40 Percent of Police Officers Convicted of Child Sex Abuse Don't Get Prison Time, Investigation Finds
An analysis by The Washington Post found that nearly 1,800 police officers were arrested for child sex abuse-related crimes between 2005 and 2022.

A new investigation from The Washington Post has revealed that over the past two decades, almost 1,800 police officers were charged with crimes related to child sexual abuse. Even worse, of those convicted, nearly 40 percent managed to avoid prison time.
The investigation revealed a staggering lack of accountability for officers who sexually abuse minors—finding not only that convicted officers often received paltry sentences, but that police departments sometimes rehired officers with child sex abuse convictions.
The Post's analysis looked at thousands of court filings, as well as The Henry A. Wallace Police Crime Database, the county's most comprehensive database of police arrests. The authors found that, between 2005 and 2022, around 17,700 police officers were charged with crimes—and 1 in 10 of those were charged with a crime involving the sexual abuse of minors.
The crimes officers were charged with varied, though most charges were for a few specific offenses. According to the Post's analysis, 39 percent of officers charged with child sexual abuse crimes were charged with rape. Twenty percent were charged with crimes related to child sexual abuse material (another term for child pornography) and 19 percent were charged with forcible fondling.
Eighty-three percent of charged officers were convicted. However, only 61 percent of convicted officers received prison time. Fifteen percent received local jail sentences, and a striking 24 percent received sentences as light as probation, fines, and community service.
But even those imprisoned received relatively light sentences. Half were sentenced to less than five years in jail.
Why did so many officers seem to get off easy for heinous sex crimes? According to the Post, it comes down to how prosecutors and judges treat police officers.
"Prosecutors have broad discretion in the types of charges they bring, the plea bargains they offer and the cases they are willing to take to trial," the Post's analysis reads. "Judges play a critical role at sentencing hearings in determining what punishment officers deserve."
Police departments also shoulder much of the blame.
"Departments hired officers who had been accused—or sometimes convicted—of child abuse, domestic violence and other serious crimes," reads the Post's investigation. "In some cases, officers fired for their conduct have appealed their terminations through their police union protections, won their jobs back and then were convicted of abusing kids."
The analysis shows just how commonplace police sexual abuse can be—and just how many barriers have been erected to prevent convicted officers from receiving adequate punishment for their crimes.
"This happens to communities all across the country, but it's not on people's radar," Phillip Stinson, a former police officer and criminal justice professor at Bowling Green State University, told the Post. "And then, police chiefs adhere to the bad apples theory, where they say, 'There's nothing to see here, we got rid of this problem when we fired them.'"
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Just following the example set by the nation’s top cop.
Top Cop from 2005 to 2022. Who might you be talking about?
Joe “touch the kids” Biden
YT don’t think has the voluminous collection, but some of it is available there:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6GgR4GMFjM
MrMissTick is afraid of the racial jungle out there.
How does any of this compare to the public at large or are we supposed to take your hyperventilating as proof of something?
Well, given all the documented and systematic frociaggine in Hollywood, sports, public education, politics, and now policing, you can be sure the selective slandering of Catholics and Scouting will continue unabated.
Catholics are actually not as bad as Prodestants on a per captia calculation. Apparently Lutherans can't keep it in their pants when a little boy walks by either. In fact, they're even worse.
MrMxyzptlk 6/3/24
“…Thirdly, political prosecutions are not new, this is just the first time it was someone so high and they lost the trial.”
Still waiting for an example of a political enemy (other than Trump) convicted of a political 'crime'.
Maybe one day you'll find a cite which does not leave you as a lying pile of shit, but so far....
MrMissTick offers no evidence for this silly claim.
His (her's?) best reply so far is 'everybody knows'. Mr. Bullshitter needs to provide a cite or admit he (she) is full of shit.
And how does any of that compare to the public at large? Or atheists?
https://boingboing.net/2020/02/04/rapistcop.html
How many more ya want?
1 in 5 girls and 1 in 20 boys is a victim of child sexual abuse;
Self-report studies show that 20% of adult females and 5-10% of adult males recall a childhood sexual assault or sexual abuse incident;
During a one-year period in the U.S., 16% of youth ages 14 to 17 had been sexually victimized;
Over the course of their lifetime, 28% of U.S. youth ages 14 to 17 had been sexually victimized;
Children are most vulnerable to CSA between the ages of 7 and 13.
According to a 2003 National Institute of Justice report, 3 out of 4 adolescents who have been sexually assaulted were victimized by someone they knew well (page 5).
CACs investigated 247,543 cases involving sexual abuse allegations in 2022, around 58% of all cases our members carried through. While not all these cases resulted in a disclosure, charges, or a conviction
Lots of numbers. None that match the question above though.
What percentage of the public at large convicted of "child sexual abuse" avoided jail time. That would be the telling figure, to compare it to the original story saying 40% of cops avoided jail time.
Also, why no source for your numbers? Looks like a cut and paste, why no link? Those kinds of "data" aren't useful without valuable information like what defines "child sexual abuse" or "sexually victimized" for the sake of the study, or what the "childhood sexual assault or sexual abuse incident(s)" the self-reporting adults recalled were.
The methodology used to create the statistics is pretty vital to actually comprehend them.
Don't think tlore understands the question.
According to ChatGPT, the rate of imprisonment for people convicted of sexually abusing children is 70%, based on a 2019 report by the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
ChatGPT is less reliable than your average politician. Don't believe a word it coprocesses .
That's why I made my disclaimer that I relied on ChatGPT to collect the information.
If you have a more reliable source of information regarding this question, please provide it.
Don't tell ENB, she's give you an earload on child "sex worker" rights.
Exactly. All this hand-wringing, but this is the same site - and the same writer! - that is 100% in support of the LGBT pedo groomers infiltrating schools.
Let's also not forget her breathless need to supply abortions and birth control to the underaged. The underaged she doesn't have a problem with their engaging in sexual activity.
It's only child abuse when Wrong Team does it. When their weird creepy predatory gay sex cult of wants it, suddenly they're using cutesy names like "MAP" or "adult-spirited teens."
Why did so many officers seem to get off easy for heinous sex crimes?
That's easy. Cops, judges and prosecutors are all on the same team.
You can't really judge a man by his fairweather friends, but you can sure as shit judge him for who he goes to bat for on a rainy day.
Yup. And they went to bat for kiddie rapists...
But enough about Democrats
They shoot puppies, don't they?
Hey look, Hank made a coherent, succinct, relevant point.
"And then, police chiefs adhere to the bad apples theory"
And people need to start calling them on the fact that they are getting the theory wrong.
The original saying is "a few bad apples spoil the whole barrel"
So an entire article about how 40% of officers convicted don't receive 'prison' time (excluding local jail time, which I guess isn't the same to the author), but excludes the percentage for non-officers to compare? Did I miss that?
Sounds pretty asinine, but I am sure it is grist for the ACAB crowd, especially the ones that like to make up near-impossible stories about how they got treated one time by a cop, therefore ACAB.
https://boingboing.net/2020/02/04/rapistcop.html
How many more ya want?
76
Now do public school teachers.
Meaningless anti police drivel from the toddlers at wapo. What are statistics for non law enforcement, you idiots.
FWIW, I asked ChatGPT the following question: "What percentage of people convicted of sexually abusing children are sentenced to prison?"
ChatGPT sited a Bureau of Justice Statistics report from 2019 that concluded 70% of people convicted of sexually abusing children went to prison for it.
ChatGPT's full response to my question of "What percentage of people convicted of sexually abusing children are sentenced to prison?" is as follows:
The percentage of people convicted of sexually abusing children who are sentenced to prison varies based on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances of the case. However, according to the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), a significant portion of convicted child sex offenders do receive prison sentences.
Based on a 2019 report from the BJS that analyzed state court sentencing practices, approximately 70% of individuals convicted of sexual abuse of a minor were sentenced to prison. This statistic can fluctuate depending on factors such as the severity of the offense, the presence of aggravating circumstances, the offender's criminal history, and variations in state laws and sentencing guidelines.
For more precise and current data, specific state or local government reports and judicial records should be consulted, as they provide more detailed insights into sentencing trends for these offenses.
Did you read that study and verify that it was accurately summarized?
People in positions of power often abuse that power. That's why preachers, priests and pastors all had high ratios of sexual predators. People have a hard time not abusing the power they are given. It's no wonder that teachers and police have the same problems with letting power go to their heads. Those in power cannot be given absolute trust. They need to be watched closely at all times.
They use their power to cover it up.
True. Their power needs to be curtailed. But that would mean parents would have to actually do the work of parenting.
An analysis by The Washington Post found that nearly 1,800 police officers were arrested for child sex abuse-related crimes between 2005 and 2022.
So they did not have to go all the way back to the 1960's to find examples?
Damn system dropped my reply here.
Are we talking about actual children, or anyone under 27, like the progs define "child"?
The way a lot of 27 year old people act I don't know that I disagree with them being included as children.
1 in 5 girls and 1 in 20 boys is a victim of child sexual abuse;
Self-report studies show that 20% of adult females and 5-10% of adult males recall a childhood sexual assault or sexual abuse incident;
During a one-year period in the U.S., 16% of youth ages 14 to 17 had been sexually victimized;
Over the course of their lifetime, 28% of U.S. youth ages 14 to 17 had been sexually victimized;
Children are most vulnerable to CSA between the ages of 7 and 13.
According to a 2003 National Institute of Justice report, 3 out of 4 adolescents who have been sexually assaulted were victimized by someone they knew well (page 5).
Self-report surveys are, typically, NWS.
Lots of gibberish terminology there.
Even putting aside the problems with self reporting, this really needs a breakdown of what the actual abuse consisted of if people are to understand how much of a problem there is. "Sexual abuse" could be anything from "playing doctor" with another kid the same age going a little too far to full on rape by an adult. While none of it should be encouraged or tolerated, there is a big difference in actual damage caused.
And as I said, age matters. The definition of "child" is often stretched beyond recognition by woke activists. See 6'+, 200 pound thugs being described as "Black children" when police use force against them.
An analysis by The Washington Post
Let me stop you right there.
So these cops are as special as Adores Trump here, and empowered to stop other people.
Qualified Immunity because how were they supposed to know it was wrong if there is no established case precedent with the same exact circumstances ?
Any asshole that abuses a child sexually should be put to sleep.
That will cure the abuser's "problems" immediately.
Oh, wait.
That makes sense.
We can't have that.
What was I thinking?
No. "Sex offenses" against minors are often very minor transgressions. Punishments should fit the crime.