Libertarian Candidate Chase Oliver Wants To Bring Back 'Ellis Island Style' Immigration Processing
The Libertarian Party’s presidential candidate says he would address areas from a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants to high-skilled visa reform.

Chase Oliver, who secured the Libertarian Party's presidential nomination on Sunday night, says "there are few better examples of 'bad government' than the overly complex current laws and regulations involving immigration."
"If we can allow peaceful people to be peaceful, we can more easily and effectively end actual crimes at our border and make our communities, immigrant and non-immigrant alike, more safe and prosperous," explains a statement provided by the Oliver campaign.
Neither President Joe Biden nor former President Donald Trump has an immigration platform—or record—that is a clear fit for supporters of free migration and a less intrusive federal government. Oliver's campaign argues that he offers a different approach, calling out the use of eminent domain "to build permanent walls or structures on properties that do not wish to have them" and the "arbitrary caps" that are prevalent in the U.S. immigration system.
"What Chase offers is a way for peaceful people to move freely, safely, and lawfully," continues the statement.
The Libertarian candidate proposes that the U.S. "return to an Ellis Island style of processing immigrants," which would involve simplifying the immigration process "for those who wish to come here to work and build a better life." It shouldn't take "months or years" for those immigrants to receive medical and criminal checks and work authorization, but days "at most."
Oliver also supports creating a path to citizenship for the country's undocumented immigrants. Millions of undocumented immigrants are "doing essential jobs, paying payroll taxes, and contributing to our economic growth," reads his platform. "Formalizing this arrangement" will "allow them to further contribute to the economy by meeting critical labor demand and reducing inflationary pressures" and save "taxpayers billions of dollars in enforcement costs," Oliver's website says.
The platform outlines a pathway to citizenship for recipients of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, the policy enacted by President Barack Obama that defers deportation action and offers work authorization to immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as kids. Oliver's platform also includes a pathway to citizenship for the children of long-term temporary visa holders, a class of legally present immigrants who must self-deport at 21 if they can't secure legal status before then. There are currently over 200,000 dependent visa holders waiting for relief.
The last point is a unique one. Dip Patel, founder of Improve the Dream, an organization that advocates for solutions for those visa holders, noted that it may be the first presidential platform to outline that relief explicitly. "It is great to see this common sense idea to allow children raised and educated in America with lawful status be [explicitly] mentioned on a presidential candidate's immigration platform," Patel tells Reason. He hopes that all future candidates' platforms will "include this and other nuanced solutions affecting so many who have spent their entire lives in America."
Oliver wants to expand the H-1B visa program, a nonimmigrant visa pathway for highly skilled, highly educated workers. He also supports a startup visa, noting that 55 percent of American startups valued at over $1 billion or more were founded or co-founded by immigrants. This was the conclusion of 2022 research by the National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP), which also found that almost 80 percent of those billion-dollar companies have an immigrant founder or an immigrant in a key leadership position.
"It was great to see the Libertarian Party advocate for a startup visa and a higher level of H-1B visas for high-skilled professionals, particularly since Democrats and Republicans often try to coopt ideas from third parties," says Stuart Anderson, NFAP's executive director. "Our research shows making it easier for highly skilled individuals to remain in the United States, including as entrepreneurs, leads to more jobs, innovation and cutting-edge products for Americans."
Oliver's views on immigration have proven somewhat controversial among some in the Libertarian Party, including members of the Mises Caucus (which "advocated this year in an internal strategy document" to "rid references to…free immigration" from the party platform, reported Reason's Brian Doherty). Quizzed on Reason's Just Asking Questions podcast this week about whether he considered himself "an open borders libertarian," Oliver called it a "very ambiguous term" and reiterated his support for a "21st century Ellis Island."
"If you're there for peace, you just go right on in and get to work and contribute to the economy. You get a job," he continued. "And that will get 99.9 percent of the people quickly filed through the process so they can get to work and contribute to the economy instead of being stuck on welfare or charity programs as they are right now."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Where millions come through New York instead of the current open turnstile in the southern border states?
End welfare the self-sufficient folks from elsewhere can join the party.
Inflation is a monetary issue..open borders is not going to change that. This guy is an idiot to say that. As for some Elias Island fantasy..during the heyday of the wave of European Immigration form 1870-1910 the US had the largest industrial revolution in the history of the planet due to free markets and the gold standard and sound money, massive increased in semi or unskilled labor was needed. This simply isn't the case today.
As for open borders..all those millions coming from corrupt "big papa" type countries will vote democrat and have no qualms about supporting bolshies who will destroy the bill of rights. The problem with Fiona is she is one of those immigrants who see America as their solution to the world's problems just like neocons/Russian Jews who believe it is our duty to avenge Stalin killing Trotsky and what the Czar did to their people.
All illegals need to be deported, they then can go to the nearest US embassy and apply for a work permit.
Oliver is a far left cultural marxist...perfect for the Reason crowd.
"free markets and the gold standard and sound money"
Those markets weren't free; powerful special interests got massive government subsidies and/or protection from foreign competition. And the money was so sound that we had horrible financial panics in 1873, 1893, and 1907. The 1873 panic resulted in a six year long economic depression. The 1893 and 1907 panics didn't because a man named J. P. Morgan bailed us out. You really think that the very existence of the US economy should depend on the whims of one rich guy?
Let's agree to disagree, continue to allow in migrants with no limiting principle, then end welfare.
End welfare first, then let’s talk about open borders.
Absolutely zero need to import more poverty.
Pedo
Fiona is a huge fan of pedos that want to destroy the us
So basically, he wants some form of amnesty plan. Just like his former master, Obama.
A 21st Century Ellis Island (or Castle Garden) should include prohibit the ….landing of criminals, paupers, and lunatics with a deportation provision for criminals.
https://blog.oup.com/2013/04/border-control-america-before-ellis-island/ | Border Control Before Ellis Island
No immigrant-to-dole pipeline.
You know who voted for the dole? Those fucking Slav and Germanic socialists we let in due to all the strife in Europe.
To be self contradictory, I say let the bastards in. They couldn't really fuck it up worse than the progtards set to take over in the next couple of decades.
They were all socialist, secularist and zionist...as was the said at the time...
But criminals, paupers and lunatics are the Democrat base...
Don't forget anarchists. Congress legislated to specifically deny entry to anarchists. This is in the verbiage that also excluded lunatics and carriers of loathsome diseases. It is a good sign that someone commenting on Reason has actually troubled to read the damned laws before telling us how to rewrite them. We're still at the 3% spoiler vote stage of pressuring the looters into repealing bad laws by exploiting their well-justified fear and loathing of EACH OTHER!
That is the law today, except for people applying for asylum, who under current law always get admitted. Biden and Senate Republicans wanted to change that but Trump ordered them not to. MAGA bots don't want to admit that.
Sure.
Bring back the welfare system from that time first.
Oh. And a 20% rejection rate.
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/goldman-immigration-and-deportation-ellis-island/
But chase is so ignorant probably doesn’t know about that.
But chase is so ignorant probably doesn’t know about that.
It's like his conception of immigration is permanently stuck at his 15-yr.-old-self's conception of Ellis Island.
Not like, is. Like sarc he probably has never read a book. His statements are so generic as to be pablum. He honestly sounds dumb when he tries to answer questions. The AOC of the big L.
No, not 20% rejection. 1%.
What about 1870-1910? The city I live in was 70% foreign born per the 1920 census and is socialist to this day.
I believe our immigration should be tightly controlled and follow the Berlusconi Doctrine……
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/italy/7223365/Silvio-Berlusconi-says-immigrants-not-welcome-but-beautiful-girls-can-stay.html
Its all about the ratio.
The US should have been more selective back then in who they let in. More Southern and Northern Europeans and few Eastern ones...who should have been vetted first for Bolshevik or socialist tendencies.
No, not 20% rejection. 1%.
Suffice to say, somewhere between 1 and 20% failure with regard to Chase's notion of "Answer a few questions... go through a quick medical checkup... background check... yada yada yada... you're in!"
That is one percent returned.
Many of the health problems were because of the terrible conditions on the steamships in the steerage section. Basically mass spreading events on every ship.
Why do advocates of unpopular policies try to hide them? We all know what "pathway to citizenship" means. If you want to offer amnesty to criminals then you should own it. You shouldn't play word games.
Especially since the US provides a pathway to citizenship that about 1M people legally take advantage of every year.
What Chase and Fiona and their ilk are actually talking about is rewarding lawbreakers and fucking over everyone who followed the law.
Breaking an arbitrary rule is not a crime.
Haven’t you heard? It’s a felony now to mislabel payments to your lawyer as legal expenses.
"Criminal" is the looter term for wretches fleeing the collapsed economies of Latin America. Trade nurtures economic growth. Kleptocracy prohibitionists call it "traffic" then send DEA agents, armed mercenaries, spies and hidden persuaders to force whoever gets elected to help America make their production and trade illegal--so it collapses. Kleptocrats so brand anyone who grows plant leaves Reagan, Biden and Trump said not to--provided they are not murdered by government personnel overly zealous to please Uncle Sam. Those are posthumously termed "drug lords." In 1905 all leaves were legal and there were no such gangs as the DEA or Sinaloa.
Not just collapsed economies but in some countries total collapse of law and order, with resulting massive violent crime.
The nativists would have these people die, just as they had the Jews of Europe die at the hands of the Nazis.
Bar and deport criminals, the communicably infectious diseased and all public charges.
"Bug" Chase Oliver will have to catch the monkey pox abroad or from returning visitors.
Libertarian Candidate Chase Oliver Wants To Bring Back 'Ellis Island Style' Immigration Processing
The notion "Americans Aren't Nostalgic for the Past. They Are Nostalgic for Being 15."
I wonder at what age peaceful Chase "Peaceful" Oliver peacefully learned what peaceful immigration was peacefully like at peaceful Ellis Island.
Because between deporting people for "low moral character", likelihood of winding up as ward of the state, serving as a detention center for undesirable immigrants, and being closed to the public for over a century, for hundreds of thousands of people it wasn't entirely peaceful.
Mildly surprised he no longer wants them coming in the backdoor.
You can say that again…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJ0ZfT77wSo
Nice.
The Libertarian candidate proposes that the U.S. "return to an Ellis Island style of processing immigrants," which would involve simplifying the immigration process "for those who wish to come here to work and build a better life." It shouldn't take "months or years" for those immigrants to receive medical and criminal checks and work authorization, but days "at most."
Holy Jesus. OK, everyone around here remembers the numerous, numerous discussions about how there isn't an actual line of people at the border waiting for their background checks to clear before they get in, right? That some people apply at their local embassy and others come on temporary visas and then apply, etc., etc. That the issue isn't so simple as some retarded, Checkpoint Charlie notion of "Your papers cleared." and then lifting the barricade and moving the saw horses out of the way.
Chase, hilariously, seems to think people line up at the doors or, if they don't, they should.
Congrats LP, you chose an even more developmentally retarded, even more gay Peter Pan to represent you. At least you're making "What is a Leppo?" seem like a legit faux pas.
There was a checkpoint Charlie
He didn't crack a smile
But it's no laughing party
When you've been on the murder mile
End dual citizenship.
Tax remittances.
Give them fuckers a tax Id
Libertarians for higher taxes?
Ending dual citizenship is a terrible idea.
Example: A person born in Mexico is Mexican, regardless of the nationality of his/her parents. Nothing the US can do to change Mexico's constitution short of invading it and taking the country over. Which would be hypocrisy since the US has the same provision in ITS constitution. A person born to a US citizen visiting or living in Mexico is also a US citizen. So that person is a dual national at birth whether he or she likes it or not. Same thing in reverse; a child of a Mexican visiting or living in the US is a dual national at birth. And that is true for almost every country in the Western Hemisphere.
The UK doesn't have birthright citizenship but a child born to a UK parent in the US is also a dual national at birth, whether he/she likes it or not.
Yeah I would like to see a streamlined process for peaceful industrious immigrants. But that ship sailed a century ago. In just the last 3 years over 10 million have entered the country claiming amnesty which allows them to completely bypass any legal path path to citizenship that Chase imagines in his fantasies. Almost none of these people have been vetted and every single one is entitled to welfare benefits that did not exist when my grandparents immigrated. In order to even attempt to implement an Ellis Island style immigration those 10 million would have to be deported to their country of origin and then apply for legal entry. If they are claiming asylum they would have to apply from the country closest to their native country, not show up demanding entry in contravention of international law. Chase Oliver is not a serious person and the Ls are not a serious political party. Good luck on getting that 1%.
Oh, so your grandparents were the cohort that voted for prohibition, women’s suffrage and social security… more of them please !!!
At least they weren't racist.
"women’s suffrage"
Wait... what?
Yea, exactly.
We don't use the term "women" anymore. They're menstruaters or chest-feeders or egg-carriers or birthing persons now.
Women aren't human anymore. Just a reference to their bodily functions. So says the LGBT pedo religion (may it never be slandered).
Almost none of these people have been vetted and every single one is entitled to welfare benefits that did not exist when my grandparents immigrated.
A welfare system that, by Reason's own telling, was built on the backs of your grandparent immigrants.
Reason and Chase continue to fail to realize how long and hard their "Let's have a few drinks, obliterate a few borders, hand out some welfare." retardation is actually fucking both natives and generations of immigrants.
https://x.com/ChaseForLiberty/status/1796629409257980015
Justice should apply to all, not just whiny former presidents. Trump’s trial exposes systemic flaws, but our focus must extend to those truly marginalized by the system. As a Libertarian nominee, my pledge stands firm: equality in justice, and dismantling mandatory minimum laws.
Libertarian candidate finally weighs in on the Trump conviction. At least, I think that's what he's talking about. Way to gloss over the politicization of the court system. How hard is it to just give a full-throated condemnation of weaponized lawfare?
If I was still waffling on whether I'd vote for him, this is the sort of thing that loses it for me. If you can't speak up for the weaponization of law against the politically disfavored, you aren't spreading a message of liberty.
Well, he might take a few votes from Biden, but he won't be taking any from RFK Jr. and Trump.
You aren't truly marginalized unless your skin is black is pretty fucking racist.
The LP chose more progressive frociaggine, they're getting their progressive frociaggine good and hard.
Libertarians would be better at convincing conservatives if they dropped their economic arguments and instead blamed some “other” and then promised to kill it.
I would say if the LP made it known pedos, weirdos, Cultural Marxists/DEI fanantics, and degenerates are not welcome. The original sin of the LP was letting degenerates as liberty demands morality...or you don't have either..aka this unemployed "activist" who now (thanks Dave Smith and the MC) the LP candidate for President. Drag show reading hours for all schools right?
↑ That.
Cultural Marxism isn't a thing so how can someone be against it?
But in any case, the entire point of libertarianism is that none of the things you decry are the government's business. You clearly are not either libertarian or libertarian-adjacent.
This freak is a case study of why ranked choice voting sucks and always get the least common denominator. I didn't think the LP could sink even farther into oblivion but here's looking at you, kid.
Yeah, they’re done as a serious third party for at least the foreseeable future.
"If we can allow peaceful people to be peaceful, we can more easily and effectively end actual crimes at our border and make our communities, immigrant and non-immigrant alike, more safe and prosperous,"
Cool. Let me know how that goes over at with the MS-13 and cartel guys.
Adores Trump has to have scantily dressed Harry Anslinger posters thumbtacked to the tenement walls. Czarism is what made communism popular in mystical Russia. Herbert Hoover's version increased CPUSA membership 700% and burdened FDR with that prohibition inheritance... that and getting German Pharma to fund Hitler's Christian party.
I don't know what that has to do with anything I said, but whatever.
Why does Pedo Twink LP Candidate think that MS-13 and cartels are going to make communities more safe and prosperous?
Trump's economic policies are a lot like Hoover's
The LP candidate never talks about liberty.
The LP voters are too stoned to care.
Pity these MAGA cowards don't have websites or identities. A worthwhile candidate can only profit from prohibitionist bigot opposition.
Perhaps you'd prefer if Big Gov unmasked everyone and punished people for thinking ways that you don't?
At work, no time to read the article right now - did she say that that was 'unAmerican'?
Because 'Ellis Island style' processing involves people showing up at immigration checkpoints and declaring themselves, not rushing the border.
It also involved a lot of people dying of consumption, 15 to a boarding house room.
Poorly-educated, socially oppressed, and minority women being accepted or rejected for only being able to do the one job that's just like any other job.
Which totally isn't either A Handmaid's Tale on the one hand or sex trafficking on the other.
They'll probably gladly turn up since the new ploy is to just request asylum anyway and then disappear. Who are they going to be turning away? This will just make it easier to rubber stamp their accommodation, welfare, and pre-paid phone applications.
People rushed the border because Trump illegally closed the ports of entry.
Really makes no difference what this guy thinks about anything at all; he's representing the fringe of a fringe party which has had no effect on any political issue whatsoever.
Might just as well interview a farm-worker.
The farm-worker probably makes more sense.
"Libertarian Candidate Chase Oliver Wants To Bring Back 'Ellis Island Style' Immigration Processing."
Oliver also wants Big Brother to "regulate" (read censor) the internet and social media.
So, fuck this fascist turd.
MAGAt reading from the butthurt girl-bullier anarcofascist script... zzzzzz.
Notice he didn't say anything about ending the welfare programs.
"instead of being stuck on welfare or charity programs as they are right now."
I was told illegal aliens can't get welfare. Get rid of the welfare FIRST, then open Ellis Island.
I don't have a problem with them getting charity, as the charity's ought to be free to fund whomever they like.
Uninspected entrants cannot apply for a work permit until long after they have turned in an application for political asylum. This is form i589. Anyone who lies awake fretting over race suicide replacement can download the form and, if literate, be disabused of the notion that the politicians voters hired to replace MAGAts are "giving away" 'Murrican jobs or handouts. There is a 1-year deadline for filing the form, and folks who traipsed through five countries without seeking asylum in any of them are in for tough sledding to get handouts.
The entire burden of the migrants is precisely because of that work prohibition. Because of that work prohibition, they become public charges. They have to be housed at government expense -- or camp out on parks and your front yards. Fed, too. They want to work and in most cities there is a severe labor shortage. But the MAGA crowd doesn't want to admit that, either, because that would require admitting that the economy is booming and has the lowest peacetime unemployment rates since records have been kept.
Even legal immigrants are ineligible for most welfare programs. The nativist bigots don't want to admit that.
Regarding the long history of immigration in the US:
"Settling in an undeveloped land and building a civilization with your bare hands is not the comparable to moving to a post industrial nation and signing up for welfare."
Can’t remember the original author, but it might have been from a comment here.
Much of the Western US is about as unpopulated now as it was in 1910. And we need all kinds of immigrant labor to address our labor shortage.
Looks like open borders advocate and promoter Chase Oliver keeps helping Donald Trump and hurting Biden (who has had the most open borders policy in US history).
Milton Friedman (and many other economists and historians) demolished the notion that rich nations with huge welfare states can thrive after allowing tens of millions of the world's poorest and most disparate people to come to America (and receive free food, housing, healthcare, education, etc.).
While I (and most Americans) support increasing legal immigration, sharply reducing illegal immigration and deporting illegal immigrants (especially those with criminal histories) is a prerequisite.
So much of Friedman's dogma has been refuted that it is surprising that anyone cites him anymore.
Oliver is not the candidate Fiona kiss-of-death is looking for. That one would be Thomas Knapp, the legalize-murder anarchist in charge of hacking the liberal immigration plank Fiona never read in 2016. The result was the 2018 no-borders plank that now insists there be no inspection to screen bomb-throwing terrorists or ebola carriers from entry. That official Alabama Mises platform is in accord with everything Fiona writes. LP House votes dropped by half, with trendline STILL sloping down by 25º (-94k votes shortfall). Oliver has better ideas than Fiona or anarchists.
Hey look! The guy no one actually voted for is making noises again.
The goal of open borders is a goal to aspire to, but is not feasible in reality. We have far too many entitlements and issues that prevent open boarders to be a practical solution.
I would advocate to vastly streamline the process of immigration. I would make a very clear and distinct between illegal and legal immigration. Zero illegal immigration and vastly reduce the cost and amount of time it takes to legally immigrate. I would advocate limiting rights and entitlements granted to non-citizens.
I would tilt the immigration process in favor of immigrants who have skills that are in need and those who have a citizen sponsor who accept personal responsibility for the immigrant.
In summary, Illegal immigrants should be expelled and legal immigrants should be expedited. Followup court dates should review if the legal immigrant is productive and can remain. Working towards citizenship should be optional, but comes with full rights that would not be granted without.
The problem is that the incentives are completely backwards. Our current immigration cluster rewards illegal immigration and punishes legal immigration. It more of a political grift perpetrated by the mono-party to gain influence against the other factions within the mono-party.
the guy is an open borders nut. anyone claiming that the criminal invaders should "have a path to citizenship" has zero credibility. every single illegal alien should be deported. period. the focus for our immigration policy should exclusively focus on securing the border such that we have zero illegals each year.