Republicans Have Completely Abandoned Criminal Justice Reform
In the Republican party platform and at the 2024 convention, alternatives to tough-on-crime policies are unfortunately in short supply.

The Republican Party wants you to be afraid. Very, very afraid.
Under former President Donald Trump, the party is playing up fears of violent crime, even as crime rates have fallen from their pandemic-era spike. And in the process, it is abandoning the modest yet meaningful moves toward criminal justice reform it made in recent years.
This much was clear on the second night of the 2024 Republican National Convention (RNC), whose theme was "Make America Safe Again." Several of the presenters spoke of the need to get tough on crime.
"We are experiencing a plague of crime across America," said retired police Lieutenant Randy Sutton. "It's all made America more dangerous than ever before."
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis charged that Democrats, like President Joe Biden, "have unleashed progressive prosecutors across our nation who care more about coddling criminals than about protecting their own communities."
If Trump's choice of running mate signaled how thoroughly he has bent the GOP's economic policy to his will, Tuesday night at the convention provided an unfortunate indication of how thoroughly the party platform has abandoned any prospect of criminal justice reform.
Trump accepted his party's nomination the first time, in 2016, during what he called "a moment of crisis for our nation."
"The attacks on our police, and the terrorism in our cities, threaten our very way of life," he warned. "Decades of progress made in bringing down crime are now being reversed by this Administration's rollback of criminal enforcement." He detailed frightening statistics from big cities: murder rates up 50 percent in Washington, D.C., and up 60 percent in Baltimore; more than 2,000 victims of gun violence in Chicago in the previous year alone.
"The first task for our new Administration will be to liberate our citizens from the crime and terrorism and lawlessness that threatens their communities," Trump pledged. "In this race for the White House, I am the Law And Order candidate."
Trump conveyed similar fears at the 2020 convention, held amid the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide racial-justice protests. "Your vote will decide whether we protect law abiding Americans, or whether we give free reign to violent anarchists, agitators, and criminals who threaten our citizens," he said.
In each case, the message was clear: Violent criminals lurk around every corner, and only by voting Republican can we hold back the deadly hordes.
Of course, that wasn't quite true in either year: While murders in the 30 largest U.S. cities rose by more than 13 percent in 2015, a study by the Brennan Center for Justice found that "half of that change occurred in just three cities"—Trump's cherry-picked examples of Baltimore, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. "Murder nationally is still similar to what it was in 2012, at historic lows."
And while 2020 did see a nationwide spike in violent crime amid summer protests, murder rates fell precipitously in 2023, and preliminary data for the beginning of 2024 suggests that overall violent crime has continued falling and may again hit record lows by the end of the year.
But ginning up fears of violent crime was key to Trump's—and by extension, his party's—pitch to America. In his inaugural address, he warned of "the crime and gangs and drugs that have stolen too many lives" and pledged, "This American carnage stops right here and stops right now."
This was an unfortunate break with the party's platform in recent years, when the GOP at least feinted toward less punitive criminal justice policies.
"While getting criminals off the street is essential, more attention must be paid to the process of restoring those individuals to the community," read the 2012 Republican Party Platform. "Prisons should do more than punish; they should attempt to rehabilitate and institute proven prisoner reentry systems to reduce recidivism and future victimization."
While the 2012 platform still advocated punitive punishments for certain crimes—including the death penalty for capital murder, "mandatory prison time for all assaults involving serious injury to law enforcement officers," and "a national registry for convicted child murderers"—it also hinted at alternatives. The party praised "faithbased institutions that have proven track records in diverting young and first time, non-violent offenders from criminal careers," and said that governments should emulate these groups' "emphasis on restorative justice, to make the victim whole and put the offender on the right path."
Even in 2016, when the GOP first nominated Trump, its platform praised "the Republican Governors and legislators who have been implementing criminal justice reforms like those proposed by our 2012 platform." (Of course, the party did not draft a new platform in 2020, simply carrying over the 2016 document unaltered.)
As president, Trump even signed the FIRST STEP Act, which accomplished many laudable goals, like reducing mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug crimes and allowing federal inmates to accumulate more credits toward early release. In the law's first year, thousands of people left federal prison early as a result of shortened sentences.
But then the effort stalled. While Trump bragged about signing the FIRST STEP Act and ran ads in 2020 touting his ability to accomplish criminal justice reforms, he had soured on the law by the end of his term. By the time he announced his bid for reelection in 2022, Trump had stopped talking about the bill altogether and was calling for anyone "caught selling drugs, to receive the death penalty." Some Republican-led states that implemented reforms are now repealing them, even in places where the measures were successful.
The FIRST STEP Act was not only one of the most successful reform initiatives in recent years, but it represented a truly bipartisan effort—progressive activist Van Jones still brags about working with Republicans to get it passed—but it became verboten in GOP circles.
The 2024 GOP platform makes no mention of criminal justice reform and instead pledges to "restore law and order," "stand up to Marxist Prosecutors," and "restore safety in our neighborhoods by replenishing Police Departments, restoring Common Sense Policing, and protecting Officers from frivolous lawsuits"—presumably a reference to Trump's stated pledge to give cops "immunity from prosecution."
On the second night of the RNC, with immigration and crime as its theme, speakers stuck to the party line: Many presenters spoke of immigration and crime as if they are inextricably linked, and nobody mentioned criminal justice reform, other than one mention of "comprehensive prison reform" by Republican National Committee co-Chair Lara Trump as one of Trump's first-term accomplishments.
It's a shame that on an issue like paring back the needlessly punitive aspects of the criminal justice system—on which Republicans and Democrats broadly agreed with one another very recently—the GOP has completely turned its back.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I guess if "criminal" is a protected class, then we have to tolerate (celebrate? encourage? subsidize?) crime. At least that is what my progressive neighbors say.
That's right Lancaster, the guy who did the First Step Act has abandoned criminal justice reform, so everyone should vote for this guy.
Joe Biden - Tough On Crime
"Madame President we have predators on our streets, born out of wedlock, who have no conscience"
Sorry Earth-based, wrong spot.
That's because the people have given up on criminal justice reform. 24 arrests and the murder of an innocent woman later, people are starting to push back.
New MAGA chant:
“What do we want?”
“Police! State!”
“When do we want it?”
“Now!”
"What do they need?"
"Immunity!"
"When do they need it?"
"Now!"
Funny, I don't see MAGA incorporating my job to force me to comply with pronouns usage.
Which has what to do with the MAGA GOP demanding that police get complete immunity so they can violate our rights with total impunity, with the excuse being that they can’t do their jobs without committing crimes against the people they supposedly serve and protect?
I think that is despicable, as is anyone who defends it.
I've never heard anyone think the police should get COMPLETE immunity.
Google "trump promises complete immunity for police"
Do some history on promises kept after election.
Is that some variation of the “Trump doesn’t really mean what he says” excuse?
No, it's a reflection of history.
Presidents almost never get what they want because of Congress.
Do you think Trump would support immunity for a cop to shoot him?
That's just dumb, and you're usually a lot smarter than this. I'm not going to ruin my opinion of you by continuing this conversation. Later.
But that would be complete immunity which you said he supports.
""That’s just dumb, and you’re usually a lot smarter than this.""
When you can't win an argument, go to name calling.
Lmao. Never change sarc.
I guess the opinion he is going to ruin is the one where he believes he can out debate me.
Sarc is an angry drunken troll. He can't debate, he can only shitpost.
Do you think Trump would support immunity for a cop to shoot him?
Duh. Trump's omni-absolute immunity as President trumps police complete immunity.
Only sarc gets to boaf sidez.
He’s a wet-brained drunk.
I like to think of Trump's immunity as... Defunding the DOJ.
>>New MAGA chant: “What do we want?” “Police! State!”
lol I don't usually, but you're an entire hemisphere off the mark with this.
What do you call it when police ranks are staffed up and then some, when police are given the power to enforce federal law, and they're given complete immunity for their actions? If it looks like a police state and quacks like a police state...
They already have immunity. They had that before the SCOTUS ruling. No one has ever had complete immunity.
Navarro was literally released hours ago and the T administration never told Twitter to censor anything.
Jeffsarc refuses to address how only certain types of people go to prison for contempt of Congress. Mostly because those certain types of people are their political enemies so they like it.
This.
""when police are given the power to enforce federal law,""
There is a valid debate around that. Both sides believe it's ok for their ends. R (immigration laws) D (gun laws).
Should the feds be allowed to help enforce state laws? Reciprocity?
Except immigration is a legitimate function of the federal government. Gun laws are the exact opposite.
Sarc chant:
“What do I want?”
“Alcohol poisoning!”
“When do I want it?”
“Now!”
“What do I need?”
“Money to buy cheap booze!”
“When do I need it?”
“Now!”
Leftist chant:
“What do we want?”
“Free Shit!”
“When do we want it?”
“Now!”
“What do we need?”
“Impunity!”
“When do we need it?”
“Now!”
“How do I get it?”
“Handies under the bridge!”
From a truck stop tranny.
Derp Derp Derp
Coming from the guy who wants to criminalize politics this is amusing.
That's unfortunate. 🙁
On the plus side, I'm sure Joe Biden will soon deliver an eloquent speech in defense of the Koch / Soros / Reason soft-on-crime #FreeTheCriminals / #EmptyThePrisons agenda.
#LibertariansForBiden
#CheapLaborAboveAll
Biden apparently had a disastrous Zoom call with moderate Democrats, reportedly worse than his debate performance. It wasn't reported previously due to the assassination attempt on Trump:
https://nypost.com/2024/07/17/us-news/biden-had-rambling-zoom-call-worse-than-the-debate/
“The call was even worse than the debate. He was rambling; he’d start an answer then lose his train of thought, then would just say ‘whatever.’ He really couldn’t complete an answer. I lost a ton of respect for him,” one person on the call said. “The president was rambling, dismissive of concerns, unable or unprepared to present a campaign strategy,” added a second source, who is a member of Congress.
At this point, I can't blame them.
The synergy between this article and today's Brickbat is interesting.
"The Sacramento City Attorney's Office has warned Target that its Land Park location could face public nuisance fines if it keeps calling police to report thefts."
Crime statistics do come down when crimes are officially ignored.
Thanks for posting; that glaring hypocrisy occurred to me too.
From the Brickbat:
The state legislature is considering a bill that would prohibit local officials from punishing stores for reporting thefts.
The California State legislature? That is literally two miles from the Target that’s being harassed?
That’s the funniest shit I’ve read this week in Reason, and this week has been a fucking laugh riot. You’re guys are killing me.
Sacramento City Attorney: "Do you really expect us to do our jobs? Maybe your store is the problem. Call us again and we'll start charging you for bugging us so much."
"even as crime rates have fallen from their pandemic-era spike."
Lies, damn lies, & statistics.
Only in places that have stopped calling crimes 'crimes'.
I've heard theft is way down in Sacramento.
It's dropping in San Francisco too. Not just from failing to report it, but because there are a lot fewer stores to rob.
It is dropping; we got a replacement for the Soros DA, and she tends to see crime as worthy of punishment. The word seems to be getting around.
Yeah that’s the problem. Reason libertarians are left to rely on government pronouncements to make their case. I thought we learned all about crime statistics from The Wire. But I guess TeenReason writers are too young for that. In any case when prosecutors refuse to charge or prosecute crimes a strange thing happens. Crime stats go down. Weird I know.
To be fair, Reason relies on the NYT, the WaPo and the Atlantic. But then I guess they in turn rely on government pronouncements to make their case.
I’m done with all the gaslighting.
Justice reform was never a republican platform like it has been for the liberals. The liberals on the other hand have decided justice is only for allies. They have abandoned reform in the name of get Trump.
Liberals, by their own actions, support charge stacking, up charging, novel prosecutions, jail before indictment (lock him up) and for some, assignation of a political rival.
I say this because all my life I've been against all the above. I thought the drug war did much damage (hat tip to Biden) and I've been waiting for reform. Sad that liberals have now demonstrated a position of reform for thee, not for me.
jail before indictment (lock him up)
I think that was a Trump policy.
Both have said it, but only one side is claiming to be the champions of reforming justice.
They want to call Trump a criminal but they seem to forget they use the words "justice involved" to describe someone like that.
They wanted the restoration of right for felons but use Trump as a felon to deny him rights.
You oppose criminal justice reform because the people who proposed it are on the wrong team and were mean to Trump?
That's fucking retarded.
WTF does that even mean?
Whatever, it's very clear you are misunderstanding something.
I have many times said I am for reform and that liberals use to stand beside me on the issue. When they start supporting charge stacking, up charging, novel prosecutions, they no longer stand beside me because I am still against those no matter who they are used against.
He’s not misunderstanding anything. He’s a lying piece of garbage.
People oppose “criminal justice reform” because it’s all just about releasing criminals to terrorize the population.
These people also support locking up people for mere peaceful possession of assault weapons or high-capacity magazines.
From their statements on other issues, it is not such things in the hands of street thugs and gangbangers that give them a hissy fit.
Not to mention standard capacity magazines for some arms.
OK, so "liberals" suck on some aspects of the criminal justice system. That doesn't exculpate the GOP from deciding to get suckier on other aspects.
I've never considered the Rs as being justice reformers. So how are they suckier? Going from a 2 to a 1 is not as sucky as going from a 9 to a 4.
The problem with the left isn’t just what you’re talking about. It’s also letting commies hijack the movement and changing it from trying to protect people that commit victimless/non-violent crimes to protecting their violent foot soldiers during the mostly peaceful summer of riots for political gain. Kinda soured it for the normies and made it a political loser.
The Ds have so many issues it's a spectrum. The house the Clinton's build is at risk. It's amusing to watch what was their biggest asset (youth vote) turn into a liability (pro-hamas). The fact that this is an issue dear to the Clinton's heart (Bill almost solved it) has a touch of irony.
No, that was a Trump campaign chant shrike. But please pretend we didn’t actually have four years of his administration where he didn’t persecute his political enemies like your side currently is, dishonest piece of shit.
Follow the actions not the words.
SRG for Kangaroo courts.
FOAD, asshole.
"Republicans Have Completely Abandoned Criminal Justice Reform."
One only has to look at the magnificent job Heels Up Harris did when she was a prosecutor to illustrate just what a wonderful job the democrats have done regarding criminal justice reform.
Her policy is still the envy of the world.
The left wants "Justice For Criminals" reform.
Fuck that noise.
They want "equity" for criminals based on race. As if releasing dangerous criminals back into society is good for the minority neighborhoods they tend to live in. For every family asking for a "second" chance for their criminal relative, there are 50 families asking to keep dangerous criminals locked up, so their neighborhoods are safer.
>>The Republican Party wants you to be afraid. Very, very afraid.
lol. the "Terribly Transparent" meter has reached Ludicrous Speed
I'm surrounded by Assholes!
Hey remember that time when Trump was president and he passed criminal justice reform and Reason supported the guy with a half a century record of voting for every drug law instead?
It seems like just yesterday Reason was railing against a President who avoided any new wars on his watch for his militaristic rhetoric, and seemed resigned to voting for the more belligerent current President reluctantly once again.
I’m really looking forward to the “Who are we voting for” article this year.
Whatever else it may be it will be strategic.
Over/under on there not being one this year?
""the guy with a half a century record of voting for every drug law instead?""
Tell Biden about that guy and watch him demean himself.
That is not all he will do to/on himself.
It would be kinda funny to watch him rail against his earlier self for 10 minutes. It might bring back some of the youth vote.
Only the Boomers would get the joke.
C'mon Man. That's a bunch of malarkey.
Gee, could it be that MAGA Republicans want to focus on actual reform rather than simply legalizing violent crime or focusing on race or imputed group membership?
Oh, I don't know about all that.
I have a feeling that at least a fair number of prisoners held unjustly will be released shortly after they assume office.
Seems like a wise political choice. Democrats are failing at the basic responsibility of government to keep people safe and to enforce justice. Why muddy the waters by saying Republicans will let criminals out early too (even if they make better choices on which criminals)?
I like how reform (a word that means to change) must always be framed through the leftist "all morality is permissable" lens.
Why the hell would republicans want to "reform" criminal justice, the people want enforcement, not reform. GFY idiot.
The Democrats elected two drug warriors with careers spanning decades . . .
But yeah, it's the GOP that 'abandoned' a thing they never supported in the first place.
Also, we've seen what you consider CJR - no thanks.
"Republicans Have Completely Abandoned Criminal Justice Reform"
Maybe that's because "criminal justice reform" has been turned into an agenda of "let all criminals out of jail and do not punish crime" by the left. Progressives couldn't be normal and agree that some criminals just needed to be kept out of civil society. Nope. They had to go with "You can't punish that person just because he raped someone. He's a victim of his circumstances and white supremacy".
Democrats have enacted laws that allow shoplifters to walk out of a store with $950 worth of goods per day. Car-jackings are a daily occurrence as are assaults, shootings, and rapes. More often than now the criminals are allowed to return to the streets many times with no more punishment than a useless ankle bracelet. Now here is Blackmon blaming Republicans for abandoning "criminal justice reform".
So now the pendulum swings.
https://chicago.suntimes.com/city-hall/2024/05/30/manaa-hoppenworth-crime-reports-email-alerts-48th-ward-edgewater-uptown
"Manaa-Hoppenworth was asked to explain how reporting crime undercuts “our values of empowerment, anti-racism and community.”"
That's her position. Reporting crime is racist because 'People of Color hardest hit'.
"And while 2020 did see a nationwide spike in violent crime amid summer protests, murder rates fell precipitously in 2023, and preliminary data for the beginning of 2024 suggests that overall violent crime has continued falling and may again hit record lows by the end of the year."
---
No mention here that many major cities have not submitted their crime numbers for the first half of 2024. Some have not even submitted data for 2023. Also, many felonies are reduced to misdemeanors by the progressive D.A.
Wow. Of all the tone deaf articles I’ve seen—and there have been a bunch of them—this one easily takes the cake. Let’s see…someone tries to assassinate a former and hopefully future president, we’re calling for being tough on crime, and that’s a ~bad~ thing???
Not much doubt how the author votes.
Not much doubt how the author votes.
All the writers here that don't openly admit to being full on leftists either claim that they're voting to support leftists and leftist causes 'reluctantly' or lie and say they're voting for the retards the LP trots out (and then vote for the leftists they support).
Reason is long dead. This thing shambling around in it's skin has also died and the two are slowly wearing away.
Guess I shouldn't believe my lyin' eyes when I see the large sizes of detergents locked up in my local supermarket. Guess they are there because they are being rationed.
Paleolibertarians have never been interested in criminal justice reform.
As Rothbard wrote in 1992 - Take Back the Streets: Crush Criminals. And by this I mean, of course, not “white collar criminals” or “inside traders” but violent street criminals – robbers, muggers, rapists, murderers. Cops must be unleashed, and allowed to administer instant punishment, subject of course to liability when they are in error.
The other paleos he was looking to ally with then were the Pat Buchanans, David Dukes - and formerly the George Wallaces and Richard Nixons. The law and order above all crowd.
The First Step Act passed because Kim Kardashian sold it to Trump
In the Republican party platform and at the 2024 convention, alternatives to tough-on-crime policies are unfortunately in short supply.
Correction: Alternatives to punishing criminals are FORTUNATELY in short supply.
The Republican Party wants you to be afraid. Very, very afraid.
Correction: YOU, and the Democrat party want me to be EXTREMELY afraid.
Frankly; I'm more concerned about the criminals in D.C. breaking the Supreme Law of the Land day-in and day-out. How can anyone expect criminal justice to be "reformed" for good by law breaking politicians and witch-hunters?
Whatever happened to federalism on the subject. How much criminal responsibility does the 'Union of States' really have?
"Republicans Have Completely Abandoned Criminal Justice Reform"
Perhaps that's a result of Soros DAs turning criminals back on to the streets and not charging them at all.
Ya think, TDS-addled shit Joe?
FOAD, asshole.
Look. Criminal Justice reform is at this point a poison pill. It was implemented so badly in some areas that crime is completely out of control.
I do not trust the numbers saying crime is down as we have actual confirmation that numerous cities have stopped reporting crime data and that there is widespread disillusionment that is causing people to not report crime to the police
Additionally, the money doesn't lie. Numerous stores and entire chains have pulled out of regions (notably Los Angeles and San Fransisco) due to increasing levels of crime that are making their stores unprofitable.
More walls. More bars. More Guards.
There's your reform. Put criminals in prison and keep them there.
I think it's important to remember that "reform" just means "change (that I would like you to approve of". That's literally all it objectively means. Change, with an implied "for the better".
So, from one person's perspective not arresting shoplifters is criminal justice reform.
From another person's perspective, locking up shoplifters and throwing away the key is criminal justice reform.
What I'm saying here is that the Republicans haven't actually given up on reforming criminal justice. They've rejected the Democrats' preferred approach in favor of their own.