolf.
Who uses “Hitler” as their hypocritical dog whistle?
A. Jews committing a holocaust in Gaza.
Refuted. By reality.
Without proof, that’s no better than your usual schtick, bleating “refuted”.
Refuted.
And retarded.
Only a Hamas cheerleader would believe that lie.
Now go iron your brown shirts and polish your jackboots.
Netanyahu gave Hamas billiions of your tax dollars in secretive cash payments.
That makes you and he far more generous Hamas cheerleaders than the United Nations and the 15 countries that have joined the ICJ case against Israel.
Most have otherwise Trump and Kamala wouldn't be running for office, they'd be running from the mob with pitchforks and torches.
That's called willful ignorance.
#NoAmnesty
…who describes herself as having “libertarian tendencies.”
Biden may have described himself as “good with kids, enunciation, emotions, and his bowels.”
I choked at the same part. Libertarian tendencies, my ass. She is an opinion writer for the Old Grey Hag.
When she gets to freedoms she actually supports, it's nanny state "positive rights."
Nick just nods right along with the bullshit labeling.
The NYT = Pravda West
Weed and ass sex. That’s it
Plus Haitian food trucks.
And ferrets, don't forget those.
"libertarian tendencies"
Sure.
Sorry, whore, this stupid "tendencies" pandering bullshit was already exploited and played out and tired before I hit puberty.
Openly Gay. Closet Progressive. Libertarian Tendencies.
New motto here.
So Republicans are attacking invitro fertilization by demanding insurance companies pay for it? Is this 3D chess?
JD Vance is wrong about testicle tube babies.
I presume it's related to the Alabama case where, unless you believe in an IVF clinic's unfettered ability to grind women's reproductive material into a salsa for profit against their contract and without the women's permission, you're invariably a scion for the Republic of Gilead... somehow.
You know, the one where an IVF clinic was found to have unacceptably poor security that resulted in the effective sterilization of a couple of women and ENB declared it a win for Women's Rights when the governor immunized IVF clinics against such irresponsibility going forward.
What a steaming pile of donkey shit. Bending over backwards to force normie some Proggy-Libertarian Alliance while doing everything imaginable to dismiss any MAGA-L alliance for months.
And, you lying hacks, IVF IS NOT UNDER ANY ATTACK. You might as well run with “Trump wrote Project 2025 to take away your Social Security”.
Alabama Courts said a hospital who negligently allowed a psych patient to wander in to an unsecured IVF clinic and destroy the frozen embryos could be held liable for the damage beyond tort-reformed Alabama’s cap on actual Property Damage.
GFYs, all of you Reasonistas. This is sickening and stupid
"It is very smart to be the people who are like..."
And most importantly to be invited to their cocktail parties.
Shit article. Do better Liz.
Speaking of pitchfork mobs. Coaston wrote: "But in Wisconsin, where the gap between Biden and Trump stands currently at 20,557 votes, Jo Jorgensen received 38,393 votes. And in Arizona, where the gap between Biden and Trump is an even tighter 12,813 votes, Jorgensen received 50,636 votes — nearly four times the margin between Biden and Trump." Here is someone fiiiinally beginning to grok how small party spoiler vote clout forces looter party machines to change their platforms and repeal bad laws. WHAT is someone with this kind of brains doing in the Zak 'n Lizard Klavern?
Hank, you’ll always be the spoiler to sanity and coherence.
They know the polls are lop sided [again], as the NYT Sienna [supposed to be the "best" as they are not "herding" their results] just admitted that they've been oversampling Democrats by 17%.
Trump is going to take this by as much as 297-312 electoral votes, and most likely the popular vote as well. This in spite of the very best efforts by MSM to create a different result.
They know the polls are lop sided [again], as the NYT Sienna [supposed to be the “best” as they are not “herding” their results] just admitted that they’ve been oversampling Democrats by 17%.
Is there a link to this admission?
https://www.aol.com/latest-trump-harris-cede-stage-111802805.html
I posted 17; it is 16:
“Across these final polls, white Democrats were 16 percent likelier to respond than white Republicans,” he [Nate Cohn, NYT Chief Political Analyst] said. “It raises the possibility that the polls could underestimate Mr. Trump yet again. We do a lot to account for this, but in the end there are no guarantees.”
'I also think that the Norman Rockwell-esque version of freedom—from want, from fear—what that looks like is so appealing to people.'
Wow, how libertarian is that? Nothing shouts freedom like wealth redistribution and nanny state coddling.
The libertarian case for the New York Times.
The NYT is the biggest joke in print journalism.
This is a good example.
When did libertarians become Democrats? Libertarians thought so hard about ways to oppose Trump that they turned gay. Like little black sambo being chased around the tree by the Trump tiger until they turned into Dylan Mulvaney.
I became an official card-carrying Libertarian in the 70s. Now I'm ashamed of that.
https://open.substack.com/pub/michael796/p/one-guy-vs-the-us-secret-police-ussp
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/rightfulfreedom/episodes/What-Makes-Us-Right-e2pp9mu
https://open.substack.com/pub/michael796/p/a-biden-conspiracy-theory-you-havent
"We want to keep all our freedoms intact." ??? Then stop enslaving yourself by electing rulers, masters.
At 82 I am convinced we won't as great as we were in 1781, when Americans left the British Empire, servants no more, instead, "sovereign citizens", i.e., "...equal (politically)..." to each other, IF we keep voting to be ruled by force, by deadly threat, fraud, propaganda. After 234 years of servitude, the constitutional republic experiment has failed over and over. It has denied us political equality, individual sovereignty. It has been tyrannical and growing more so every decade. We the People are seeing the end of our society, economically, and blaming capitalism instead of socialism. Most can't even define capitalism, the free market. How can they value or achieve it?
The constitution guarantees that our “freedoms” are limited by the rights of others.
Thats a public concept, not a private one.
Unregulated by the rights of others, rights you call tyranny, capitalism is no better than socialism.