If Opiates Are Killing Americans, Why Won't the FDA Let Us Try an Alternative?
As the DEA relentlessly tightens regulations on pain meds, the FDA refuses to approve a safer alternative already being used in similar countries.

For more than a decade, patients who've needed certain controlled medications have suffered from ill-advised, untenable policies the U.S. government has instituted, allegedly to mitigate the ever-surging numbers of drug overdose deaths. These policies have been a dismal failure on multiple fronts: Not only have deaths continued to surge, but the terrifying intrusion of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) into the practice of medicine has had a chilling effect on patients and their physicians.
As the DEA relentlessly tightens production quotas on medications for pain and ADHD, it has begun tracking every pill, making doctors increasingly reluctant to prescribe any controlled drugs and leaving many patients in a lurch. Perhaps worse, DEA production quotas have caused the back-order of multiple drugs—an increasingly common burden for patients, even those fortunate to have doctors willing to risk a DEA drug bust for simply doing their job.
The ill and disabled suffer the most. Virtually all patients who have diseases or chronic pain conditions will say that the emergency department is the single worst place to go for relief from severe pain. Doctors and hospitals are often more concerned about law enforcement looking over their shoulders than patient care. Patients desperate for pain relief often turn to street drugs, where they fall victim to counterfeit pills that contain fentanyl (or worse) instead of a legal opioid.
By contrast, doctors in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and throughout Europe have been using a fixed-dose, inhaled general anesthesia medicine that effectively reduces acute pain—a medication denied to Americans by a seemingly indifferent Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Doctors commonly used methoxyflurane (Penthrane) as a general anesthetic in the 1960s and 1970s. But, because it had toxic effects on the liver and kidneys, anesthesiologists gradually stopped using it and turned to safer anesthetics. In 2005, the FDA removed methoxyflurane from the market.
However, an Australian company, Medical Developments International, has been marketing a lower-dose, self-administered, single-use nasal inhaler version of methoxyflurane for 30 years. Its brand name is Penthrox, though many people refer to it as the "green whistle," because of the package it comes in. People living in Europe have had access to the green whistle since 2015, and Canadian patients have had it since 2018.
In 2020, a randomized controlled clinical trial in the U.K. demonstrated that the drug saved an average of 71 minutes in providing pain relief to accident and emergency department patients. Likewise, a 2020 Australian trial found that a methoxyflurane inhaler "was associated with clinically significant lower pain scores compared to standard therapy." While it may cause drowsiness in some people, methoxyflurane at this low dose has few adverse effects, such as liver and kidney toxicity, and there are no reported cases of addiction or abuse.
In 2022, the FDA finally lifted its "clinical hold" on methoxyflurane nasal inhalers and has allowed its manufacturer to resume FDA-supervised clinical trials. Unfortunately, this is an unnecessary waste of time.
This is hardly the first time the FDA has been behind the times, blocking Americans from accessing medications that are readily available in other advanced countries. People in Europe were able to purchase nonsedating antihistamines like Claritin over the counter (OTC) in the 1990s, but the FDA didn't permit Americans to do this until 2002, instead forcing them to use more dangerous sedating OTC antihistamines, such as Benadryl.
It took 12 years and 4 months (beginning in 2001) for the FDA to finally give women the freedom to buy the emergency contraceptive Plan B over the counter, while during this same time, women in the U.K., Canada, and countries in Europe already had OTC access to the drug. And while women in over 100 other countries can get birth control without a prescription, American women still have to get a prescription for all but one.
Australians have been free to purchase the opioid overdose antidote naloxone OTC since 2016, and Italians have had it available to them since 1996. It wasn't until 2023 that the FDA allowed Americans to buy the drug without a prescription and only in its nasal spray form.
Now, while Americans are having more and more difficulty getting access to pain-relieving opioids, the FDA forces them to wait for an alternative to opioids that people in much of the developed world have been using for years.
One way lawmakers can bypass the FDA's long and arduous approval process is through a reform called international reciprocity—allowing American doctors and patients access to drugs and medical devices approved by regulatory agencies in similar countries. Labels on such products should plainly state "Not FDA-approved" but should state which country's agency has approved them.
Reciprocal approval already exists among the European Union states plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway. There is no logical reason that Americans shouldn't be able to access products approved in countries such as Canada, France, England, Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand, and Israel.
If Congress enacted reciprocity, Americans in pain would be able to get relief from methoxyflurane while the FDA deliberates. This common-sense action has enormous potential upside and little to no downside. Congress should act without delay.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
instead forcing them to use more effective sedating OTC antihistamines, such as Benadryl.
FTFY.
The FDA is too busy insuring (assumed) women can kill their babies to waste time on merely crippling pain.
Nobody needs more than 2 types of medical procedure in socialist utopia.
Plan A - hope you don't get sick
Plan B - abort it (mifepristone)
Plan C - abort yourself (coming soon as an over the counter pill - somewhere)
Fetuses aren't babies.
"If Opiates Are Killing Americans, Why Won't the FDA Let Us Try an Alternative?"
There's no mystery if you're willing to face the truth.
The FDA is the Federal Death Administration, tasked with murdering Enemies of the Deep State.
There is no logical reason that Americans shouldn't be able to access products OTC without government interference.
FIFY.
You recreational drug addicts gotta ruin it for everyone.
Why are you even on this website? You’re not a libertarian and you are for restricting civil liberties.
The Biden administration needs to do a better job keeping antisocial, America hating extremists like you out of our military.
You’re a deplorable. The bottom of the barrel of American society.
AT is a 'concern troll,' and a reasonably clever one at that! In this case, he/she takes the position of a rabid prohibitionist and does it in such a unhinged, over-the-top manner as to foster total disgust with all prohibitionists.
How did I take the position of a “rabid prohibitionist?”
All I did was point out that recreational drug users are their own worst enemies. They point out PRECISELY WHY recreational drug use is a problem. If libertarians cared at all about people who genuinely need pain-relieving drugs, they wouldn’t intentionally abuse said drugs for solely recreational purposes. Or defend the worthless degenerates that do so.
It just shows that they only care about themselves, and chasing their high, than they do anyone else. Miserable addict pukes that they are.
Some Catholic priests and Mormon bishops abused kids. Let’s label all Christians pedos who need to be removed from American society.
An extreme minority. And the Catholic and Mormon church expressly denounce it.
The same is not true for the drug abusers. Or the LGBT pedos. Both of whom are the extreme majority. And neither makes any effort to hide or deny it.
Addicts don't intentionally abuse drugs. If they could control their use they wouldn't be addicts.
How about some compassion. Alcoholism was recognized as a disease way back in the 1780s. Addiction is no different. You probably hate lung cancer patients, too.
If it’s compassion you want, then you should be telling me your plans for getting these degenerates into rehab and clean. Not facilitating their drug use by making it as easy and available as possible.
That’s the truly cruel and uncompassionate thing. And the really sick part of it is that you’re attempting to weaponize people’s compassion for the singular purpose of you being able to get stoned into oblivion.
We’re hip to this game, chuck. You can’t guilt us. Nor will anyone let you get away with your make-believe game of “I can control my use doesn’t make mean addict."
Put the drugs down. Get clean. Be a better person.
Or just admit that you don’t WANT that. That you WANT to be a degenerate who can’t live without a high. How about that, chaz? I see your weaponized compassion, and raise you weaponized honesty.
I'm more libertarian than you are.
The fact that you want so desperately to restrict me, in any way you can, because you don't like the things that I have to say, is proof enough of that.
I should point out that what you hate most about me is that I have correctly pegged and outed you as a pedophile.
I don’t want to restrict you. You label me a pedophile because I don’t hate LGTB people.
You claimed that people were going to kill all the gays and people like me who don’t hate them.
You don’t seem to realize that you are in a very small minority.
You also advocated for criminalizing all recreational drugs except alcohol. You want to eliminate no fault divorce and ban birth control.
You’re not a libertarian. You are a slack jawed, inbred, Bible humping Christian Nationalist.
The reason most educated Americans look down on you rubes is because you’re so backwards and ignorant.
Backwards, ignorant, and dangerous.
Wrong. I label you a pedophile because you support the LGBT – who are pedophiles and/or pedophile enablers.
You simply don’t want to admit this, because you want to look cool in front of your hard-left virtue signal friends.
But there is nothing libertarian about supporting THE LITERAL GROOMING AND RAPE OF CHILDREN.
I promise you I am not the minority on that subject. You are. If you think that large swaths of America/Western Culture are on board with raping children – then you’re so far beyond stupid and ignorant that it’s mind-blowing. But hey, maybe I’m wrong. You know how many children have been raped by illegals in just the last week? But most of you leftist sociopaths are all for that too, aren’t you, as you hold the border doors wide open.
Not to mention killing kids before they’re even born. And then addicting them to drugs as soon as you can after.
These are not libertarian principles of defending liberty and autonomy and respecting the rights of others.
And you’re darn right I’m a Christian Nationalist. So were the Founding Fathers. So were the great men and women that fought off slavery, oppression, nazism, and communism. The REAL question is: why aren’t you? Why would you rather treat that term as a slur rather than hold it up as the strongest libertarian principle you can think of?
I know why, you self-loathing America-vilifying liberty-lamenting people-despising God-hating cretin – but I’d love to hear it from your own mouth.
Yeah, just like people who use guns irresponsibly justify all the gun laws we have.
Well see that one there's literally codified into the defining document that founds our nation.
Not so much with your smack.
How? We want unrestricted access to all drugs.
"We?"
Recreational drug users. That wasn't obvious? Are you on drugs?
OK, what about everyone else who doesn't want that because of how socially destructive it is, seeing it firsthand watching drug-abusing blue cities fall into total decay?
If Opiates Are Killing Americans, Why Won't the FDA Let Us Try an Alternative?
Because killing Americans is the objective?
It was the objective of the COVID disinformationists -- many of whom comment here on a regular basis.
It was the objective of the COVID disinformationists — many of whom comment here on a regular basis.
Yes, we all remember JFree's blubbering.
Considering its history of being toxic, do you really think drug companies will be lining up to make it and face the torrent of lawsuits from ambulance chasers?
All it takes is one jury, one venue, and ka-ching!
Pharmaceuticals found how to avoid that with covid vaccines.
COVID vaccines don't kill people. They save lives.
Whatever you have to tell yourself to rationalize your bootlicking.
Solution: Make them immune from prosecution.
Black label warnings.
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed the new Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) into law on June 24, 1938.
It's time for the States to cut the ILLEGAL (UN-Constitutional) [Na]tional out of FDRs So[zi]al[ism] just like they did with medical marijuana.
Medical marijuana remains a Schedule I controlled substance.
It shouldn't be, but the Republican Party weaponizes drugs as part of its culture wars and Democrats are too fearful of being tagged as drug pushers to fight back.
FDR-[D] and a trifecta-[D] passed the Control Substances Act which launched the drug war. More like Republicans were too fearful of being tagged as drug pushers to fight back.
and Canadian patients have had it since 2018.
You know what else Canadian patients have had since 2018?
LaBatts Green?
Look up the patents on methoxyflurane and you will have your answer. As any rational administration flunkie knows, the only drugs that work are the ones that are under patent to companies that give lots of money to government agencies (and adminstrative flunkies). Once the patent expires the efficacy of any drug plummets. This is the way.
Instead of a ringing libertarian defense of the right to use drugs, Singer and Bloom offer an effete plea for permission to use less effective pain medications. Given that Reason has published a cover story by, and an interview with, Sally Satel, who has declared that “force is the best medicine” against illicit drug users, this is not a surprise. Reason is evidence of how far we’ve strayed from John Locke and the American founders, who were, in principle, more libertarian. They argued for inalienable rights, not more generous regulation. This is an illustration of Tocqueville’s fear about the tyranny of democracy. With Szasz and Friedman gone, there is no prominent libertarian articulating a defense of self-ownership and drug use. Singer has been serving up this pap for a generation.
What is happening is obvious. It is another big lie that opioids are killers, except for Fentanyl. That si why the DEA is forcing more and more American to turn to Fentanyl rather using safer drugs like Norco. By depriving Americans of safe rugs, the DEA force people to buy on the street where Fentanyl is becoming used in all such drugs. That way the DEA keeps the opioid overdose rate high, while the DEA lies about which opioid is causing the deaths. It's the illegally produced Fentanyl and not the doctor prescribed Norco. If the government allowed alternatives and told the truth about other opioids, the death rate would drop and so too would DEA funding. In brief, the DEA is intentionally murdering Americans in order to increase its funding.
"...leaving many patients in a lurch." The idiom is "in the lurch."
I went to Urgent Care a number of years ago because I had a sinus issue that had been ongoing, but had gotten so painful that I wanted some help. I had never asked for pain medication in my life. The doctor treated me like a criminal and said I could admit myself into the hospital and they would give it to me intravenously. I told her I’ve already missed a day of work, I have two toddlers at home, and I have a $7500 deductible so I can’t go to the hospital. She said, have a good day then.