She 'Came at Me With Boiling Water,' a Cop Charged With Murder Claims, Contradicting What Video Shows
An Illinois sheriff's deputy with a spotty employment history shot Sonya Massey in the face after responding to her report of a prowler.

Early in the morning on July 6, Sonya Massey, a 36-year-old resident of Springfield, Illinois, called 911 to report a prowler at her home. Sangamon County Sheriff's Deputy Sean Grayson and another deputy responded around 1:50 a.m. Half an hour later, Grayson fatally shot Massey in the face. His justification for that use of deadly force was so implausible that last week he was fired and charged with first-degree murder.
Body camera video released on Monday illuminates the circumstances of the shooting, which President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris publicly condemned this week. After searching the property and finding no intruders, Grayson and his colleague repeatedly knock on Massey's door. It takes a while for her to respond, and she explains that she was getting dressed. Her demeanor is calm, but she is behaving oddly. "Please don't hurt me," she says after opening the door. She says she heard "somebody outside my house," adding, "Please God, please God" as she looks at her cellphone.
Grayson explains that he and the other deputy did not see any sign of a prowler. "Please God, please God," Massey says. "I'm trying to get help….Please God, please God. I don't know what to do….I heard somebody outside." Grayson reiterates that no one is there, and he seems on the verge of leaving, asking, "Is there anything else I can do for you?" Then he asks, "You doing all right mentally?" Massey, who according to The Independent "reportedly suffered from mental illness," says "yes" and mentions "my medicine."
Grayson asks Massey for her ID and follows her into her house as she goes to get it. The other deputy also enters the house and looks around, perhaps continuing to search for an intruder. Sitting on the couch in her living room, Massey grabs her purse, then gets distracted, saying, "I've got some paperwork." Grayson tries to get her to focus on retrieving her ID. "I just need your name," he says, "so we can get out of here….Just a driver's license will do, and I can get out of your hair."
Then things take a weird turn. Grayson points to a pot of boiling water on the stove in the kitchen adjoining the living room, saying, "We don't need a fire while we're here." Massey responds by walking into the kitchen and removing the pot from the stove. Massey, who is in the living room, on the other side of a kitchen counter, evidently backs up, because Massey says, "Where are you going?" Laughing, Grayson refers to "the hot, steaming water," and Massey jocularly observes that he wants to get "away from the hot, steaming water." After putting the pot down on a counter, Massey calmly but bizarrely says, "I rebuke you in the name of Jesus," which she repeats after Grayson says, "What?"
At that point, Grayson's amusement instantly turns to alarm. "You better fucking not," he says, putting his hand on his gun. "I swear to God, I'll shoot you in the fucking face." Then he draws his gun and points it at Massey, who flinches and picks up the pot again. "OK, I'm sorry," she says before ducking behind the counter, still holding the pot. "Drop the fucking pot!" Grayson shouts. A few seconds later, Grayson fires three rounds, one of which strikes Massey in the head.
After the shooting, the other deputy says, "I'm going to go get my kit," meaning he intends to render medical aid. "Nah, it's a head shot, dude," Grayson replies. "She's done. You can go get it, but that's a head shot. Goddamn it. Fuck. I'm not taking fucking boiling water to the fucking head. It fucking came right to our feet too. Goddamn it….What else do we do? I'm not taking hot boiling water to the fucking face, and it already reached us."
As other officers arrive, Grayson tells one: "She had boiling water and came at me with boiling water….She said she was going to rebuke me in the name of Jesus and came at [me] with boiling water."
Grayson later reiterated to investigators that he was defending himself against the threat posed by the pot of hot water. But as First Assistant State's Attorney Mary Rodgers notes in a July 18 petition to deny Grayson pretrial release, "the pot was located in another room of the home, separated by a large counter," and Grayson was "still in the living room area." Yet "despite his distance and relative cover," Grayson "drew his 9mm firearm, not the less lethal TASER located on his duty vest, and threatened to shoot Ms. Massey in the face."
Massey "put her hands in the air and stated, 'I'm sorry,' while ducking for cover behind the counter that separated her" from the deputy, Rodgers says. Grayson, "with his firearm still drawn, proceeded to close the gap between him and Ms. Massey" and "aggressively yelled at Ms. Massey to put the pot down." He "then fired his duty weapon in the direction of Ms. Massey, striking her in the face one time."
A use-of-force expert that the Illinois State Police consulted during its investigation of the shooting, Rodgers notes, concluded that Grayson "was NOT justified in his use of deadly force." The expert "likened the scenario to an officer intentionally and unnecessarily putting himself in front of a moving vehicle and then justifying use of force because of fear of being struck."
Because Massey was black and Grayson is white, the incident has provoked commentary about racial bias in policing. "Sonya Massey, a beloved mother, friend, daughter, and young Black woman, should be alive today," Biden said on Monday. "Sonya called the police because she was concerned about a potential intruder. When we call for help, all of us as Americans—regardless of who we are or where we live—should be able to do so without fearing for our lives. Sonya's death at the hands of a responding officer reminds us that all too often Black Americans face fears for their safety in ways many of the rest of us do not."
The next day, Harris, the presumptive 2024 Democratic presidential nominee, likewise implied that Grayson would have handled the situation differently if Massey had been white. "Sonya Massey deserved to be safe," Harris said in a written statement. "After she called the police for help, she was tragically killed in her own home at the hands of a responding officer sworn to protect and serve….Our thoughts are also with the communities across our nation whose calls for help are often met with suspicion, distrust, and even violence. The disturbing footage released yesterday confirms what we know from the lived experiences of so many—we have much work to do to ensure that our justice system fully lives up to its name."
Even without speculating about exactly why Grayson perceived Massey as posing a threat that justified a lethal response, anyone who watches the body camera video can see that his perception did not correspond with reality. To the extent that he faced any danger from the pot of water, it was not a deadly threat, and he could have neutralized it without firing his gun. Instead, as Rodgers observes, he magnified the threat by approaching Massey with his gun drawn when he could have remained at a safe distance.
Under Illinois law, "a person who kills an individual without lawful justification commits first degree murder" when "he or she either intends to kill or do great bodily harm to that individual," "knows that such acts will cause death to that individual," or "knows that such acts create a strong probability of death or great bodily harm to that individual." If convicted, Grayson, who was also charged with aggravated battery and official misconduct, faces a sentence of 45 years to life.
Grayson's senseless escalation of his encounter with Massey raises the question of how someone with such poor judgment came to be employed by the Sangamon County Sheriff's Office, where he had worked for a bit more than a year. Grayson "worked at six different law enforcement agencies in the last four years," WGN9 reports. His employment record includes less than a year at the Auburn, Illinois, police department, a year at the Logan County Sheriff's Office, and brief stints at police departments in Virden, Kincaid, and Pawnee.
That employment history was not the only warning sign. "Grayson was arrested twice for Class A misdemeanor DUIs, once in 2015 and once in 2016," WGN reports. "There was all these red flags," said James Wilburn, Massey's father, "and yet they still made him a deputy in [Sangamon] County."
The case also underlines the value of body camera video. If Grayson's account of what happened had been accurate, the video would have confirmed it. But because the video contradicted his claim that Massey "came at me with boiling water," he can be held accountable for a gratuitous use of deadly force that might otherwise have been deemed justified.
Addendum: Self-defense lawyer Andrew Branca cites a few seconds of silent video from Grayson's body camera, which he activated immediately before shooting Massey. It shows her rising up, lifting the pot, and spilling the water, which lands on the floor between her and Grayson. But that happened after Grayson cornered her at gunpoint, threatening to shoot her in the face. His decision to approach her instead of keeping his distance and his decision to use his gun rather than his Taser still seem unjustifiable.
"Sonya Massey lost her life due to an unjustifiable and reckless decision by former Deputy Sean Grayson," Sangamon County Sheriff Jack Campbell said on Monday. "Grayson had other options available that he should have used. His actions were inexcusable and do not reflect the values or training of our office."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I was wondering when Reason was going to cover this.
FYI, when you watch the raw, unedited video, it's almost like you could tell the cop knew he fucked up. He started justifying the shooting almost immediately after it happened.
I saw that video. He laughs when he says he shot her in the face. Fucking psychopath.
Yeah, he should have shot her in the back, like a normal person.
Another normal day in Neverland.
The way he casually just says "dont bother, it was a head shot" after shooting her seems like the way you would talk about an wanted enemy combatant/terrorist you were supposed to bring in but things got wild and oops you shot them in the face. She was clearly a bit nuts but fuck man, you are in her house and the instinct to shoot her seemed to pop up so fast you would think he lives on that hair trigger daily.
This dude is very likely on the psychopath spectrum. Immediately going from shooting her, to getting his story straight, to dont bother its a head shot. Really not seeming to be bothered by much of anything other than "motherfucker I cant believe she made me shoot her in the face and now I gotta do paperwork"
No surprise he has been bumped around from dept to dept, this kind of thing seems like it was a matter of time for him. Fucking lunatic.
No surprise he has been bumped around from dept to dept, this kind of thing seems like it was a matter of time for him.
I was unable to find why he left the other departments. Just that he would resign and got a new job the very next day.
She didn't have a dog so he had to shoot her in the face.
Where can we send more taxpayer money and resources to stop bad things from happening?
Send it to the Federal Government, care of FJ Biden. They'll forward it to the appropriate people.
….shot Sonya Massey in the face…
She must have been trespassing on public property.
The very worst sin.
I'm guessing the Union's going to back away from this fool, very slowly.
"Grayson was arrested twice for Class A misdemeanor DUIs, once in 2015 and once in 2016," WGN reports. "There was all these red flags," said James Wilburn, Massey's father, "and yet they still made him a deputy in [Sangamon] County."
Huh...
It's a shame the only available jobs are in law enforcement. Giving someone who has had a criminal history can indeed be a good thing, but maybe don't give them a job that equips them with a badge and a gun when they've shown a repeated inclination toward addictive behavior, poor impulse control, and bad judgment.
From one of the linked articles:
WCIA says it has multiple Freedom of Information Act requests out to Grayson’s previous employers for more information on his departures from previous jobs. According to WCIA, state records show he resigned and started new jobs shortly after leaving previous ones — sometimes the next day.
County officials told WCIA that to their knowledge, Grayson had not been fired from previous jobs.
That usually means he should have been fired, but they let him resign so he could keep his pension. Question then is why did he get forced out? We will likely never know.
I bet that he’ll request a bench trial like most cops do, get a sympathetic judge, get convicted of a lesser charge, serve no time, sue for back pay, win, quietly be hired by some other department, and finally retire with a fat pension. That’s what usually happens anyway. Cops, judges and prosecutors bend over backwards to make sure everyone gets a pension.
How long before some shameless idiot says it's ok because of Saint Babbit? Or has one of the grey boxes done it already?
Poor sarc. Out of “ideas”.
Awe, poor sarc.
If the pig was scared of fire starting he could no longer rely on fire extinguishers since those are now just as deadly as a gun.
Union work rules prohibit police from responding to fires.
Race had nothing to do with this. Mental illness, on the other hand, appears to have had a great deal to do with it. Based on the article above, some on the part of the resident but raging paranoia on the part of the cop.
Also rank incompetence on the part of the police hiring manager.
Yeah, but unfortunately the police are not equipped to deal with crazy people. When police react to something unexpected, gunfire is often their first choice.
While part of it is this cop seems to have issues, it's also their training, how everyone is out to get them and they only have seconds to shoot. It might be paranoia, but it's taught paranoia.
She was definitely acting kind of crazy. But didn't seem threatening. In any case, when you are in someone's house by their invitation and they start acting weird, you should probably leave or at least give them some space, not fucking draw a gun on them. A little deference to the person whose house you are in seems appropriate. And maybe don't scream "I'll shoot you in the fucking face" to someone who is obviously not the most mentally stable person.
Ya, there seemed to have been at least a few other game theory options all of which were 1000% better options than what he chose, to the point it does seem like this dude was about one fraction of a second away from shooting someone in the face, and this lady's cooky behavior seemed to be that spark.
I mean fuck just walk backwards, leave the house and her to her crazy ramblings. "Ill shoot you in the fucking face" is a response that only comes from pathological rage. At least if this dude was in some sort of military unit / kill squad in a shit hole terrorist country his rage could be harnessed to some positive benefit to humankind. No business whatsoever policing citizens.
I think he may have mistook her meaning with the whole 'I rebuke you in the name of Jesus' line.
Maybe he actually is a demon and the name of Jesus panicked him.
He interpreted her rebuking him “in the name of Jesus” together with the pot of boiling water to mean she was going to conduct an ad hoc exorcism ("the power of Christ compels you"). Instead of calming the situation, he exacerbates it. He could have simply told her to put the pot down while keeping his distance. Instead, psycho cop decides to conclude he is under attack and engages the enemy with his firearm.
Yeah, but unfortunately the police are not equipped to deal with crazy people.
Also, this woman was not equipped to deal with a paranoid and psychotic cop.
Grayson asks Massey for her ID and follows her into her house as she goes to get it. The other deputy also enters the house and looks around, perhaps continuing to search for an intruder.
Cops do this all the time, they don't get invited inside ... they just do it. Follow you in , when you clearly left them at the door; get mad if you close the door on them; stick their foot in the door, etc . I wonder if she invited them at all ... or did they take it upon themselves to enter and "look around" . I don't remember hearing a clear invitation to 'come in while I get the Photo ID that you don't really have a right to order me to get.'
Yep. Once you open the door it's all over. They will prevent you from closing it, and follow you if you turn around. Best to not open to door, or call them in the first place. These are people who are like two-year-olds in that they immediately use violence when they don't get their way.
Like with Ashley Babbitt?
Yes. Every unjustified police shooting somehow relates to Babbitt the Traitor.
So, Molly, why don't you call Antony Blinken a traitor---he organized the government's suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop, That clearly impacted the election.
I do. Because an effort to suppress a laptop of someone who has never worked in government or ran for office is the same level of treacherous activity as someone who was trying to attack members of Congress during an attempted coup.
You MAGAs have the stupidest "what-a-bouts".
Which coup was that?
Qualified Immunity!!!
Don't call the cops unless you want someone to get shot and you're at least 50% okay with it being you.
You beat me to it. There's two things cops are good for: arresting people (by any means necessary) and shooting people. If you don't want anyone shot or arrested, don't call the cops, and remember that the person they arrest or shoot might be you.
If you’ve been the victim of a crime and you call the police, what is the first thing they do? They demand identification. Why? To see if they can arrest you for warrants. Next they will search you and the place where the crime occurred. Not to investigate the crime, but again to see if they can find an excuse to arrest you. After that they will minimize the crime itself and tell you it was your fault or you somehow deserved it. Finally, if all that fails, they might fill out a report. What they will not do is help you or investigate the crime.
Does First Degree Murder sound like justice? No. But this guy needs some time. Sad sad sad situation. Guy clearly wasn't cop material, but there are lots of situations that go bad quickly. I don't really have sympathy for the cop at all,
Deliberately and unnecessarily killing someone is exactly what first degree murder is. That he is a cop is irrelevant.
The situation 'went bad' when the cop threatened to shoot her in the face.
Up to that point it was just weird.
This is all on the cop.
There isn't one murder law for cops and another one for non-cops. If it was me in the video (I'm not a cop) it would undoubtedly be seen as first degree murder. The cop should be put to death.
This seems like a clear-cut case of at least an unjustified shooting. There are so many instances of bad cops doing bad things. Obviously there are good cops out there, but I’m starting to think the number of good cops is much smaller than I’d previously thought years ago.
What also pisses me off, though, is that you almost only hear about the cases of police brutality/violence/violation of rights if the victim is black, or at least not a white man. The over-arching problem with policing in this country, IMO, is unqualified/undertrained officers abusing the rights of citizens because they are pissed off because of disrespect. They have a bully mentality and if you don’t acquiesce, even if you have a right to refuse, that’s a personal insult and they lash out. It doesn’t often result in a death, but even minor instances of police abuse takes its toll. People of all races are abused by bad cops, but if you watch the media, you’d think the only issue is racism and only blacks are victimized.
A good YT channel that I found last year is Audit the Audit. An expert will review video from both the person filming the encounter with the police as well as the police’s own bodycam footage and say where each went wrong or right, legally, and grade each.
You're almost there...
Obviously there are good cops out there
If good cops existed they wouldn't tolerate the bad ones.
They have a bully mentality and if you don’t acquiesce, even if you have a right to refuse, that’s a personal insult and they lash out.
They are trained to have zero tolerance for noncompliance, and zero tolerance for anything that might compromise officer safety. So failure to obey requires escalation, anything goes if they claim "officer safety."
This isn't a problem of bad cops. It's a problem with cop culture. Fact is that they're all bad. The ones who don't do bad things still excuse the one who do. They laugh about guys like the one who murdered that woman as being "hard asses" or something similar.
Until cop culture changes, incidents like this will continue. That culture is perpetuated by training, and by the "warrior cop" mentality. They really think that they are at war. They aren't out there protecting our rights and solving crimes. No, they're an occupying force that views us as the enemy.
Let's make it about race ASAP, so we can get this loser cop off and on to correctional work before his family has to suffer.
I believe this is the first time since J6 that you didn't attack Reason for an article critical of cops that didn't lament the premeditated murder Saint Babbitt by that viscous cop who woke up that morning with plans to take her life.
Congrats! You've moved on! I'm happy for you, and rather shocked.
It's the fake ML. I know because I muted him and he's a gray box here.
This is the kind of reporting Sullum did regularly before he pissed away his credibility nine years ago. Cute that he got a Kamala endorsement in there.
"His actions were inexcusable and do not reflect the values or training of our office."
Except that they do reflect the training. Police are trained to use force in response to noncompliance, and to use "officer safety" as an excuse when they do something wrong. He followed his training perfectly!
I wonder whether he was looking for an opportunity to notch up a kill. His escalating seemed astonishingly quick
This incident shows how flawed the human brain can be.
The issue here is that the officer cannot process what is happening quickly enough. He sees the crazy "rebuke you in the name of jesus" and the pot of boiling water and evaluates that this is a threat - and that his gun is his justified and best defense.
And when she throws the water, he has this theory confirmed. He decided that it was a shooting scenario, and now she has "fired" her weapon. The decision is made to respond with deadly force.
He cannot re-visit his decisions in real time. This is part of his brain's construction. This is a deadly dangerous moment. Act or die. Analysis comes later.
This is like when you decide to close your car door, spot the keys just as you are closing it and you close it anyway as you say "nooo".
As usual, the real mistakes here happened years ago in training. They should screen for more than hitting targets and reciting rules. There were plenty of opportunities to avoid this entire situation. Without a gun in his hand, he would undoubtedly have thought of them. Everything he did made it worse.
We always focus on "the split second decision". Rarely is the "split second decision" the problem. The problem usually is in what led to that split second decision.
This one underlines that problem, because this guy decides "if she throws that water, I have to shoot"... a huge error. So she throws water that lands harmlessly on the floor and he follows his decided path - open fire!..... after the threat just neutralized itself.
Accountability is an important step. But the problem is not that this guy's brain could not handle the situation he was in. The problem is way before that. It is in our evaluation of officer's capabilities. It is in training (how about taking a few steps back and diffusing the situation?). It is in the group dynamic - his partner is locked in to supporting his decided course of action.
This is not one cops failure, even though he made the errors that lead up to pulling the trigger after the threat was over. We should not be putting people who cannot handle it in that position. Training needs to be better. Accountability needs to be better. Recruiting needs to be better. Mission guidance needs to be better. All of it needs to be better.
He will have plenty of time to meditate on this while in prison.
The culture of "go home safe" failed him in this instance.
A clear case of capital murder deserving of capital punishment.
"...raises the question of how someone with such poor judgment came to be employed by the Sangamon County Sheriff's Office..."
That's easy to answer. The cop hiring screening process is looking specifically *FOR* people like this. If you're not like this, you fail the screening and don't get hired.
Because Massey was black and Grayson is white, the incident has provoked commentary about racial bias in policing.
What it should provoke is commentary about the lack of mental health care in America.
This woman was a known paranoid schizophrenic. But apparently we're just letting them run wild in society, self-medicate, and handle boiling water?
Then he asks, "You doing all right mentally?"
This is a question we're asking, but not doing anything about.
We should be locking these people in sanitariums. But we don't do that anymore, because it seems "insensitive" and interferes with narratives.
LGBT pedos - perfect example. There is something obviously mentally broken in them. They need to be protected from themselves, and frankly society now needs to be protected from them. Instead, we affirm their delusional thinking and behavior. We empower it. We enable it. Same goes with drug users/addicts. These are people who are broken. Yet we let them roam the streets, self-medicate, and claim are victims of the chaos and disorder they sow. While enabling them.
What America - what most of the Western World - has forgotten, in their oh-so-DiVeRsE and ToLeRaNt efforts, is that mental health problems are not "alternative lifestyles". They are problems. Problems that can be solved, but not before acknowledging that they ARE problems.
This whole thing could have been avoided if this woman had been in a sanitarium where she belonged. But no. We let the crazies run the streets, and the inmates run the asylum - and then we expect normal people to just go along with it.
No. We should be locking them up. Until they can get the help they so desperately need, and until they're ready to rejoin society living in actual reality. In the meantime, thorazine. Lots and lots of thorazine.
So, if you were in the cops shoes that night, would you have shot the lady in the face? All the pontificating about solving societies problems and what to do with crazy people is irrelevant to that cops behavior that night. He didn’t have to blow her away, but he did, didn’t he.
I already said what I would do: put the known paranoid schizophrenic in a sanitarium long before she gets her hands on a pot of boiling water.
I'm told that "I rebuke you in the name of Jesus" is a more common, everyday refrain in some circles than this former altar boy realized.