IRS Crackdown Nets Enough Revenue To Fund the Government for 90 Minutes
The Biden administration's $60 billion expansion of the IRS has netted $1 billion in new revenue so far.

The Biden administration's expensive efforts at beefing up the IRS' ability to target wealthier Americans with unpaid federal taxes have finally netted $1 billion in additional revenue.
Or, to put it another way, the yearlong campaign has generated enough cash to fund the federal government for…about 90 minutes.
Do the math. The United States spent about $6.1 trillion last year. That translates to roughly $16.7 billion per day or about $700 million per hour. Against the federal government's insatiable appetite for spending, even unfathomably large figures like $1 billion are reduced to mere rounding errors.
That $1 billion was the result of what the IRS calls "stepped up activity" targeting about 1,600 individuals with incomes of over $1 million and who owed over $250,000 in known tax debt. The $1 billion in new revenue comes from payments made by about 1,200 individuals, according to the IRS.
"Our increased work in this area means these past-due tax bills from high-end taxpayers are no longer being left on the table, like they were too often in the past," IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel said in a press release.
Of course, everyone should pay the amount of tax that they legally owe—and not one penny more. And, yes, $1 billion in additional revenue brings the federal books marginally closer to balancing.
But this announcement mostly serves to underscore the size of America's fiscal problems and the utter inability to solve them by closing the so-called "tax gap." The federal government is on pace to run a deficit of $2 trillion this year and a cumulative deficit of over $20 trillion in the next decade. Closing that gap will require a complete overhaul of the federal budget and a rethinking of the role of government.
Indeed, the fact that this $1 billion came from wealthy taxpayers with known tax debts means that it was the lowest of low-hanging fruits. And the government will chew through all of it in less time than it takes to watch Jaws.
Harvesting that extra revenue wasn't cheap, either. Taxpayers ponied up an additional $60 billion in new revenue for the IRS in recent years, of which about $5.7 billion has already been spent, according to The New York Times. (The agency was given $80 billion in new funding as part of the Inflation Reduction Act, but Congress later clawed back $20 billion as part of last year's debt ceiling deal.)
The Biden administration originally said the additional enforcement funding for the IRS would pay for itself by squeezing $316 billion in additional revenue out of American taxpayers. Separately, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that increased IRS enforcement would generate about $200 billion. It's probably right to be skeptical of that claim. One should also wonder if the country would be better off if that money remained in the hands of productive people rather than being swallowed up by the federal government.
Sending the IRS to dig through the proverbial couch cushions of the wealthy—and probably a lot of less-than-wealthy folks too—will only create a lot of headaches for Americans who almost certainly didn't intend to underpay their tax bills and give the IRS the occasional opportunity to issue press releases bragging about how well it is doing its job.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Exactly what most of us predicted.
To be fair the sub human evil retard faggot bohem voted for this
Be interesting to see the political affiliation of those caught.
“And, yes, $1 billion in additional revenue brings the federal books marginally closer to balancing.”
Not if it cost $60 billion to get that $1 billion. The books would be more balanced if they had just cut their losses and moved on.
They aren’t qualified to run a lemonade stand.
In fairness, the $60B is a ten-year spend so they've only spent $5.7B to collect the $1B. Still a god-awful return but only 6:1 against rather than 60:1 against.
And, yeah, they aren't qualified to run a lemonade stand.
"The Biden administration's $60 billion expansion of the IRS has netted $1 billion in new revenue so far."
A $59 billion loss is OK so long as we can PUNISH those who willfully use wrong pronouns!!!
The equivalent will be true under Trump, except that those being punished will be different! They will be illegal sub-humans, trannies, accused “groomers”, abortionists, gays, heathens, infidels, vaxxers, mask-wearers, atheists, dirty hippies, Jews, witches, or, the very WORST of them all, being one of those accused of STEALING THE ERECTIONS OF OUR DEAR LEADER!!!!
Did this include all of the Congresscritters and their families that owed back taxes?
Only the ones with R's after their names.
The entire uniparty is safe. Only a few outliers will have trouble.
Wait, you’re not comparing apples to apples. Don’t compare the total to the amount recovered this year… if we are going to be honest citizens, compare the amount spent per year vs the amount recovered per year … or show me the total spent YTD vs the amount recovered YTD. Don’t go mixing the numbers.
I swear , I can’t tell if they are bad at math or if they are being obtusely misleading on purpose.
It's in there at $5.7 billion spent to bring in $1 billion and yet Bozo Binion thinks this is somehow a positive change in how long the government is funded by theft.
And they only got the low hanging fruit. It will get more difficult as time goes on,
A lot of this was falsified returns for Covid exemptions. Something a simple database script could find. One employee.
UPDATE FILERS_T SET AMOUNT_OWED = 0;
or
DROP TABLE FILERS_T;
Should do the trick.
RTFA. It wasn't even finding new tax liabilities, but collecting money already owing, from the lowest hanging fruit - taxpayers averaging over a million each in unpaid taxes, who were able to pay it. They could have collected it faster for only $100,000 by hiring collection agencies.
It has been determined the US spends $78,000 a SECOND!
If this spending does not stop, then there will be no more United States, and our country will go the way of the old Soviet Union within a few short years.
Then what?
Pictures of a shirtless Trump riding a horse?
Just don't let it be a shirtless Hillary.
Note that this was collections of unpaid taxes, and not audits finding new taxes where millionaires hid money or cheated on their taxes. It was just basic collecting unpaid but pretty well undisputed bills that the taxpayers just...didn't pay.
WSJ:
The IRS Has a High-Earner Delusion
The agency can’t find all those wealthy tax cheats that Democrats swear exist.
Unlike bank robbers, IRS auditors tend to look where the money isn’t. That’s what happened after the agency started scrutinizing more tax returns from the wealthiest Americans. A new report says increased targeting of these taxpayers was hugely ineffective.
Maybe because high earners use Turbo Tax or similar programs, or hire professional tax preparers, and the uber wealthy have the best tax lawyers advising them? Just a thought.
“Note that this was collections of unpaid taxes, and not audits finding new taxes where millionaires hid money or cheated on their taxes. It was just basic collecting unpaid but pretty well undisputed bills that the taxpayers just…didn’t pay.”
What could have stopped the IRS from collecting them before Biden spent 60 billion dollars to form the “soak the rich” task force?
No business would every go out of their way to scrutinize a wealthy customer. They might even turn a blind eye to some embellishment as long as they get the money in the end. The government does the exact opposite.
The end result won’t be a bunch of rich liberals being honest on their tax forms. They’ll likely avoid any situations that could invite an audit. They know they’re being targeted by the IRS. But I’m not going to shed any tears for these people, given that they’re being the hand bitten by the mouth they fed.
So, how many extra $$s were spent to beef up the IRS? Are we dealing with a wash here?
"The Biden administration's $60 billion expansion of the IRS has netted $1 billion in new revenue so far." = Subtitle to the article, hello? $59 billion loss... Ass long ass the IRS gets to reward friends and punish enemies, all is well... Enemies are being punished on YOUR behalf, Dear Taxpayer, so do NOT fret!
That's comparing 10 years of expenses to one year of collections. In other words, they spent about 6 billion to collect 1 billion. It's hard to see how even a Democrat wouldn't see that as a big loss.
The IRS should farm out debt collection to the private companies that specialize in it. I doubt they'd have charged more than 10% of the collections.
90 Minutes
Is that in 2024 minutes or do we have to adjust for inflation?
It’s already only 89.
Who says President Biden didn’t create any high paying jobs with great benefits? I count 87,000 such jobs, at the IRS alone.
And we were told those jobs would pay for themselves, by cracking down on the rich scofflaws who are so rich they don’t bother to hire tax attorneys.
And they definitely weren't hired to crack down on regular folks who happened to make some extra money trading crypto or selling stuff on eBay and might have been tempted to not report it. Comrade Yellen was trying to help them avoid such IRS scrutiny, by simply having any transactions over 600 dollars automatically reported.
Boehm, we know math is not your strong suit but if they spent 5.7 billion to collect 1 billion then it is more correct to say they added 7 hours to federal spending then it is to say they collected 90 minutes. Cost benefit is a thing and focusing on one side only outs you as a moron.
Go take Boehm's job, Super-Genius! I bet that they'll pay you 10 times his salary, to boot!
Another $1 Billion to be pissed away on government programs that don't work and are not needed.
Indeed.
And the other $59B somehow got lost in D.C. wealth.
Now you know how the richest area in the USA produces absolutely nothing.
The $60B is a ten-year spend number. As the article notes, only $5.7B has been spent to date so only the other $4.7B got lost in DC wealth (so far). But they'll keep trying. I'm sure they'll get to the full $59B quickly enough.