Is Inside Out 2 Secretly About Helicopter Parenting?
In the sequel to 2015's Inside Out, letting kids grow up means relinquishing control.

Pixar's Inside Out, released in 2015, was a delightful—if tear-jerking—journey through the mind of a precocious 11-year-old girl named Riley and the five emotions (Joy, Sadness, Anger, Fear, and Disgust) that attempted to pilot her subconscious through a disruptive cross-country move.
The first Inside Out arrived on the precipice of a major change in how American culture treats mental health. While the first film's handling of Riley's slump into depression felt boundary pushing, its sequel comes at a time when the risks of talking too much about mental health are starting to be examined.
In Inside Out 2, Riley faces another mental health catastrophe. Two years have passed, and Joy—voiced by an energetic Amy Poehler—is still leading Riley's team of emotions. The now-teenage Riley has just graduated middle school with top marks, two best friends, and a solid self-concept lovingly curated by Joy.
However, peace doesn't last for long. The night before Riley is set to attend a sleepaway hockey camp, puberty—coming in the form of a literal wrecking ball—blasts into her subconscious. As part of Riley's mental overhaul, she gets four new emotions: the bright orange, Animal-esque Anxiety (voiced by a jittery Maya Hawke), Ennui, Embarrassment, and Envy.
Riley's new emotions quickly take over, insisting that she needs more complex, sophisticated emotions to guide her, leaving the old crew literally bottled up, trapped in a dark vault in the back of Riley's brain.
Ruled by Anxiety, things quickly go south for Riley, who becomes convinced that the only way to ensure that she isn't lonely in high school is to get on her new school's competitive, championship-winning hockey team. As a result, she becomes crippled by self-doubt—and ends up alienating the friends she already has.
In order to save her from completely spiraling out of control, the old team of emotions must journey through the labyrinth of Riley's mind, back to her mental control panel before it's too late.
For those familiar with the first film, Inside Out 2 hits many of the same beats as its predecessor. Riley faces a big life change, and to weather it, Joy has to learn to relinquish some control over Riley's mind. In the first film, that meant letting Riley feel sadness. In the sequel, the lesson is a bit more complicated: Joy learns that she needs to let Riley develop a multifaceted self-concept—one that includes acknowledgment of both her strengths and her flaws.
At a time when concern about skyrocketing rates of depression and anxiety among teenagers is at a high, Inside Out 2 ultimately presents a solution that wouldn't be amiss coming from Jonathan Haidt or Lenore Skenazy.
In the film, Riley's emotions—especially Joy and Anxiety—ultimately serve a parental role, attempting to protect her and lead her to make good choices, while also having limited ability to control her actions. Riley can only become well-adjusted when her most active emotions learn to relinquish some control.
In Inside Out 2, it's not hard to see Anxiety as a stand-in for an ever-hovering helicopter parent. Anxiety is motivated by an earnest desire to secure Riley's future, but her relentless planning and prodding ultimately make Riley miserable. As in the first film, Joy too has to learn to let go—though that particular beat is slightly less straightforward than in the first Inside Out.
While Inside Out 2 still has plenty of tear-jerking moments, the—ahem—emotional core of the film is less solid. The new emotions aren't as fully developed as their predecessors, and some of the old emotions end up getting lost in the shuffle. The climax of the film, too, doesn't have the same gut-punching impact as the first film's. However, while Inside Out 2 doesn't quite reach the heights of its predecessor, I found it hard to leave the theater with any hard feelings.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The retarded fag pedofiles at Disney are incapable of anything approaching nuance, or art.
LGBT activists are already trying to make it a lesbian movie because she idolized the hockey star on the HS team.
While ignoring that we are presented with her actual crushes deep in the back of her mind, who are all male.
But she dyed her hair. So that goes back to being a lesbian or something.
Any niggers at Disney?
its sequel comes at a time when the risks of talking too much about mental health are starting to be examined.
Starting?
"Don't wallow in self-pity or misery, get off your ass and do something about your life, or better yet help someone else improve their life" has been a prescription for depression, like, forever.
"Navel-gazing" is not a new term.
Original emotions: Joy, Sadness, Anger, Fear, and Disgust. Four out of five negative.
Added emotions: Anxiety, Ennui, Embarrassment, and Envy. So now 8 out of 9 negative.
The writers don't feel any positive emotions?
Love
Peace/Contentment
Empathy/Altruism
See what post-modern, victim politics, catastrophic narcissism can do for us?
I am surprised Pixar-Disney did not jump directly to the core angst emotions they have helped sponsor: gender uncertainty, climate extinction, toxic masculinity, FOMO, and Trump.
you forgot white guilt
Nigger hate is always fun
Retard
Babylon Bee made that joke.
The movie actually shows how most of those emotions can be positive. Anger cares about keeping things fair. Fear and Disgust help avoid danger. Embarrassment helps Riley recognize when she is being a jerk to her friends.
Yeah. Also, the whole point of the first movie is that sadness serves a purpose (getting people to realise how their actions are affecting you so they change).
Also, Peace/Contentment seems to fall under Ennui, and Love forms a part of Riley's personality islands with Family Island and Friendship Island, but love isn't really an emotion.
And Empathy means experiencing other people's emotions, and isn't really an emotion in its own right.
As for Altruism, yeah, Riley isn't altruistic.
Yeah, a girl in her teens only operating with five "emotions" was a stretch. Now we get four more and none of them are balanced by any positive feelings. Pride in accomplishments isn't in there? My 5 year old granddaughter feels pride in her accomplishments. If you can't feel pride why potty train? Unless her parents tied her to a toilet and used a cattle prod to potty train. That would explain a lack of any actual emotions...
Well, I suppose they couldn't have realistic post-puberty emotions and still keep it PG.
The number of voice actors needed to voice the real.number of emotions in a child's head would have broke the budget. Also they wouldn't have had enough screen time for them all to get in sufficient lines to justify the expense.
It’s a fucking cartoon.
But sadly, it does send a message that it’s all about emotions. No thinking required. At least that was my takeaway from the first one. Not interested in seeing this second.
In the Fox 90s sitcom, Herman’s Head, one of the characters represented Herman’s intellect. Inside Out has no such character. Is that because the story involves a girl, rather than a man, and/or because the writers and producers want to promote the idea that decisions should be emotion-based?
I would say primarily because the writers and producers want to promote the idea that decisions should be emotion-based. The girl would be secondary. They may have subsequently found it easier to craft the story using a girl. Or girl characters may be more appealing to the audience they're going after. Or just because most all the protagonists need to be female these days.
Nope. The emotions in the dads head are all dumb. So it properly demeans males.
The new movie does go into more detail about thinking. At one point the emotions enter an area of Riley's imagination where the little blobby mind creatures are generating ideas. Anxiety takes the area over and demands that the creatures start producing more ideas faster. They do, but the quality of the ideas drops precipitously. The implication is that if you let your emotions run wild, your ability to think is impaired, and you're likely to come up with bad ideas.
'In the sequel to 2015's Inside Out, letting kids grow up means relinquishing control.'
To who?
To whom?
🙂
The state.
But will Riley get her FAFSA cash in time for joy to return? Or will she be overcome by depression and be denied the Adderall she desperately needs? Stay tuned for yet another sequel.
I think everyone here has missed the point.
Full disclosure, Inside Out is hands-down without a doubt no contest even slightly my absolute favorite Pixar movie. It was brilliant. It hit perfectly on every mark. That movie was flawless. Like, I had to seriously consider if Iron Giant needed to be bumped from its throne (it didn’t). But here’s the thing:
Inside Out was about an 11yr old girl. Her emotions were that of an 11yr old girl, learning to come to deal with more complex emotions following a traumatic event, that resulted in a blend of her core child-like emotions. Joyful sadness. Angry fear. Sad anger. Fearful disgust. This was clearly a movie written for and targeted to kids of that age range (and parents of those kids) – breaking down the core of what defined her childhood, and rebuilding it into adolescence.
Here’s the problem. They can’t market to that same audience twice. Now they made a movie about a tween girl experiencing puberty and getting a whole new range of emotions. BUT, it’s still marketed towards the kids/adolescents. Because tweens and teens don’t go see Disney cartoons in the theater with their parents. So what Disney is ultimately doing is trying to introduce smaller children into concepts they don’t understand and aren’t ready for. I will try very hard not to refer to this as “grooming” (but it’s grooming).
A co-worker of mine put it perfectly. “My ten year old doesn’t need to be introduced to things like anxiety, envy, and ennui.” She’s right. What 10yr old does?
But this is Disney’s problem at its core. It’s now run by woke children in adult bodies who want to speak to their own inner child through a lens of wokeness, and affirm/validate all their own prejudices and beliefs retroactively. And that's their target market.
Problem is, normal people aren’t going for that. Oblivious parents maybe (hence its box office receipts) and perhaps ones that were as enamored as I was over Inside Out’s brilliance that they blindly trusted the sequel. But the kids that watched Inside Out are adults (or pretty close to it) now, and the younglings that Inside Out 2 is talking to have little interest in lame kiddie Disney movies anymore. Meaning that Disney has targeted the subject of a movie to a market that won’t really understand it. And whose parents object to the veil being drawn back on their children’s innocence.
But then, that seems the goal with so much of American culture lately – stripping away childhood innocence. Honestly, what good does that serve?
Your favorite... well. That explains a lot.
Name a better Pixar movie and explain why.
Let me guess - you love Lightyear best. That would track.
I cant say I really thought anything Pixar has done makes my top 100 much less my top of all time. They all are pretty basic plot and uninspired charachters with bland lines. The only reason I've seen any of them was a kid was around who wanted to watch them. I've suffered through a lot of crap because my granddaughter wanted to watch some animated movie.
Buzz Lightyear? The toy movie? No. Didn't really care for it.
I can't say my top favorite ever. Ghostbusters, the original, is near the top. I use a lot of Peter Venkman quotes even today. Mother puss bucket is my go to curse when kids are around.
I cant say I really thought anything Pixar has done makes my top 100 much less my top of all time.
In AT's defense, the original comment was:
Full disclosure, Inside Out is hands-down without a doubt no contest even slightly my absolute favorite Pixar movie.
Not all-time favorite movie, or even Top 100 favorite movie, just Pixar movies
So what? He's a lying sack of shit I owe nothing to.
You could always just admit that you vomited on your keyboard without reading. I mean, that'd at least be honest.
I cant place any Pixar movie on any list of any kind. I honestly don't know which ones are Pixar, which are other Disney subsets, which are Warner Brothers, Netflix or any other place. They're animated movies. They're pointless entertainment for children.
Adults dont seek these kind of movies out, they endure them because a child wants to see it. I endured them when my son went through the phase and learned more about it Yugio, Pokémon and Beyblades than any adult could ever want to. Now my granddaughter watches them and I learn about the relationships of Disney Princesses.
Well, I'm sorry for your ignorance.
I'll take that apology (or at least your admission of keyboard vomiting) any time.
I've seen both. They are very clever, but the second one is too obvious and lays it on too thick. I felt the loss of a couple of points of IQ having watched it.