Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Reason Roundup

Campaign Finance Rules Can't Stop Hotties for Harris

Plus: Venezuelan surveillance, American book banning, the shifting politics of shitposting, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 8.28.2024 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Kamala Harris bracelets | Carol Guzy/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom
(Carol Guzy/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom)

Influencers and the DNC: "Federal Election Commission rules require paid campaign advertising to carry a disclaimer notice identifying who paid for the communication," reports Lee Fang for his Substack. "However, payments to individual influencers represent a grey area of completely unregulated campaign finance. No federal rules require disclosure when a TikTok star or Instagram personality is paid to promote an election-related message. Although efforts have been made to reform election transparency rules, little has changed. Last December, the FEC formally punted on the issue."

But Fang has found that campaigns—including those of Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz—have been "showering funds on social media influencer marketing agencies," which in turn contract out with individual content creators. Given the lack of disclosure from these agencies, it ends up being very difficult to see which influencers ultimately get paid.

What we do know, per Fang's reporting: Harris-Walz shelled out $1.9 million to Village Marketing Agency. "The company previously worked on the 2020 Biden campaign and several efforts to promote the Obama family," notes Fang. "Village Marketing, now a part of the marketing conglomerate WPP Group, is reportedly working to recruit 5,000 social media influencers to promote the Kamala Harris presidential campaign."

At the Democratic National Convention last week, the party "treated influencers like celebrities, hoping that free stuff and copious access in Chicago would reap buzzy posts on Instagram, TikTok or YouTube," reports The New York Times. There were parties with tiki drinks; there were free Lake Michigan boat rides; there was a "hotties for Harris" neon sign with which you could take pictures. A lot of influencer travel and lodging was paid for by progressive groups.

"I know why they want me here," one foodie influencer told the Times. "I'm not here to ask any embarrassing questions."

In a sense, this lays bare what we already knew to be true: Social media influencers are down to be purchased, whether it's sponsored content for products or sponsored content for ideas. And many voters are also not especially ideological or even thinking about these issues very deeply.

Perhaps this also lends some credence to Harris' strategy of running a policy-lite, vibes-heavy campaign; it's about the joy and the TikTok egg-cracking videos and how Daddy Walz can fix your car for you, not about the economic despair that would come from instituting price controls. If you're operating in a landscape where the youth vote is being influenced (and you're attempting to put your own thumb on the scale), maybe we've transcended any hopes of political seriousness.

Israel raids West Bank: On Wednesday, Israel conducted raids and airstrikes in Jenin and Tulkarm—both in the West Bank—in an attempt to stamp out terrorist groups. Nine are dead so far. "We are in the first stages of this operation," Lt. Col. Nadav Shoshani, a military spokesman, told reporters.

Earlier this week, on Monday, Israel carried out an airstrike on the West Bank's Nur Shams area, killing five people it claims were terrorists, one of whom had been released in November as part of one of the prisoner exchanges.

Iran has reportedly been using Bedouin smugglers to get arms across international borders, specifically the border between Jordan and Israel, and into the West Bank, allowing terrorist cells there to be flush with weapons. "Iran is working to establish an eastern terrorist front against Israel in the West Bank, according to the Gaza and Lebanon model," said Israel's foreign minister, Israel Katz.

The Israeli military reports that, since the Hamas attack on October 7, more than 500 Palestinians have been killed in the West Bank, with more than 4,500 arrested. This most recent round of fighting is not altogether new, but it does show an escalation in the region, as Israel continues fighting on multiple fronts, including Hezbollah to the north and Gaza to the west.


Scenes from New York: Did you know that 48 percent of bus riders fail to pay their fare? That's roughly one million bus riders per weekday. "The skipped fares are a crucial and growing loss of revenue for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which is under severe financial pressure," reports The New York Times. It's worth noting that this form of antisocial behavior, like many others, has spiked post-pandemic. Before COVID-19, it was more like one in every five bus riders who refused to pay their way.


QUICK HITS

  • "'I feel like a Jew in Nazi Germany. The regime's security forces are going door by door, arresting human rights activists,' a 21-year-old activist from Barquisimeto in northwest Venezuela, who asked to remain anonymous," tells Jorge Jraissati for Reason. "In the past two weeks, security forces have been systematically stopping citizens to inspect their phones, including photos, social media profiles, and WhatsApp conversations. Detainees are often held based on content uncovered during these searches, such as images or conversations related to protests or anti-government expressions."
  • "Today's young online political spaces are vastly different from the shitposting antics of a few years earlier," writes Joshua Citarella for default.blog. "On the right, there is noticeable shift away from the free market evangelism that characterized conservative politics for the millennial generation. No one under the age of 25 is a 'lolbertarian.' They make jokes about Ayn Rand and call Paul Ryan a cuck. Everyone believes in climate change. Young conservatives have aligned themselves with an older set of values that emphasize tradition and hierarchy. They no longer seek to fix market failures by further deregulating the economy. Instead, a heterodox economic populism has emerged among the young right. Many of them are economic protectionists and some are isolationists." ("On the Left, there remains a big eco-anarchist hangover that is bolstered by a techno-pessimism towards all climate technologies.")
  • "Books are not being banned; I reject the framing completely," says Erika Sanzi on Honestly.
  • Hamas-sympathizer spring, in one chart:

This is such an amazing chart: pic.twitter.com/dny7MSbg2U

— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) August 26, 2024

  • U.S. consumer confidence rises to a six-month high.
  • Tim Ballard, a MAGA-world hero who claimed to be fighting sex trafficking, actually stands accused of abusing many of the women with whom he worked.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Telegram CEO Pavel Durov’s Arrest Is Part of a Global War on Free Speech

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Reason RoundupPoliticsVenezuelaNicolas MaduroKamala HarrisSocial Media
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (290)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   9 months ago

    Campaign Finance Rules Can't Stop Hotties for Harris

    But they did in Twinks for Trump!

    1. Minadin   9 months ago

      Why is the boggle bracelet using a 'W' for Kamala and an 'M' for Swifty?

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

      If they think dancing will smite the evil one and bring prosperous times for the righteous, how long before they start throwing virgins into volcanoes?

      1. Minadin   9 months ago

        Do incels count?

        1. Ajsloss   9 months ago

          Incels = childless cat ladies

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

            Why do you hate fur-babies?

            And why do you deny them the vote?

      2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

        The dancing on tik tok ended covid more than Fauci did.

        1. Eeyore   9 months ago

          It was at least as effective as all other interventions combined.

    3. Anomalous   9 months ago

      They're Thots for Harris.

      1. Mother's Lament   9 months ago

        Cat ladies for Harris more likely. The only action they get is shilicking to Japanese boy’s love comics.

    4. HorseConch   9 months ago

      Twinks for Trump would be the thing that gets Lindsay Graham on the Trump Train. He would be chaperoning all of their events.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   9 months ago

    However, payments to individual influencers represent a grey area of completely unregulated campaign finance.

    If you're paying attention to influencers you're voting D. This is a waste of money. (And of speech rights.)

    1. Bubba Jones   9 months ago

      Why not pay *everyone* to be a social media influencer?

      Pay bonuses to influencers who post from the polling places.

      Pay 10x bonuses to influencers who voted in the Dem primary who then vote from polling places.

      "We" spent $6.5B on the 2020 presidential election for 150M votes.

      $40 per vote.

      1. JFree   9 months ago

        $40 per vote seems about right if the average voter spends an hour or two deciding how to vote.

        With a phenomenal return on investment if $6 billion can control a few trillion in spending.

        And maybe that's what a universal basic income could do. Pay everyone to be much more involved with governance.

        1. Don't look at me!   9 months ago

          What could go wrong?

          1. JFree   9 months ago

            We’re already well into election choice limited to Douche v Turd. Or Dead Man v Only I Can Save You. Into elections/pols controlled by donors. Govt controlled by special interests.

            Maybe citizenship limited to election of others is the problem

  3. Fist of Etiquette   9 months ago

    At the Democratic National Convention last week, the party "treated influencers like celebrities, hoping that free stuff and copious access in Chicago would reap buzzy posts on Instagram, TikTok or YouTube...

    I dub this the reverse poor man's cocktail parties.

  4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

    "However, payments to individual influencers represent a grey area of completely unregulated campaign finance. No federal rules require disclosure when a TikTok star or Instagram personality is paid to promote an election-related message. Although efforts have been made to reform election transparency rules, little has changed. Last December, the FEC formally punted on the issue."

    How about disclaimers for all statements from people who sold their votes to Democrats in exchange for any material rewards from the government? For example, a face tattoo for anyone who had more than $100 in student loan debt forgiven.

    1. Stupid Government Tricks   9 months ago

      How about the government just butts out?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

        Get a load of the libertarian here.

    2. Mickey Rat   9 months ago

      As soon as Republicans figure out how to exploit this, then paying "influencers" under the rable will be corrupt, "dark" money, and the worst thing that has ever happened to "our democracy" and there will be calls for an immediate need to regulate the practice out of existence.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

        Selective regulation. Based on DEI.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   9 months ago

        Or Russian disinformation.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   9 months ago

    If you're operating in a landscape where the youth vote is being influenced (and you're attempting to put your own thumb on the scale), maybe we've transcended any hopes of political seriousness.

    Fortunately that's not the most reliable voting bloc.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

      Even more fortunately(?) seriousness is not required for Democracy!

  6. Fist of Etiquette   9 months ago

    On Wednesday, Israel conducted raids and airstrikes in Jenin and Tulkarm—both in the West Bank—in an attempt to stamp out terrorist groups.

    Let's all say it together: GENOCIDE.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

      GENOCIDE GENOCIDE GENOCIDE

      Where's Misek?

      1. Mother's Lament   9 months ago

        Somebody told him the truth which made him melt.

    2. Sometimes a Great Notion   9 months ago

      Genocide...but the Jews don't seem to understand how to do it well, they just freed an Israeli Muslim Bedouin from Hamas. It's like no one told them that they are supposed to be genociding.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

        To be fair, Israel IS trying to genocide militant Palestinian terrorists.

        1. markm23   9 months ago

          It's racist to imply that "militant Palestinian terrorists" are a race or ethnic group - but that's what those opposing the Israeli response to gang rapes, mass murders, kidnapping, and torture imply when they use the word "genocide".

      2. SIV   9 months ago

        Ben-Gvir and Smotrich have both long called for the forced expulsion of Arab-Israeli citizens like the recently released Bedouin hostage.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   9 months ago

      Worst. Genocide. Ever.

      Why are the jews unable to effectively eliminate 2 million Palestinians crowded into an open-air prison?

      It's like they're going out of their way to avoid killing them!

  7. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

    Jeffs favorite political site complains JD Vance is tying Harris to Biden. So weird.

    POLITICO
    @politico
    ‘Our corrupt leadership’: Vance tries to tether Harris to Biden during Michigan rally

    https://x.com/politico/status/1828558004301508855

    Great community note.

    1. Minadin   9 months ago

      Readers added context they thought people might want to know:
      The headline states “JD Vance tries to tether Harris to Biden.” Harris is currently President Biden’s Vice President.

      https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

        FAKE NEWS!

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   9 months ago

      Again, like I pointed out the other day, the propaganda from the press on this is incredible, as if Bush had absolutely nothing to do with what took place during Reagan's term, or Gore with Clinton's.

      "Vote for our candidate because she'll change course from the fuckups of her boss the previous 3.5 years!" Absolute slavish devotion to advancing the Democratic party.

      These journoscum are the enemy specifically because they're acting as the PR organs for the DNC and advancing the party's political agenda.

      1. Bertram Guilfoyle   9 months ago

        Sarcasmic assured me yesterday that dems were “pissed off” about Biden being secretly senile, thus proving they aren’t cultish.

        1. R Mac   9 months ago

          Just not pissed off at the people that lied to them about it.

          1. Bertram Guilfoyle   9 months ago

            And not particularly upset about Biden remaining in office.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   9 months ago

        Biden: So it’s not her {Harris] full responsibility and job, but she’s leading the effort because I think the best thing to do is to put someone who, when he or she speaks, they don’t have to wonder about is that where the President is. When she speaks, she speaks for me. Doesn’t have to check with me.

    3. Jefferson Paul   9 months ago

      When I clicked on it, the community note has disappeared, as of now.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   9 months ago

        "Harris is currently President Biden's Vice President".

  8. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

    CNN panelist asks of Trump actually won the debate v Biden.

    https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/nicholas-fondacaro/2024/08/27/largely-anti-trump-cnn-panel-insist-trump-did-not-win-biden

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

      How could Trump have won? He is not a Democrat.

  9. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

    If you don't find Kamalas ugly step daughter cute or pretty, you're probably MAGA.

    https://www.salon.com/2024/08/27/maga-on-kamala-harris-stepdaughter-threaten-to-backfire-on-donald/

    1. Jerry B.   9 months ago

      Sort'a nerdy-cute, maybe. Not crazy about the tats.

      1. The Mysterious Edwin Dunkel   9 months ago

        She looks like she just rose from her coffin.

      2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

        End of the night and no other options cute?

        1. damikesc   9 months ago

          I'd say not even "Well, better than my own hand" cute.

        2. markm23   9 months ago

          Is there such a thing as in the dark with a bag over her head cute? To me, she looks like AOC, except lacking whatever iota of self-respect kept AOC from covering herself with tattoos.

      3. Mickey Rat   9 months ago

        But enough to rationalize away the crazy?

        1. Medulla Oblongata   9 months ago

          Never stick it in crazy.

      4. damikesc   9 months ago

        Wouldn't fuck her with Dylan Mulvaney's dick.

    2. Anomalous   9 months ago

      Never stick it in crazy.

      1. Dillinger   9 months ago

        instant gratification will always have an argument here lol

      2. Zeb   9 months ago

        Where does one go to find these non-crazy women?

        1. Quo Usque Tandem   9 months ago

          Xanadu, Lost Horizon...some mythical place.

    3. damikesc   9 months ago

      I never thought of conflating MAGA and "not blind" --- but it kinda fits.

    4. Mother's Lament   9 months ago

      ==>By Amanda Marcotte
      ==> salon.com

      I think I found the problem.

      Probably why it's Sqrlsy's favorite news source.

    5. Moderation4ever   9 months ago

      Isn't the general rule of thumb to leave a politician's kids out of the fight. Acknowledge them and leave it at that.

      1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   9 months ago

        GFY

      2. R Mac   9 months ago

        Yes, Salon and other left-wing propaganda should stop focusing on her.

      3. damikesc   9 months ago

        As Sarah Palin pointed out, would have been nice if this rule was in effect in 2008. Well, at least for HER children.

        Obama's were, of course, off limits.

        Will never forget Andrew Sullivan, forensic gynecologist.

      4. DesigNate   9 months ago

        Yeah, Democrats gave that shit up like 4 or 5 presidents ago.

    6. Minadin   9 months ago

      Oh, we're allowed to tell people who they should be attracted to again?

    7. Jefferson Paul   9 months ago

      She looks like she has a unibrow, without having a unibrow. Something about her is rather off-putting.

      Also, according to the left, you shouldn't criticize her looks, but it's fine to call Trump's supporters "incels."

  10. Fist of Etiquette   9 months ago

    Before COVID-19, it was more like one in every five bus riders who refused to pay their way.

    It's like Reason is trying to convince me that COVID-19 wasn't just designed to win an election but also to bring devastating changes to social norms in an effort to take down western civilization.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   9 months ago

      I refuse to believe it, of course.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

        MAGA!

      2. Mother's Lament   9 months ago

        We've moved on to "It happened and it's a good thing".

    2. Moderation4ever   9 months ago

      I can't say what happened in NYC but I do know that some bus system suspended payment during the height of the Covid pandemic. It may be that people got used to not paying. Systems like NYC will likely have to go to heavier enforcement until people reestablish the habit of paying.

      1. Don't look at me!   9 months ago

        Like with guns?

      2. TrickyVic (old school)   9 months ago

        It was a big issue before the pandemic. But yes, got worse when people started adapting the I don't have to pay for anything (like rent) attitude.

        ""NYC will likely have to go to heavier enforcement"

        Well, that's become a joke. What are they going to do to you? Fine you money you won't pay? Fill up the jails with the non-compliant? Also heavier enforcement is something Rudy Guliani would do.

        The don't give a fuck crowd has the liberal government of NYC over the barrel and the liberals don't know how to respond.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   9 months ago

          Just another great example of how pathological altruism cripples complex societies that don't have populations who won't exploit high-trust constructs.

          1. Medulla Oblongata   9 months ago

            https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324688404578545523824389986

            Oakley defines pathological altruism as "altruism in which attempts to promote the welfare of others instead result in unanticipated harm." A crucial qualification is that while the altruistic actor fails to anticipate the harm, "an external observer would conclude [that it] was reasonably foreseeable." Thus, she explains, if you offer to help a friend move, then accidentally break an expensive item, your altruism probably isn't pathological; whereas if your brother is addicted to painkillers and you help him obtain them, it is.
            As the latter example suggests, the idea of "codependency" is a subset of pathological altruism. "Feelings of empathic caring . . . appear to lie at the core of . . . codependent behavior," Oakley notes. People in codependent relationships genuinely care for each other, but that empathy leads them to do destructive things.
            Ostensibly well-meaning governmental policy promoted home ownership, a beneficial goal that stabilizes families and communities. The government-sponsored enterprises Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae allowed less-than-qualified individuals to receive housing loans and encouraged more-qualified borrowers to overextend themselves. Typical risk–reward considerations were marginalized because of implicit government support. The government used these agencies to promote social goals without acknowledging the risk or cost. When economic conditions faltered, many lost their homes or found themselves with properties worth far less than they originally had paid. Government policy then shifted . . . the cost of this "altruism" to the public, to pay off the too-big-to-fail banks then holding securitized subprime loans. . . . Altruistic intentions played a critical role in the development and unfolding of the housing bubble in the United States.
            The same is true of the higher-education bubble. As we've argued, college degrees became increasingly necessary for entry-level professional jobs as the result of a well-intentioned Supreme Court decision that restricted employers from using IQ tests because of their "disparate impact" on minorities.

            1. Medulla Oblongata   9 months ago

              Our Government is a classic enabler and we are all codependent. An enabler is a person who by their actions make it easier for an addict to continue their self-destructive behavior by rescuing the addict. The codependent party exhibits behavior that controls, makes excuses for, pities, and takes other actions to perpetuate the obviously needy party's condition, because of their desire to be needed and fear of doing anything that would change the relationship.

      3. damikesc   9 months ago

        Given that they do not punish petty theft...they are not going to punish fare jumping.

  11. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

    On Status Coup News podcast, Colonel West basically says the Harris campaign committed a felony, offering him jobs and money to drop out.

    Chariton: What were, you know, the offers that they made and your response?

    West: Well, I mean a number of them reached out just saying I need to get on the bandwagon — this is a historic moment, especially a black moment … I told them, I said you all just talking to the wrong brother. You can offer resources or position or what have you — that’s that’s not what I’m all about. That’s not the game I play…

    Chariton: Can you specify, if you can, you mentioned offering positions, resources. Were you offered a position in the Harris administration? Any financial incentives to drop out?

    West: Oh, I mean there was definitely various kind of offers. I won’t go into concrete details of it — I really won’t, because I don’t I — I don’t even want to make that the focus of the interview —
    Chariton: Let’s let’s just say they did not offer you the janitor’s position they offered you something relatively high up.

    West: [Laughing] Well, I don’t think it was that high up …
    Chariton: Did they — just one more on this — did they offer you did they offer you a cabinet position, a lower position ,and offer to pay off any of your campaign debt?

    West: Well, they offered serious, substantive conversation about all of those that could lead toward some real [unintelligible].

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   9 months ago

      Stolen valor shouldn't be believed! West wasn't even a buck private let alone a Colonel.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

        Auto-correct is racist! (It probably is.)

    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   9 months ago

      Were you reading a kindle book about Colonels?

    3. Mickey Rat   9 months ago

      That they tried to appeal to West's sense of racial solidarity is one hell of an allegation. The Left is the home of racism.

    4. Red Rocks White Privilege   9 months ago

      Can you blame them? This sort of under-the-table beak-wetting has been going on with black “pastors” in community NGOs for decades. They get some cash in exchange for doing the work of ensuring the people in the neighborhood get the ballot boxes properly stuffed and locate “lost” boxes of votes in the janitor’s closet at the high school gym. Or in the case of BLM, the org leaders get a money pool to buy mansions with in exchange for helping foment a color revolution against a Republican president.

      Why wouldn't they think West was any different? The guy has been a faithful shill and gadfly for them for decades.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   9 months ago

    I feel like a Jew in Nazi Germany.

    You know who else felt like a Jew in Nazi Germany?

    1. Ajsloss   9 months ago

      Jennifer Aniston in Office Space?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Factio Democratica delenda est 5/30/24)   9 months ago

        “You know, the Nazis had pieces of flair that they made the Jews wear.”

      2. Bertram Guilfoyle   9 months ago

        Say hello to Lumberg for me.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic (Factio Democratica delenda est 5/30/24)   9 months ago

      Reginald Denny?

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

      Jewish students at Columbia?

    4. Anomalous   9 months ago

      Sgt. Donny Donowitz?

    5. Dillinger   9 months ago

      Vic Morrow?

    6. R Mac   9 months ago

      White girls in Rotterham?

    7. Vernon Depner   9 months ago

      Buddy Holly at the Apollo?

  13. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

    They are better than you. 150k loan, no cash down. But only if you're an immigrant.

    Greg Price
    @greg_price11
    BREAKING: The California State Senate just voted overwhelmingly to pass AB 1840, which allows illegal aliens to apply for taxpayer funded down payments on homes up to $150,000.

    An unbelievable betrayal of the citizens of their state.

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   9 months ago

      Jesse fact check time!

      This is the bill that the tweet is referring to.

      https://californiaglobe.com/fr/senate-passes-bill-to-give-home-loan-down-payments-to-illegal-immigrants/

      Assembly Bill 1840, authored by Assemblyman Joaquin Arambula (D-Fresno), would expand eligibility of the California Dream for All program, to be renamed under the bill to the Home Purchase Assistance Program, and remove any disqualifications based on an applicants immigration status. If approved, illegal immigrants can enter the lottery system under the program that gives 20% in down payment assistance up to $150,000. This year, out of 18,000 people who applied to the California Dream for All program, only 1,700 were chosen. The bill would greatly expand the number of applicants, due to the California Dream program targeting low to middle income first time buyers.

      In addition, not all illegal immigrants would qualify for the program. Under AB 1840, only those with taxpayer ID numbers or Social Security numbers could apply. According to the language of the bill “This bill would specify that an applicant who meets all other requirements for a loan under the program and who is otherwise eligible under applicable federal and state law, shall not be disqualified solely based on the applicant’s immigration status.”

      So, this bill would expand an already existing program to make illegal immigrants eligible. So it is not true that the loans would ONLY be for illegal immigrants. They would now be available to everyone in the state who otherwise qualified.

      Furthermore, the loans are for 20% in down payment assistance up to $150,000. The loans are not for $150k, that is the MAX possible.

      So, this program is a bad idea, but not because illegal immigrants are eligible; it is a bad idea because the government shouldn't be in the business of granting loans for down payment assistance at all, whether it is for citizens or immigrants (legal or otherwise).

      But Jesse and his pals are instead pushing a grievance narrative, where they want you to be angry and upset about this program because those filthy illegals are getting a benefit that they don't deserve, that rightly belongs to us instead. That the government is *prioritizing* illegal immigrants over citizens. That is flatly untrue and it is a disgusting narrative.

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

        So the bill extends an already terrible system to those not illegally here with state subsidized loans and you think this is a good thing? Glad to see they revised committee language at the last moment.

        But please explain why illegals should be offered these taxpayer loans Jeff.

        1. Ersatz   9 months ago

          You are absolutely right in that it should not be offered to illegals. chemJ is wrong that that is not the worst part (given that 80% of what the govt does they dont have constitutional sanction for)..but
          - and I am on your side here - I think you should cop a plea for the error. It is an important thing to correct and doesnt make you wrong on the idiocy of California expanding this idiotic program.

          You have to separate clean from unclean - make sure you dont react to being called out by distraction, ad hominem, obfuscation and avoiding the penalty like those of his ilk.

      2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

        Also left out of your selective clipping.

        Meanwhile, Republicans and moderate Democrats have said that the bill would increase costs, that there is no money left to fund such an expansion, and that the money would still be going to people who entered the country illegally and broke the law, even if they have a taxpayer ID number, potentially invalidating the law in court should it be signed. In addition, as the Globe noted on Monday, the bill’s sponsor, the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, receives tens of millions a year in government grants, and barely make contributions to immigrants, simply wanting taxpayers to foot the bill instead.

        1. Mother's Lament   9 months ago

          Haha, Lying Jeffy never fails.

      3. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   9 months ago

        When Jesse isn’t lying he is just ignoring the truth.

        1. Bertram Guilfoyle   9 months ago

          With your screen name, you commit a lie in every post. Why not just go back to original SPB, with no additional text?

        2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   9 months ago

          turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
          If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
          turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

        3. sarcasmic   9 months ago

          Or sleeping.

          1. Mother's Lament   9 months ago

            Jeff just demonstrably lied by pretending his quote says something different than what Jesse said, despite selectively editing it.
            You are literally the only person here that would fall for it. Buttplug didn’t, because he didn't read it in the first place and lying is what he does, so it was just you.

            Jesse: “which allows illegal aliens to apply for taxpayer funded down payments on homes up to $150,000.”

            Lying Jeffy: “that gives 20% in down payment assistance up to $150,000.”

            Your not Lying Jeffy’s pal, Sarckles. You’re his target.

      4. Social Justice is neither   9 months ago

        You dishonest cunt, nowhere in that tweet does it claim it is ONLY for illegals as you claim. This is a horrible program but expanding it to stealing from taxpayers to give to non-taxpayers makes it worse.

      5. Ron   9 months ago

        the program has been available to citizens but you have to be a first generation home owner. so if your parents own their own home you can't qualify. I don't know the purpose of this rule my parents owned their own home but they had no extra to help me buy a home so what gives its a BS rule and under funded and why would illegals be offered anything other than a 3rd class bus ticket to where they came from

      6. R Mac   9 months ago

        So Jesse’s post was accurate.

        Fact check: True

        Poor Lying Jeffy

        1. Zeb   9 months ago

          Except for the "but only if you are an immigrant" part.

    2. chemjeff radical individualist   9 months ago

      Furthermore:

      An unbelievable betrayal of the citizens of their state.

      Set aside for the moment whether this particular program should exist at all. Why would it be a "betrayal" to make illegal immigrants eligible for the same program that citizens already have access to?

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

        This could be the dumbest question ever written. Especially given your past lies that you don't support welfare for illegal immigrants.

        How many years would it take an illegal immigrant to contribute enough to even match the subsidies on a 150k loan?

        I get it. You think the US taxpayers are a global piggy bank.

        Ironically you don't argue why those whose first act is violating American laws should be granted a benefit. Your initial assumption is we should reward them and if you disagree prove they shouldn't be. Weird.

        1. Super Scary   9 months ago

          "How many years would it take an illegal immigrant to contribute enough to even match the subsidies on a 150k loan?"

          I would imagine that depends on how much they charge at their truck.

          1. HorseConch   9 months ago

            What's the tax rate on sopapillas?

        2. Ron   9 months ago

          the 150K is just the max 20% down payment the loan itself is another bondogle supported by the state with extremely low to no interest loan on top of the down payment. the down payment only has to be payed back if the house is sold so if you live in it forever it is never payed back and you pay almost no interest on the house over 30 years.

          1. R Mac   9 months ago

            New CA bill in 2030: All down payments owed from this program will be forgiven.

            Lying Jeffy: That doesn’t just help immigrants!

      2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

        Yes.

      3. damikesc   9 months ago

        "Set aside for the moment whether this particular program should exist at all. Why would it be a “betrayal” to make illegal immigrants eligible for the same program that citizens already have access to?"

        Them not being citizens is enough.

        1. Mickey Rat   9 months ago

          It is a question that should answer itself.

          1. R Mac   9 months ago

            Not if you’re a collectivist globalist like Lying Jeffy

      4. Bertram Guilfoyle   9 months ago

        Jeff is clearly right - let's extend this program to Hamas operatives as well.

      5. Nobartium   9 months ago

        That's easy, governments (in the US) derive their legitimatecy from consent of the citizenry.

        That is who they serve.

      6. Spiritus Mundi   9 months ago

        Totally not a democrat.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   9 months ago

      "But only if you’re an immigrant."

      Should probably have been "Even if you’re an illegal immigrant."

      Other than that, the meat of the issue is that illegal aliens are now going to be eligible for taxpayer-funded assistance for downpayments.

      1. damikesc   9 months ago

        Part of me, however, loves this shit.

        Want to keep virtue signal voting? Then do not cry when you are getting fucked by the government.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   9 months ago

    In the past two weeks, security forces have been systematically stopping citizens to inspect their phones, including photos, social media profiles, and WhatsApp conversations.

    All of Venezuela's minuscule resources must be going toward paying their SS.

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   9 months ago

      Did the report say they returned the phones? Civil assest forfeiture goes a long way paying those salaries.

    2. damikesc   9 months ago

      Venezuela is such a bunch of amateurs.

      The state needs to force the social media companies to do what they want. They will go along. They always do.

      Well, not X. But all others.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   9 months ago

        Western politicians are absolutely seething with jealousy right now.

        Like Coach Tim says, that spreading misinformation is not free speech. Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences!

  15. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

    In Michigan, dem SoS refuses to remove RFK from ballot despite request. In Wisconsin, dem SoS fought to kick RFK off ballot. So weird picking and choosing where he appears. Protecting democracy and all.

    https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1828491593340637373

    1. The Mysterious Edwin Dunkel   9 months ago

      If you haven't listened to RFK's interview with Tucker, I encourage you to do so. I don't think I'd ever vote for the guy, but he made a lot of worthwhile points.

      1. Dillinger   9 months ago

        fuck five minutes in he sells out Zuck which is the only reason we heard from Zuck yesterday

    2. Mickey Rat   9 months ago

      Not sure about Michigan, but in some states voting for the fall elections starts in less than three weeks.

      1. Mother's Lament   9 months ago

        Are you ready for the freest and fairest election in American History?

        1. Spiritus Mundi   9 months ago

          They will be as secure as the border.

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   9 months ago

      In Georgia, the Democrats convinced a judge to kick the independent left-wing candidates off the ballot specifically because having them on the ballot would hurt Kacklin' Kammy.

      1. Don't look at me!   9 months ago

        She never got any votes before, why would she need them now?

  16. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

    Outspoken
    @GetOutspokenUSA
    Human rights campaign @HRC president says quiet part out loud:

    “We can’t just worry about protecting democracy… we have to reimagine it”

    “More revolutionary than what our founders put down on that little piece of paper”

    Little piece of paper??

    You mean the Constitution?
    Video

    https://x.com/GetOutspokenUSA/status/1828085059502669979

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

      Fucking communists! Oh, sorry, fucking progressive revolutionary social justice anti-liberty one-world authoritarians who are totally not communists.

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

        Would a communist say they are for Human Rights? Boom. Refuted.

        1. Mother's Lament   9 months ago

          "You see, there's bad guys and good guys. We call ourselves the good guys and we call them the bad guys. So everything we do is right and justified because we are the good guys, and everything they do is evil and wrong because they are the bad guys.
          It's so simple.
          I don't get how anyone can call us evil, because we are the good guys. They're probably stupid or the bad guys."

    2. Mickey Rat   9 months ago

      "We have to reimagine democracy into credentialed oligarchy and tyranny.:

  17. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

    'In a sense, this lays bare what we already knew to be true: Social media influencers are down to be purchased, whether it's sponsored content for products or sponsored content for ideas.'

    Um, "social influencers" who wish to earn a living of course sell their output. Back in the dim 20th century we called this advertising and endorsements, and only idiots thought that sports and pop stars really liked the shit they hawked on TV. Influencers that feel they are doing a service to mankind, and in turn deserve to have others support them are either children or commune-types.

    'And many voters are also not especially ideological or even thinking about these issues very deeply.'

    Speaking of idiots...

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

      Hollywood has been selling out to democrats for decades.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

        Selling out or selling for?

  18. Fist of Etiquette   9 months ago

    Today's young online political spaces are vastly different from the shitposting antics of a few years earlier...

    Someone seems to be blocking all of Liberty Twitter.

    1. R Mac   9 months ago

      LPNH has entered the chat.

  19. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

    'There were parties with tiki drinks'

    And torches?

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   9 months ago

      Yes, sorry about that, our intern got the conventions confused and sent this to the wrong one. Luckily the khaki brigade were notified before it became really awkward. Our bad.

      - Soros Foundation

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

        LOL

  20. Fist of Etiquette   9 months ago

    Books are not being banned; I reject the framing completely.

    But they're still literally being burned, right?

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

      My book burning protects you, your book burning protects me.

      1. Don't look at me!   9 months ago

        Nobody needs 23 kinds of books.

  21. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

    "'I feel like a Jew in Nazi Germany. The regime's security forces are going door by door, arresting human rights activists,' a 21-year-old activist from Barquisimeto in northwest Venezuela, who asked to remain anonymous," tells Jorge Jraissati for Reason.

    We would never see that here...

    Next thing you know Maduro will ban those people from using the internet like the judges in D.C. did for J6 prisoners.

  22. Fist of Etiquette   9 months ago

    U.S. consumer confidence rises to a six-month high.

    Thank you President Harris!

    1. Anomalous   9 months ago

      When consumer confidence is low, people refrain from shopping because they're afraid of fucking it up.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

      What about voter confidence?

    3. Don't look at me!   9 months ago

      U.S. consumer confidence rises to a six-month high.

      They know Trump is going to win.

  23. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

    'Perhaps this also lends some credence to Harris' strategy of running a policy-lite, vibes-heavy campaign; it's about the joy and the TikTok egg-cracking videos and how Daddy Walz can fix your car for you, not about the economic despair that would come from instituting price controls.'

    DEMOCRACY!!!

    Anyone else remember why the founders preferred a republic with limited democratic participation?

    1. VinniUSMC (Banana Republic Day 5/30/24)   9 months ago

      Pepperidge Farm remembers.

  24. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

    "On the right, there is noticeable shift away from the free market evangelism that characterized conservative politics for the millennial generation.

    People grew up. Learned a bit more. Watched globalist outfits try to control all trade. Saw trade disruptions during covid. And realized the "Free Market" advertised was really just globalized control of trade.

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

      They no longer seek to fix market failures by further deregulating the economy.

      Who actually tried this? Because it wasn’t the GOPe. It was Trump, some of his judges, and the aligned Freedom Caucus.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   9 months ago

        Where is the tangible, real-world evidence of all this deregulation?

        If Trump was such a deregulator, shouldn't we see some real evidence of this in our lives?

        When Carter deregulated the airlines, we all saw the result with lower fares and better service.

        When Clinton and the Republican Congress deregulated banking, we all saw the result with banks expanding their portfolio of services (some in a good way, some bad, but that is how deregulation works).

        Likewise when they deregulated telecommunications, we saw a great change in communications technology on all levels (phone, cable TV, etc.)

        So, where is the evidence for all of this deregulation that Trump undertook?

        Frankly I think most of the claims for his 'deregulation' are hot air. He liked to talk a lot about it, he signed an EO about it, but not much got done.

        1. sarcasmic   9 months ago

          Problem with deregulation done through executive orders instead of legislation is that it can be undone through executive orders.

          1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

            So your ignoring how the entire regulatory structure works with congressional delegation? Man you and Jeff will find any dumb argument to not give credit.

            1. sarcasmic   9 months ago

              I'm ignoring comments where every sentence contains "you" because they're all arguments against the person.

              1. Bertram Guilfoyle   9 months ago

                Why not just mute all posters except Jeff and plug? A libertarian paradise, that.

              2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

                Including your own?

              3. InsaneTrollLogic (Factio Democratica delenda est 5/30/24)   9 months ago

                Right. And none of them are calling out the blatant hypocrisy propagated by none other than, (wait for it)….

                YOU.

                1. sarcasmic   9 months ago

                  Nothing he said refuted what I said. By the way, someone can be a hypocrite and still be right. If a smoker say that smoking is unhealthy, is what they said wrong because they’re a smoker? Because that seems to be the core of all y'alls “arguments”.

                  1. Bertram Guilfoyle   9 months ago

                    "By the way, someone can be a hypocrite and still be right."

                    True enough, but should that hypocrite complain that nobody likes him?

              4. Mother's Lament   9 months ago

                Mute 'im, Sarckles!

          2. Mickey Rat   9 months ago

            Which assumes that the executive respects the limits of authority granted by the statute Congress has passed or that the courts hold them to it. Which is why the Dems have been up in arms about SCOTUS no longer regarding Chevron Deference as binding precedent.

        2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

          So, don't vote for Trump because he talks deregulation but can't get it done; instead vote for some empty figurehead from the party of regulation?

          1. sarcasmic   9 months ago

            I think jeff's made it pretty clear that he’s voting L, not D. And if I was to vote, I’d vote L as well.

            1. Bertram Guilfoyle   9 months ago

              Months ago, you told us if Kami was nominated, you would register and vote for trump, because you “hate cops” so much.

              Why the change of heart?

              1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

                Joy?

              2. Don't look at me!   9 months ago

                Lies?

        3. Mother's Lament   9 months ago

          "If Trump was such a deregulator, shouldn’t we see some real evidence of this in our lives?
          So, where is the evidence for all of this deregulation that Trump undertook?"

          https://www.cato.org/regulation/summer-2020/deregulation-under-trump#findings

          Why don't you just move into Sarc's house where you can spend the day blissfully lying straight into his ear.
          He's the only one who ever believes you anyway, Jeffy... Or at least he pretends to.

    2. Moonrocks   9 months ago

      That entire statement can be summarized as "the young right is far more leftist than its older counterpart".

      1. Rick James   9 months ago

        The populist right has never been barking free market neo-liberals. The whole paragraph reads like a jr. high kid that just discovered something smart people have known for a century.

        1. mad.casual   9 months ago

          The whole paragraph and article reminded me of the “First Person Shooter” episode of the X-Files where, at the time, people spouting corporate-culture techno-jargon was distracting enough to cover an abjectly shitty plot. But even 5 yrs. later, all the shitty babble will be obvious and it will obviously be “I paid attention to a bunch of younger influencers who were left/progressive like me and discovered that as some of them aged, they got more conservative, but not as conservative as my parents.”

    3. mad.casual   9 months ago

      IMO, the whole paragraph (and the larger article) is, at best, a word salad of content used to conceal a WTF?/IDK from someone who isn't really themselves a Conservative of any real notoriety and doesn't really grasp it, or care to, either. Like getting your up-to-the minute TikTok influencer women's issues talking points from Clint Eastwood.

      The author states up front that:

      Members of this group generally begin on the progressive left but overtime become anarcho-primitivists

      So we aren't exactly looking at, "I'm going to put my phone down, set up a lemonade stand, and actually learn what my parents and grandparents mean by 'supply and demand'." 'Conservatives' as much as we're talking about the low-information, low-attention span paid shills that Liz herself references 7 paragraphs earlier.

      1. Rick James   9 months ago

        I haven't read his whole piece, and I might if I find time, but I thought the clipped paragraph was somewhat telling.

        Here's what's going on:

        On the right, [words words words words words words words... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...]

        (On the left [...])

        Again, I admit I may be pre-judging and making assumptions here, but that's a pretty typical response from someone who's scrutinizing the shit out of the right but doesn't spend a whole lot of time thinking about the left because there's 'nothing to see here'.

        This has been typical of say, coverage about internal party machinations that we've received from our establishment press over my entire lifetime. Entire articles about internal strife within the Republican party, with everything on the left humming along, a finely-tuned, well-oiled machine. I mean, sure it's got its problems, but *lol snort* nothing like what's going on over there in GOP land!

        1. mad.casual   9 months ago

          This long form project began in 2018 when I wrote an essay called Politigram & the Post-left
          …
          I soon learned that theses users are enmeshed in a much larger and highly active community called Politigram.

          Wait, so the conception of “Conservative” that you pulled from (Progressive) Instagram (and Tumblr!) tween meme generators is fragmented… and… ?

      2. Dillinger   9 months ago

        >>IMO, the whole paragraph (and the larger article) is, at best, a word salad

        yes. this this this.

  25. Fist of Etiquette   9 months ago

    Tim Ballard, a MAGA-world hero who claimed to be fighting sex trafficking, actually stands accused of abusing many of the women with whom he worked.

    You had Anna Merlan at MAGA.

  26. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

    'Did you know that 48 percent of bus riders fail to pay their fare?'

    Meh. As long as they are poor POC oppressed trans-women then we achieved bus fare equity.

    BTW, what percent of NYC people are now poor POC oppressed trans-women?

    1. VinniUSMC (Banana Republic Day 5/30/24)   9 months ago

      Is it 48%?

  27. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

    "'I feel like a Jew in Nazi Germany. The regime's security forces are going door by door, arresting human rights activists,' a 21-year-old activist from Barquisimeto in northwest Venezuela, who asked to remain anonymous," tells Jorge Jraissati for Reason. "In the past two weeks, security forces have been systematically stopping citizens to inspect their phones, including photos, social media profiles, and WhatsApp conversations. Detainees are often held based on content uncovered during these searches, such as images or conversations related to protests or anti-government expressions."

    The Obamas approve.

  28. Michael Ejercito   9 months ago

    How is this consistent with how Alvin Bragg interpreted federal campaign finance law?

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

      The judge never made Bragg prove there eas a campaign finance violation. And the jury had multiple crimes to choose from unproven. It is why an actual former FEC chairman wasn't allowed to talk about the law. Sure Bragg brought it up on close against judges instructions. But he never had to prove it.

      1. Michael Ejercito   9 months ago

        At the time of the trial, Chevron was controlling- you know, the ruling that courts had to defer to federal agencies when it came to the laws that they enforced.

  29. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

    'U.S. consumer confidence rises to a six-month high.'

    Confidence or joy?

  30. Quo Usque Tandem   9 months ago

    "...maybe we've transcended any hopes of political seriousness."

    Joy, hope, laughter, and vibe. Stupid is as stupid believes.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

      Don't forget DEI rapture.

      1. I, Woodchipper   9 months ago

        dont forget "brat"

        lololo lmao even. this election more than any other has proven to me we need to drastically limit the franchise.

  31. KARtikeya   9 months ago

    “Tim Ballard, a MAGA-world hero who claimed to be fighting sex trafficking, actually stands accused of abusing many of the women with whom he worked.”

    I could tell right away he was full of shit. Many of the commenters on here bought the “sound of freedom” lie.

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   9 months ago

      OTOH, we have to read a word or two of any of your comments to realize:
      You.
      Are.
      Full.
      Of.
      Shit.
      FOAD, assshole.

      1. ducksalad   9 months ago

        Fess up. How much of your money did you send to Tim Ballard?

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   9 months ago

          Fess up. How did you end up such a fucking imbecile.

      2. KARtikeya   9 months ago

        God bless you Sevo! I hope you have a wonderful and productive day!

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   9 months ago

          FOAD asshole.

    2. I, Woodchipper   9 months ago

      ^fed

      1. KARtikeya   9 months ago

        I hope the feds are monitoring Nardz, Red Rocks, and fire up the woodchipper.

        1. Truthfulness   9 months ago

          Call the cops if you're so inclined, and see if you can make a compelling case against them. But know this, accuser: the accused stand innocent until proven guilty. Get going.

          1. KARtikeya   9 months ago

            Truthfulness: Are you a Latter-day Saint?

  32. ducksalad   9 months ago

    Coincidentally, I apparently got my first call from a paid individual influencer yesterday. It came up “Scam Likely” from Washington DC but I answered, hoping as always for a chance to answer “Chase Oliver” on a poll.

    It sounded like a young woman. No announcement of who she was or who she was representing, just asked if I had time to talk about politics. Told her I was at work so it would have to be quick.

    She started trying to read a script but was completely incoherent. Either semi-literate, severe social anxiety, or maybe both. The gist of it seemed to be that Harris was trying to save America while Trump was planning to ruin all our social programs, but most of it was too garbled to tell. At some point she ran out of steam and asked if I would agree to spread the message to my friends, and to get her off the line without being too rude I agreed to do my best.

    It appears that they’ll hire anybody, or maybe it’s a deliberate strategy of sounding “authentic”. Anyway, by posting this I fulfilled my promise to the young lady.

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   9 months ago

      That’s not an influencer. That is a campaign employee.

      Influencers post on social media. They don’t make random calls to people.

      1. ducksalad   9 months ago

        You could be right, sorry if I'm not up on the terminology. But if she was a campaign employee, she was in violation of the law. She didn’t say who was paying for the call and didn’t say who she worked for.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   9 months ago

          These are the same people who broke campaign finance rules by turning off the country of origin identification for donations during Obama's run. A bunch of neurotic Zoomers not identifying themselves on cold calls isn’t even going to push the needle.

          1. ducksalad   9 months ago

            Not saying that's unlikely.

    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   9 months ago

      This sounds very similar to sarcasmic's made up anecdotes.

      1. ducksalad   9 months ago

        Hadn’t seen any sarc anecdote about a campaign call. But then I don’t follow him around obsessively, like some people.

        Seriously, if people with opinions like sarcasmic are your biggest enemy then America is already doing great and has no need to be made great “Again”.

        1. sarcasmic   9 months ago

          He's just being a douchebag and calling you a liar in an effort to bait you into defend yourself.

          1. Bertram Guilfoyle   9 months ago

            ^This post contains the words "you" and "he" so it can be ignored, per the dipshit style guide.

            1. Don't look at me!   9 months ago

              !! Sarc never talks about people, just ideas.

          2. Medulla Oblongata   9 months ago

            Comment ignored per sarcs's rules, contains "you".

        2. Bertram Guilfoyle   9 months ago

          Your story is, the call was marked "SCAM" but you answered and had a lengthy conversation and were very polite, and agreed to do your best to help spread the word.

          Don't rational people just not answer, or hang up? This is why your story smells like bullshit to me.

          1. ducksalad   9 months ago

            So you’ve stipulated that I’m rational, answering would be irrational, and therefore you deduce that it’s a lie.

            If you wish to consider this a victory, Mr. Holmes, please go ahead. But the real logical solution to this mystery is thus:

            I respond to you, which is way more irrational than responding to a Scam Likely call, therefore I sometimes do irrational stuff.

            1. sarcasmic   9 months ago

              When you roll in the mud with pigs, you get dirty and the pig enjoys it.

              1. Bertram Guilfoyle   9 months ago

                Posts where every sentence contains "you" can be ignored.

  33. Red Rocks White Privilege   9 months ago

    Funny how so many “hate crimes” are perpetrated by the supposed victims themselves for media clout:

    A former Biden administration appointee and aspiring Texas lawmaker has been accused of running four fake social media accounts that were harassing him and his campaign.
    Taral Patel, 30, was arrested in June and charged with online impersonation and a Class A misdemeanor after he allegedly staged racist attacks against himself in an attempt to gain sympathy.
    The Democratic candidate for Fort Bend County commissioner is now accused of running several fake accounts – including one where he impersonated a real district judge, as reported by ABC 13.

    When a Democrat claims a hate crime took place, always assume first that they’re the ones who committed it.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

      Four fake accounts?

      Just wait for the next round of election reform when every social media account gets a vote.

    2. Ajsloss   9 months ago

      Yep. Anytime a gay waitress receives a homophobic slur on the bill in lieu of a tip, you know it's been done for the gofundme that will inevitably pop up.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   9 months ago

        My favorite in this demographic was the Aimee Whitchurch case in Denver a few years ago when she spray-painted "Kill the Gay" on her garage.

        Another one happened at the Air Force Academy when a black cadet posted a racial slur on his own dorm whiteboard, which prompted this viral speech from the dumbass commandant that was stunning and brave. Funny how no follow-up speech about fomenting racial discord took place after they caught the cadet and kicked him out.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

          You want the Air Force to celebrate ordinary and cowardly?

        2. Dillinger   9 months ago

          iirc the Mizzou poop-swastika was self-applied as well.

          1. Vernon Depner   9 months ago

            Poop Swastika would be a great band name.

    3. Social Justice is neither   9 months ago

      He was just starting a very important conversation about how there is so much bigotry in the US he had to do it himself to find some. Stunning and brave.

    4. Moonrocks   9 months ago

      The demand for racists far outstrips the supply.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   9 months ago

        Not like they aren't doing their best to create them organically in reaction to their ongoing spastic ethnonarcissism. That's how the marxist dialectic works: Assert that there's oppression, act in a provocative manner to get the reaction you want, then claim that the reaction to your obnoxious behavior is proof of the assertion, as opposed to the fact that you're just a loud-mouthed asshole.

        Case in point:

        A pair of Utah high schoolers have sparked fury after wearing what appeared to be 'blackface' to a 'blackout-themed' football event.
        Edward Wright, whose daughter attends Pine View High School in St George, said the two boys were even celebrated for their 'spirit' at the game.
        The angry father blasted the school for the 'racist' display - along with the teacher he said posted the image on social media.
        'This s*** is ridiculous,' Wright wrote online. 'And the picture was posted by a teacher who teaches at the school - great message.
        'Pine View High School you must do better. If my daughter is old enough to experience racism, your child is old enough to learn about it.'
        However, other parents defended the boys, saying they were painted black like a panther, their team mascot, in line with the 'blackout' theme of the game.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

          Black panthers? Sounds like felony appropriation.

        2. I, Woodchipper   9 months ago

          fake and gay

          1. Vernon Depner   9 months ago

            Isn't that a country music act?

    5. I, Woodchipper   9 months ago

      same with me-too claims.

  34. Moonrocks   9 months ago

    I feel like a Jew in Nazi Germany. The regime's security forces are going door by door, arresting human rights activists

    That framing will not make your cause any more sympathetic to Democrats.

  35. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   9 months ago

    Hint.
    Anyone that says they like kamala is getting bribed/blackmailed to say it

  36. damikesc   9 months ago

    Can anybody explain the baffling desire of Democrats to label EVERY SINGLE MAN associated with a Presidential ticket as a fucking sex symbol?

    They did it to Clinton. Obama. Edwards. Now fucking Emhoff?

    I know the party is losing men pretty bad, but are they THIS damned desperate?

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   9 months ago

      A party that marinates in sexual hedonism is naturally going to act like a bunch of coomers about their politicians.

      1. damikesc   9 months ago

        And they have the audacity to call Trump supporters "cultists".

        Trump, bare minimum, is telling the voters what his plans are.

        Kamala is not because she does not know them because, if elected, she will not be the one governing.

    2. Moonrocks   9 months ago

      You may as well as why North Korean media does so for every single North Korean dictator.

    3. ducksalad   9 months ago

      Simple. Democrat base is female, Republican base is male.

      Sarah Palin, Kristi Noem, Kari Lake, all the way back to Kathleen Harris. R’s tried to spin all of them as hot when what they really had in common was Boebert Syndrome.

      1. I, Woodchipper   9 months ago

        women vote for the candidate they would rather sleep with.

        Every time.

      2. MK Ultra   9 months ago

        Couple of the current Republican broads do look pretty good in swimwear.

  37. Rick James   9 months ago

    Scenes from New York: Did you know that 48 percent of bus riders fail to pay their fare? That's roughly one million bus riders per weekday. "The skipped fares are a crucial and growing loss of revenue for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which is under severe financial pressure," reports The New York Times. It's worth noting that this form of antisocial behavior, like many others, has spiked post-pandemic. Before COVID-19, it was more like one in every five bus riders who refused to pay their way.

    WTF is the NYT going on about? Do the idiots over there really think any kind of fare enforcement will take place?
    NYT: We need to stop antisocial behavior and do real fare enforcement!

    Zen master me: We'll see.

    It's like they don't remember the cultural beat they've been on over the last 10 years. After scrubbing many crucial details of the 1619 project, they going to now claim they never even published it?

    1. mad.casual   9 months ago

      It’s like they don’t remember the cultural beat they’ve been on over the last 10 years. After scrubbing many crucial details of the 1619 project, they going to now claim they never even published it?

      Did you not understand how Minitrue operates in 1984 or did you just not read the book?

      1. Rick James   9 months ago

        I merely refuse to believe that a dystopian fiction book is that close to real life. I still have hope.

  38. Rick James   9 months ago

    Hamas-sympathizer spring, in one chart:

    Yes, the richest, whitest kids are the ones protesting the hardest. Film at 11.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   9 months ago

      Daddy issues?

      1. Dillinger   9 months ago

        I thought we weren't talking about the emhoff kid

  39. Rick James   9 months ago

    "Today's young online political spaces are vastly different from the shitposting antics of a few years earlier," writes Joshua Citarella for default.blog. "On the right, there is noticeable shift away from the free market evangelism that characterized conservative politics for the millennial generation. No one under the age of 25 is a 'lolbertarian.' They make jokes about Ayn Rand and call Paul Ryan a cuck. Everyone believes in climate change. Young conservatives have aligned themselves with an older set of values that emphasize tradition and hierarchy. They no longer seek to fix market failures by further deregulating the economy. Instead, a heterodox economic populism has emerged among the young right. Many of them are economic protectionists and some are isolationists." ("On the Left, there remains a big eco-anarchist hangover that is bolstered by a techno-pessimism towards all climate technologies.")

    Hoo boy, a lot to unpack here...

    1. Dillinger   9 months ago

      am I supposed to be impressed by Joshua Citarella? literally asking never heard of him

      1. Ajsloss   9 months ago

        He's the heir to the Citronella fortune.

        1. Dillinger   9 months ago

          there's a joke in there comparing greasy smelly things but I won't make it.

      2. mad.casual   9 months ago

        The share has done the opposite.

        As I linked above, I'm not really a fan of Richard Dreyfuss but he did a great job depicting Citarella's descent into irrelevant absurdity in Close Encounters Of The Third Kind almost 50 yrs. earlier.

        1. Dillinger   9 months ago

          "you people have held me back long enough. I'm going to Clown College!"

          1. Ajsloss   9 months ago

            Since you've set it on the tee...

            I'd thank you not to refer to Princeton that way.

            1. Dillinger   9 months ago

              ... the Cappadocians

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   9 months ago

      On the right, there is noticeable shift away from the free market evangelism that characterized conservative politics for the millennial generation…Young conservatives have aligned themselves with an older set of values that emphasize tradition and hierarchy. They no longer seek to fix market failures by further deregulating the economy. Instead, a heterodox economic populism has emerged among the young right.

      Why would younger conservatives continue to cleave to gauzy Reagan-era missives about “small government” when the last 30-odd years have shown that focusing the entire conservative movement away from the culture war did not actually result in smaller government, while allowing the left to take over the nation’s institutions to the point that their political ideology is being implemented at the corporate boardroom level? Just look at how the current western establishment continues attacking anyone who promotes free speech, by poisoning the well with the assertion that free speech is “misinformation” that needs to be suppressed, just as Herbert Marcuse argued should be done about ANY speech that was right-wing.

      When the NYT hired Sarah Jeong, it was done because she had literally written the book on how to justify online censorship of anything which was not explicitly leftist.

      This is a simple acknowledgement of the reality that the bureaucracy isn’t going anywhere, and political self-preservation involves employing that structure to your own preferred policies, not waste energy in an ongoing fruitless effort to eliminate it.

      1. Dillinger   9 months ago

        >>Why would younger conservatives continue to cleave to gauzy Reagan-era missives

        >>Young conservatives have aligned themselves with an older set of values that emphasize tradition and hierarchy.

        what working conservative tradition and hierarchy preceded Reagan?

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   9 months ago

          Probably the one that leftists were railing against and wanting to subvert and destroy in the 1960s.

          They weren’t coy about it–read the shit released by Weatherman during that time. Read Marcuse’s output, who was massively influential on the New Left during this time, which is almost entirely devoted to railing about the current “bourgeois capitalist” system in the US. They’re very explicit about what they’re trying to tear down.

          Keep in mind that Reagan was a cultural conservative as much as an economic one. Leftists since the 60s do NOT celebrate the US, unless their side happens to be in charge, and even then they’re constantly complaining that it’s not the communist utopia of their dreams. Reagan was an unapologetic nationalist, which is one of the main reasons the mainstream media, academia, and the entertainment industry despised him. That mostly got thrown by the wayside starting in the 1990s after the neocons freaked out about MTV and Arsenio Hall working to get Clinton elected.

          1. Dillinger   9 months ago

            lol they didn’t like their parents either. lucky for them no “conservatives” got anywhere near power from Hoover –> Reagan

            1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   9 months ago

              That would be Coolidge to Reagan

              1. Dillinger   9 months ago

                yes! and here's how stupid I can be in the morning I had Truman there and was like "that doesn't look right"

        2. Rick James   9 months ago

          Young conservatives have aligned themselves with an older set of values that emphasize tradition and hierarchy.

          Young conservatives are conservative.

          edit: A telling word here is 'hierarchy'. The left continuously rails against 'hierarchy'. And yet those of us with a working brain cell can't figure out why. Does the left actually believe it exist without hierarchies? It's so fucking stupid it makes me want to link Jordan Peterson videos.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   9 months ago

            It's just a reframing of their fake oppressed/oppressor duality.

            Obviously even the left doesn't exist without hierarchies (they don't call it the progressive stack for nothing), but because they have a retarded belief that the communist utopia can be achieved, anything with a hierarchy that slows down the utopia has to be reframed as oppressive. Hence, why Paolo Freire admitted that marxism is ultimately a philosophy of perpetual revolution, because any new construct that replaces the status quo is now the status quo itself, and any status quo is ultimately oppressive to someone.

            Yes, to people who aren't deranged lunatics, this doesn't make sense and would result in society being in an unending state of upheaval, because True Marxism is always somewhere over the rainbow. For marxists, revolution until the utopia actually happens is a requirement. It's why these freaks are always going on about "doing the work"--what they mean is, not stopping until the utopia happens.

            And if you think that sounds like a fringe doomsday cult, yes, you're not that far off. The difference is that this philosophy is now the driving force of western society. It literally has replaced the Christianity that Marx himself targeted.

    3. I, Woodchipper   9 months ago

      dont care. still voting trump.

      that's the essence of the perpetually online young right.

      and i'll take them over any single kamala voter.

  40. Dillinger   9 months ago

    >>Campaign Finance Rules Can't Stop Hotties for Harris

    did anyone try common sense?

  41. Dillinger   9 months ago

    >>Perhaps this also lends some credence to Harris’ strategy of running a policy-lite, vibes-heavy campaign

    is anyone at this place gonna lead with what the fuck? maybe how the fuck? anyone?

  42. Dillinger   9 months ago

    >>Israel carried out an airstrike ... killing five people it claims were terrorists

    back to rooting for Hamas too ...

  43. Dillinger   9 months ago

    >>Did you know that 48 percent of bus riders fail to pay their fare?

    how do they get on the bus w/o putting the token in up front?

  44. Dillinger   9 months ago

    >>U.S. consumer confidence rises to a six-month high.

    well fuck yes we've heard all those gauged prices are gonna be controlled.

  45. Dillinger   9 months ago

    >>Tim Ballard, a MAGA-world hero who claimed to be fighting sex trafficking stands accused of abusing many of the women with whom he worked.

    both can be true. one has been verified.

    1. mad.casual   9 months ago

      Tim Ballard, a MAGA-world hero who claimed to be fighting sex trafficking, actually stands accused of abusing many of the women with whom he worked.

      #MeToo

    2. I, Woodchipper   9 months ago

      he didnt call her back

      1. Dillinger   9 months ago

        the media is leading me to believe these Utah chicks are okay underneath their friends' men

  46. Dillinger   9 months ago

    >>"I know why they want me here," one foodie influencer told the Times. "I'm not here to ask any embarrassing questions."

    prostitution legal in Chicago now?

  47. mad.casual   9 months ago

    one of whom had been released in November as part of one of the prisoner exchanges.

    Of all the bombing sites, in all the conflict zones, in all the world, a recently-released Palestinian prisoner walks into mine...

    1. Dillinger   9 months ago

      is this one of those ... recidivism cases we're always hearing about?

      1. mad.casual   9 months ago

        I'm sure Emma will rest easy knowing that the method of execution has been tested more than inert gas asphyxiation.

  48. I, Woodchipper   9 months ago

    Imagine being 'influenced' by Hotties for Harris. Who is this person? Why are they not in an asylum?

  49. I, Woodchipper   9 months ago

    "The Reason RoundtableWhy Libertarians Hate Kamala Harris' Economic Platform"

    Good lord. Imagine needing this explained to you.

    She's a fucking bolshevik. end of story

  50. I, Woodchipper   9 months ago

    "In the past two weeks, security forces have been systematically stopping citizens to inspect their phones, including photos, social media profiles, and WhatsApp conversations. Detainees are often held based on content uncovered during these searches, such as images or conversations related to protests or anti-government expressions."

    At first I thought this was some grandmas who walked through the capitol building a few years ago.

  51. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   9 months ago

    "NYT publishes damning profile of Kamala Harris saying even close allies have ‘lost hope’"
    [...]
    "A damning New York Times profile claims Democrats around Washington have “lost hope” in Kamala Harris, raising doubts that she’d be valuable on the 2024 ticket as either a presidential or vice-presidential candidate.
    “I can’t think of one thing she’s done except stay out of the way and stand beside him at certain ceremonies,” John Morgan, a prominent fund-raiser for Democrats, told the paper
    [...]“it doesn’t help that she’s not [that] adept as a communicator”..."
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/kamala-harris-new-york-times-profile-b2277037.html

    1. I, Woodchipper   9 months ago

      "not that adept" lol. lmao even

    2. Uncle Jay   9 months ago

      I wouldn't worry about it.
      The biggest joke in print history, the NYT, will still endorse Comrade Kamala.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   9 months ago

      Guess they missed that one in the recent memory-holing operations.

  52. Uncle Jay   9 months ago

    "Campaign Finance Rules Can't Stop Hotties for Harris."

    Demonstrating once again the ruling elitist vermin can break any law with impunity especially those higher up in office.
    The law is for the peasantry, not DC royalty.

  53. markm23   9 months ago

    I’m tempted to repost the “Hotties for Harris” images as “Hoes for da Ho”. Except that to do that, I'd have to see the images.

  54. BrianMcDaniel   9 months ago

    Marketing is very important in various fields. It can also be said that marketing KPIs are crucial for any digital marketing team, check marketing kpi examples. They provide important insights into the effectiveness of different marketing channels and strategies, helping you optimize future campaigns. You should track KPIs for all marketing channels in your organization.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Can We End Racism by Ending the Idea of Race Itself?

Rachel Ferguson | From the June 2025 issue

The Supreme Court Said States Can't Discriminate in Alcohol Sales. They're Doing It Anyway.

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 5.24.2025 7:00 AM

Cocaine Hippos, Monkey Copyrights, and a Horse Named Justice: The Debate Over Animal Personhood

C.J. Ciaramella | From the June 2025 issue

Harvard's Best Protection Is To Get Off the Federal Teat

Autumn Billings | 5.23.2025 6:16 PM

Trump's Mass Cancellation of Student Visas Illustrates the Lawlessness of His Immigration Crackdown

Jacob Sullum | 5.23.2025 5:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!