Trump, Who Wants To Execute Drug Dealers, Promises To Free Ross Ulbricht
Ulbricht is serving two life sentences plus 40 years in connection with the Silk Road, an online marketplace he founded and operated where users could buy and sell illegal substances.

"We're going to be asking everyone who sells drugs, gets caught selling drugs," former President Donald Trump said in November 2022 as he launched his 2024 presidential campaign, "to receive the death penalty for their heinous acts."
That promise was not an offhand remark; it has been core to Trump's platform. Which made one of his comments yesterday at the Libertarian National Convention all the more interesting. "I will commute the sentence of Ross Ulbricht," he said, referring to the man serving two life sentences plus 40 years for a slew of convictions, including distributing narcotics. Ulbricht's legal troubles stem from an online marketplace he founded and operated called the Silk Road, where users could buy and sell illegal substances.
Ulbricht has long been of interest to libertarians, many of whom have been dogged about their belief that his sentence was perversely disproportionate to his actual conduct. Taking Trump's words at face value, it would appear the former president agrees, at the very least, that the nearly 11 years Ulbricht has served are sufficient punishment. That is hard to square with his supposed view that people who sell drugs should be put to death.
The inconsistency here may be puzzling, but—as Reason's Jacob Sullum highlighted last year—it isn't new to his remarks on Ulbricht. While in office, Trump famously commuted Alice Marie Johnson's sentence after she was sent to prison for life without parole for her alleged role in a cocaine conspiracy. He widely touted the move (which was the right one) as a sign of his saner approach to criminal justice.
Not long after, Trump signed legislation that bolstered that narrative: the FIRST STEP Act, which lessened several mandatory minimum sentences and increased "good time" credits, among other modest provisions. It remains one of the more lasting and effective parts of Trump's legacy, particularly when considering the very low recidivism rates for those released under the law.
Now Trump, it seems, would allegedly pursue policies that would have many of those same beneficiaries killed. That would include not only Johnson but also the bulk of the people who were set free by the FIRST STEP Act, the majority of whom were serving time for drug trafficking offenses. It would almost certainly include Ulbricht, one of the more famous drug offenders on the planet.
Trump also attempted to pull off this balancing act while he was in the White House. "We have to get tough on those people. We can have all the blue ribbon committees we want, but if we don't get tough on the drug dealers, we're wasting our time. And that toughness includes the death penalty," he said—in 2018, the same year he commuted Johnson's sentence and signed the FIRST STEP Act.
It's possible that the former president's drug-warrior rhetoric is another part of the flamboyant performance art that has become one of his defining traits. Whether his Ulbricht promise is yet another element of that, just on the flip side of the coin, remains unclear—although one possibly instructive fact is that Trump had the opportunity for four years to sign such a clemency grant and opted not to.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Is KMW sarc?
Noth ex neocons with only very facial understanding of libertarian thought?
After they ban us non-paying commenters, I’ll swing by a time or two thereafter to see which socks ponied up the subscription fee.
It’s been three months, I wonder if they’re just not going to let new accounts for free and keep the grandfathered stay indefinitely.
At least some of the editors have disdain for those commenters not part of the bourgeoisie Marxist decadent demographic.
I'll say this much, the new system has gotten rid of a lot of the spam accounts. I haven't had to mute one of them since this started.
That has been a nice change of pace, ngl.
My theory is that Reason Plus subscriptions are going as strongly as CNN Plus subscriptions were.
^+1
To read the comments, you must have reluctantly and strategically voted for Joe Biden, and signed up to Libertarianism Plus.
You guys think everyone is sarc.
Years back I started getting hate directed at me from people I’d never chatted with in these comments. Was really confusing. Then one Saturday I looked in the comments and WTF someone was pretending to be me. Using my handle, but also pretending to be me. And doing a good job.
A time later ML accidentally proved that I was being impersonated, and had been for a long time. He linked to a comment from ‘sarcasmic’ that if muted did not mute me. But it muted a lot of other stuff. So it wasn’t me.
Didn’t matter.
The narrative says that anyone with libertarian principles must be a sarcasmic sock, and if they aren’t they’re still a sarcasmic sock. Or someone who writes for Reason.
Expect at least four “pour sarc” replies from the imagination crew.
Poor Mr M.
“The narrative says that anyone with libertarian principles must be a sarcasmic sock”
Wtf narrative says this, lol?
I was wondering which of the "everyone is sarc" chorus is the real person and which are the socks? They all say the same things and mostly post agreements and insults.
Not really; we recognize steaming piles of shit like you as independent steaming piles of shit.
No, everyone is Shrike (whoever that is).
I don’t care how many libertarian-adjacent policies Trump touts, if he deports one fucking migrant, I swear I’ll reluctantly and strategically vote for the Jew Killer.
Running a website is not a drug dealer
You mean the comment section here is not an assault woodchipper emporium?
Section 230 agrees!
Well I kinda figured this would be the direction of the writers. Even when they agree with him, attack Trump.
Ulbricht didn't sell the drugs on silk road btw, he provided the infrastructure. At least as far as I remember. And trumps death penalty is in relation to major dealers connected to cartels. Not for selling a dime bag. But youre all in, so lie with impunity. You have your orders.
Any drug dealers killed by the feds are too many.
Hey sarc! What about unarmed women at the capitol?
I'm not sarc. Also, get over it. Conservatives are always defending cops who kill citizens. Why cry over that one?
Great question.
Conservatives are always defending cops who kill citizens.
Who did that?
The conservatives he sees in Maine with illegal immigrant hunting bumper stickers.
It might not be these exact three or four socks but several other socks of this drawer defend cops killing citizens all the time.
"...Conservatives are always defending cops who kill citizens. Why cry over that one?..."
Oh, goody! Another steaming pile of TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?...”
And:
SRG2 12/23/23
“Then strode in St Ashli, clad in a gown of white samite and basking in celestial radiance, walking calmly and quietly through the halls of Congress as police ushered her through doors they held open for her, before being cruelly martyred for her beliefs by a Soros-backed special forces officer with a Barrett 0.50 rifle equipped with dum-dum bullets.”
Now tell us, Mr FULLOFSHIT, how either one of those piles of lefty TDS addled shit qualify as "conservative". Or perhaps, provide a link which even suggests that you are no full of shit.
Because it seems, you are:
Full.
Of.
Shit.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
You first.
See sarc, this is where you fuck up. You support federal officers killing people over politics lol.
Your comments sum to: killing drug dealers and cartel members bad, killing political enemies good.
First off, not Sarc. Second I don't support cops, either federal or local, killing anyone. That's what conservatives do. You must have a hard time keeping up with all the accounts you use and forget what you're supposed to be saying with each one. The JesseAZ account is the Conservative who claims to be non religious.
Remember, Trump said "legalize all the drugs" for well over a decade and when asked about it by Stephanopoulos in the 2016 campaign he didn't deny or retract it.
BOOO!!!!!!!!!! Goes the hypocritical Libertarians?
Or are those just paid hecklers?
Booing is so classy.
"Trump, Who Wants To Execute Drug Dealers, Promises To Free Ross Ulbricht"
Trying to make sense of this article, folks?
Here's why: The Koch political machine, which fuels the most powerful donor network in conservative politics, is declaring itself as part of the NeverTrump effort for 2024, aiming to deny former President Donald Trump a third nomination for the White House.
Meanwhile at Koch Industries HQ
Staffer: Sir, reporting back. The Reason editors have been instructed to put a full court press on Trump per your new directive.
CK: Are you sure the message is clear?
Staffer: Sir, yes sir. I spoke with KMW personally. She said on her own she had already nudged editors do this and was enthusiastic about the official orders from above. She said she would call each of them regarding this mission.
CK: Excellent. Make sure any article critical of Biden is at least twice as critical of Trump. That has played well in the past for the lower intellect readers.
Staffer: Sir, understood. I believe that has already been occurring but will make sure they double their efforts.
CK: What about the LP event with Trump? Any news of how the paid hecklers worked out?
Staffer: Sir, there were many boos even when Trump was speaking libertarian. Reason plans to do a few stories about the booing. Again, polling shows this will play well with the lower IQ readership.
CK: Very good. That was money well spent. I’ll be damned if that orange man wins another election. Goddammit, I don’t even like oranges or Sunkist because of that man. Make a note that we never donate to Syracuse University. Fuck them all. I need the borders open wider than Stormy Daniels and he’s the one son of a bitch that could actually close it. No cheap labor and no billions in profit. Fuck that.
Staffer: Sir, noted. No funding for Syracuse.
Staffer: An update from the Koch Industries engineering department. The Electronic Follicle Formation Enhancement Device has begun testing, but there have been some issues.
CK: WHAT issues?
Staffer. Sir, well, three of the test subjects were killed by the device.
CK: Goddam it! When did this happen? Why wasn’t I told sooner?!
Staffer: Sir, I just learned of this a few minutes before coming in. I don’t have many details. I’m told they were all illegals and the standard “drop the bodies off at the border” protocol has been carried out.
CK: What about the results?
Staffer: Sir, I’m not sure yet. But don’t you think having test subjects die as part of a hair restoration product might be going too far? Even if it would be a commercial success?
CK: I don’t pay you to ask questions. Get me the results. And this isn’t going to be something to go to market. I want to be able to sport my own head of Robby hair. I could spend hours just running my fingers through those luscious locks. Years ago, I used to do just that…until he started charging double. I’ll still indulge around the holidays, but I didn’t become a billionaire by spending that kind of money every week. Just, just get me the updated results.
Staffer: Sir, I’m on it.
If I were a Hollywood exec, I'd greenlight this.
I laughed, well played good sir.
But why is my bigger question.
One I can't seem to find an answer for just like I can't figure out why Libertarians are against the most Libertarian President this nation has had in over a decade.
This articles author also is 'unclear' on the same question.
https://newrepublic.com/post/177140/koch-network-haley-trump-2024
"It’s also unclear exactly why the Koch network dislikes Trump so much. While in office, he successfully carried out moves long sought by the organization, including the gutting of the Environmental Protection Agency, a single-minded strategy of deregulation to strengthen the hand of private businesses, and tipping the Supreme Court conservative—with a majority that’s proven to be well inclined to favor the interests of big business and the decimation of the administrative state."
Most Libertarian in over a decade? That's a low bar.
Actually, it’s over 100 years and it takes a TDS-addled pile of shit to find that to be unacceptable.
But I’ve read your comments and realize you qualify, so please stuff your TDS up your ass to keep your head company.
More like 90; Coolidge was really hands off, especially compared to his two immediate successors.
95 years you innumerate fucks!
90 years is a hell of a lot more than a decade. Most folks would use "almost a century" for that period of time.
A decade is 10 years.
There is a difference between Libertarian and libertarian. A Libertarian is a member of a political party. A libertarian is someone with a political philosophy that centers around liberty. Not all libertarians are Libertarians, and not all Libertarians are libertarians.
Trump is neither.
There a difference between being an idiot and otherwise; sarc has continued to prove himself a blithering idiot. Fuck off and die, shitbag.
Do you write emails to your mother with those fingers?
>Fuck off and die, shitbag.
Out of curiosity do you have this copy pasted or do you type it out every time? What do you feel as you say this to the third anonymous person for the day?
Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Unless the clock is Joe Biden, then he's wrong all day long.
Biden’s hands aren’t on the clock…
ooooohhh SNAP!
🙂
“…That promise was not an offhand remark; it has been core to Trump’s platform…”
Binion is:
1) A turd-level ignoramus incapable of reading his own links.
2) A TDS-addled steaming pile of shit willing to lie about Trump anywhere and any time.
Check his link (first paragraph of the story). Expect to find where Trump had included that in his platform?
Surprise: The link it to a Sullum (steaming pile of TDS-addled shit) article with various links, NOT A ONE OF WHICH supports Binion’s claim.
Stuff your TDS up your ass, Binion.
It is no surprise that Trump's words are at odds with his actions. The only surprise here would be his actions being better than his words for a change.
It is a great surprise that the TDS-addled shit Will Nonya admits to being a TDS-addled shit.
You've only got two replies. That someone is a sufferer of TDS or that someone is a sock puppet of Sarcasmic. At least with this sock puppet you manage some consistency.
Let's not forget it was probably more than just drugs. The evidence of murder for hire attempts was enough to increase the sentence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Ulbricht#Murder-for-hire_allegations
Oh, goody! A wiki link to prove the linker's idiocy! Fuck off and die.
Bad enough the feds can sentence for acquitted conduct is they can for unindicted conduct too.
So, here's the thing about Trump.
He just tells EVERYONE what he thinks they want to hear. It'll often be at odds with itself, reveals no underlying social/political/moral ideology beyond "winning" (whatever he thinks that means), and will immediately flip on a dime if his popularity ratings start decreasing.
And because we're a nation of lowfos who just want to hear the things we want to hear, our reaction to it is some binary proto-brain reaction that can only distinguish between LOVE and HATE, both of which are exclusively defined by not being the other one.
You see this with the Marxists too. "HATE ISRAEL!" necessarily means "LOVE NEONAZI TERRORIST BABY KILLERS!" There's no actual thought that goes into it - which is why Trump, like his Democrat buddies, can be so constantly hypocritical all the time and it never be considered a flaw of any kind.
So here’s the thing about AT.
S/he’s an adolescent, TDS-addled, steaming pile of shit and, as an imbecilic pile of shit, chooses to focus on personality (HE’S SO ICKY!!!!!), rather than any actions or results.
You might try growing up, but I doubt that is not possible for such an asshole.
Added by edit:
Fuck off and die; make the world a better place.
Language.
And thank you for so clearly illustrating precisely what I was talking about. Sevo is absolutely illustrating that undeveloped binary proto-brain at work.
Thing 1: Agree - LOVE
Thing 2: Agree - LOVE
Thing 3: Agree - LOVE
Thing 4: Disagree - HATE
HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE!!!!!!
Thing 5: Agree - HATE, SEE THING 4
HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE!!!!!!
Once it's taken over, there's no stopping it. This is the core problem that results from having made zero lifetime effort to develop their brain from that reactionary lizard blob of nerve clusters they started with. Sevo is the perfect illustration of someone who (I'm assuming) made it to adulthood, but never learned to think. Not even slightly. Same kinda dude you see with pink hair pitching a tent (which he was supplied) on a college campus going on a 20min hunger strike in support of terrorists who put babies into ovens and offering to sacrifice one of his testicles to prove how woke he is.
That's Sevo.
They can't handle ANY deviance from their own perspective. The moment it occurs, they lash out wildly and uncontrollably. The only way to control people like this is, well, for lack of a better description - fitting them with jackboots and telling them how to march. Which they will do obediently and in perfect uniformity.
Scato, as I call him (for obvious reasons), can actually think. I've actually seen evidence of it!
But, most often he has this MAGA-typical response to anything remotely challenging which, in his case, manifests itself in a seemingly uncontrollable urge to spout the same old scatological references and childish insults. The effect (and, presumably, the purpose) is to stop any further conversation (which he considers threatening in some way).
Scato then goes one step further with his silly copypaste screeds against certain people (sometimes in automatic response to anything they say, no matter how benign). These obviously make him look even more childish than the scat-stuff, but I guess it's one of those things once you start, you can't stop, or people will call you a sissy...
ONS can string some words together in an apparently cogent sentence, I've seen it once or twice. But that's by accident; s/he a fucking ignoramus.
Aren't you going to call him a sarc sock? You call everyone else who disagrees with you a sarc sock. Why not AT?
For that matter, why not you?
"...Trump had the opportunity for four years to sign such a clemency grant and opted not to."
What would doing that have done for him? (Him being Trump, obviously.) Now, he can use Ulbricht's promised clemency as a tool to score a few votes.
Trump also had ample opportunity to preemptively pardon the J6 "hostages" before he left office, but he didn't even consider it. Why would he? What would doing that have done for him? Now, he can use the J6 prisoners' plight for propaganda purposes (and, boy, has he done that!), and dangle clemency and pardons as vote-winning tools.
Trump's amorality is almost pure. I hope he donates his brain to science (but somehow, I don't think he will consider it), so we can one day understand what causes people like him.
We know what "causes" people like you: Brain damage.
Watch the video of trump’s speech in the linked article. He’s clearly referring to cartel level dealers.
This kind of petty, pedantic tone / analysis (especially on MAGA related topics) is becoming a pattern at this publication. It’s like a high maintenance wife rebuffing the husband’s attempt to make amends on a certain conflict by reminding him of all his past transgressions that he can’t make up for. It would be impossible to advance any kind of agenda with this kind of attitude.
Lots of conservatives hated on Fetterman. But they reacted mostly with appreciation when he stood up to the Hamas youth. Yeah, they still griped that he was a lefty. But he earned their respect. When someone you disagree with takes a stand for principle, the natural reaction is admiration. Begrudgingly perhaps.
Ulbricht is spending the rest of his life in prison, a result of what reason sees as unjust prosecution. Trump, who’s going through his own witch hunt, may have felt the pardon would be a way to find some common ground with libertarian voters. Why is this difficult? Ulbricht’s mother is voting for Trump. Migrants and tariffs are the furthest things in her mind.
If trump wants to Snowden or assange, one can still highlight instances in which he supported the surveillance state. But that’s only sake of context to a game changing decisions.
Where are the “Biden, who saved Griner, abandons other American hostages” type of headlines? What about “The democrats, who impeached Trump over withholding aid, opposed impeachment of Biden over doing the same thing”? I can think of a few headlines in migrants.