New Georgia Law Limits Film Tax Credits. But Marvel Would Still Qualify.
While the state senate's bill would cap tax credits at 2.3 percent of the state's budget, any production filming at a big enough studio would be exempt.

In February, Reason reported that Georgia lawmakers were considering modest changes to the state's film and television tax credits. So far, the state senate is backing off even those meager modifications.
For more than a decade, films or TV shows that filmed in Georgia and spent at least $500,000 in the state could qualify for a 20-percent tax credit; putting a "Made in Georgia" logo on the final product would boost the credit to 30 percent. Last year, the state certified $1.24 billion in production tax credits.
Auditors routinely find the production credit program to be a waste of money: Most recently, a 2023 audit conducted by Georgia State University's Fiscal Research Center found that "net job creation is negative" as a result of the credits, and that each job created as a result of the program costs state taxpayers $160,000.
State law also allows the credits to be transferred, and production companies based in California pay very little in Georgia income taxes. As a result, the vast majority of recipients sell the credits: According to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 97 percent of credits are sold by film companies, mostly to individuals who use them to offset their own tax liability.
For example, if a studio spends $1 million on a film shoot in Georgia, it could qualify for a $300,000 tax credit, but since the company likely won't owe that much in Georgia taxes, it can sell that credit to someone else and bank the proceeds. State law even requires that any transferred credit be sold for at least 60 percent of face value, so the production company would net $180,000, and the buyer would get a $300,000 credit that he could carry forward for up to three years.
Last month, four state Republican lawmakers announced that there would be changes to the program. They suggested doubling the minimum investment to $1 million and capping the amount of credits that could be sold at 2.5 percent of the previous year's state budget.
While these changes are modest—2.5 percent of last year's budget would still be over $900 million—the state legislature has included language to render them effectively meaningless.
The state House passed H.B. 1180 at the end of February. The bill inserted a provision that the "total amount" of transferred credits "in a calendar year shall not exceed an amount equal to 2.5 percent of the total budget in the General Appropriations Act as passed and signed into law for the corresponding fiscal year."
Last week, a different version of H.B. 1180 cleared the state Senate Finance Committee. This version lowered the cap from 2.5 percent to 2.3 percent, but it also included a notable exception. The Senate bill exempts any productions shooting at a studio sound stage facility "that was substantially completed between January 1, 2023, and June 30, 2027" and cost "in excess of $100 million" to build, or "that has more than 1.5 million square feet of stage space."
That would exempt the biggest and most expensive productions and render the caps moot. Atlanta's Trilith Studios, the largest studio complex in the state, contains 1.5 million square feet of studio space; Marvel's Avengers films and TV series and the upcoming Superman film are shot there, each of which costs hundreds of millions of dollars.
"I can't imagine anybody reaching the cap under the version we have," said state Senate Finance Chairman Chuck Hufstetler (R–Rome).
It makes perfect sense for legislators to feel like changing a law that causes state taxpayers to subsidize billion-dollar companies, especially when those companies turn around and sell the subsidies for cash. But in that case, they should fully commit, if not by scrapping the program altogether then at least by imposing a meaningful cap that doesn't exempt the biggest participants.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Forgive my math, but if jobs created are negative and each job created costs the state money, this program should make money for the state, yes?
Seriously, how is job creation negative?
Locals find Hollywood in their midst and move out of state, taking their taxable income with them.
That would make more sense than the study. Their thesis is the govt would have spent the 1.2 billion in tax breaks creating slightly more jobs than the film industry created by spending 4 billion more in the state than before the tax credits.
A very dishonest presentation of data.
The credit is probably too generous but the tax credit looks to have been successful generally.
Except the government created jobs would have been jobs no one wants anyone to do (i.e., make-work programs). A does not equal B.
Just what the Hell do Avengers and X-Men need with tax credits? They have powers that have saved the Earth and indeed the Universe multiple times!
They need to harness their powers for some real Libertarian good! Professor X could convince Magneto to square knot the gun barrels of Jackbooted Thug and Revinooer agencies!
Wolverine could take his Adamantium claws and adamantly slash whole budgets and libraries of laws and regulations that should have been sunsetted ages ago!
Spider-Man and his Spider-Verse of Amazing Friends could do some web-slinging and tie up and move the Antifa/Burn-Loot-Murder/Stop Oil Now/Free Palestine mobs off of our streets!
And Cap, Iron Man, and Thor could convince Thanos to only do “The Blip” on Welfare State programs and spare everything else!
Then they really would be “Uncanny, Indefatigable, Spectacular,” and “Earth’s Greatest Heroes!”™
🙂
😉
If Thanos could eliminate half the federal government with a snap of his fingers, that would be a good start.
Tax credits don't cost taxpayers anything. They are a promise to businesses not to steal X amount from them, if those companies promise to do business in the state. Without the tax credits, the tax revenue raised from those companies and their employees and those who cater to them would be zero dollars.
Yeah, I don't really get the logic here. Who exactly is being harmed here?
“If you do significant business in the state, long term, with permanent facilities, then you qualify for higher tax credit. Otherwise, you have a lower limit.”
Yeah, so terrible.
Is any Joe Lancaster article not garbage?
Lower taxes are still lower taxes, you’ll never hear me complain