When the Government Came for Florida's Orange Trees
The state cut down private fruit trees and offered gift cards as compensation. It didn't solve the citrus canker problem.

Many South Florida residents remember with grief a day in the early '00s when the government came for their citrus trees.
"They didn't ask politely, 'Can we please come in and take your trees?' No, they said, we're taking the trees," one Orange County resident recalled.
Armed with chainsaws and woodchippers, contractors hired by the Florida Department of Agriculture were tasked with destroying any citrus trees—healthy grapefruit, lime, lemon, orange, or tangerine trees—that were within 1,900 feet of a citrus tree infected with canker. Among the casualties of the canker war were my grandmother's lime and sour orange trees in Miami.
Citrus canker is a disease that creates small lesions on fruit and leaves. The infected fruit remains harmless to humans. The real damage occurs when severe infections lead to defoliation and significant fruit drop, eventually rendering trees barren. Canker has plagued Florida since its first introduction in the early 1900s, prompting repeated, albeit unsuccessful, eradication attempts by the state.
Given the citrus industry's hefty contribution to Florida's economy since the 19th century, the statewide panic that sparked when canker reappeared in the late '90s is understandable. Eradication efforts started after an outbreak in 1995 and were met with pushback over the years from angered homeowners and growers. In 2002, then-Gov. Jeb Bush signed a bill clearing the way for the destruction of any citrus trees within a 1,900-foot radius of any diseased tree in order to protect the citrus industry. The law even allowed inspectors to obtain countywide search warrants for properties that were otherwise inaccessible.
Despite these efforts, the spread of canker persisted, exacerbated by South Florida's windy and rainy conditions. The infected area ballooned from 14 miles in 1995 to over 650 miles by 2002, after the state had already culled over 2 million trees. By 2006, when the program was ultimately abandoned as ineffective, the University of Florida's Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences estimated that more than 16 million nursery, residential, and commercial trees had met their demise via burning or wood chipping.
During the tumult of the 2000s eradication, the state offered to compensate homeowners with $100 Walmart gift cards for their first destroyed tree and $55 for each subsequent tree. Residents later sued, arguing that the tree destruction constituted an unconstitutional taking of their private property. They contended that the state owed compensation based on the replacement cost of the trees, which often exceeded that nominal gift card amount. Over the next 18 years, the government paid out tens of millions of dollars to affected residents across Broward, Lee, Miami-Dade, Orange, and Palm Beach counties.
That was not Florida's first foray into mass property destruction for the supposed greater good. A similar eradication program in the '80s was followed by a swift resurgence of the disease. Today, canker still resides in Florida, yet the citrus industry thrives thanks to ongoing decontamination efforts—no eradication necessary.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Florida's Citrus Slaughter."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Look, stopping blights is a known and accepted governmental purpose. It didn't work, so we can discuss the wisdom or effectiveness of their mechanism. However, that is with benefit of hindsight. If we are talking rights, there's little to say.
The only real question was their method of compensation, which as was mentioned, is insultingly small for a fully grown fruit tree.
Known and accepted by statists like yourself? From TFA, certainly not known and accepted by science or reality.
They should have put masks on the trees.
If the trees had just followed the 6 foot social distancing rule that Fauci said someone just made up, I'm sure that it would have worked.
Oh sure, you might blame Mao Zedong for killing millions in retrospect, but how was he to know his stupid policies would starve the peasants– other than actually listening to experts?
Also, if you'd read the entire article, you could have seen that THE EXACT SAME THING had been tried in the 1980s with the same results.
So we can call them idiots, but that's a far cry from saying that it's a violation of civil liberties.
My parents, in Orlando, lost two grapefruit trees, a bitter orange, a tangerine, and a wonderful giant navel orange tree.
When the Government Came for Florida's Orange Trees
First they came for the Orange Trees,
and I did not speak out
Because I was not an Orange Tree.