Texas Public Colleges Crack Down on Peaceful Anti-Israel Protests
In March, Gov. Greg Abbott signed an executive order demanding that colleges crack down on antisemitic speech.

As pro-Palestine demonstrations erupt at college campuses across the nation, several public colleges in Texas have come under fire for cracking down on peaceful protests. While public universities are bound by the First Amendment, a March executive order by Gov. Greg Abbott forces colleges to suppress antisemitic speech, seemingly motivating some of the universities' responses this month.
Following the arrests of over 100 students at a tent encampment at Columbia University, pro-Palestine, anti-Israel protests in solidarity with the Columbia protesters have sprung up at colleges across the county. However, protests at several Texas universities have been met with immediate attempts to suppress demonstrations.
Students from the University of Texas at San Antonio told the San Antonio Current that, during a pro-Palestine demonstration on Wednesday, administrators told protesters they could not use the phrase "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" in their chants, nor could they use the words "Zionism" and "Israel."
The UT San Antonio students said administrators told them the phrases counted as antisemitic speech and that they were also barred from chanting in Arabic.
While the students allege a galling suppression of their First Amendment rights, their claims have not yet been fully verified. The San Antonio Current wrote that a university spokesperson who was present during the protest "couldn't immediately comment" on the allegations. A day earlier, UT San Antonio President Taylor Eighmy released a statement warning that the school would "not tolerate disruptive behavior, vandalism, or antisemitism."
At the University of Texas at Austin, university officials took a much more dramatic stand against student free expression.
On Wednesday, video emerged of police on the UT Austin campus aggressively forcing protesters back and throwing what appears to be a television cameraman to the ground. So far, nearly 60 protesters have been arrested at the college.
"This chilling show of force is a disproportionate response to an apparently peaceful protest," the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), a First Amendment group, said in a Wednesday statement responding to the arrests. "Sending in a phalanx of law enforcement threatens protected speech where it should be at its most free: a public university like UT Austin. Unfortunately, Gov. Abbott's public commentary makes his disregard for the First Amendment's protection of political speech clear."
While it's unclear whether UT Austin's leadership would have involved police without Abbott's March executive order, the vague order that universities "review and update free speech policies to address the sharp rise in antisemitic speech" certainly doesn't incline university administrators toward protecting peaceful anti-Israel protests.
For his own part, Gov. Abbott has been bragging about the police crackdown on student protests.
"These protesters belong in jail," he wrote on X (formerly Twitter) on Wednesday. "Students joining in hate-filled, antisemitic protests at any public college or university in Texas should be expelled."
The idea that a student should be expelled from a public university for joining in a peaceful protest and engaging in protected speech (which "hate-filled, antisemitic" demonstrations almost always are) is absurd—not to mention a prospective violation of the First Amendment.
"For generations, college students have engaged in protest to express their views, to actively participate in the public conversation and, in doing so, to draw wider attention to causes they care about," FIRE wrote on Thursday. "The ability to distinguish between peaceful protest, civil disobedience, and genuine misconduct is as important now as ever."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The ability to distinguish between peaceful protest, civil disobedience, and genuine misconduct is as important now as ever."
Oh , right. Now it’s important.
Now it is from the precious and noble far Left.
Jews are committing genocide in Gaza.
Telling the truth about it is antisemitic.
So, what’s the problem?
How many Jewish men pounded your mom into oblivion? 10? 20?
More?
Misek is a Jew. Can't you tell?
He bears all the stigma.
He is what Hitler used to rile the German people
"Jews are committing genocide in Gaza."
Source?
It is Hamas that wants to commit genocide in Israel and has wanted to do so since its founding over three decades ago. Basically, this is the German American Bund and America First all over again.
I have a simple rule for determining genocide, the ratio of dead bodies. At 1 genocider for 100,000 genocidees that's a real genocide. If the ratio is more like 1 to 100 its questionable. At 1 to 10 its just a badly fought war. That's why I don't accept the war in the American West with the aboriginals as being a genocide or the conflicts that Israel has had with neighbors and the like as genocide. Israel just plays war better than its neighbors. That doesn't make it genocide.
Genocide has already been defined by the UN and ALL signatories to it are required to oppose it, not simply deny that it’s occurring.
Your genocidal perspective is irrelevant.
But they can only oppose it IF it's occurring, so determining whether it's occurring unavoidably is the first step, which you don't proceed past if the answer is, no, it isn't.
So they are required to oppose something that isn't happening? And can't deny that it's occurring even when it isn't occurring?
So what kind of bullshit does the UN think is genocide? Only when brown people are dying?
Exactly. They’re racist. Nearly everyone in the world is more racist than conservative white American men - and this is _not_ sarcasm.
The Israelis are NOT "committing genocide" and they are not targeting civilians. Compared to almost every other war in history, the civilian collateral casualties are far lower EVEN IF YOU ACCEPT THE BULLSHIT NUMBERS FROM THE TERRORISTS. Which no one with two functioning brain cells to rub together does. Hamas are liars as well as terrorists. They need to be exterminated.
I'm confused. Do they need to be exterminated because they are liars? Why?
The terrorism stuff is the real problem.
Ok. Just curious. Extermination is pretty extreme, I mean, it sounds awfully, um, er, genocidal...
They need to be exterminated because they're engaging in terrorism. And they don't stop--even after they get their asses handed to them, they just lay low and do it again.
Innocent people are getting killed.
So you have to exterminate.
Extermination sounds kinda genocidal. I mean, Hitler used Ausrotten to describe his plan for the Jews. Maybe "defeated and disarmed" would be OK?
Defeated, tried for war crimes, and executed. They aren't terrorists any longer. Hamas is the effective government of Gaza, and they sent armed forces to invade Israel, for the purpose of rape, murder, kidnapping, and torture - a planned military operation .
Israel is quite justified in executing every one of the invaders, their entire chain of command, and every one who provided material support. And they are not going to see peace until they kill their enemies. Disarming Hamas is pointless - they can always get more arms.
Absolutely correct. The IDF is doing an amazing job at minimizing civilian casualties.
By the standards demande by the neo Nazi pro Hamas protesters, the US and Britain would never have been able to defeat Germany and Japan in WW2
Interesting. So the mohammedan semites' attack on more civilized semitic peoples inside the borders of Israel sort of amounted to the initiation of force? And the perps are surprised there is unequal yet apposite reprisal force coupled with demand for return of those kidnapped... hmmmm. The surprise is how Fifth Columns of useful idiots were managed into such a demonstration of aggression on behalf of girl-bullying mystical fanatics.
As jews support fascist police brutality.
“Columbia faculty members walk out after pro-Palestinian protesters arrested”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/22/columbia-university-protests-shutdown
Good on them.
Columbia faculty members are marxists, and this is simply a lever for them to continue promoting a marxist revolution. All marxists should be turned into slurry, irrespective of the issue they're agitating.
Karl Marx was a Jew.
What’s your point?
I think the point is gender, skin color, religion, etc. are irrelevant and that being a Marxist is what is important.
Being Jewish isn’t a race, it’s an ideology.
The fact that Jews have made their religion something children are born into doesn’t make it a race.
You're not wrong. Superstition does not a sufficient genetic drift make to claim it as a race.
Israel is on trial in the UN International Court of Justice for committing genocide in Gaza.
Genocide
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
Killing members of the group;
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
The Genocide Convention establishes in Article I that the crime of genocide may take place in the context of an armed conflict, international or non-international, but also in the context of a peaceful situation.
Netanyahu is responsible for telling the IDF to commit genocide by referencing the Jewish biblical “god approved” genocide of women and children with the story of AMALEK. Clearly inciting genocide. With over 20,000 non combatant women and children intentionally targeted and killed and IDF soldiers on record rejoicing about it referencing Amalek, the effect of Netanyahus instructions are clear.
Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant said Israel was fighting “human animals” and that they will be “starved of food and water” which Israel has done and continues to do.
Amichay Eliyahu, the minister for heritage, suggested dropping a nuclear bomb on Gaza. Israel isn’t supposed to have nuclear weapons. Saddam Hussein was hung for crimes against humanity and he didn’t even have WMD much less threaten to use them.
The country’s mainly ceremonial president, Isaac Herzog, who described Palestinians as “an entire nation out there that is responsible” demonstrates the genocidal intention.
These statements in combination with their actual execution clearly meets the UN definition and criteria for genocide aka holocaust.
The UN definition of genocide is clear and the US is a signatory to it meaning THEY HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO OPPOSE IT. Not send bombs money and troops to support it.
October 7 was an inside job.
The following video is the best compilation of evidence to date that proves October 7 was an inside job coordinated by Israel as an excuse to commit genocide in Gaza.
https://richardgage911.substack.com/p/new-documentary-on-gaza-october-7
The video proves that Israel, funded, coordinated and enabled the October 7 attacks.
It shows that Israel opened the gate to welcome trucks carrying Hamas through the wall.
It shows how Israel not only ignored repeated warnings from their many surveillance sources but withdrew all defences from the wall and emptied their military bases just hours before the attack and had ZERO response for more than 5 hours.
It shows and proves that the IDF attacked the concert goers and the kibbutz’s with Apache helicopters and tanks.
It shows that they sacrificed dozens of their IDF forces to blame Hamas.
It shows that only handfuls of Hamas soldiers wandered for hours through the evacuated areas looking for soldiers to fight but finding none.
It shows that the hostages that were taken by Hamas said they were treated well.
It shows that Israel has funded Hamas with billions in cash in suitcases in the backs of cars
When the Jews of Israel who elected Netanyahu drag him and his complicit ministers to the gallows to hang for their crimes against humanity, along with the leaders of allied nations funding arming and enabling the genocide, the world will move forward.
Swing along with Bibi.
Intent... That's the tough call. Showing there was intent to elimnate all of the people in a given "group" is right up there with other prosecutions that require mind reading. Did Donald Trump "intend" to overturn an election? Did Joe Biden "intend" to arm terrorists in Afganistan when he pulled out the troops but left the gear? Hard to swy if you're not a telepath.
Sure in the heat of the moment people might say things like, "Those fucking rag headed rats need to be exterminated" but do they really mean wiping out the women and children as well as the soldiers or do they mean the fighting forces of the enemy need to be seriously fucked up? Again, without a telepath you will find it hard to prove anything.
People not directly involved in the fighting who are chanting slogans that historically have meant something to the effect of "wipe all the fucking jews out" aren't any indication of the intent of the actual leadership or their troops on the ground. I mean, some asshats here say that the Gazans (is that a correct term?) need to be exterminated. Do they mean all of them? Do they mean the fighters? Hard to say.
The question is, what do the respective leaders think. What have they said to the commanders and other leaders of their fighting people? What have they said in public speaches and in private meetings? Post WWII the Allies found a shit ton of paperwork proving the Germans actively wanted to kill every Jew they could get their hands on. Fucking Hitler used the word "ausrotten" many times in pubic speeches, he made it clear the Jews needed to be exterminated, not just shipped to other nations. They had built camps where people were worked to death and other camps where they were actually murdered en mass. That's clearly Genocide. No question.
Do you think we can find similar evidence in Israel? Do you think the Israelis can find such evidence in Gaza? Will you be willing to belive what is or isn't found? Can we find Israeli run death camps? What about Israeli mass graves overflowing with non combatants?
In WWII the US dropped two fucking nukes on Japan. Lots of civilian deaths. The Allies bombed German cites to knock out factories but they hit schools, residences and everything else in the city. Plenty of German civilians died. Were those cases of Genocide too?
At what point do we dilute the meaning of genocide to the point where it means, "I just dont like those people and if a bunch of them died it would be cool."
Refuted
The Israeli army under Netanyahu's Likud government is doing the killing after Hamas did a bunch of killing first and hid underneath hospitals with Israeli hostages.
'Jews' encompasses an entire religion. Most people of that religion are not in Israel. It's like saying 'Muslims' took Israeli hostages and raped women on October 7 instead of 'Hamas'. Literally true, but an attempt to blame a superset of the actors.
The video demonstrates what you need to know about Israel, Hamas and October 7.
You don’t take hostages to kill them.
Israel didn’t take 24000 women and children hostage. They just killed them.
Only Israel’s genocide benefits from the propaganda optics of dead hostages.
24,000 women and children? Fuck, that's low numbers. In WWII we killed more that that in one explosion of a nuke in Japan. Do we need to dig up Truman's grave and put his ass on trial?
24,000 out of a population of only 10 million. Japan's population in 1945 was over seven times that.
It’s important now, and it always has been. That’s pretty much what as important now as ever means. (Well, it could also mean “not important now, and never was” but that certainly was not intended here.)
It’s no surprise to me that Abbott is taking a position directly contrary to the First Amendment. People like Abbott and Ron DeSantis only support “freedom” when it is exercised in ways that they like.
In fairness this is a quote from FIRE, they have always been good on free speech
They are good on free speech, better than the ACLU at this point.
Maybe not so good at distinguishing actually peaceful protests from violent ones, though, sometimes.
Horseshit. After the switch from FIRE(ducation) to FIRE(xpression) they became just ACLU: The Next Generation.
The ACLU treating Universities as student political platforms rather than (MUH PRIVUT!) education centers (even against their own University) is how we got to the tenured, activist Lesbian Underwater Basketweaving Professors shouting down the local coffee shop for accusing thieves of theft. FIRE openly defends student activists for their assertions that the University owes them a platform (like a tent city is more critical to democracy, or education, than a water slide) and protect University employees against their contracts expiring in the background of rising tuition and Federal student loan guarantees. And does it all with Reason openly, knowingly, in both directions, running their one-sided agitprop for them.
They aren't better than the ACLU, they're the ACLU with a PR department that appeals more to up-and-coming "Smoking dope makes me a moderate progressive and/or libertarian!" useful idiots rather than dying "Smoking dope makes me a moderate progressive and/or libertarian!" boomers.
Look. Give it the fuck up. You're trying to claim that angry adult people shouting angry slogans and entering the halls of Congress is just like some halfwit liberal arts students making noise on the quad of a college campus about a fucking war halfway around the world.
No. Not the same.
Are the Jan 6 people being treated unfairly? Yes. Duh. But they were close to the seat of power and people get flippy about that. These college kids aren't even in front of a courthouse.
Has Reason not taken your complaint seriously? Sure. But why should they? Republicans aren't going to join the LP. Our stands on abortion and pornography are going to keep you away. So fuck you. We don't give a shit about your Orange Lord.
Mostly peaceful anti-Semitism.
The FBI "white supremacist" LARPers at the Patriot Front are a threat to democracy when the march down the street with flags, but borderline insane mobs of anti-Semites screaming threats at campus Jews are A-Okay in Reason's book.
Pick a position and stick with it.
But trying to overturn an election is patriotic.
Poor sarc.
They pour him too many as it is.
Who did that?
I mean, you wouldn't confuse disputing results for an attempted coup, right?
Is that what you call it now? Peaceful tourists disputing election results? Your euphemisms need to be euthanized.
I call it protesters occupying government space, which is what left wing protesters do all the time. Insurrection actually require a tangible plot to overthrow the government. No one outside of one fringe group was every charged with insurrection.
Trump actually didn't overturn elections. These people cry out for genocide. You're better than this. Be better.
I’ve said from the beginning that J6 was, in Comic Book Guy’s voice, the “Worst. Insurrection. Ever.”
However I’m so sick of the deifying of those people that I just don’t care anymore. It’s like whenever there’s any protest then it becomes on opportunity for some J6 purity test. Are you outraged at this but not outraged at that? What outrages you more, outraged at outrage or outrage at a lack of outrage? You are outraged, right? If you’re not outraged then you’re on the other team. Denounce this! Defend that! You're not outraged enough!
Unlike you, some people are bothered by the hypocrisy of a two-tiered “justice” system.
It is possible and consistent to think both that the Jan 6 rioters are generally shit heads and that they are being unjustly treated. And that's all that a lot of the people complaining about how they have been charged and tried are saying.
I get that the extreme Trump lovers keep bringing Jan 6th to compare with every semi violent display by the left. But they look stupid doing it, so why give a shit? Yeah, they want to cannonize every idiot who thought that walking into the building was a good idea. So what? I am sick of hearing about it from everyone who brings it up. Drop it. Please. if for no other reason than so we dont have 75 comments of nothing but name calling every time you do it.
Tu quoque is a demanding intellectual challenge to Trumpanzees. But it did actually work in court once. At Nuremberg the Allies included unrestricted submarine warfare in a bill of indictments. Nazi naval officers successfully pointed to the U.S. reaction (unrestricted sub warfare) after the Nipponese attack on Pearl, Wake, Midway, the Philippines and the Aleutians. Sadly for today's national socialists, that defense hasn't worked since--and not for lack of whining and pointing.
Trump tried and failed to overturn his election loss and you know it. Don't play us for fools. The 1/6 insurrectionists should get long prison terms and the Nazi protesters who break the law should be prosecuted to its fullest extent.
What are you going to do when trump gets re-elected?
J6ers should be treated as rioters, trespassers, since that is what they did. Just like BLMers who were not involved in arson or assault.
"You can't condemn actual racists chanting for deaths of people unless you condemn something Trump did" Sarc
He has TDS, I hope he gets help.
"If you question how God's Chosen People treat a lesser race, then you're the racist." XM
That's one of Trump's Deranged Supporters for ya.
“If you question how God’s Chosen People treat a lesser race, then you’re the racist.” XM
Yeah, I AM the one that’s deranged. Fucking imbecile.
The fuck do you know about being oppressed? I’m not white, and I’m from a country that was occupied for most of its existence. None of our “resistance” movement raped / killed 1000 civilians and put babies in the oven. Nothing remotely resembling apartheid has ever happened in Gaza. You doing your tired TDS act and trying to play equivalency with Trump makes you look like a retard who can’t evict Trump from his head.
What the fuck are you? A white, middle aged never trumper who reads the David French newsletter every single day? Does he tell you Trump poses a threat to the nation than these modern day Nazis taking over the country? You can’t condemn people chanting for genocide without getting Trump involved? What would you do if Trump said “The Jews should go back to Europe!” like the Columbia kids? Oh yeah, HE has to be held accountable.
I’m done with you. I’m just going to mute your ass. Burn your brain cells hating on Trump. Loser.
Trump supports Russian genocide in Ukraine.
Why do you always call anyone who's not white a 'lesser race', sarc?
Oh, you're paraphrasing what you insist others are thinking, but it's always YOU the words actually come from.
I think we all know.
It's because it's what YOU think and you feel horribly guilty about in and need to put the blame for your burning, innate racism on someone, anyone else.
I read sarc's rejoinders with no need to even look at the mooted rectangular brainwashee yelps. The algo generating those never varies: Using your vote to wipe the Don's derrière is winning, all else is losing, because (moronic terror trigger). This after the idiot got beat in BOTH popular votes and only squeaked past the electoral college once on Gary's new deal of 127 electoral votes. Sad.
He’s beyond help.
Yelling mean things isn't illegal. Doing mean things is illegal. Texas universities are stopping protesters from yelling mean things and that's a 1st Amendment violation. That undermines the efforts to stop real violent protesters. Dealing with protests is walking a fine line.
BTW, tying everything back to Jan 6th is not helpful.
There's a legal line to walk. They have to differentiate yelling from blocking traffic and entrances to buildings etc. If you just yell it's a protest. If you are blocking access to a street or people's classes and jobs expect to get arrested. Arrests for just yelling are a violation of the 1st.
Any time people get together to protest it's a tough call for eveyone. I don't want to say anything defensive of American Police but these situations are a real pain in the ass for them. They take place on campuses which are some kind of Neutral Zone of legal bullshit, the people protesting are rich white kids whose parents likely can hire expensive lawyers to tie up the courts for years, they aren't doing anything really horrible, anyone with a lick of common sense can take a different path between class buildings and such to avoid the whole thing. Also the media is going to make anyone doing anything against the protest out to be jack booted thugs beating up their intellectual betters out of jealousy and evilness.
So yeah, I get leaving them alone to stew in their own jucies, make a lot of noise and make other late for classes. Even if they punch a few random people it's probalby not worth tear gas and batons.
Emma's next article is going to talk about the fix cameraman who said the cops harassed him befor arresting him. Problem is there is video of the camera guy walking up to a cop and hitting him in the back of the head with the camera
Yeah, I don't know. Looks like the edge of the video cuts off the moment when this was supposedly happening. So I can't honestly say the video confirms your version of what happened.
There is a video from the camera. And the guys story was that he got pushed. There is Noone behind him. The cop ignored him while passing him.
Never believe anything a leftist claims.
Because when I think of all the footage I’ve seen of brutally oppressive, terribly censorious Stalinist Russia and Nazi Germany or Rwanda or China or Iraq or Iran or S. Africa or Israel the intentionally-crafted and displayed narrative of a conversational interview with the suspect/perp, along with multiple different camera angles of what happened at the scene, is how I envision a state-controlled narrative to go.
Not people disappearing in the middle of the night. Not people running for their lives. Nope, open public discussion of “I got pushed.” and the video evidence kinda-sorta showing things one way or the other is irrefutably conclusive proof that the government is cracking down on journalism.
You fuckers can’t help but lie.
Trying to shut down a public university?
Seems a bit insurrectiony to me.
Peaceful protests, fine.
Encampments where not permitted, prosecute every one of them for trespass. And they fail their courses they miss while in jail.
Shutting down a public university, yup, that is a form of insurrection.
Oh and if it a private university, it isn't an insurrection, but the shutdown mob can be permanently expelled. The private university has its own First Amendment rights.
Putting aside the peaceful protest's low level violence and squatting on private property, free speech doesn't mean you can openly call for violence against Jews without repercussion. Inciting violence is not free speech.
If they were simply protesting for Palestinians to be "free" that would be one thing (and never mind the Palestinians are the only reason they aren't free due to their homicidal behavior), but when you call for a global intifada, for Israel to be wiped off the face of the earth, that Jews don't deserve to live, that Oct 7 should be repeated, that crosses the line.
You want a hate speech exception to the 1A?
Sorry, the Semitic snowflakes don't get a "safe space" carved out of my rights.
Your defense of modern day Nazis is noted. Every one of them should be expelled from every private university they attend. The public universities have to put up them.
You can disagree with Israel without being a NAZI.
Is fucking chickens a 1A protected activity?
Hmmm... Sounds like something PETA would be opposed to. Also exactly how do you fuck a chicken? A goat, sheep, cow, horse even I can understand but a chicken?
Just wing it.
But it's the JEWS!!! Any opposition to Israel is opposing scripture! Gawd needs the Jews in Israel to kick off the Book of Revelations stuff.
You want a hate speech exception to the 1A?
You do realize that there are already several hate speech exceptions to the 1A, right? Moreover that the exceptions are largely exercised against people permitted to be speaking in public or online and that the people invoking the 1A defense without exception are just as frequently responsible for the violence, right?
And it’s been this way for a long, long time.
people invoking the 1A defense without exception are just as frequently responsible for the violence *and effectively squatting*
In the 70s, you may’ve had a notion of “It’s just a student protest.” but, today, between flash mobs and online applications, the idea that people just showed up for 3 days with tents to spontaneously exercise their free speech rights in a peace and love moment, but totally not in an any way obstructionist, trespass-to-chattels heckling, is bordering on absurd.
Some things never change. For example, faggots like you have always cheered police assaulting protesters for the sake of war because the Jews tell you to. See; Kent state. Neck yourself coward.
If any of those liberal arts majors had the brains to plan an actual assault then maybe you'd have a point. They aren't going to incite anyone to do anything except take a different route between classes.
The poor protesters might have been told they cannot call for thevdestruction of Israel and the ethnic cleansing of the land it sits on?
Boo, hoo, hoo.
I am sure that in Austin, like at Columbia, the protesters were just peachy towards those suspected of being Jewish.
There's no shortage of Jews among the pro-Palestinian protesters.
That makes sense.
Peaceful protest? for who? Put on a yarmulke and try walking through the group waving an Israeli flag. If you make it from one end of the protest area to the other end without being harassed, spit on, screamed at, or physically assaulted, let us know.
Dress in drag while waving a rainbow flag at a Trump rally and I'll take bets on how long before you need to be hospitalized.
Weird how that never happens though.
Because the drag queens value their lives.
When your sexual fetish group is known for being a haven for pedophiles, there's a reason for that.
I see, you support violent acts against people because they might maybe somehow support someone somewhere who may possibly do something bad to a kid.
Yeah, they're the monsters.
Dress in drag and walk through any street in Gaza. Harassed? Hell no, you'd be stoned to death.
I’d take that bet.
Don’t be retarded. People would laugh and shake their heads. There is no shock value anymore. The rainbow cult is just boring.
Had to happen eventually.
It's like everyone forgets the Big Gay Nomination Party thrown by Milo at the 2016 RNC convention. Or the subsequent drag tour.
The problem isn't gay people. The problem is the pedos hiding among them and their fellow travelers.
If that happens then they are committing an actual assault and that can be prosecuted. But yelling mean things isn't a crime.
In the law, "assault" means threatening violence. "Battery" means doing violence.
Yes, but the threat has to be specific and immediate. "Kill the Jews" is not an assault unless you have the Jews in front of you and a means to kill them at hand.
And some states just call it all "assault". Not sure about TX.
In Waco they yell "Kill the christian hippies," and "GO ATF!"
Seriously? When I was young you had to actualy hit somebody to get charged. Now all you need to do is hold a stick and growl at someone and if they wet their pants you go to jail? Pussies.
"While public universities are bound by the First Amendment"
Are they? They're not allowed to have campus speech code?
A student can use homophobic slur against a gay professor and expect no discipline?
It's unreasonable for a college campus to suspend a student for wearing a sombrero to a Halloween party, or for making a Twitter joke. It's not unreasonable for colleges to forbid clear forms of intimidation and bigotry. A peaceful display of hate is hate. I have no problem with KKK burning crosses in their own backyards or marching on the streets. They don't have unfettered rights to do that on a school, public library, rec center, etc.
If you want colleges to be a total free speech zone, that's fine. But we're not there, so everyone abides by the same standards. The left will have you believe schools should forbid American flags on Cinco de Mayo because it "might" cause conflict. What do you these pro hamas protests are?
It’s unreasonable for a college campus to suspend a student for wearing a sombrero to a Halloween party, or for making a Twitter joke.
Good point and honest question, did these incidents you're referring to happen at state colleges or private colleges?
You know goddamn well that universities (public and private) regulate speech they don’t like.
So, evading the question then.
I think you protest too much. FIRE has actually defended people who fell victim to such pro leftist speach codes on campus.
While in principle I think that public schools should respect free speech, I don't think banning antisemitism is particularly inconsistent with existing rules. For example, I can't imagine a white student going around campus calling every black person they see "nigger" would not face some serious discipline.
Calling a black man or woman a nigger should be as protected as calling a Jewish man or woman a kike. Just because you can get away with one and not the other just means the 1st Amerndment isn't being applied fairly, not that you should be able to go after the guy screaming Kike.
The answer is simple.
All colleges should be treated like churches.
We should nuke the University of Texas from orbit.
It's the only way to be sure.
It has too much oil money to ever go anywhere. The State has little control over it because it is so rich.
We all know everything is better when the state has control.
Fuck off.
Your vulgarity shows that you have no ability to counter my argument and accept that I have owned you.
You can bet your sweet ass that chinas TikTok algorithms are trying their hardest to promote division.
I keep seeing Soros name, why is nobody mentioning the obvious? It is also my understanding that in addition to Russia, both Iran and North Korea punch above their weight in these type of social influence campaigns.
NPR and Facebook/twitter (read: CIA) don’t have a monopoly on this shit.
And both Donald Trump and most commenters here are okay with the foreign propaganda.
Examples?
What does that even mean? Is tolerating the existence of something "being OK with it"?
I guess I'm OK with foreign propaganda in the sense that I don't think there is much to be done to stop it that wouldn't also infringe on everyone's speech rights. And I'm more worried about domestic propaganda anyway.
Is the "foreign propaganda" pointing out what a bunch of deviants your lefty boos are, charlie?
Go back to Patterico. They LOVE being simps for the left.
How do you tell them apart?
TikTok shows propaganda to kids that aren't in college. Colleges are basically run by people who are far to the left who teach it to the kids. And have been for 40+ years.
It's Texas, who are generally pretty good about self-defense, outside of Austin. I wonder how one would fare holding a sign advocating for the extermination of the West Jordanians living in what should be Israel's land, and when some psychopath inevitably came up and engaged in violence, one shot the motherfucker down.
Leftists are a scourge.
These are not peaceful protests.
You cannot possibly with a straight face suggest that there is anything "peaceful" about a "protest" in which anti-Semitic, anti-American, neo-Nazi terrorist sympathizers are literally calling for open genocide, and intentionally creating a genuine atmosphere of fear and intimidation and threat of violence directed at certain demographics.
Oh wait, you're Emma Camp, of course you can do it with a straight face. Because you're a psychopath.
What's next, is burning a cross on someone's law "peaceful protest" and "protected speech" too? Maybe put a mannequin wrapped in a rainbow flag into a noose and hang it from a tree? All perfectly harmless, but yet... hmm.
Because it sure seems like "the ability to distinguish between peaceful protest, civil disobedience, and genuine misconduct" is now defined exclusively by whom it's directed toward.
"All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others?"
"These are not peaceful protests.
You cannot possibly with a straight face suggest that there is anything “peaceful” about a “protest” in which anti-Semitic, anti-American, neo-Nazi terrorist sympathizers are literally calling for open genocide, and intentionally creating a genuine atmosphere of fear and intimidation and threat of violence directed at certain demographics."
Exactly.
I'm not white, and I can't imagine any of my kids attending a college where any group of racists build encampments and demand that immigrants go back to their country. This wouldn't happen in a Mcdonalds. Or an apartment complex. Why is it a responsibility of colleges to grant 1A rights to many outside agitators who aren't enrolled students and aren't part of academic discourse?
Peaceful display of bigotry is still bigotry. The KKK burning their cross in their backyard is an act of hate. But expressing their viewpoint in the privacy of their homes or private space is their constitutional right. The notion that they should be able to do that unabated in a taxpayer funded public school is absurd. I don't know why Emma Camp or FIRE is thinking. They are arguing for an indefensible position.
They have a right to express their bigotry in public too. They just don't have the right to interfere with everyone else going about their business while doing so.
[tilts hand]
They have a right to but they will absolutely get arrested for doing so and excommunicated even from public accommodations, or the modern digital equivalent for doing so.
There's also a lot of other stuff that's being glossed over in Emma and FIRE's take. Namely, The University has been taking State and Federal funds to teach explicit racism and colonization for quite some time as well.
The only reason this is an *Abbott* issue is because nobody in at the Campus level wanted to call the campus police to do this job but were content to let Abbott send in State Troopers to push back against the Biden Aministration's next iteration of Open Borders, Diversity Über Alles, Studieren Und Federal Loans Macht Frei ideology.
Who are you talking about? I see lots of people expressing bigotry in public and not getting canceled and excommunicated.
I see lots of people expressing bigotry in public and not getting canceled and excommunicated.
Hand tilt, Zeb. It means "sorta". I'm certainly not saying "no one expresses any bigotry in public". I'm just pointing out that Trump, Alex Jones, Candace Owens, Matt Walsh, Charlie Kirk, Riley Gaines, etc., etc., etc. frequently do nothing but express ideas in public without interfering with anyone else and have both lawfare and rage mobs, officially and unofficially sanctioned, unleashed against them.
You didn't use to be this, seemingly willfully, stupid.
In these ‘anti-war’ protests, students have demanded the complete destruction of Israel, while waving signs in support of Hamas and singling out Jewish professors and students for harassment and abuse. The horrifying frenzy of anti-Semitism on display at America’s top universities should upset everyone. Widespread condemnation of their actions matters. Yes, we should defend their right to protest, but as a nation we must come to terms with how rampant Jew-hatred has been allowed to persist and grow unchecked.
Jews have claimed to be victims of genocide, holocaust of 6 million poor souls, on over 166 separate occasions in various nations between 1900 and 1945.
The world has been brainwashed to pity the poor persecuted Jews while continuously sending them money and enabling their atrocities.
So now, when the whole world is watching Jews commit genocide, even openly calling for it against Palestinians, Jews can’t understand why the world condemns them for it.
There’s no going back to victimhood status Jews. You burnt that bridge for ever with this genocide. The term antisemitism as you have misused it is defunct.
The world sees that your delusional relationship with your satanic religion has always been the cause of conflict in every nation that you’ve existed.
Swing along with Bibi.
Nazi Retard ^^
So, nothing intelligent to say in reply? Just insults that have been WAY overdone.
Why not point out that his definition of Genocide is a pile of shit. It's so loose that the bombing of Japan with nukes in WWII could be seen as Genocide depending on what private writings of Truman can be found regarding his attitude toward the Japanese. Hell, we had concentration camps for Japanese in the US. Then we set fire to a shit ton of them with two nukes. Bad us. Naughty Naughty.
How about pointing out that calling Jews satanic is something even a hard core Atheist isn't willing to try because that sounds pretty fucking far out there.
If all you're going to do is call him a Nazi then just block him. Fuck, grey box his ass.
You burnt that bridge for ever with this genocide.
How many Hamas babies did they find in hot ovens?
Now this is a good comeback, normally I don't agree with you but here you said something creative and didn't call him a NAZI. Congratulations.
Tell it to everybody those same wokesters cancelled or hounded off campus for politically incorrect yet protected speech.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
But three do...
Protests? Last I checked colleges can't stop a war. The protestors are so serious about their values that they are asking amnesty for being arrested so it doesn't hurt they job opportunities.
Israel - goes out of it's way no to hurt civilians
Hamas/Palestine - chants death to all. Hamas states they want Israel wiped out.
BTW Hamas defenders like idiot Rob M, why won't any Arab nation take in Palestine refugees? Next question - why haven't all the Arab nations joined together to wipe Israel out?
I did read here someone trying to use the UN, hahaha Iran is on the Human Rights Council there. The UN is a joke
I'm sorry, but a bald assertion that a protest is peaceful isn't exactly convincing. This is especially in light of explicit harassment and abuse of Jewish faculty and students at other universities. This is not counting the outright riots that have occurred.
Where did you get the idea that our freedom of protest requires that we allow our people to suffer explicit racist threats or allow our university to get shut down, damaged, or destroyed?
Now, if this group were out of the norm and were truly peaceful, then I might agree, but given what we have seen and the fact that I do not trust anyone to report on this honestly, I cannot condemn the actions of the Texas police.
This is the first action of Texas cops I've failed to find fault with in decades.
Ackshully, the whacks screeching in support of the mystical berserker aggressors remind me of the "Antifa" useful idjits of not long ago.